Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

SETTING THE FISCAL DIRECTION – Mayor Dan Curtis reads his 2019 budget speech during Monday’s city council meeting.

Council asked to approve 2.3-per-cent tax boost

Local property owners can expect a 2.3-per-cent hike in their city tax bills next year if council approves the new operating budget as proposed.

By Stephanie Waddell on December 11, 2018

Local property owners can expect a 2.3-per-cent hike in their city tax bills next year if council approves the new operating budget as proposed.

Council unveiled its $81-million operating budget at its meeting Monday evening, along with passing first reading of the spending plan.

Along with the proposed increase to property taxes, residents would also pay an additional 2.76 per cent – going up to $84.41 per month from the current $82.14 – on their water and sewer bills.

They would also fork over an extra 12.8 per cent – an increase to $12.47 from the current $11.05 per month – for garbage collection.

That means anyone on the city’s water and sewer system and waste collection would pay $96.88 per month for city utilities.

The tax hike would see the average home owner pay an additional $69 next year over 2018.

The average residential tax bill would rise from $2,405 to $2,474.

Recreational fees such as passes to the Canada Games Centre, rentals and such would go up 1.5 per cent in September, as they do every year.

Along with the spending plan for 2019, there are provisional plans for 2020 and 2021 that would also see taxes rise by 2.3 per cent each of those years.

As Mayor Dan Curtis outlined in his five-page budget address Monday: “About half the operating budget is funded through taxes and the rest comes from fees and government grants, which can present challenges as a municipal government tries to keep taxes predictable for all citizens.

“Though tax increases are not usually welcome, it is a necessary action in order to cover the essential services for our growing community.”

Curtis noted the operating budget covers the services needed to keep the city running day-to-day: transit, road maintenance, snow removal, recreation programs and more.

“It ensures the City of Whitehorse always has enough lifeguards, accountants, engineers, planners, firefighters, bylaw officers and many other employees to deliver the city’s programs and services,” he said.

The mayor went on to highlight the city’s work to make greater use of technology to improve service and find efficiencies.

“The addition of a development officer leadhand position in the land and building services department will provide efficiencies to the existing permit application and enforcement processes, which have seen a significant increase in recent years,” Curtis said.

“This position will also be tasked with reviewing and implementing efficiency changes involving technology, and that integrates into a city-wide document management system.”

A utility stations leadhand will also be hired to help deal with the expansion in utility demands that have come with the city’s growth in recent years.

The provisional budget for 2020 also includes funding for a technological implementation co-ordinator that year. The person hired in that role would upgrade the city’s systems for effectiveness and allow residents more transactions online.

“Our citizens remain our number one focus, and we are making the best possible use of limited tax dollars,” Curtis said. “We are working hard to keep taxes low and maintaining top-quality services.”

Utility services are not funded through taxes, he pointed out, but rather through the fees.

After outlining the proposed utility hikes, Curtis pointed to the need to keep pace with additional costs of operating the water and sewer system and of the increase to waste collection. Dealing with waste costs money, he noted.

“Waste generation has gone up 53 per cent since 2000,” he said.

“That means the sheer volume of waste needing to be professionally handled has increased significantly. The city does not control what people consume and thus, must constantly adapt to the waste that comes into the waste management facility.

“The city is doing its best to divert waste in order to save precious landfill space and protect the environment, but diversion costs money too.”

While the city is creating quality compost, that focus on quality has meant significant and capital improvements at the city’s facility.

The mayor then went on to address recreation, noting the city’s pride in supporting the National Aboriginal Hockey Tournament that will be played here next year.

It’s expected to bring 600 participants over eight days along with 300 of their family members and 20 VIPs.

“This event will have significant economic and tourism impact on the community,” the mayor said.

Those who like to get out on their skateboards, scooters and BMX bikes are also set to benefit from the city’s operating budget, Curtis pointed out.

He highlighted the city’s commitment to take on the operations and maintenance of the improved skateboard park being designed and built by the Yukon government next year.

“Given the popularity and importance of the Second Haven skate park in Riverdale, we strongly believe it will be a wonderful improvement for our local skateboard, scooter and BMX riders,” he said.

