Whitehorse Daily Star

Dog's death sparks protest petition

The death of a dog in the Lake Laberge area on Nov. 6 has spawned a petition calling for the removal of the canines which attacked it.

By Stephanie Waddell on November 22, 2010

The death of a dog in the Lake Laberge area on Nov. 6 has spawned a petition calling for the removal of the canines which attacked it.

The death of a dog in the Lake Laberge area on Nov. 6 has spawned a petition calling for the removal of the canines which attacked it.

"We, the undersigned, are gravely concerned about the aggressiveness and viciousness of the dogs that reside at Lot 1013 Cookies Road,” reads the petition signed by more than 30 past and present residents of the area.

"We are concerned for the safety of people and their dogs who live in the general area. We are demanding the removal of the dogs that belong to the residents of Lot 1013 Cookies Road.”

The document was drafted by Angela Neufeld following the death of her and her partner's dog, Max, while out for a walk in the area. Cookies Road branches off the Shallow Bay Road.

Neufeld said today she was out walking Max and the couple's other dog when she came across one of the residents from the Cookies Road home walking three of their dogs.

Max was off-leash, and as soon as the three dogs saw him, one of them came charging at the 11-year-old canine, the other two also attacking.

The two women eventually got their dogs apart, Neufeld being bitten in the process.

"Max couldn't walk,” she recalled in an interview today, noting that while the other woman offered help, she was furious. Though she didn't want the help, she eventually relented in order to get Max home and then to a veterinarian.

As Candace Stuart, the vet with All Paws Veterinary Clinic, described in a letter provided to Neufeld for her records: "Max had extensive muscle trauma, with puncture wounds to his right front leg, chest, and right back leg.

"Max also had extensive muscle trauma to his left back leg. He was treated for shock and pain and his wounds were treated, but Max died of injury complications less than 48 hours after the attack.”

It goes on to state that the injuries weren't those typical of "dog interaction. In these situations, most negative interaction is posturing and noise making with bite wounds, if they occur being localized to the ruff, ears or face.

"Max's wounds were more consistent with a dog pack attack. His wounds were deep and there was a lot of tissue damage from ‘crushing pressure'. The location of his wounds, to legs and chest, are also more consistent with a takedown approach.”

His death came a decade after Max had joined the family.

"He was total sweetheart,” Neufeld said.

Neufeld was also treated at the hospital for a bite to her right wrist, that required follow-up care due to an infection.

This isn't the first time there's been an issue for Neufeld, with the same dogs who bit her dog last year.

"I regret not being firmer (in the past),” she said, as she also recalled moments when the dogs would appear aggressive even just walking past their yard. At those times, residents of the house would often call them in.

Living at a dead end in the area, Neufeld said, if she wants to walk her dog on the road, she has to go by the property and there are times, such as the Nov. 6 attack, when she meets the animals on the road.

Discussions with neighbours soon revealed others had issues with the dogs as well – issues many have recorded on the comment section of the petition.

"Only a matter of time before these dogs attack a child,” reads one comment by Jessica Flinn.

Johanne Koser stated: "I have changed my walking routine solely due to the aggressive nature of these dogs – I avoid them!

"My daughter is not able to walk with the dogs or alone for fear of attack. Our family has had two different incidents with these dogs with no solution from the owners.”

Allen Lueck, a former resident of the area who also signed the petition, is also among those who have tried to find some solution, but to no avail.

In an interview last week, Lueck spoke of an attack on his dogs in September when he was walking them off-leash. While the other dogs were on chains, they still attacked, with his dogs ending up with minor injuries.

Though he tried to point out the problems to the property owner, Roy Pawluk, who lives there with his daughter and granddaughter, he said Pawluk argued the dogs from his property had been on leashes and had been approached by Lueck's two dogs.

He also noted only one of the three were his, with the others belonging to his daughter and granddaughter.

"Three make a real pack,” Lueck said. "Pack animals will attack.”

While Lueck phoned the RCMP about the situation, his complaint went nowhere as there was nothing outlined in the territory's Dog Act on it, given that the animals were chained.

"I think the act has to be strengthened,” he said.

Neufeld may be getting further ahead. After calling for charges, she said she was told last week by the RCMP that Crown prosecutors may pursue the case.

Evidence shows, she said, that though the dogs were on chains, they may be considered "at large” because the owners weren't in full control of them.

The next step will be finding that the owners knew the dogs were dangerous and didn't take action on that.

Neufeld believes that evidence is there based on all she's heard from neighbours, along with her own experience.

As she waits for word on the criminal case, she is also continuing work on the petition. Only two people contacted to sign it have refused, she pointed out. In one case, the residents stated they didn't want to be involved.

She plans to present the petition to MLA Brad Cathers, with whom she's already spoken about it.

"He was pretty concerned,” she said, noting that he also advised her to bring the issue forward to Community Services Minister Archie Lang as well.

Lang has yet to return her call.

Cathers did not return phone calls from the Star this morning.

Neufeld is also still waiting for an apology from the dogs' owners and for them to pick up a registered letter she sent them so they could pay Max's vet bill.

The dogs owners are not commenting in detail on the Nov. 6 incident or the petition.

As Diane Pawluk, Roy's grand-daughter, explained this morning, the matter is currently with the RCMP, and they have yet to view the petition.

She did describe it as a "really unfortunate,” situation and noted the family has put up additional fencing and has one of the family's four canines in dog classes.

She also said the family is not planning to move anytime soon from the property her grandparents have lived at for 25 years, and the dogs will remain with the family.

"We're going to live our lives,” she said.

