Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Community Services Minister John Streicker

Deal would see $592 M flow into projects

The Yukon is poised to receive a significant injection of cash over the next decade as the federal Liberals double down on their infrastructure spending plan.

By Sidney Cohen on August 3, 2017

The Yukon is poised to receive a significant injection of cash over the next decade as the federal Liberals double down on their infrastructure spending plan.

Ottawa and the Yukon are expected to sign a funding agreement by March 31, 2018 that will see $592 million flow into local projects over a 10-year period.

Three-quarters of that amount will come from the federal government.

The remaining $148 million will be covered by the Yukon government.

“That’s a good news story,” Community Services Minister John Streicker said in an interview Tuesday.

The funding, which is new money set out in the 2017 federal budget, “alleviates pressure” on the Yukon government, said Streicker.

With at least three years of major deficits on the horizon, starting with an estimated $49 million in 2018, the Yukon may soon be forced to pass on major capital projects.

The Yukon Liberals plan to spend about $220 million a year on their capital program for the upcoming three years.

As for which projects will be supported by the new funds from Ottawa, and when the spending will start, it’s too early to say.

“We don’t have a list of priorities,” said Streicker.

The territorial government must meet with First Nations and municipal governments before such a list is drawn up.

Streicker emphasized that improving Yukon infrastructure will be a collaborative effort.

After the meetings with other governments, the territory will create a three-year, rolling plan.

This plan, which will be open to updates and amendments each year, will lay out the Yukon’s infrastructure priorities.

The infrastructure spending boost announced July 6 is part of the federal government’s Investing in Canada Plan, which is supposed to deliver $33 billion to the provinces and territories through bilateral funding agreements over 11 years.

The Yukon is slated to receive the following investments over the next decade (with 75 per cent of each amount coming from Ottawa, and 25 per cent supplied by the territorial government):

• $276 million for green infrastructure (such as sustainable energy projects);

• $269 million for projects that benefit rural and northern communities ($50 million of this will come out of the Arctic Energy Fund);

• $34 million for culture and recreation facilities; and

• $13 million for transit.

“I’m looking forward to working with communities to put these dollars to work in Yukon,” Streicker said in a statement last month.

“In our (2016 election) platform, we committed to invest in our communities using local solutions. We are ready to work together with First Nation and municipal governments to maximize the positive impact of these dollars. ”

If all goes according to plan, the money will flow with relative consistency from year to year, Streicker told the Star.

“(The federal government) is not trying to front-load or backload the money; it’ll flow pretty smoothly over time,” he said.

Though the Ross River suspension bridge seems like a prime target for infrastructure spending, it is actually ineligible for new federal funding.

The footbridge over the Pelly River has been out of commission since 2013, when an inspection revealed serious structural problems.

In 2014, the government committed to repairing the bridge, and earmarked $3 million to that end with $2.25 million of that coming out of the federal Small Communities Fund.

But repair plans ground to a halt last month when all bids on the contract came in over budget – by $1 million or more.

The bridge is barred from additional federal support because Ottawa is already covering 75 per cent of the original repair budget.

Under the Yukon’s agreement with Canada, the federal government will pay up to 75 per cent of the cost of a given infrastructure project, explained Brook Simpson, press secretary for Amarjeet Sohi, the federal Minister of Infrastructure and Communities.

Funding may come out of one federal pool, such as the Small Communities Fund, or a combination of pools, but once a project is three-quarters funded, the project is cut off.

Cost overruns (such as those affecting the Ross River bridge) are the responsibility of the Yukon government, said Simpson.

“We didn’t budget enough money for it,” Streicker said of the suspension bridge. “That requires us to look internally to ourselves to fund it.”

He added that, “We’re not dragging our heels; we’ll be there soon.”