Non-profits will also benefit from the spending plan, with grant funding budgeted at more than $1 million annually.

“With your tax dollars, our city will continue to deliver top-quality services and programs to all residents and visitors alike,” Curtis said.

“This includes snow-clearing, road maintenance, fire protection and first response, transit, park and trail maintenance, recreation programs and a number of other important regulatory services.

“Quality municipal services are a significant contribution to what makes Whitehorse an ideal place for citizens and businesses to thrive, and visitors to enjoy in our Wilderness City.”

He then went on to thank city staff “for delivering an outstanding level of service to our community.”

Full budget documents are available on the city’s website (www.whitehorse.ca).

Residents will have a chance to tell council their thoughts on the spending plan at a public input session set for council’s Jan. 14 meeting.

A report on the input council receives will come forward to council a week later. It’s anticipated council will then vote on second and third readings at its Jan. 28 meeting.

Along with passing first reading of the 2019 operating budget, council passed third reading, thus adopting, the 2019 capital budget worth up to $23 million.

Nearly $15 million of that, however will have to be approved through other government sources such as the federal gasoline tax.

See coverage of capital budget discussion in Wednesday’s Star.

Comments (25)

Up 0 Down 0

jason on Dec 17, 2018 at 10:30 pm

I dunno, I agree that the City could look at efficiencies, but I'd have to believe that they are doing that already. I just think that modest increases are better than one massive increase every 5 years ... And yes I get that it's just the mill rate which is applied to the assessment, however, I believe the City usually adjusts for that figure when the new assessments come out.

The City does a reasonably good job of managing things in my estimation. My contribution to having a City with all the stuff I enjoy seems like pretty decent value. Whitehorse has also added like 6000 people in the last ten years and growth costs a lot of money upfront. That's why the City is always on about densification and infill (which people ironically don't support either) to keep operations as efficient as possible.

Anyways, there'll always be people who complain about paying taxes and fair enough. I kinda feel like the $1,000 I give the City every year gets me a lot better value than the $25,000 I pay the Federal government, but that's just me.

Up 10 Down 0

@Max Mack on Dec 17, 2018 at 2:34 pm

We did have a yellow revolution, it's called an election. Not much changed did it!

Up 18 Down 1

DMZ on Dec 15, 2018 at 10:59 am

There's a higher level of acceptance here than usual, for what I think is a higher property tax hike than they've tried for awhile. I can see that property taxes are lower than other cities, but when you add in user fees, it might be a different story. I'm also surprised that there's not more pushback from council members, including Samson Hartland and Dan Boyd, who wouldn't have let this go unremarked in their last term.

I don't know if they can brag about snowplowing so much. It seems to take a long time to get to some streets over the winter. For a northern city they sure complain about snowplowing a lot.

The landfill stuff gets to me the most. What does Dan Curtis mean, costs have gone up 53 percent? Compared to what? Is he factoring in the increased population? And isn't it strange that the costs rose so much with the composting program, which is supposedly a conservation measure?

Then when residents ask for bearproof bins, which should have been a no-brainer when the program was conceived, "oh, that costs too much". Complaining about having to provide essential services, while they gloat about their pet projects -- it's grating.

Giving those poorly conceived subsidies to developers is salt in the wound.

Up 16 Down 1

My Opinion on Dec 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm

@Jason
There are two things at play here. The tax rate goes up by 2.3% however that is just a multiplier for your assessed value as established by YTG. So as property values increase the taxes go up by much more than that. City and YTG are co conspirators as they both blame each other.

Up 13 Down 6

atom on Dec 14, 2018 at 1:54 pm

@yukoner...if they did actually plow snow or enforce anything (parking being the exception but they make millions off that) I guess folks wouldn't mind paying.

Up 19 Down 4

What if.. on Dec 14, 2018 at 8:51 am

What is the consequence for not paying taxes? I imagine if you can get away with murder here, a consequence for not paying taxes can't be that severe.

