Photo by Will Johnson
POTENTIAL BUILDING SITE – A local developer wants to build 16 seniors' townhouse units at the corner of Keewenaw and North Star drives.
Photo by Will Johnson
POTENTIAL BUILDING SITE – A local developer wants to build 16 seniors' townhouse units at the corner of Keewenaw and North Star drives.
City council is being asked to rezone a large piece of commercial property in Copper Ridge to allow for a housing project.
City council is being asked to rezone a large piece of commercial property in Copper Ridge to allow for a housing project.
Developer Patrick McLarnon of Maxavier Real Estate is proposing to build 16 townhouse units for seniors at the corner of Keewenaw and North Star drives, instead of a mix of commercial and residential space, according to a city administrative report.
Currently, the property allows for commercial space on the ground floor with residential accommodations on the second storey.
City council approved first reading of the required zoning amendment late last month.
But Coun. Ranj Pillai, who lives four or five doors from the vacant lot which sits next to a playground, suggested in an interview this week there are issues to be addressed.
A public hearing is scheduled for June 27, with the findings to be reported back to council July 4. Second and third readings of the amendment are scheduled for July 11.
Information put before council by city staff indicates commercial space is included in neighbourhood planning to create a holistic approach to development.
Residents should be able to walk no more than five minutes or 300 metres to their nearest neighbourhood corner store or coffee shop, says the revised Official Community Plan adopted in 2008.
Allowing McLarnon's development to proceed would put the closest commercial property at the Granger Mall, some 1.2 kilometres from the site at Keewenaw and North Star, council was informed.
It was pointed out to council, however, that the commercial property has been available since 2005 but did not attract any commercial interest until McLarnon bought it over the counter for $165,000 from the Yukon government in December 2009.
The local contractor gained title last month to the property, after fulfilling the requirements of the agreement for sale. The lot measures just over one-third of a hectare, or a fraction less than an acre.
Pillai said he's had a few phone calls expressing concerns and different points of view, though he'll wait to see what comes from the public review process to make up his mind on the matter.
Other developers, for instance, may have bid on the property if they'd known of the opportunity to change it from commercial-residential to entirely residential, Pillai said.
He also pointed out neighbourhoods need something of a corner store as a central focus; a place where neighbours bump into buddies, or a place for kids to walk or bike to.
The current zoning, for instance, allows for a day-care on the ground floor with a residence above, Pillai pointed out.
He said the neighbourhood desperately needs a commercial day-care, as there's not one in the entire Copper Ridge subdivision.
Furthermore, it might be a stretch to describe this as a housing project for seniors, the city councillor said.
With the proposed single-storey design, Pillai said , it's certainly well suited for the senior clientele.
More than likely, however, whoever puts up the money first will get the townhouse unit, senior or no senior, he suggested.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (15)
Up 0 Down 0
Marianne Darragh on Jun 27, 2011 at 3:21 am
As much as developers invest in their properties, so do residents. So there's a little more at stake for them than being "inconvenienced".
It takes a lot of energy and personal time for residents to effectively provide input on the OCP and zoning -- and rezoning. (And how effective it can be is another story.) That's what a developer's application is triggering, not just city staff time and his own time.
The OCP isn't even a year old, is it? It might take more than a year for the commercial possibilities of the site to be recognized.
Up 0 Down 0
DG on Jun 24, 2011 at 4:49 pm
So than what you are essentially saying is that because the guy can't make the commercial option work in his favor he can't have any other options? Because it is inconvenient for his neighbors?
Up 0 Down 0
Marianne Darragh on Jun 24, 2011 at 1:50 am
Zoning isn't intended to be a menu of options for developers, I don't think, or as "fluid" as it is here. As for the idea that it's just an application, what's the harm, it's not that simple. Rezoning applications are disruptive for communities. They pit neighbor against neighbor, and spawn a negative undercurrent, because it's basically a lobbying atmosphere, with winners and losers.
Why have zoning at all? The process for creating the zoning bylaw is also intense, if anyone is paying attention. The way it's conducted in Whitehorse it's a never-ending cycle, because as soon as a developer has a different idea, the cycle starts all over again, on a spot zoning basis. It should be called the Tweaking Bylaw.
As for the commercial zoning -- why isn't it attractive for commercial? Whether it's a corner store, or a rental unit, people don't seem to want to invest that way. Why is that?
Up 0 Down 0
DG on Jun 22, 2011 at 5:58 pm
Of course amending the zoning isn't a given but why can't he try. If as I said there is no interest in operating a business out of there than why can't he apply to have it rezoned for any purpose so deemed.
It's an application that it, that's all.
Up 0 Down 0
YukonMax on Jun 22, 2011 at 5:50 am
Why buy the property with a project in mind that doesn't suit the zoning? Amending the zoning isn't a given, unless unauthorized promises were made to the purchaser in the first place.
