Whitehorse Daily Star

Councillor keen on hearing public’s feedback

Residents will have an opportunity to tell city council exactly what they think of the proposed zoning changes being considered for the MacBride Museum of Yukon History.

By Stephanie Waddell on September 13, 2016

Residents will have an opportunity to tell city council exactly what they think of the proposed zoning changes being considered for the MacBride Museum of Yukon History.

The zoning changes, as well as a separate encroachment agreement MacBride officials are seeking, would allow the museum to move ahead with the massive 19,000-square- foot, three-level expansion it’s planning.

The federal and territorial governments recently announced they would each contribute $3 million for the expansion.

As a report to council sums up: “The society plans the construction of a modernist building sited adjacent to and overhanging the historic Telegraph Office.

“The proposed building does not meet several of the regulations of the existing zoning, and the society has applied for a zoning amendment that will remove requirements to retain a front yard setback, meet waterfront design guidelines, and provide off-street parking.

“The society is also requesting approval for encroachments into the Front Street and Steele Street rights-of-way to accommodate the new building.”

As officials with MacBride have explained previously, with limited space on its Front Street property, the only way to build an expansion is by building up.

While the proposal doesn’t technically meet the requirements of the waterfront guidelines, the building is designed to have the appearance of the warehouses that were once commonplace in the area.

During Monday evening’s meeting, council members were unaanimous in voting to pass first reading on both the zoning bylaw and encroachment agreements.

It was also stressed by some, however, that the vote will get the issue to the next stage in the process, which will see a public hearing about the zoning at council’s Oct. 11 meeting.

Coun. Samson Hartland said he’s very interested in hearing what the public has to say on the plans.

A report on the public hearing session will then be presented to council at the Oct. 17 session, with second and third readings coming forward Oct. 24.

While there is no public hearing on encroachment agreements, second and third readings for that are also scheduled to come forward Oct. 24, as the encroachment cannot proceed until the zoning is in place.

Council and senior management are also slated to discuss the plans at an Oct. 4 council and senior management meeting.

In addition to the zoning changes and encroachment agreement, the museum is also asking the city for in-kind support in providing the annual encroachment fee.

The amount of the fee is based on the amount of land being encroached on and its value.

At the current market value, it’s estimated the fee would be more than $4,000 per year.

Officials with MacBride are aiming to begin construction on the estimated two-year project this year.

Coun. Betty Irwin was absent from last night’s meeting, while Hartland and Coun. Dan Boyd and attended via conference call.

Comments (7)

Up 5 Down 0

CJ on Sep 14, 2016 at 9:44 pm

@a great opportunity here -- I think this place is too small for a design competition. Who would assess them? Plus people have a hard time rejecting any local firms. A design panel might be a more workable solution. We could use one by now. This approach just isn't right for these flagship projects. It's all about them marketing a done deal now.

Maybe there should have been some public consultation around the terms of reference, and not by the architects. (Of course, the planning department will say they did public consultation for the waterfront policy in the OCP, but then the architects couldn't seem to stay within that, anyway.)

Up 27 Down 2

A great opportunity here on Sep 14, 2016 at 1:25 pm

Let's do something for the people.
The city has a great opportunity here to invite a few different architectural firms to actually compete for the job. Not just cookie-cutter kza design, backroom handshake deal for a few million in fees.
Please CoW & Museum folks do the right thing. Put out an invite. I'm sure you will get a few interested parties. I personally know 3 architects aside from KZA here in town and I think everyone should get a fair go and the design get voted on by the public & the city. That would be a fair, -cough- democratic process.
Mull it over. It's not rocket science.

Up 24 Down 5

A bit off the Mark don't you think on Sep 14, 2016 at 12:42 pm

As an individual who studies design and people of history will tell you this project does not go with Yukon history or culture, which it is supposed to reflect.
Get a local saw mill to supply the material and have it designed in the manner that reflects Yukon history and culture.
It looks like some of the shopping center projects I was involved in built across Canada and into the US.

Up 29 Down 2

Gayle Moffatt on Sep 13, 2016 at 9:23 pm

Not against the zoning but I would rather see a different design.

Up 15 Down 1

Josey Wales on Sep 13, 2016 at 7:01 pm

Hi Thomas...the shortest answer I can offer...no.
Much like a nefarious turnstile jumper in our courts spewing their tale of woe to a judge, the public input is just an illusion of concern...for the public.
This as everything will be steamrolled into our community, and these things used to bug me. Not so much anymore, sure I still have things to say.
But this place, the windbags running it is a write off.
The priorities we carry up here are so backa**wards, bureaucrats breed like bacteria.
The trees and hills keep me here, and soon we regular folks won't even be able to access as the entire territory seems to be given to special interests.
No, Thomas they do not give a s••t what any dissenting subjects have to say, they just must appear too.

Up 23 Down 0

Mark Sanders on Sep 13, 2016 at 5:11 pm

Here is my feedback.

A company does its own thing creates a messy parallel road and then asks for an amendment after the fact. Council then attempts to look professional by discussing the issue and considers an amendment.

The company and most of the people who show disrespect for the city and city bylaws usually get their way. The bylaws are ignored.

Voters will ignore most city councilors during the next election because they have no ethics- that is my feedback.

Up 41 Down 1

Thomas Brewer on Sep 13, 2016 at 3:14 pm

So will City Hall Administration and the muppets on Council actually listen and abide by what the citizenry of Whitehorse want?

That's the real question here since the overwhelming opinion of this plan is negative.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.