Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

John McConnell

Company envisions a producing mine by 2015

The Eagle Gold Mine project proposed by the Victoria Gold Corp. should be permitted to proceed at Dublin Gulch northeast of Mayo, YESAB is recommending.

By Chuck Tobin on February 20, 2013

The Eagle Gold Mine project proposed by the Victoria Gold Corp. should be permitted to proceed at Dublin Gulch northeast of Mayo, YESAB is recommending.

The recommendation was released Tuesday, a little more than two years after the company filed its application for an assessment by the executive committee of the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board.

Under legislation, the Yukon government has 30 days to review the recommendation and make a decision whether to issue a Quartz Mining Licence.

Victoria Gold, however, is already planning for site preparation this spring, company vice-president John McConnell explained this morning.

"We are gearing up right now,” he said. The target, he added, is still to be in production by the summer of 2015.

McConnell pointed out Victoria Gold has put out a request for proposals for the large earth-moving contract required for the open-pit operation.

"A number of contractors are visiting the site this week, and I would hope to have their proposals by the end of February,” McConnell said.

It's a mix of different companies which are looking at the job, from locals like Pelly Construction to larger national contractors like the Ledcor Group, he said.

A joint venture company involving the Nacho Nyak Dun Development Corp. and a company out of Yellowknife are also visiting the site, he added.

McConnell said he expects to bring in some heavy equipment next month ahead of the spring thaw and begin moving dirt in May.

The company, he said, is already permitted to do a lot of work that does not require its Quartz Mining Licence, though he does not expect any issue with the licence.

McConnell said the assessment board's recommendation is quite favourable, so Victoria Gold doesn't see any problems with either the mining licence or water licence.

"Our team did a good job, and YESAB did a good job as well,” he said. "It is a very thorough environmental assessment.”

The Eagle Gold project currently calls for a 10-year mine life, using a cyanide heap leach process to remove the gold from the ore.

Employment during construction is expected to peak next year at between 150 to 200 people on site on any given time, McConnell said.

During production, he added, it's estimated there will be 400 on the payroll, with 250 at the site on any given day.

Victoria Gold has already signed off on a benefits agreement with the First Nation of Nacho Nyak Dun.

YESAB's assessment produced 123 recommendations dealing mostly with the protection of the environment, safety procedures around the use of cyanide, emergency response planning and the requirement for the closure and reclamation of the site.

But the 336-page document also addressed concerns about the potential impact on the community of Mayo and its 450 residents, additional highway traffic along the Silver Trail and the heavier demand on the electrical grid.

"I appreciated the quality of work prepared by the proponent and their consultants, the involvement of the Nacho Nyak Dun, the community of Mayo, and our cyanide and water consultants,” Ken McKinnon, a member of the assessment board's executive committee, said in a statement accompanying Tuesday's recommendation.

"It is a fine example of how the assessment process should work.”

McConnell said the company is in discussions with the banks to raise the required $430 million in capital financing.

The banks have already had an independent engineering company confirm Victoria Gold's feasibility study.

"Now we have a bankable feasibility study,” McConnell said.

"We are working with the banks now in terms of discussing debt financing, and we would hope to be in a position to make an announcement in the second quarter of this year.”

The vice-president acknowledged it's a tough time to raise financing for mining projects, though he said a mentor of his once told him good projects will always secure financing.

"This is a good project,” he said.

McConnell said he expects employment at the site will top out at between 100 and 150 workers this summer.

"Next year will be our big year,” he said. "We will be a little slow getting started this year.

"But next year will be the big year when we start pouring concrete, putting in the foundations and bringing in the crushers and that sort of thing.”

Comments (10)

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Feb 27, 2013 at 6:30 am

You gotta keep this cyclic consumption cycle going. Everyone loves those new gizmos, appliances and smartphones. The crap has to come from somewhere and apparently no one practices what verbal crap they spew.

Its the only system we know and it died 35 years ago yet we love to repeat it endlessy. So mine it, the yuppie, the care bears, miners and the CEO's will be all in the same line when the new iphone comes out. GET IT?

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Feb 26, 2013 at 7:05 am

Thanks Joel. We need mature and respectful discussion on the costs and net benefits to the Yukon of mining industry and your post and link helps with that.

Up 0 Down 0

Atom on Feb 26, 2013 at 5:57 am

Wow Joel....can you say polyanna?

There is no arguable benefit to Yukon. Yukon Party is a puppet for Ottawa. Harper is using our resources (Canada's) to leverage economic growth internationally....a sad approach when you consider natural resources are finite....and if we want our big transfer dollars we had better sell out our "Pristine Yukon" environment to help the cause.

