Cost to reclaim road cannot be known until spring
The Yukon government wants to reclaim an illegal, 17-kilometre road built near Carmacks in 2016 by a placer miner without authorization.
The Yukon government wants to reclaim an illegal, 17-kilometre road built near Carmacks in 2016 by a placer miner without authorization.
In its project proposal submitted to the Yukon Environmental an Socio-economic Assessment Board, the government is planning to begin the work this summer.
Communications analyst Sue Thomas of the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources (EMR) said Wednesday a cost estimate is not available. “They have to wait for the snow to melt before they can assess the work that is required,” she said.
It was also not clear today whether the government will attempt to recover any of the costs from Nicholai Goeppel and H. Coyne and Sons, the two parties who pleaded guilty in November 2017 to building the road without authorization.
Brigitte Parker, EMR’s acting director of communications, said this morning the government has not decided whether it will attempt to recover any or all of the costs of reclamation from the two parties.
It’s reviewing the options, she said.
The reclamation proposal indicates the work will be done using only light equipment and crews with hand tools.
The deadline for making submissions to the assessment board regarding the reclamation proposal is April 9.
Goeppel and Coyne & Sons pleaded guilty last November to: using a bulldozer to build the road without authorization; using equipment heavier than five tonnes to do the work; and levelling and clearing a trail wider than the 1.5 metres allowed under low-level exploration activity.
Evidence before the court indicated Goeppel had registered a placer mining lease along McGregor Creek, located off the North Klondike Highway between Carmacks and Pelly Crossing. Coyne & Sons was involved in building the road.
The placer lease did not provide authorization for the road.
The road, in any case, went well beyond the eight-kilometre width of the lease, evidence showed.
Goeppel and Coyne & Sons were each fined $1,200 for the three offences they each pleaded guilty to.
The government is proposing to use the vegetative mat and other surface material pushed into windrows along the side of the 17-kilometre route for the reclamation project.
There is also a need for stabilization work at four stream crossings where natural willow shoots will be planted to stabilize creek banks and re-establish the riparian area along the creek, says the proposal. It also notes there are matters of exposed permafrost to address.
“EMR will hire a professional environmental consultant with expertise in reclamation and permafrost,” reads the government’s submission to the assessment board.
“The consultant will undertake a site assessment when weather and access is favourable, to assess local site conditions including: soil type, soil temperature, exposure, precipitation, surrounding vegetation, stability of permafrost and then develop a mitigation plan to restore the crossings and access trail.”
The project proposal suggests the reclamation work will “encourage natural revegetation.”
“Land Management Branch has received various complaints about the unauthorized road and requests for its reclamation from Little Salmon/Carmacks First Nation and Selkirk First Nation,” says the proposal.
The government has put up a sign at the head of the road indicating access is prohibited.
During submissions on sentencing last December, the territorial prosecutor told the court that since the road was built, 250 mineral claims have been staked beyond the end of the road, including claims staked by Goeppel and Coyne & Sons.
Comments (14)
Up 0 Down 0
GoGreen on Apr 6, 2018 at 6:22 pm
This headline seems pretty hilarious. Obviously you don’t know the costs until spring. It’s almost funny to put on an application to reclaim something if the initiator probably hasn’t even been out there. Seems like someone was in a hurry to make a big stink about this again. Why not wait until snow is gone, let spring catch up, have a look at it and then see if it’s even necessary. I guess some people have just too much fun dragging other people’s names through the dirt again and again. Everybody else must be super perfect and have never made any mistakes in their lives.
Rock on like that Yukon...
Up 1 Down 0
Robert Scott on Apr 5, 2018 at 2:06 pm
Why are the companies responsible not forced to mitigate their damage? If the road truly is illegal, why not force them to fix it or pay for remediation? If the laws are not correct or the government department erred, then the cost for remediation should come directly from that departments operations/capital budgets. Yukon taxpayers should not be on the hook for this.
Up 0 Down 1
Alan Boomer on Apr 4, 2018 at 5:40 pm
This road is a high issue to First Nations.
Who decided miners can pretty much do what they want? I certainly did not.
Up 3 Down 0
Yukon Watchdog on Apr 3, 2018 at 5:25 pm
OMG. What next? Can we please spend some of my hard-earned tax dollars on something really needed and that assists the masses as opposed to only a few? Can we please get tough with these entitled idiots who think they can do whatever they want just because they're out in the bush? Do the big ditch at the beginning of the road. Just like windows won't keep thieves out, they do deter some of them. Can we please just let nature take care of its own? Who dreams up this sh**?
Up 8 Down 0
Groucho d'North on Apr 2, 2018 at 9:23 am
What? Willow brush can be killed? Not in my backyard.
Up 3 Down 5
Woodcutter on Apr 1, 2018 at 11:04 pm
a mini excavator with a grapple bucket can clear this mess in no time. just blocking the road at its start will only restrict those with low motivation.
with permafrost exposed there will be ongoing changes to the topography that will cause erosion, perhaps into the creek
time to put the screws to those that made this mess, send z clear message to others who might think of doing this
Up 5 Down 2
Vlad Petrlak on Mar 31, 2018 at 12:14 pm
Why not to upgrade it into some acceptable standard, so people would have access further than onto the shoulder of Alaska highway or Klondike highway. That so called reclamation seems to be a silly idea, however what else is there to expect.
Up 12 Down 2
ProScience Greenie on Mar 30, 2018 at 10:08 am
No need to spend any tax dollars feeding consultants or waste energy (read unwanted C02 emissions) on this. Put some big boulders and a deep trench at the start of the road and let mother nature reclaim it all on her own. In a couple of years it will be too full of willows to be accessible.
Speaking of consultants, odd that with so many qualified people working at EMR and Environment that they would hire a consultant for a task as simple as closing out a bush road. That wasteful mentality has to end.
Up 11 Down 3
YXY on Mar 30, 2018 at 7:21 am
"......where natural willow shoots will be planted to stabilize creek."
Hold on a second. Willows will be planted? We are going to be paying for a company to go out and plant willows? Along a stream? In The Yukon.
I'd bet the Willows and Alder are already growing thick as YG employees at Baked cafe at the crossings and on the road.
Fly over the Nansen/Freegold areas, there are old cat trails everywhere. The guilty were fined, leave it at that.
Up 5 Down 1
Alan Boomer on Mar 29, 2018 at 11:52 pm
They should contact the city of Whitehorse which is always talking about restoring illegal trails made ATVs and trucks.
Have not seen any restoration work so it seems to be all talk because the city never seems to undertake the work they so eagerly talk about.
Sorry, caught myself thinking out loud without separating perception from fact.
Up 10 Down 1
north-of-60 on Mar 29, 2018 at 7:04 pm
Make the first km impassable with a deep ditch across the road, plus large rocks and debris on the roadway, then fell trees across the road at 100m intervals or less. Just make the road impassable to additional use and nature will reclaim it.
Up 8 Down 2
BnR on Mar 29, 2018 at 5:43 pm
So they'll spend the cash to reclaim a 17km cat trail, but won't do anything about illegal outfitter cabins.......
Go Libs.........
#notfittogovern
Up 8 Down 2
Nile Nukon on Mar 29, 2018 at 3:50 pm
What would it hurt to leave it? Save some tax dollars.
Up 6 Down 6
like reallY on Mar 29, 2018 at 3:48 pm
Just send them the bill or sooo many more roads, trails and illegal cabins will show up in the bush as it only costs about a grand in fines....pathetic...#nospine