Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

City planner Mike Ellis

Council considers sweeping Chadburn Lake plan

Coun. Samson Hartland is expressing concern after it became clear Monday night the Kwanlin Dün First Nation (KDFN) is not endorsing the city’s proposed Chadburn Lake Park Management Plan.

By Stephanie Waddell on October 5, 2016

Coun. Samson Hartland is expressing concern after it became clear Monday night the Kwanlin Dün First Nation (KDFN) is not endorsing the city’s proposed Chadburn Lake Park Management Plan.

City planner Mike Ellis brought the plan forward for council’s consideration.

Hartland was quick to bring up the issue of consultation with First Nations governments – the Ta’an Kwach’an Council and Kwanlin Dün First Nation – whose traditional territory is in the city.

While the Ta’an have signed off on the report, the KDFN’s support does not show up in the document that would serve as a guide in managing the 7,550 hectares that would make up the large park space in Riverdale.

A parcel of Kwanlin Dün settlement land is located in the midst of the park with two other KDFN settlement parcels bordering the southern portion of the park.

Though the First Nation doesn’t have its name attached to the plan, both the city and First Nation maintain they continue to have a good working relationship.

Ellis explained at the meeting the Kwanlin Dün had initially been involved in planning, but had a different vision for how to approach the planning.

City manager Christine Smith noted some of the issues were resource-based, with the First Nation interested in more scientific-based studies of the area, for which there just aren’t enough resources.

Both the city and First Nation highlighted the upcoming Oct. 14 forum between the two governments as an example of their good working relationship.

KDFN spokeswoman Marie-Louise Boylan said planning – including the park management plan – is one of several items to be discussed at the forum.

“There’ll be more collaborative talk,” she said, after stressing the two governments have a good working relationship.

With council’s vote on the plan set for next week though, the document could be adopted before the meeting.

As it stands, though, the document has not been adopted yet, Boylan stressed.

Coun. Dan Boyd had suggested the vote be put off until council’s meeting on Oct. 17, following the intergovernmental forum with the First Nation, but could not get the support of council to delay it.

It was suggested by Coun. Rob Fendrick that Boyd could make a motion to defer the vote at next week’s meeting if he wants to pursue the delay further.

Meanwhile, Hartland said he would spend some time this week looking at the First Nation issue before he decides how he will vote on it.

While concerns remain about consultating the KDFN on the plan, the input opportunities offered to the general public were praised Monday night.

Keith Lay, head of Active Trails Whitehorse, addressed the city, congratulating officials on the work done to come up with the extensive plan for the Chadburn Lake area.

“We don’t think anyone can complain (that they did not) have input,” he said.

A total of seven events were hosted with approximately 500 people attending the sessions; 85 filled out surveys and 22 emails on the matter came in to city staff.

A number of changes were made from the initial draft plan to the final document that’s now proposed for adoption.

Among them are more details on fire abatement strategies coming directly from input offered by the territory’s forest management branch; the direction to assess the state of Rotary Cabins in the area which are currently in disrepair, but used by the endangered little brown bats as a roosting site; removal of an initiative that would have seen a paved trail around the Riverdale neighborhood because it is not strongly related to the park and would be expensive; and the possibility of renaming the park.

As Ellis explained on the potential renaming: “Lloyd Chadburn was a Canadian World War II war hero with no specific link to Whitehorse. Renaming parks to a traditional First Nations name is very common across Canada. The lake would retain the name.”

The plan outlines a total of 26 initiatives for the short-term (in the next two years), medium-term (two to five years) and long-term (five to 10 years).

The initiatives range from a dog-owner education program, to working with the Ta’an Kwach’an Council and KDFN to identify and inventory significant cultural sites, traditional sites and stories within the park, to the development of an accessible trail to Hidden Lake #1.

The initiatives fall under five goals including:

• promoting environmental health;

• promoting outdoor recreation;

• supporting community stewardship, education and partnerships;

• improving accountability, planning and management; and

• protecting and promoting cultural and heritage values.

The Chadburn Lake park is the largest of five regional parks that were identified in the city’s 2010 Official Community Plan.

“The park offers a variety of recreational uses, such as paddling, hiking, mountain biking, skiing and wildlife viewing,” Ellis stated in his report.

“It also contains environmentally sensitive areas, significant wildlife areas, and historically significant resources.

“City-wide amenities found in the park include Miles Canyon, Hidden Lakes, Long Lake, Canyon City and many others.”

Comments (15)

Up 7 Down 0

paul on Oct 11, 2016 at 12:28 pm

Holy smokes , that area should be turned into residential.

Up 5 Down 3

Josey Wales on Oct 10, 2016 at 9:49 am

Hi salar, me giving you your number four up...imagine eh?
You know another thing never discussed in the media with the cultural elites? That the health and volume of critters ABSOLUTELY TRUMP the above all others "rights" with seemingly few if any responsibilities.
Our political masters must carry a set and actually use that feature drafted in our revisionist and delusional..."history"

Up 8 Down 6

Salar on Oct 9, 2016 at 10:55 am

I posted already that aboriginal rights trump any silly trail designation or other restrictive rules. Not sure why the news wouldn't print that. Anyhow it will be a tough pill for users like KLay and the gestoppo into the future.

