Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pictured Above: DAVE STOCKDALE and ROB FENDRICK

Council members to vote on pay increases

The city's top job may soon get a little more lucrative.

By Stephanie Waddell on July 17, 2012

The city's top job may soon get a little more lucrative.

City councillors indicated Monday night they will vote in favour of raises for the next mayor and council to be elected in October.

It's suggested that the mayor's salary jump from $74,000 plus a monthly vehicle allowance annually to $84,100 with the vehicle allowance included in the salary.

Remuneration for councillors would rise from $18,000 to $19,600 annually.

Per diems for councillors attending meetings where they're representing the city or serving as acting mayor would also rise to $150 for a meeting of four hours or longer, or to $100 for meetings that last between one and four hours.

The rates are currently set at $62.50 for meetings between three and six hours long and $125 for more than six hours.

There is no per diem for events that are fewer than three hours long.

"I'm really happy with this,” said Coun. Dave Stockdale, who was the first council member to address the proposals.

The new rates, he commented, recognize that the work the mayor does is a full-time job.

Prior to each election, city staff bring forward a bylaw to set the new rates for the next city council.

In coming up with the proposed figures, acting city manager Rob Fendrick looked at the Consumer Price Index average increase over the last three years of 1.7 per cent.

Using that figure would have seen the mayor's salary climb to $78,700 annually, but staff also looked at what mayors are making elsewhere.

"Using these calculations, the mayor is comparable to a western cities average of $79,586 but well under the mayoral compensation levels for Yellowknife ($87,700) and Iqaluit ($110,000),” it was noted in Fendrick's report.

As Stockdale said, the new proposal for $84,100 is still below Yellowknife and Iqaluit, but brings the salary up to a level that compensates the mayor for the full-time work.

Meanwhile, in informal discussions with council, Fendrick noted it appeared members wanted an increase for the next group of councillors that would be in line with the CPI, so the hike to $19,600 per year is proposed.

That compares to an average remuneration across western Canada of $22,298 annually.

"Everybody likes a little extra (cash),” Stockdale said.

Councillors appeared to agree Monday night that the remuneration for councillors is a recognition of the work and time they put in.

Coun. Kirk Cameron said he was initially concerned about raising council's pay, but has since been talked into it.

He noted the pay is probably "below the poverty line” for the amount of work required of council, but the remuneration is a statement recognizing the workload to councillors.

As Coun. Betty Irwin commented when she first decided to run for office, she was informed there would be about 20 hours of work each month.

She soon discovered it was 20 or more hours each week.

While anyone running for council signs on for the work and time they spend doing those tasks, it's also nice to be recognized for it, she said.

As Coun. Florence Roberts reaches the end of her time on council (she's not planning to run for another term in October), she noted: "The city has owned me for six years.”

The remuneration, she noted, barely covers the time and expenses that comes with the job.

As Coun. Ranj Pillai pointed out, as a city councillor, it has to be accepted that every time you run an errand or are out anywhere, you'll find yourself talking about city issues.

If you're a councillor with a young family, you'll find there are times when you have to get a babysitter so you can go to city functions. If you have a cell phone, you'll find the job takes its toll on your phone bill, Pillai added.

You'll find, he concluded, the money that comes with being a city councillor gets eaten up pretty quickly by obligations that come with the role.

While he agrees with the increase, Pillai noted he's also prepared for the criticism that may accompany it.

Trying to justify a pay increase is a losing battle with the public, he said. No matter what, there will be a large section of individuals who will comment that the move is "classic,” he said.

Council will vote on the suggested pay increases next week, though the raises wouldn't come into effect until a new council takes office after the Oct. 18 election.

Mayor Bev Buckway, who is not planning to seek a third term as mayor, and Coun. Dave Austin, who has yet to state his intentions for the vote, were absent from Monday's meeting.

Stockdale, who has been a councillor for 29 years, Cameron, Pillai and Irwin have all indicated they will seek another term.

Comments (10)

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Jul 19, 2012 at 12:02 pm

Place the pay raise question on the election ballot; the additional cost will be insignificant. Let the PEOPLE speak!!!

Up 0 Down 0

June Jackson on Jul 18, 2012 at 2:59 pm

This council has demonstrated their entire term that they couldn't care less what the electorate thinks.

They know they are not popular, and it is right in keeping with their prior actions to gouge every last cent they can out of the taxpayer while they still can.

Mike is right.. with what you have not done .. as well as for what you have.. you should be volunteers.. however.. he could have gone one step further and said.. we don't even want you for free.

Mayor and council payraises should have to be approved by the electorate.

Up 0 Down 0

CMZ on Jul 18, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Politicians are supposed to be drawn from the community, reflecting the make-up of the community. 99 percent of us need, we don't just want, to be paid for the work we do.

What do you want, to be governed by the 1 percent who can say the money isn't important? Then Mayor Karp can push forward his cockamamie idea that voting should be based on the amount of property taxes you pay, and won't that be cozy.

Begrudging politicians a reasonable, and probably rudimentary, income -- no matter what you think of their individual performance -- doesn't do anyone any good, especially us, who need good politicians. It's little enough money, even with the raise.

Up 0 Down 0

Denise G on Jul 18, 2012 at 8:47 am

My math skills are not the strongest but I have done my best as I only have so many fingers and toes (lost an arm and a leg to property taxes over the past few years) but these increases represent raises of 13.64% and 8.88% annually. Are you kidding me?

Up 0 Down 0

yukonlinda on Jul 18, 2012 at 8:27 am

If you think about it, who wants to put up with the BS that these people have to put up with for $19,600 a year? Nevermind $18,000. That's probably a good part of the reason that people don't want to run for council, it's a huge time commitment, that's billed as part time, but really is more than that, especially if you do all your reading and homework, when the amount of money that it pays is peanuts.

Up 0 Down 0

I agree on Jul 18, 2012 at 7:27 am

I agree with the pay raise for the mayor. I think that is the only way you will get someone with some education and a brain.

Up 0 Down 0

Blame the 36% who voted... on Jul 18, 2012 at 4:09 am

Yeah, those councillors are making bags of money...$10.41 an hour for a 6 hour meeting. Nothing for less than 3 hours.

For the vitriol and nastiness that comes from people towards those that run in these elections...well, all I can say is it really makes me wanna throw my name in the hat. Who's with me?

That's what I thought

Up 0 Down 0

mike on Jul 17, 2012 at 12:29 pm

Pay raised?? HAHAHA, nice try council. With what you have not done this term, you need to be volunteers

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Jul 17, 2012 at 11:04 am

Seriously? OK now for sure I think there is a staff bong at city hall!

Typically when one is given a raise it is a reward for a job well done, but in this case?

Let me guess they are either AWARE of the fact that each one of them post election will be unemployed, and out of the goodness of their hearts (with OUR cash) they will vote in favour.

I guess many are budgeting for yet another complacent team of voters/non voters to do as they did when these fools got in...and hopefully some will get to feed some more at the trough-O-taxes.

Why even have car allowance, lead by example and take our awesome transit.

Oh yes silly me, buses are for the little people not professional windbags.

Our mayor? please leave sooner than the election...as you are useless and left scars on this town.

Does one need to actually be a Canadian?

City managers need not be from here...why stop at just Yukon...why not just let any "temporary" (too funny) workers do it?

Up 0 Down 0

north_of_60 on Jul 17, 2012 at 7:41 am

Those who vote for a pay raise will not get my vote in October.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.