Up 0 Down 0
Clarke Griswald on Jun 21, 2011 at 1:31 pm
I did not know that this guy already owned the lot WT heck! These guys just buy up these lots with no interest to use them as the zoning suggests then cry to the city to have it re-zoned for "seniors housing" let's get real. Wasn't it smurf village that was supposed to be for seniors then housing prices went up and they sold to whoever had 200k for the 120k huts. I think this is a scam much like the Meadow Lake Monster! If the city re-zones it then it should charge accordingly.
Up 0 Down 0
DG on Jun 21, 2011 at 9:20 am
@ Bobby I realize that he purchased it at a set price for a set purpose however he purchased it and has likely found a very unwilling lot from the business community to build a daycare convenience store or otherwise. Take the Granger Mall there is no "real" convenience store a bar (tavern) fitness studio, and daycare.
We've seen many corner stores and such disappear in the last few years certainly due in part to the big box stores downtown but also to the fact that many people are more willing to drive to them.
He owns the land and has applied to have it rezoned any landowner to my knowledge can do the same within the set rules whatever they may be.
If that makes good business sense to him then I applaud him for making the choices he deems appropriate.
Up 0 Down 0
Nope on Jun 20, 2011 at 7:29 am
I don't buy McLarnon's plan for senior housing for a second. He'll obviously lease to whomever can pay top dollar.
Currently the land is zoned in a way that will allow for both commercial and residential development. With the proposed changes it will allow many more units.
Of course the downside to this will be reduced property values for houses in the immediate vicinity. Plus with more people comes more traffic, noise and crime.
Ranj is correct in saying Copper Ridge needs to be more than a 'vinyl village' and has the need for actual service so that those who live there don't have to get in the car and drive elsewhere for their services.
I oppose the zoning change. McLarnon bought the land knowing full well how it was zoned.
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on Jun 20, 2011 at 5:53 am
DG, he bought it at a certain price with a specific zoning. Perhaps others would have bid more had the zoning been different, but perhaps not. So that is part of the issue. But I realize you are addressing the person who wants to see it 'go to the highest bidder' - suggesting it is not yet sold.
I think it should be up to the neighbours within 500 meters of the property, to decide whether they want the only (?) commercial property in their area eliminated. (no corner store 'ever' - until the next place is rezoned!)
Up 0 Down 0
Live across the street on Jun 20, 2011 at 12:08 am
My only concern with the proposed 16 senior units is the parking. 16 units = 16 possibly more vehicles. So where are they parking? The lot's not that big. As far as a corner store going in there? Come on, what's the price of a pack of gum going to be $5.00? to afford the rent/lease? Sorry but Big Way prices are bad enough to pay for the "convenience” this would only be worse. Building a day care with residence on top would not be my first choice either. My first choice would be proceed as planned and build it for the seniors. It's a nice quiet street, where seniors would fit right in. They might even enjoy watching the children in the playground right behind them. Just have a parking plan.
Up 0 Down 0
Copper Ridge Resident on Jun 18, 2011 at 1:40 am
I'm a Copper Ridge resident and I'm in favour of development on that lot. Seniors' housing is great and all, but that's one of the only commercial lots in the area and I'd rather see a daycare or small office space than more residential (and yes, I do live very close to the lot). I'm sure this public hearing is going to be a gong show.
You know none of the residents bothered to look at the zoning map that comes with their lottery packages. Who buys land or a house without checking current zoning around them? Sure, zoning is fluid but I'd want to know what's around the property currently to avoid any surprises.
Most residents don't know that the large greenbelt around the extended care facility is actually public service...it's supposed to be a high school. Most residents don't know that those terminated roads off Falcon lead to settlement land that's already got cut roads and lot boundaries. Yes, a good number of folks who think their lots abut on greenbelt are going to be very disappointed when KDFN starts developing.
Maybe I'm being preemptive in my rant, but I see nothing but complaining in the future. I guess all the people who shop at Bigway have forgotten the fight to get the land rezoned to commercial to allow it in the first place.
Up 0 Down 0
Francias pillman on Jun 17, 2011 at 10:17 am
Give me a break. There is enough senior housing in Whitehorse. Build some apartments for the working class who can't afford these over priced million kit homes.
Up 0 Down 0
DG on Jun 17, 2011 at 9:12 am
If you read it carefully he already owns the land and is asking to have it rezoned not the other way around.
Up 0 Down 0
JC on Jun 17, 2011 at 9:04 am
Good idea! But what will they be renting them out to the seniors for? At a price only the rich retirees can afford?
Up 0 Down 0
Clarke Griswald on Jun 17, 2011 at 8:37 am
I say rezone the lot but.....it should go to the highest bidder not just hand it over to this developer, then lets see where the bids go. As a tax payer I want the city to get the best bang for the buck!