Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Dan Davidson

‘A COSTLY ENDEAVOUR’ – Dawson City’s wastewater treatment plant, seen here Tuesday, ‘has never operated the way it was intended to,’ Community Services Minister John Streicker concedes. After a capital cost of $34.3 million, no other treatment plant in the territory has cost taxpayers more to operate. Inset John Streicker

Dawson needs a new wastewater solution

While Dawson’s wastewater treatment plant is finally capable of doing the job for which it was built, it will not meet the town’s future needs in a financially sustainable manner.

By Dan Davidson on January 16, 2019

DAWSON CITY – While Dawson’s wastewater treatment plant is finally capable of doing the job for which it was built, it will not meet the town’s future needs in a financially sustainable manner.

Consequently, the Yukon government has determined, planning should begin toward finding a replacement system.

This comes not quite 10 years after the first test holes were drilled for the plant’s construction, and seven years after the court-ordered facility went into service.

The $34.3-million plant has been problematic since it became operational in 2012, and has consistently failed to meet the terms of its water licence.

Because of the many issues and cost escalations associated with the plant, the City of Dawson refused to accept final ownership of the facility after its trial run period. The Yukon government has been operating it now for several years.

Just a year ago, the government made what was described as a “last-ditch effort” to make the plant compliant.

While a November 2018 letter to municipal council from Community Services Minister John Streicker indicates that this was successful, there are too many other issues, beginning with the financial burden.

Dawson contributes $210,000 annually to the O&M costs of the plant (a number close to the original projections).

The actual cost, however, has ballooned to $950,000 annually, with “additional costs for building and site maintenance,” and the government is making up the difference.

These costs are “significantly higher than in any other Yukon community, including Whitehorse,” Streicker wrote.

Those costs are better than three times the projections that were stated while the plant was in the planning phase under a Yukon Party government. The selection of this type of system for Dawson “wasn’t a good choice,” as Streicker has put it.

His letter to council paints a grim picture of the future.

“Further, these costs are expected to rise as the plant ages and additional maintenance is required,” he wrote.

“For example, the plant has hundreds of mechanical systems and control elements, each with a scheduled service life.

“Replacement costs for these are expected to jump to $500,000 in 2025, with additional costs of more than $1 million per year in 2030 and 2031, with another $2 million required in 2035.”

Put the plant’s lackluster performance and its escalating costs together, and the government has determined that “the life cycle of the plant is severely limited,” Streicker wrote.

“The Government of Yukon has concluded that it would not be fiscally responsible to operate the DWWTP (Dawson City wastewater treatment plant) beyond 2026.”

The minister was blunt in a news release issued Tuesday.

“This plant has been a costly endeavour for Dawson City and Yukon. It has never operated the way it was intended to, and as Dawson grows, the challenges of maintaining the facility will become even more difficult,” Streicker said.

“We are committed to working with the City of Dawson to develop a sustainable wastewater treatment option.”

In his November letter, which was part of the council package for Monday’s meeting, the minister concedes that “this may well be frustrating news for you as it is for us.

“Therefore we would like to support the City of Dawson to begin planning a new wastewater treatment lagoon, to be operational by 2026 or earlier.”

The plant is now meeting its requirements, after what the minister refers to as “a great deal of effort.”

However, it seems likely that Dawson, which the Yukon Bureau of Statistics currently says has a population of 2,323, up from the 2016 census number of 1,375, will soon exceed the capability of the plant to handle the town’s effluent.

The letter advocates a lagoon solution, which, interestingly enough, was the solution proposed and designed over a decade ago.

It was defeated in a 2008 referendum, which objected to the proposed location at the foot of the Dome Road, and across the highway from the Tr’ondëk subdivision.

The press release contains the following background information.

Construction of the wastewater treatment plant was largely completed in 2012.

Corix Water Systems Inc. – the company contracted to build the plant – began operating it in 2013.

Corix continued to operate the plant, under contract, until February 2017, when the Department of Community Services took over operations and maintenance.

The government has filed a statement of claim against Corix.

Originally, the plant was to be operated and maintained by the City of Dawson.

In 2015, however, it asked the government to manage the plant until it was fully functional and financially sustainable.

From the outset, the plant struggled to meet the requirements of its water licence.

Most of the time, it was less compliant than the primary treatment facility (a screening plant) it was designed to replace.

As a result of changes in the plant design implemented after negotiations with Corix and its subcontractors (mostly at their cost), the plant is now in compliance.

Discussions with Corix are continuing over the performance of the plant and the issue of higher operating costs.

“After a great deal of effort over several years, the wastewater treatment plant is now marginally capable of meeting effluent discharge standards under normal operating conditions,” the minister’s statement says.

“As Dawson grows, the challenges of sustaining this facility will only get more difficult.

“The Government of Yukon will actively support the City of Dawson in the planning of a new wastewater treatment option and will help secure appropriate infrastructure funding for a wastewater treatment facility.”

Comments (15)

Up 11 Down 1

Wes on Jan 21, 2019 at 3:59 pm

Where did some of the commenters get the idea that Dawsonites voted for this design??
They rejected the lagoon concept. That's it. It was the Yukon Party that came up with the Corix "solution".
But keep in mind that prior to this debacle, the YP squashed as too expensive an SBR design that was pretty much tender ready. The design was proven but the cost estimates were coming in too high for the powers that were. And here we are.
I'd love for the Auditor General to perform a complete investigation on this whole mess. Same with the Centre of Hope in Whitehorse.

Up 8 Down 0

Jacko on Jan 20, 2019 at 5:56 pm

@Yukonblonde absolutely right! Dig deeper! Dig real deep, there is so much that can be exposed. Incompetence runs so deep here that it would shock the public if they knew. I do think reporters are afraid of the repercussions, don't be! We need to know.

