Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Michael Nehass

Detention plight, delays spark Charter challenge

Michael Nehass has filed a new Charter challenge in Yukon Supreme Court, arguing he should be released from custody as a remedy for his rights having been breached.

By Pierre Chauvin on November 13, 2015

Michael Nehass has filed a new Charter challenge in Yukon Supreme Court, arguing he should be released from custody as a remedy for his rights having been breached.

In the application filed on Thursday, Nehass argues procedural delays and detention conditions infringed on his constitutional rights protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

He is asking the court to stay the current proceedings and to release him from custody.

In case the court doesn’t decide to stay the proceedings, he is asking the current application for having him assessed as a dangerous offender to be stayed.

Last May, the 31-year-old Yukon man was convicted of forcibly confining a woman, holding a knife to her throat and breaching his probation.

Since then, the Crown has been seeking to have him assessed as a dangerous offender – meaning having a specialist evaluate whether such designation would be appropriate.

Being designated as a dangerous offender could give him an indefinite jail sentence, periodically reviewed by the National Parole Board.

Nehass filed a similar Charter challenge in February of this year. He decided to drop it as a part of an agreement with the Crown, presenting a joint submission for other offences he was judged for.

In the newly-filed challenge, Nehass claims he suffered from prolonged detention in the segregation unit and bad treatment.

Nehass has been on remand at the Whitehorse Correctional Centre (WCC) since Dec. 29, 2011, the application reads.

In January 2014, Nehass appeared before the court via video.

He was naked, shackled and held by three guards in full riot gear.

This later prompted an apology from Yukon Supreme Court Justice Leigh Gower for not having ended the hearing sooner than he did.

“The applicant has, as a result of the accumulation of violations to his Charter rights ... lost trust in the judicial system and does not believe he will be fairly assessed,” the application reads.

Nehass has already served time equivalent to what the Crown was originally seeking for his May conviction, the application claims.

Nehass was represented by a lawyer on Thursday for the first time since the beginning of the trial.

Last July, Nehass made a Rowbotham application, seeking that the territory pays for an Outside lawyer.

Legal aid services declined to represent Nehass – he had fired three legal aid lawyers, clearly stating he had no confidence in them.

The application was granted. and lawyer Sarah Rauch is now representing him.

Throughout the trial, he had been self-represented, with the court appointing B.C. lawyer Bibhas Vaze to assist him and the court as amicus curiae.

Ever since that appointment, Nehass has tried to get Vaze removed.

Justice Scott Brooker acceded to Nehass’ request today, noting that since he was represented, there was no need for Vaze’s help.

Brooker did thank Vaze for his work, noting the circumstances were “challenging” at times.

Nehass had accused Vaze multiple times of colluding with the Crown to keep him locked up.

Rauch told the court Thursday her client was ready to be assessed – but only by a doctor he had agreed to.

Crown prosecutor Eric Marcoux refused.

Rauch had trouble at times keeping Nehass from interrupting her, the Crown or the judge.

The court spent most of Thursday afternoon dealing with questions about Nehass’ criminal record being altered.

Rauch took issue with a change made in the record about the June 2010 sentencing of Nehass for having assaulted correctional officers at the WCC.

The judge sentenced Nehass to three years minus the time he had already served, effectively sentencing him to two years.

The judge knocked off another day so Nehass could serve his sentence in the territory.

Rauch and Marcoux argued about the correction, debating whether the judge had actually sentenced Nehass to two or three years.

Both were back in court today to argue over the Crown’s application to have Nehass assessed as a dangerous offender.

Comments (8)

Up 28 Down 1

Thomas Brewer on Nov 16, 2015 at 1:32 pm

The very last thing that Whitehorse needs is this scumbag back on the streets. Remember that incarceration isn't just for potential rehabilitation of the offender, but to protect society from said offender.

Up 48 Down 2

John Gould on Nov 15, 2015 at 2:37 pm

The facts about Michael Nehass are clear. He is a manipulative violent offender who is well aware of right and wrong and true or false. He accepts zero responsibility for his actions and looks for people to blame for his wrong doings. That all being very clear, another fact is that Michael is afraid to go to the Penitentiary because he would have to be housed with protective custody inmates because he even messed up in the Pen before and can't go back to general population. So he hides in WCC abusing the staff, other inmates and the system. It's sad and embarrassing to watch this continue. Lock him up and hold this creep accountable for once.

Up 72 Down 5

JC on Nov 14, 2015 at 12:11 pm

He may have a criminal mind, but he sure knows the system and how to abuse it. Why does Human Rights support human wrongs?

Up 63 Down 4

yukon56 on Nov 13, 2015 at 9:41 pm

This POS keeps going on and on. Have him declared and moved on

Up 60 Down 4

Yukoner on Nov 13, 2015 at 8:06 pm

And here folks is one of the many reason why our justice system is farcical and so very, very broken. At what point does someone say enough is enough. What a menace this guy is, troubled or not.

Up 50 Down 5

June Jackson on Nov 13, 2015 at 7:37 pm

What do you think some bleeding heart judge will 'poor poor Michael" and agree he should be free for having committed crimes and gone to jail in the first place.

Up 55 Down 6

Northern Knight on Nov 13, 2015 at 5:47 pm

Yes, this is the perfect example of how 'circle sentencing' works. This person is a hardened criminal who will end up killing someone in due course, yet he is smart enough to put up a bunch of legal arguments about how his 'rights' have been violated.

How about the 'rights' of the person he attacked without provocations, and kicked in the head several times? Yeah, that guy had no rights, but THIS piece of work has 'rights'?

I don't think so.

Up 98 Down 7

Yukon Resident on Nov 13, 2015 at 3:52 pm

Seriously? This piece of work should not be allowed to waste anymore of the legal system's time or money. And he sure as hell should not be released. What a farce

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.