Dirt biker must pay $1,800-plus to victim
A Whitehorse resident who used his dirt bike on prohibited trails last summer, injuring a cyclist, was fined Tuesday in territorial court.
A Whitehorse resident who used his dirt bike on prohibited trails last summer, injuring a cyclist, was fined Tuesday in territorial court.
Arlen Neufeld had pleaded guilty to operating his dirt bike in a prohibited area under the city’s All-Terrain Vehicle Bylaw.
Justice of the peace Sharman Morrison-Harvey dismissed a charge of operating the vehicle without due care or attention. Neufeld had contested that charge.
He was fined $300 and ordered to pay more than $1,800 in restitution to the victim.
The victim, Dexter Kotylak, and his partner, Larissa Lychenko, testified by video from Toronto, where they study.
On the evening of June 23, Kotylak, Lychenko and two other friends were biking down the Lower Roller Coaster Trail on Grey Mountain.
Kotylak testified that, as he was coming around a corner to the right, he saw Neufeld, and both slammed on their brakes.
Neufeld went to his left, while Kotylak went to his right, hitting the rear end of the dirt bike.
Kotylak estimated both were going at about 30 kilometres per hour.
When told he wasn’t supposed to be there, Neufeld answered, “Everybody does it,” according to Kotylak.
Neufeld gave him his name and phone number.
Only once back at his vehicle did Kotylak realize he was injured: he couldn’t lift his bike back into the truck.
Later, at Whitehorse General Hospital, he found out his right wrist was strained and he had tissue damage to one of his knees.
The crash damaged the bicycle’s cranks and pedals.
A quote of $1,822 for repairs was presented to the court.
The crash happened very fast, Lychenko testified.
“We heard a loud engine roaring, then a grinding-crunching sound,” she said, later adding the two were only separated by a split second.
The shock sent Kotylak “far away” in the bushes she testified.
Neufeld’s answer that he wasn’t the only one driving an ATV in a prohibited area angered her, she testified. He quickly switched topics to congratulate Kotylak on his prompt reaction, giving him a high-five.
Bylaw Const. Kyle Morrison also took the stand.
He told the court there are two signs indicating the trails are prohibited to ATVs. One is at the beginning of a trail connecting to Lower Roller Coaster and one is on the Grey Mountain Road at the power line.
Morrison was contacted by Kotylak the day after the incident, and subsequently took a statement from him.
Motorized vehicles are banned on these trails to protect environmentally-sensitive areas, he told the court.
The justice of the peace dismissed the driving without due care charge.
The Crown didn’t put forward any evidence proving the charge, Morrison-Harvey ruled.
The fact that Neufeld was driving his dirt bike in a prohibited area isn’t enough to prove carelessness, said the JP.
Noting the defendant was self-represented, Morrison-Harvey took some time to advise him of what he could do.
She told him he could make a motion asking the court to dismiss the charge, since the burden was on the prosecution to prove it.
“Had he counsel, Neufeld would say there is no evidence for that count,” Morrison-Harvey told Crown prosecutor Claire Anderson.
The Crown noted the trail was only two to three metres wide and that Kotylak had testified Neufeld’s front wheel was “slightly off the ground” when the accident happened.
“He was (the one) out of control,” Neufeld shot back.
“He cut the corner and ended up on my right. I was able to stop before Dexter hit me even though my front wheel was in the air,” he told the court.
The trail map Neufeld had entered as evidence doesn’t suggest it was a one-directional trail, Morrison-Harvey noted.
“Nothing indicates either party was travelling at excessive speed,” she ruled.
In early July, the city released a statement about the accident, noting Neufeld had been fined for $700.
“So not only was he not where he was supposed to be; he wasn’t driving responsibly,” senior bylaw constable Tom Wyers said at the time about the driving without due care charge.
Comments (20)
Up 6 Down 1
Mafdet on Nov 18, 2015 at 11:31 am
Mark S the biggest problems on the Mary Lake trails are loose dogs off the leash. Scary when little mutts try to take on my Alaskan Malamutes that are all on leashes. I muzzle my over excited one to prevent injury to loose dogs, but that still does not prevent injury to me when I got tangled up in leashes going down to the ground. The owner ran away after rescuing her dog which my toothless Malamute tried to drown in the lake and I had nobody identified to sue for my cracked ribs.
Up 6 Down 3
Silver Lining on Nov 18, 2015 at 1:50 am
Trails aren’t racing tracks. ORV collisions have caused injuries and death… but so have bicycles collisions with pedestrians… There are rules for bicycles too on trails.