Up 17 Down 0

Yukonblonde on Jan 19, 2019 at 10:20 pm

Why is that the journalists just rewrite the press releases - but the real story comes out in the comments ? There’s so much to cover in the territory and our journalists just rewrite press releases and court reports. It’s part of the reason this bs keeps happening.

Up 19 Down 2

Sylvia Burkhard on Jan 18, 2019 at 3:49 pm

I'm not sure why folks are saying Dawson voted overwhelmingly for this, we didn't, however there was a referendum that defeated having a aerated sewage lagoon just outside of town past Crocus Bluff. There were concerns about smell and contamination of the drinking water supply. So instead of having a lined lagoon keeping waste away from the drinking water we pump it down 300ft underground not far from the source of the drinking water. It's obviously quite cold down there and the microbes that deal with sewage couldn't do their job, at one point there was a horrendous amount of chemicals being pumped down to make it compliant and try to pass a test (which involved fish living (or in this case not living) in the effluent. It's ridiculous to see the truck loading up waste from the plant and taking it out to the Dempster highway dump site, happens regularly.
This has been a turkey from the beginning and there was a few of us at all the council meetings because the lemon hospital was going at the same time and lots of us thought the hospital should go where the treatment plant is due to space constrictions. Instead we had an apartment building put in an empty corner of the lot which made the whole lot less user friendly.
I don't remember having a vote on whether we wanted this particular type of plant, as I've mentioned and some folks remember we were warned by Manitoba and Homer Alaska that it didn't work but the design build program that governments have adopted pitched their wastewater treatment plant to YTG and Council and they bought it. Dawson hasn't built any infrastructure in the last twenty years that wasn't a fuster cluck! End of rant.

Up 16 Down 9

Really?! on Jan 17, 2019 at 10:27 pm

Really Groucho?! Wasn’t it your Yukon party that approved this whole project and exclaimed how well it worked? Then shamed any opposition that brought up the contrary? Don’t forget who was in power through the entire conception of this project, it’s build, it’s initial failures. I love how you blame the courts for their small contribution and forget the architects.

Up 13 Down 0

My Opinion on Jan 17, 2019 at 6:29 pm

At the time there were other options and I believe it was a local contractor perhaps Ketza that was unsuccessful even though much cheaper. Greenies pushed this thing down their throats. Were told by some it wouldn't work. The company that sold it to the Territory should not be in business anymore. It wasn't their first or last failure.

Up 25 Down 0

Jacko on Jan 17, 2019 at 4:29 pm

Wonder sometimes if YTG is getting too much of a free ride. Both from the Public and our Overseers who fund 90 percent of them. I hear lots of stories of mismanaged projects all over the Yukon simply because of no oversight and personnel that are under qualified to handle them. Would be an interesting read.

Up 15 Down 1

Jack on Jan 17, 2019 at 4:21 pm

@ Politico, I know of what I speak. Just look at the public expenditures listed for Dawson, this year alone. I only questioned if anyone else had. They are in the tens of millions for this year. Not to mention past boondoggles such as the Rec Complex,City Hall and fire hall move, Ice bridges, this septic mess and oh yes the Bankruptcy that in itself had many miss managed items. All this costs not only Government of Yukon and those that pay taxes but also other communities that may have to have projects delayed due to emergency expenditures. You should check the public accounts before dissing us.

Up 17 Down 2

Groucho d'North on Jan 17, 2019 at 4:03 pm

Does anybody remember that this system was a solution ordered by the courts with instructions to make haste in getting it built and running? Do these same courts take any responsibility for the role they played in creating this expensive mess? An old CBC story to jog your memory if you forget: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/north/judge-gives-thumbs-up-to-dawson-lagoon-plans-1.669777

Up 16 Down 1

poop master on Jan 17, 2019 at 3:49 pm

Sunk cost of $34.3-million. $950,000 a year to run, 1,375 people in Dawson. So disregarding the up front cost and assuming each person poops once a day, a crap in Dawson is $1.89.

Up 1 Down 12

Politico on Jan 17, 2019 at 1:19 pm

@Jack. Financial records of the communities are public record. Instead of making unsubstantiated accusations maybe do some research and present verified facts! @Wilf. Nice try for a drive by but pump it where? The area is well populated so who's property get expropriated? Who is going to want to live next to a waste treatment plant? Put some thought into what you say!

Up 14 Down 5

Wilf on Jan 17, 2019 at 2:13 am

This was not the solution and not elsewhere as history has proven. Just pipe the material out of town and then treat it.

Up 20 Down 3

Max Mack on Jan 16, 2019 at 11:49 pm

Streicker might be right that it is time to look at doing something different, but watch for Liberal-friendly palms being greased.

It's not entirely fair to blame the Yukon Party for this fiasco, as Streicker sneakily implies. The residents of Dawson voted overwhelmingly for this option, along with the Dawson town council. There were plenty of folks around that argued that the chosen system was too risky and untried - read some of the media coverage and reader comments at the time - but Dawsonites shut their eyes and voted for it anyway.

Up 21 Down 1

Jack on Jan 16, 2019 at 10:13 pm

So here we go again. Bucks dumped into Dawson to the detriment of all the other communities. As Politico stated they voted for this so live with it. Would love to know the total amount of dollars being spent in the Klondike this year by all levels of Government and how that compares to the rest of the Yukon. Bet it would shock!!!

Up 38 Down 4

Politico on Jan 16, 2019 at 3:39 pm

Let's not forget this is the solution that the majority of people in Dawson voted for. Maybe next time let an experienced engineer design something that works in spite of the cost or political interference.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.