Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mike Gau
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Mike Gau
City council is being asked to approve a 40 per cent increase in the development cost charges it levies against all new housing.
City council is being asked to approve a 40 per cent increase in the development cost charges it levies against all new housing.
The proposal was presented Monday night by city planning manager Mike Gau and other senior staff.
Currently, the city charges $2,500 for every single-family home in urban neighbourhoods. The proposed boost would raise the fee to $3,500.
The development charge for unserviced country residential homes is $1,250 currently. It would climb to $1,700.
There's been no hike in the charges since they were implemented in 1995.
Staff are also asking council to approve an automatic two per cent hike in 2013, 2014 and 2015 to keep pace with inflation.
Gau told council development cost charges help cover costs associated with growth.
"We have done a considerable amount of research and we have found Whitehorse development cost charges are well below the average across the country,” he said.
Council is scheduled to vote Monday on first and second readings of the proposed bylaw, with third and final reading scheduled for March 12, following a public hearing March 3. If approved, the new rates would come into effect July 1.
While the actual cost of building the new Whistle Bend subdivision – water, sewer, sidewalks, pavement – is recovered from the sale of lots, there are other associated costs which are not covered, Gau explained.
He told council it's estimated the city will need to spend $2.3 million on a new vactor truck, transit bus, grader and other heavy equipment because of urban expansion related to Whistle Bend.
The Canadian average for development cost charges on a single-family urban lot is $13,000, council was told.
Council was also told there's been nothing added to the original development cost charges to offset the increase in the cost of living and construction costs in the last 17 years.
Coun. Ranj Pillai pointed out the development charges collected from the first two phases Whistle Bend will not cover the required investment in new equipment.
Robert Fendrick, the director of administrative services, told council the city's development charge account – currently sitting at $3.5 million – has not been shrinking but nor has it been growing at an appropriate rate.
"What we do not want to do is fall behind the eight ball, which would require a drastic adjustment in the future,” he told council.
Staff emphasized that if the money required to keep up with the challenges of growth does not come from development cost charges, it needs to come from the general tax base.
Other increases would see the charge for a living suite in a fully serviced single-family house rise from $1,500 to $2,100; a living suite in an unserviced country residential home would rise from $750 to $1,000; the charge for a duplex would go from $4,000 to $5,600; and the cost for apartments in multi-residential developments would jump from $1,500 to $2,100.
Using the known number and types of lots for Whistle Bend phases one and two, and an estimate of the density in the 18 multi-family developments, the city would collect approximately $1.5 million under the current rate, but about $2 million with the new rate.
The report to council indicates while there is no development cost charge applied in Yellowknife, Surrey, B.C. charges just over $40,000 per house, while Edmonton is sitting on the national average of $13,500.
Vernon, B.C. collects more than $16,000 per house while Kamloops, B.C. levies a fee of almost $9,000.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 0 Down 0
north of 60 on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00 pm
Let the people who buy houses in the new subdivisions pay for the development costs of those new subdivisions. Go with user fees, NOT tax increases. I'm 'sick and tired' of my taxes increasing when I see no benefit to me or my neighborhood.
Up 0 Down 0
Steve E on Feb 23, 2012 at 12:53 pm
If you need so-called strategically condensed development, head on out to Ontario to the overpopulated breeding grounds there.
Up 0 Down 0
Squawk box on Feb 23, 2012 at 11:12 am
What an abomination. These buffoons couldn't plan an economical lunch let alone a city.
Up 0 Down 0
Max Mack on Feb 23, 2012 at 4:44 am
Wow . . . there's a surprise. CoW increasing fees once again. Not by inflation, mind you, but by a whopping 40%.
And this after CoW decided to wave all or part of development fees for multi-residential developments.
CoW is out-of-control.
Up 0 Down 0
get real on Feb 22, 2012 at 7:46 am
Nobody likes to pay more, but think for a minute. If the NIMBYs all over town would allow strategic, condensed development and not worry that they can't walk out their back yard to a trail, we would be able to hook new developments up to existing infrastructure. As it is, new developments are pushed further and further out - creating the need for miles and miles of new roads, new water and sewer, lights, etc. That doesn't even touch on the need for schools and other services that will be demanded.
If people were less selfish and less focused on their own tiny universe, this wouldn't be necessary. Welcome to the consequences!
Up 0 Down 0
Tax us some more you fools... on Feb 22, 2012 at 2:35 am
It matters not anymore what gibberish comes out of our city managers...council...or our soon to be (again) barber.
Translated means ALL fees some yet to be invented WILL RISE.
When they toss wads of our cash to special interest groups of many types...decorate this town like a tourist theme park...
Our council whom actually ARE run by managers...and our waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay out of touch barber are the greediest money grubbing crew I have even seen in my 17 years here.
Imagine how high our taxes would be if they actually focused on running NOT ruining our town?
We still daily deal with piss-tanks staggering all over town...city parties held to promote someone's agenda.
in summary folks...we live in the 15th century and those whom do toil?
Toil for our Queen (barber)...her nobles (council)...the lords(city managers)...and we just as then are kept in poverty as we give our money to those lording over us and stuffing their agenda down our throats.
i just wished we had more "stones" up here and showed them how we really feel with the ineptness of it all.
When does the new mega city hall get built? Certainly it is designed by now and expected to be river front...beside our extorted new PC library no doubt?
Up 0 Down 0
Francias Pillman on Feb 21, 2012 at 12:40 pm
I forgot to add something. I understand that Bev and the city are not real estate agents. But where does it end? How are young people suppose to live here when none of them can afford a home? Even entry level houses are out of reach. I have a very serious question to the COW. Have you prepared for the future? Have you prepared for lower property values? If you just think everything will go up forever you are in for a shock. A couple of mines in the Yukon is great now. Have you planned for when they shut down? Canadians better wake up soon, but I honestly think it's too late. No ones wage in Canada has gone up 200%. So how can we see the prices we see? It's all one big ponzi scam on Canada. It doesn't concern anyone that the CMHC (mortgage assoc.) needs their limit raised to the tune of $600 billion? Does it concern anyone that all those risky mortgages the bank gave out are 100% insured by you, the tax payer? What? Since when is it the Governments duty to bail out private businesses? Oh right, it's the norm now since 2008. There are no risks for the bank to give out mortgages to people that should not have one. If you people don't want to see the writing on the wall, that's fine by me. But don't go crying when the bankers own your home for free but you still owe more than what's it is worth. It's USA 2008 all over again folks. And like good Canadians you fell for the biggest scam in Canadian history, HOOK, LINE & SINKER.
Up 0 Down 0
Francias Pillman on Feb 21, 2012 at 11:21 am
Where does it end? I can't wait for interest rates to raise. How does the market keep going up and up when less people can't afford these over priced, over speculated houses? Why? Because a huge correction is coming. Why else is your mortgage insured by the Canadian Government? Because they know this housing market is one fake created bubble, waiting to burst. Funny that this exact same thing happened in the USA. While ignorant Canadians dance around saying "that will never happen here" lol. Keep believing yourself.