Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

PROPOSED SITE – The proposed 16-unit apartment complex for Cook Street would be built in this snow-covered space. Council has rejected the proponent’s bid for relaxed parking requirements for the project.

Council spurns bid for reduced parking rules

The proposal to reduce parking requirements for a 16-unit apartment complex at 410 Cook St. was defeated at city council’s meeting Monday.

By Chuck Tobin on March 23, 2021

The proposal to reduce parking requirements for a 16-unit apartment complex at 410 Cook St. was defeated at city council’s meeting Monday.

Three councillors voted to allow the parking reductions though a zoning amendment and three voted against, resulting in a tie vote.

Mayor Dan Curtis is taking a leave of absence while he runs in the territorial election for the Liberal Party in Whitehorse Centre.

Tie votes mean the proposal before council is defeated.

Asked Monday night what would happen if the request for a parking reduction was defeated, city manager Linda Rapp said the proposal would simply be defeated and would not come back before council.

It wasn’t known Tuesday morning if the project proponent would continue to pursue a development at 410 Cook St. now that their request for a parking reduction has been denied.

The opposing votes were registered by councillors Samson Hartland, Dan Boyd and Laura Cabott.

All three expressed concern that allowing the reduction would have a negative impact on the Cook Street area by creating more on-street parking when parking is already an issue in the downtown core.

Cabott said while on-street parking may not be an issue now, she is concerned about what the future will bring as the development potential in the area is high.

Those in support noted the importance of having more affordable housing available.

If on-street parking were to become a problem, the city always has ways to address the problem, Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu told her colleagues.

Coun. Steve Roddick noted how council has made housing a priority, and when opportunties for more housing come along, those opportunities should be seized.

The project proponent is looking to build a four-storey apartment building with 16 micro-units and two commercial spaces.

The proponent was asking to remove the requirement to provide two visitor parking stalls, to remove the requirement for a loading space and reduce the number of residential parking stalls from eight to seven.

Information provided to council over the last couple of months says the proponent has said they needed the parking reduction to make the project viable.

The city’s development review committee did review the request for a parking reduction and no substantial issues were raised, according to the information provided to council.

The project has also received a grant from the Yukon Housing Corp. that would guarantee at least 10 of the 16 units would be maintained as below- market affordable housing units for the next 20 years.

Of the 15 written submissions to council for the Feb. 22 public hearing, eight were opposed, four were in support and three raised concerns or had general inquiries.

The opposition largely revolved around the issue of parking and how a reduction would create more on-street parking and generally increase traffic congestion.

There were suggestions that the proponent could reduce the number of living units to make it work.

Responses in favour of the reduction were largely in support of having more affordable housing available in the downtown area.

The Cook Street lot is located two lots behind the Chilkoot Inn, where there is currently a big hole in the ground. The single-storey structure that occupied the lot previously was demolished early last year.

Information put before council suggested there is evidence that those with below-average incomes are less likely to own a vehicle.

Council was also informed that a U.S.-wide study has showed that availability of parking is significantly less important for renters of micro-units than for renters of conventional apartments.

Comments (14)

Up 29 Down 0

downtown resident on Mar 24, 2021 at 4:01 pm

The Yukon Housing program provides $50,000 per unit for 'affordable rentals', no matter whether they are 3 bedroom or 'micro' single rooms. The developer is making out like a bandit, receiving half a million bucks for the ten 'affordable rental' units.

Now that the project is supposedly not viable, I guess they won't be building it!
Actually, I'd say the odds are good that they will go right ahead with their project, and that they were just pushing the envelope to see if they could get away with not providing all the parking.

Who were the proponents / owners of the project? I like to know who's getting the funding, and who is asking for exceptions to the rules.

Up 22 Down 0

Lennie on Mar 24, 2021 at 2:22 pm

Thank God for at least 3 common sense Councilors. Three names we have to make sure everyone remembers: HARTLAND; BOYD; & CABOT. You can bet our group will do all we can to ensure they are successful next election. Courteneau et al will be toast. WE NEED THOSE 3 FOR COMMON SENSE THE NEXT TIME THE OFFICIAL COMMUNITY PLAN IS DRAFTED. As for Yukon Housing, they only give money away, and have restricted parking for themselves near their office..

Up 15 Down 0

Max Mack on Mar 24, 2021 at 2:17 pm

Well, knock me over with a feather! Did not see this coming.

Even so, I doubt this is the end of this issue. Colour me skeptical.

Up 1 Down 16

Politico on Mar 24, 2021 at 1:52 pm

Good to see all common sense and the scientific approach to housing thrown out the window in the interest of blind hysteria.

Up 26 Down 2

Anie on Mar 24, 2021 at 1:37 pm

People who live in or near affordable housing deserve the same basic standards as everyone else. Thank you to the 3 councillors who used their common sense.

Up 38 Down 1

jason on Mar 24, 2021 at 10:19 am

Good. I'm so tired of seeing this council bend over for every person that wants to build an apartment here. Hold them to the highest standard your bylaws allow. They'll figure out a way to make it work. If a couple of parking spots are making/breaking your 16 unit apartment project than maybe your project needs a little revise?

Up 3 Down 33

This is upsetting. on Mar 24, 2021 at 6:29 am

As our population grows, so will our need for more affordable housing. It’s upsetting that this boiled down to three parking spaces.
Decisions like this will just perpetuate an environment where Landlord can continue to get away with charging ridiculous rates for substandard conditions.

Council should be embarrassed.

Up 31 Down 1

Gord Bradshaw on Mar 23, 2021 at 8:40 pm

Serious question: I'm curious how a housing project in downtown Whitehorse can only be viable if the parking quota is reduced. Especially if - as I have been told - Yukon Housing is putting money into it.

Up 28 Down 0

Thank you on Mar 23, 2021 at 5:25 pm

Genuinely
Thank you!

Up 19 Down 0

bonanzajoe on Mar 23, 2021 at 5:20 pm

How about the builder apply for underground parking.

Up 55 Down 0

joe on Mar 23, 2021 at 3:53 pm

Good move. Finally positive action from council.

Up 21 Down 22

Matthew on Mar 23, 2021 at 3:49 pm

"Mayor Dan Curtis is taking a leave of absence while he runs in the territorial election for the Liberal Party in Whitehorse Centre"

Come on Dan, how hard is it to attend a meeting for 2 hours once a week!? It really shows who you are and you'll drop anything and everything for a glimmer of something "better"

Up 67 Down 1

yukoner85 on Mar 23, 2021 at 3:46 pm

Thank you Hartland, Boyd and Cabott.
Common sense has prevailed at last.

Up 41 Down 3

My Opinion on Mar 23, 2021 at 2:54 pm

We have to either live by the official Community plan or scrap it completely. As it is right now it is a complete joke every development is applying for some exemption or an other. Mostly parking, trying to maximize profitability on postage stamp lots.

YTG and the City must want Tenements. So produce some big pieces of land and let's build them if that is what you think is best.
I, on the other hand think it is not. It is toooo many rules in every aspect of construction that drives up costs. Land costs being a huge driver.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.