The family, she pointed out, is involved with the community, with the canines joining them on trips into town and taking part in Sourdough Rendezvous events like the howling contest, which one of her dogs won earlier this year.

And just as Neufeld and others want to see a stronger Dog Act, Pawluk said she would like to see changes too, including a requirement that dogs be leashed when they are being walked.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 0

B. Young on Nov 28, 2010 at 5:13 am

It sounds cruel but walking with a bear spray is an excellent way of getting rid of aggressive dogs. Our husky was twice attacked in the Wolf Creek area, the second attack the owner an elderly lady was too weak to separate the dogs so I had to do all the work. I had my husky by the collar when her two German Shepherd crosses attacked.

Up 0 Down 0

Anthony Wong on Nov 26, 2010 at 5:55 pm

I have got a great idea. Why don't we get Mike Greico and Terry Cumming to take over all these dangerous dogs. After all they think that it is the owners always that are the problem!!!

Better yet lets send the dogs to Melfort Sask. and the authourties there can deal with them because nobody here will.

Up 0 Down 0

Sonja Seeber on Nov 23, 2010 at 1:27 pm

usually the dogs that have never been walked run loose all day...it would be nice to see some rules in subdivisions outside city limits. the police can't do anything so we're just calling in every time something happens....and we all have fences now!!!

Up 0 Down 1

ROY LINK on Nov 23, 2010 at 9:39 am

WHAT ABOUT WHEN YOU GO TO THE BEACH ON A NICE SUNNY DAY AND THERE HALF A DOZEN DOGS RUNNING AROUND, GETTING IN YOUR FACE AS YOU SIT ON THE BEACH. DOGS SHOULD BE BANNED FROM THE BEACH IF NOT TIED UP. JUST BECAUSE THE OWNER THINKS THEY ARE CUTE SHAKING OFF WATER ON PEOPLE AFTER GETTING WET, IS STUPID, THE OWNERS SHOULD BE FINED. DOGS THAT DANGEROUS SHOULD BE DESTROYED. CASE CLOSED !!!

Up 0 Down 0

D.D. on Nov 23, 2010 at 4:13 am

"And just as Neufeld and others want to see a stronger Dog Act, Pawluk said she would like to see changes too, including a requirement that dogs be leashed when they are being walked."

Interesting, I have never seen those three dogs on leashes - I don't believe those owners have any plans to leash their dogs. They are aggressive dogs, and unfortunate incidents with the community will continue unless something changes. I take great pains to try and avoid those dogs at all times.

If they committed to keeping the dogs on their property at all times - that would be enough for me. They have a big enough property, that shouldn't be an issue. Meeting them on the trails/road is just a nightmare.

We all love our dogs, they are a part of all of our families - this kind of incident is so sad and really, inexcusable.

Up 0 Down 0

Tammy McBride on Nov 23, 2010 at 1:58 am

I am currently dealing with a similar situation except 3 dogs (great pyrenees) came into my yard and took my little 3 pound dog Wally (pom/chi X)on November 15th 2010. Our little Wally has never been found.

These 3 dogs are only 3 of 18 (and 10 more pups on the property too!)... these dogs have been in the spotlight before but the 'breeder' wont do anything about them... the cops have been out because of them on different occasions and because we do not live in city limits we have no animal control...our town also does not have SPCA...

These dogs have on many occasions accosted other dogs walking with their owners and even have grabbed other dogs off their leashes... they are a huge traffic hazard as well... it is well out of control... we have contacted many different associations and newspapers etc and nothing has yet to be done.

I hope to find some justice for Wally and have also put together a petition - our neighborhood should not have to live in fear. I guess until a child is mauled nothing will come of this... this sort of irresponsible breeding makes me sick.

I hope Angela and her partner can get justice for their dog as well.... maybe we could be in contact with each other and help each other out - I don't plan on giving up!

Up 0 Down 1

Mike Kohler on Nov 22, 2010 at 6:37 pm

So according to Allan Lueck's twisted logic, it's okay to let his dogs trespass onto someones property with tied-up dogs and when these dogs defend their space and injure his dogs he wants to sue the property owner, who likely would have been in his right to shoot the intruders for safety reasons in the first place.

In the other case, the same three dogs loose is negligent and asking for trouble, but so is walking a dog off-leash in an area where you know dogs may run loose. Both happens because people don't always think ahead and we have a tendency to give our pets a little freedom from time to time.

In situations like this, animal defense sprays for dog walkers or fire extinguishers for home owners come in real handy. One should never try to separate fighting dogs with bare hands.

So how about you people just learn from your mistakes, forgive each other and change your ways handling/keeping your companions instead of pondering lawsuits and calling for more laws?

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Nov 22, 2010 at 1:26 pm

I seem to recall some at loose dog that got shot near Tagish a year or two ago.

Apparently the canine was a problem for some chicken farmer...so he shot it dead.

seems as though this scene is similar...

I have two big dogs of my own, they are a big responsibility & require training so they do not digress into a pack headspace.

I am very aware of where both my dogs are every second of the day, they NEVER run amuck...EVER.

They are right at my heel on or off leash.

Usually people whom have dogs as these are alleged to be irresponsible pet owners.

Up 0 Down 0

R.C on Nov 22, 2010 at 9:26 am

I firmly believe that dogs should be on a leash at all times outside a fenced yard. Too many times have issues come up when they are off a leash and for the sake of other dog owners and people I think it would be the safest way if they remained on a leash. If a person still can not handle their dog when it's on a leash and it's causing problems i believe that person shouldn't have the dog then. Also if a person can't handle three dogs on leashes then they either shouldn't be walking all three together, or just not have three dogs at all.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.