Up 27 Down 3

Max Mack on Dec 13, 2018 at 10:30 pm

“Waste generation has gone up 53 per cent since 2000,”
What does that even mean? How does Mayor Dan and his merry den count waste generation? By volume? By area? By weight? By revenue generated at the gate? By guessing?

Does Mayor Dan include compost? Recycled goods? Construction waste (e.g. FH Collins)? Does he account for the waste being trucked to our landfill from other Yukon communities - something that increases 'waste generation' but has zero to do with Whitehorse property owners? Does Dan factor in population growth?

Mayor Dan's attempt to make residents feel guilty is pathetic. This town has been on a tear with recycling, which is costing many millions of dollars - not counting the many millions more that would be added to the bill if we added in lost opportunity costs - while services to residents at the dump and at the curbside have seen round after round of decreases - and we are being told to pay more yet again.

Mayor Dan is giving subsidies to property developers to tear down buildings and create new gleaming edifices, which creates all kinds of construction waste, and he wants to blame you and me for his waste-generating policies.

We get it, Dan. Perhaps Whitehorse needs its own Yellow Vest protests?

Up 12 Down 20

Yukoner on Dec 13, 2018 at 10:01 pm

Unbelievable. All of the comments here screaming bloody murder for such a small tax increase. Newsflash folks, you are basically living in a wonderland in Whitehorse. If you have lived in any other city south of us, you would realize how good we have it up here! The entitlement here is mindblowing. Everyone wants their streets plowed and bylaws enforced but no one wants to pay for it. Costs will go up every year so there needs to be small tax increases to cover it. For anyone who thinks otherwise, step up to the plate and declare which services you currently use that you would like to see cut. It's easy to say 'cut all the services that don't benefit me personally'.

Up 10 Down 0

Willard on Dec 13, 2018 at 5:29 pm

Just as a matter of interest Yellowknife has passed a property tax of 1.44% for 2019.

Up 10 Down 6

David on Dec 12, 2018 at 6:34 pm

@Karl
"Property tax" is just a name. If you think about it, your "property taxes" are the only taxes you ever pay to the city, so essentially this is the tax you pay to live in the city. Call it what you want, it is the city tax. It goes to pay for all the city amenities including snow removal and road works. Every property uses the same amount of city services, no matter how much the house on said property is worth.

Up 9 Down 2

Andreas Pohle on Dec 12, 2018 at 5:07 pm

Waste generation has actually gone up by more than 100% since 1896.

Up 49 Down 2

I just wish they would look at ways to reduce costs for once on Dec 12, 2018 at 4:45 pm

I understand property taxes, and I may grumble a bit but they are a necessary evil. The complaint I have is that this administration seems to NEVER look at ways of reducing costs. The assumption is always that costs have to increase and taxes will pay for the increases. No efficiencies? No redundant positions? No vacancies that can be done away with?

Up 16 Down 6

Karl on Dec 12, 2018 at 4:16 pm

David doesn't get what the word "property" in property tax means I guess.

Up 9 Down 26

Jason on Dec 12, 2018 at 2:15 pm

The problem with zero tax increases (which seems to be what people are up in arms about) is that costs go up every year and if you don't raise taxes a little bit then you have a situation where you need to do a massive increase. Taxes suck but it's necessary to provide the services to residents .... I actually like the idea of municipal taxes being collected as a share of income taxes, not sure why that isn't a thing?

Up 28 Down 4

And for a bit more on Dec 12, 2018 at 1:11 pm

"In other breaking news local businesses charge 5% more on everything (Tim horton's is taking a nickel more per cup of coffee)" If you haven't figured it out yet, let me know when you do.

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Up 13 Down 21

David on Dec 12, 2018 at 12:40 pm

On a slightly different, but similar topic - does anyone else feel that calculating our city taxes based on our perceived property value doesn't make sense? Other that sewer and water and garbage the only city taxes we pay is property taxes, so essentially this is our general city taxes. Why is how much tax we pay to the city based on how much our house and property is worth? Why not base it on how much our car is worth, would that make any less sense? As an example, say there are two houses on a street, house #1 is owned by a couple who's combined income is $160k, while house #2 is owned by one single person who's income is $80k. Say both houses are worth the same, $500k, each houses's property taxes will be about $3k per year. This means that the couple in house #1 will each pay $1.5k in city taxes per year while the single person in house #2 will pay $3k. Why should the person in house #2 have to pay twice the city taxes as each of the people in house #1? It should be based on our income. We already file all our income reports for the federal taxes so it wouldn't be hard to use that same information to calculate our city taxes. Another benefit to this change is that we wouldn't have to pay for property assessors to assess every house in the city every couple years!