The Bicycle Bylaw states that cyclists must yield to pedestrians on trails, and operate their bicycles with due care and consideration for other trails users, etc. Fines are listed in the Bicycle Bylaw for breach of those conditions. Look it up on the City’s website.
To minimize erosion, please keep your bicycle on existing trails, and your ORV on motorized trails. Consideration for each other and for a few simple rules will result in more enjoyable trail experience for all.
Up 28 Down 7
north_of_60 on Nov 17, 2015 at 3:05 pm
Many mtn-bikers display a smug attitude of superior entitlement to the trails, because after all, we must realize they are doing the non-motorized 'green thing'.
Their smugness ignores the carbon intensive 'gear & garb' their sport requires.
Up 23 Down 6
Atom on Nov 17, 2015 at 11:49 am
BnR....if your elite cyclists could learn to share perhaps more folks would be friendly....and since 'exactly' one mtn biker (how could someone not hear an approaching 'motorized' vehicle in that scenario?) has been injured in a collision on the trails I don't expect anyone will fall for the grandiosements of lurking danger you proporte.
Trails were made by miners and hunters back there long before the advent of mtn biking.....and let's be clear, mtn biking is an awesome activity/sport.....it's just off putting that it's placed ahead of other users.....like they can't play.
Talk about taking your chances and then use the exact argument against other users.....ppplllluuuoooi
Up 5 Down 23
BnR on Nov 16, 2015 at 5:07 pm
Max Mack
On multi use trails, where both bikers and walkers use them, you take your chances. How many walkers have been injured on Whitehorse trails? Exactly, none, you are just throwing out an anti-cycling sentiment. In many cases, the trails the hikers are using were purposely built by mountain bikers, Money Shot on Grey mountain is a perfect example of a mountain bike trail that is being used by runners, walkers, people getting in shape for Sheep hunting. You use it at your own risk. Contagious Mountain bike Club has worked with the KSA on trail access issues, so mountain bikers are not "The Enemy", although as I mentioned previously! There are many bikers who do need to pay attention and use some common sense! But this can be said of all user groups. I miss the '80s and '90s when there was no one else out there, and if you ran into a cyclist or dirt biker, you usually knew them. And people used wave and smile too, but those friendly gestures are in short supply these days.
Up 32 Down 15
Max Mack on Nov 16, 2015 at 11:54 am
An uncomfortable truth buried in the story is that mountain bikers are a danger to hikers and others on these trails. The City will not acknowledge this, nor vigorously condemn environmental damage caused by cyclists and hikers in its pursuit of a "green" city.
We think nothing of paving the Millenium Trail (ostensibly to accommodate persons with disabilities). It is difficult to imagine a more destructive outcome to the environment than paving over top of it. How easily the City rationalized its destructive act. But, those "environmentally-destructive" ATVs are forbidden on the Millenium Trail?
What a world.
Up 21 Down 26
Stu Whatman on Nov 16, 2015 at 10:05 am
This case shows there are rules and safety responsibilities that citizens and the city take seriously.
People need to drive these vehicles in a safe manner and stay on the trails they are allowed to use.
Up 18 Down 15
Just Sayin' on Nov 16, 2015 at 9:46 am
This is stupid. I loathe how the Yukon is becoming more and more like the south. I remember when you would get a speeding ticket from an officer, ask him about his family, he would respond and you'd get your ticket and be on you merry way. Now, we sue for every freaking thing. You know what, here is a solution for everyone, if you are going to walk, bike, use your ATV, you must have insurance. All signs should now state that insurance is required to use a trail in the Yukon, in the likely event one is sued!
Up 20 Down 1
BnR on Nov 16, 2015 at 7:23 am
Mark,
Read the article, the restitution was for repair to damages sustained on the bike resulting from the collision. If there was a collision between two trail users who were both legally allowed to be there, there would be no fines, it would be a civil suite I suppose. On a multi use trail, you take your chances. This should be a wake up call to cyclists to pay attention to other trail users. And mountain bikers, keep your dogs on a leash and stay to the side of the road when biking up Grey mountain. You aren't making any friends by being spread all over the damned place.
Up 16 Down 51
Peace N’Quiet on Nov 15, 2015 at 4:36 pm
How could the charge of operating the vehicle without due care be dismissed in this case?!! Driving a motor bike at 30 km around a blind corner on a non-motorized trail IS RECKLESS. Trail users should be able to trust that non-motorized trails are free of such traffic. There are families with toddlers, baby strollers, and their pet dogs using those trails.