Comments (9)

Up 1 Down 2

Joint ventures on economic development in the communities on Aug 9, 2017 at 2:17 pm

This funding, can be leveraged, if invested, in the right way! For example,
> we need economic opportunity analysis, for each community, in the Yukon.
> We need experienced economic planners, which can analysis the opportunities, for realistic business case.
> We don't need Regan economics: build it and they will come.
> We don't need sand box investment!
> We need vision from inside the community, with assistance of private sector developers, not just government employees.
For example, When I was at Ec Dev. we completed a study on a forest industry for the Yukon. It was done by a private sector firm and it clearly laid out, how we can develop our specialized forest industry, not the standard forest products, on the open market. We can make blanks for furniture and ship to Asia. We can make specialized flooring, on and on.
But the plan was put on the shelf in Ec Dev. and nothing done with it. There was a lot of guidance in this work for the potential of the Yukon future.
One of the keys was joint ventures, with firms, from out side the Yukon, who has the experience, knowledge, skills and capital, to make projects, move forward.
Governments have great employees, but not the experience in the private sector. Some Government employees wanted it killed, by putting in clauses in the forest act, by stating no leases longer than 10 years. Manufacturing and processing plants need raw material supply of 25 to 35 years so they can finance the project. But no one would listen.
There are opportunities, all over the place, like using the dead wood in Haines Junction, to heat green houses growth of local food. Food grown in our climate taste different. Look at the Yukon Gold potatoes. Yukon has to develop its own identity in the food industry.
Wild game farming growth, offers major opportunities, especially selling into Asia markets.
John, please do not spend money, for the sake of spending and have a social economic results that are long term, not short term have this investment.
Second, why is our infrastructures spending, by Ottawa, down by almost 50% compared to the past 10 years, when looked at it all like housing, etc. This will certainly mean less jobs in the Yukon.
Why not 90 to 10 like the last Federal Government?
What economic impact will this infrastructure spending have on our economy and how will it improve the jobs in the communities long term?
How many private sector jobs will be created?
What is the sustainability plan, look like for this investment?
Why did the Yukon Government let the City of Whitehorse not use funding to purchase clean transit bus service which would mean they would not need that great big building?
Why did the Yukon Government and the City of Whitehorse partner on that building and servicing center? This make no sense for tax payers.
Please release a statement answering these questions?
Wilf Carter

Up 12 Down 13

Miles Ocean on Aug 6, 2017 at 7:14 pm

Sorry Jose Wales but I want the new government to build a nice running track and a nice soccer pitch.
Think of how fit you could become if you ran with your feet rather than your mouth. No offense really but fit people are way less negative and fitness increases blood flow to the brain.

You could even discover meditation and art rather than trash talking.

Up 11 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Aug 6, 2017 at 11:23 am

Too bad all this spending depends on another four years of the Trudeau Liberals in Ottawa. They lied to win the last election, what's to say they are telling the truth now?

Up 10 Down 0

JACK on Aug 5, 2017 at 10:37 pm

How about funding for a diverse fibre cable before green energy? Where is this government's priorities?

Up 16 Down 7

Josey Wales on Aug 4, 2017 at 8:50 pm

Oh roger...in this the current year, budgets," balance themselves."
Said an idiot in Ottawa.
Financial smoke blown outta the arse of team red is all it is.

Up 19 Down 0

yukon56 on Aug 4, 2017 at 5:58 pm

Sooo, we have federal money and Yukon Government money. Basically the same . Don"t kid yourself the amount of taxes collected from Yukoners is minuscule. If there were no Federal money there would be nobody here.

Up 19 Down 1

Roger on Aug 4, 2017 at 1:52 am

Good heavens...how are we going to pay for all this???

Up 23 Down 2

Max Mack on Aug 3, 2017 at 5:56 pm

$276 million for green infrastructure, and another $269 million for projects that benefit rural and northern communities - which will also likely be "green infrastructure"?

Details on what this spending is for, please.

Up 20 Down 4

jc on Aug 3, 2017 at 5:19 pm

I think most of us out here pretty well know where most of that Liberal funding will go. Don't need to say anymore.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.