Up 35 Down 3

North_of_60 on Dec 12, 2018 at 11:28 am

'Waste generation has gone up 53 per cent since 2000' Mayor Curtis said, while conveniently ignoring the fact that the vast majority of waste is commercial not residential. The local construction industry is especially wasteful and citizens are not allowed to salvage that useful material.
Look at how much demolition, clean-up, and new construction has happened in the past 18 years, such as FH Collins, and Wasteland Bend, and it's easy to see where the additional waste comes from.
In a typical Lieberal deflection Mayor Curtis is trying to guilt-trip Whitehorse taxpayers into swallowing the tax increases by making it look like they're throwing out more garbage.

Up 36 Down 1

Concerning on Dec 11, 2018 at 11:42 pm

If/when this is approved, because it probably will be, the mayor better damn well put some focus into crime prevention and safety in our neighbourhoods. There has been so much talk about neighbourhood watches, or even vigilante justice. Something HAS to be done if they are raising the price of our properties, which continue to be vandalized or leaving us victims to theft.

I think we all saw this coming when the city decided to build that new building off of range road/2 mile. Are we stuck paying for your costly mistakes, Mr. Mayor?

Up 13 Down 27

ralpH on Dec 11, 2018 at 9:00 pm

Come on it is only 2.3 percent and only happens once a year. Pony up for the boys. LOL

Up 33 Down 1

Charles on Dec 11, 2018 at 6:40 pm

WOW, what a surprise here. I bet nobody saw that one coming.
Did they not give themselves a Pay raise not to long ago? Good timing too, to announce it just before Christmas, when so many families have a hard time to put a present or two under the tree if they can afford one. They sure make it easy to (I say it nicely) not to like them.

Up 6 Down 35

Rural Resident on Dec 11, 2018 at 5:32 pm

We live in a great city so tax increases are expected and a 5% a year increase each year seems reasonable.

There could be improvements in traffic congestion and basic traffic infractions, the poor condition of our streets, the drug and alcohol problems which are very apparent, the noise from ORV use that goes unchecked, and the violence which is not far beneath the facade of our cosmopolitan city.

But tax increases are very low because of all the positive things we have which I cannot remember in the flash of the moment.

Up 60 Down 8

Lost In the Yukon on Dec 11, 2018 at 4:09 pm

Bullshite ... I hope the fiscal conservatives on council will reject this ... Once again Senior's on fixed incomes get to pay for the high salary King Dan engineered for himself.

Up 45 Down 4

Barty on Dec 11, 2018 at 4:02 pm

The city will find efficiencies with these lead hand positions. Bwahahaha, what have they been doing in the past? Follow em around for a bit and you'll see efficiencies.
Compost costs money to produce says your Worship. Tell me one other business producing something where they get their material for free and can't make a profit.
Waste is up 53% since 2000. I question the veracity of this statement considering all the recycling that has been going on at all levels and our pop hasn't increased by that same amount. We are being fleeced for all dump services.

Up 47 Down 7

Hugh Mungus on Dec 11, 2018 at 3:21 pm

No.

Up 56 Down 5

Charlie's Aunt on Dec 11, 2018 at 3:07 pm

Well now, isn't this a surprise? 'Waste generation has gone up 53 per cent since 2000' Was this another surprise? More subdivisions, more residents = more garbage, did no-one think of that? Those areas also mean more taxes and utility fees are collected. I doubt the residents of newer subdivisions are chucking out more per head than anyone else so what's Dan saying? Is he inferring that we are all throwing out more when most of us are recycling more than we did 8 years ago?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.