No mention in the article whether this offender had a license plate on his machine, which is required for driving ATVs anywhere within Whitehorse limits. Probably not… Should have been charged for that too. Offenders get that brazen when they know they can’t be identified.
On the other hand, there’s a need to address mountain bicycles racing at high speed on shared non-motorized trails. That too is dangerous.
Up 42 Down 57
Mark on Nov 14, 2015 at 5:15 pm
It's only a matter of time before a bicycle collides with a pedestrian.Then what? The bicyclist is automatically at fault? I've never lived somewhere that had so many self righteous spoiled rotten little whiners like the ones here in Whitehorse. What is the $1800 restitution for? His medical needs were met via the taxpayer through medical system. It is their idea of punishment.
Up 46 Down 22
Riverdale Res on Nov 14, 2015 at 1:29 pm
Looking at this case neutrally, there is only one person in the wrong, and that was the dirt biker. Was not allowed to be there. Period. You can use all the "what ifs" you want, but it was a non motorized area. Having said that, it's kind of BS that this even went to a trial. As I recall, the dirt biker offered to pay for the damage prior to the charge being laid? The mountain biker didn't sound very "injured" to me. And, if you can't hear a dirt bike coming and react accordingly, well, sure the dirt bike shouldn't have been there.
It would be nice if we could get all the trail use issues sorted out.
Up 39 Down 71
Frank on Nov 13, 2015 at 3:13 pm
Sounds like from the article no one was at fault other then the fact that one person was in a prohibited area; both were traveling at high speeds on a trail, possibly both recklessly. The biker even more so if the dirt bike stopped while the bike was still out of control (it could have been a walker, another bike etc coming the other way).
"Motorized vehicles are banned on these trails to protect environmentally-sensitive areas" what a joke of an excuse... if the motorized vehicles stay on the trails they wont damage anything.
Up 37 Down 58
Salar on Nov 13, 2015 at 2:27 pm
I can't believe we are at this point on this planet......losers who rape, drive drunk, committ fraud, etc. don't get fines of this magnitude....what a pack of NIMBY's.....I'm redoubling my boycott of these stupid biased city boy rules.....and Mark S...you wouldn't have a trail to walk on in Mary lake or Wolf creek if it wasn't for atv's....grow up and learn to share
Whitehorse putz's.
Up 15 Down 12
Higher fines for t/d, dd, and this on Nov 13, 2015 at 2:20 pm
Should be higher fines for drunk driving, texting and driving (only $250 and it's $500 to pass a City bus--where's there more danger?), and higher fines for being on trails you shouldn't. Lucky somebody wasn't killed. I have ski dooed and mountain biked and if you aren't expecting somebody to be there driving up the wrong way on a motorized toy, so very lucky that somebody wasn't killed or have to be search and rescued.
Up 24 Down 2
BnR on Nov 13, 2015 at 1:22 pm
JP, he was fined $300, the rest was restitution.
Up 21 Down 23
JP on Nov 12, 2015 at 7:34 pm
So the fella driving an ATV on a trail like everyone else does gets a fine of almost $2000. A Driving drunk conviction results in a loss license and a $1000 fine, please tell me who is the criminal here?
Up 80 Down 56
Mark S on Nov 12, 2015 at 4:19 pm
Neufeld’s answer that he wasn’t the only one driving an ATV in a prohibited area angered her, she testified.
I think that answer is very common. in the Mary Lake and Wolf Creek areas most people are not either aware of the city laws or they think they can go anywhere and do whatever they like.
A little more city enforcement and education would be nice.
Up 65 Down 90
Yukoner on Nov 12, 2015 at 4:01 pm
"trail was only two to three metres wide" sounds like a fricking highway... should be more than enough room for a dirtbike and mountain bike to pass each other easily, if the mountain bike was taking the corner wide, what would have happened if they ran into another mountain biker?
Up 47 Down 33
June Jackson on Nov 12, 2015 at 3:10 pm
If Neufeld had respected the law regarding dirt biking, where and where they can't be, this would not have happened. On the other hand.. he is right..everyone does it. The bylaws state that skateboarder can't be on city sidewalks.. newflash... there they are.
I am sorry anyone got hurt.. lucky it wasn't worse.. could have been.. Bylaw doesn't enforce any of these kinds of small transgressions. Shouldn't be on the books if you can't follow through.