Up 1 Down 2

Josey Wales on Oct 8, 2016 at 11:15 pm

Hey PSG I'm picking up what your putting down.
Your post suggests...Black Nights Matter.

Up 6 Down 8

Mark Sanders on Oct 8, 2016 at 1:31 pm

The City has created 5 new parks.
Chadburn Lake Park is great but in another news article we hear a new rogue trail was built up high and the city then changes bylaws and decides to finish it.

And when Keith brings this issue to councils attention and there is open season on him and his his association. We have lots of trails so let's think hard before creating new ones.

And let's hear the concerns of all groups so we can get something that works. And I also mean the motorized people. Hearing skidoos and trail bikes making as much racket as they can in greenbelts does not sit well with many people. Think about it! Did you buy a nice place to put up with that?

Up 3 Down 3

ProScience Greenie on Oct 7, 2016 at 10:59 pm

Of course astronomy Just Say'in. A nice fall or winter walk, ski or ride on the trail, taking a break to gaze up at the stars and Milky Way above. Nothing beats it. Just say no to light pollution.

Up 8 Down 2

Max Mack on Oct 7, 2016 at 4:31 pm

Well, you've all been suckered. CoW has been eliminating parks spaces all over Whitehorse, while making a big deal of Chadburn Lake.
Loss of green space and green belt protection everywhere else, but we get a "park" in Chadburn Lake. "Infill" development is the new paradigm . . .

The behind-closed-door plan to move the skate park to either Rotary Park or Shipyards Park - to accommodate a French high school in Riverdale - is a perfect example of the ongoing sleight-of-hand.

Based on CoW's recent rezoning of parkland everywhere else, who is to say Chadburn Lake will be safe from development? Meanwhile, all levels of government will cry land poverty when there is almost unlimited land available for development in Yukon.

Up 15 Down 5

Really? on Oct 6, 2016 at 11:07 pm

@Really People?
You're right, we should have a rubber stamp council.
Personally I'm pleased Sampson has half a brain to query kdfn's involvement or the lack of.

Up 12 Down 5

Just Say'in on Oct 6, 2016 at 7:32 pm

Maybe Just Maybe the KDFN does not want non motorized Gestapo on the trails over there.

Up 11 Down 5

Just Say'in on Oct 6, 2016 at 7:30 pm

I am willing to bet that most of the population of Whitehorse was not aware that Motorized Trail use was almost entirely shut down on the East side of the river over the last few years.

They will say that is not true but it is limited to Roads only and the Power line.
Now with the South Highway Trail Planning taking place people better come forward and protect our use, or it will all be gone.

Up 3 Down 2

Just Say'in on Oct 6, 2016 at 7:25 pm

@ PSG. Astronomy???? Say What????

Up 10 Down 5

Really people? on Oct 6, 2016 at 1:09 am

@mark sanders
Your comment reads like those in council talk. Overbearing and nonsensical. Perhaps a reminder that this is municipal politics, and maybe everyone should just calm down. Samson what are you aiming at? I'm starting to think your just a contrarian. Countering anything in hopes your name gets flashed across the newspaper. And frankly, there are way too many people in this town just like that. Maybe it's a side affect of being a sheltered economy .. but we have way too much flourished talk, and almost no substance.

Up 5 Down 2

CJ on Oct 5, 2016 at 8:35 pm

@Mark Sanders

Maybe the city just wanted to table the plan instead of delaying it pending Kwanlin Dun. That could also speak to issues with their consultation, but I don't know. The city wouldn't be the first level of government to find themselves at a crossroads with Kwanlin Dun.

Lately (in the past couple of years) the city does seem to want to push things through, which might have more to do with the planning department's personality. On the other hand, people seem to like this Chadburn Lake plan, so maybe by and large most are fine with seeing it progress to the next stage.

Up 11 Down 2

ProScience Greenie on Oct 5, 2016 at 4:14 pm

Somewhere in the list of 5 goals there should be more prominent mention of promoting science - biology, geology, astronomy and such. They also need to include in the plan ways to curb the city's growing light pollution so people using this park are able to see the treasures of the night sky.

Up 19 Down 9

Mark Sanders on Oct 5, 2016 at 4:05 pm

It seems highly unusual that the KDFN is not prepared to be a partner in this park. They may develop their land for housing. To have a housing development surrounded by parkland should be a blessing and a money maker.

Would like to know more about why they are not on board and what scientific-based studies of the area they envision being conducted.

The city is very good at not really consulting with groups - could this be part of the issue? Potentially motorizing the Rotary Centennial Bridge was not discussed with the Rotary Clubs or the many other partners and the East Yukon River Trail Plan was passed by council before it was discussed with first nation governments.

As a city resident and tax payer I want better city consultation with First Nations. This park plan should not be passed until the city has exhausted all avenues of getting KDFN support. Also, let's put the detailed scientific studies on the table. What is the concern and how much funding is needed for these studies. Based upon my experience with the KDFN they may have compelling reasons for wanting these studies; lets explore this further because these studies will likely be of benefit to the new park.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.