Up 0 Down 0

Joel on Feb 26, 2013 at 3:46 am

Royalty rates for mines were updated in 2010 for all hard rock mines. It is the placer mines that are still on the old system which pays basically nothing.

http://www.emr.gov.yk.ca/mining/pdf/Royalty_guidelines.pdf

They also pay their fair share for power rates and also normally pay for the infrastructure to get the power to their site. If you want to create a system where Yukon Energy can deny a user access to power, then you would also have alot of residences or other businesses that could be denied power as well. Or maybe a special extra high power rate for businesses to fund a decrease in residential rates...I think a few businesses would have issue with that. It is a double edged sword.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Feb 25, 2013 at 8:01 am

PS - my references for their profit expectations: http://www.vitgoldcorp.com/s/home.asp

They say the costs will be $600 an ounce, and the expected production will be 200,000 ounces per year.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Feb 25, 2013 at 7:58 am

From the victoria gold website speaking of this Eagle Gold Mine, "producing +200,000 ounces of gold annually at an operation cost of less than $600 per ounce."

They expect PROFITS of $200 MILLION a year! All of this coming from resources belonging to the Yukon. What does the Yukon get for this?

'Costs' will amount to $120 million a year, all covered paid for by our own gold resources. This includes royalties and wages. Who will be paid the wages? Will they be Yukon residents? If they are counting on 400 employees at most, at an expense to the company of possibly $100,000 each including housing and transportation and benefits, that consumes 40 million. Where does the other 80 million go? Maybe to executive wages and equipment and so on, but how much exactly stays in the Yukon?

Tell me, why can't they pay for their own electrical lines and why are Yukon rate payers subsidizing them?

These mines should be paying for everything, including their YESAB reviews and the time of our government workers who have to oversee the project.

The Yukon has to move past simply assisting people to come up here and remove our assets. Once the minerals are gone, these companies will be gone as well and we'll be stuck with the mess. I do not believe the pay offs to the Yukon's economy are near what they could be if this industry were managed to maximize the benefits to the Yukon. And I am concerned about our ecology very much as well.

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Feb 25, 2013 at 7:46 am

How many Yukon residents, and Yukon tax payers are going to be on this payroll of 400 personel? How many of the 150 to 200 construction workers expected there this summer will be Yukon residents? I talked to a person who lives in Mayo who said the workers there right now are flown in and never even see Mayo, let alone the rest of the Yukon. They are not Yukoners. Is this true? Can we have a story on just how much of the profits from our resources stays in the Yukon, either through wages paid to Yukon workers or through royalties to the government? Then compare this to the cost of our YESAB boards and all the environmental reviews and damage, and all the government departments that support and monitor this mining project and others like it, and of course the fact that Yukon Electric rate payers have our rates going up to subsidize the mining industry, who pay LESS than we do per kwh of electricity, who have multi-million dollar lines put in at our expense even though they are FOR PROFIT and they often go out of business after a couple of years, let alone this one is only planning to be IN business for 10 years. Is it economic to be paying for their electricity access? If a Yukon home owner wants electricity, he or she has to pay for her own line to come in from wherever the closest spot is! Not the mines apparently.

Up 0 Down 0

fed up yukoner on Feb 23, 2013 at 3:47 am

I agree with Yukonertoo, these mines may be good for the image of the Yukon's bottom line and for some workers, meanwhile the rest of us pay thru the nose as we subsidize mines that barely pay any royalties unless they are on settlement land. I like to see mines but they better start paying their own way, YP is paying mines to operate in the Yukon!!

Up 0 Down 0

Jackie Ward on Feb 22, 2013 at 11:30 am

What scares me is the method being used for extraction. It's the cheapest route. So this is a question to all you big university taught minds. What about the fish? What about the ground water? What happens when metal prices go down again? You think that a mine who hasn't even started, is already pursuing the cheapest extraction method available is going to care if there is a spill? What happens when there is accident? What happens if the acid in the trucks gets in an accident coming to the mine? The majority of people can't see past their front noses today. Hey, by the time something probably might happen you will be in another cushy job and it will be someone else's problem right? Just as long as you get a cheque right? Who cares about thinking today, for our children's future tomorrow. Just gimmie gimme gimme right now. What even makes me sadder is this mine getting the green light. Just because you made "recommendations" does not mean the mine will follow it. I actually hope something goes wrong with this mine. Then and only then people might wake up and realize how stupid we really are. Faro? Oh sorry, I guess I'm wrong about that one. May God have mercy on all your souls for destroying his beautiful creation. And the same goes for the ones who turn a blind eye to it.

Up 0 Down 0

Yukonertoo on Feb 20, 2013 at 10:41 pm

Congrats to Eagle Gold. Given that OUR electrical generation capacity is finite, and it appears that Eagle wants to use our power, we must ensure that the shareholders of Yukon Energy profit from the supply of our power. At the very least, Yukon Energy should charge twice the residential rate for the power they sell to Eagle and other mining projects. It is about time that Yukon Energy look after its shareholders. Mr. Morrison, the CEO of Yukon Energy, is reported to have insisted that we must supply power to this and other mines. If that is the case, Yukoners deserve to have their power consumption subsidized by miners rather than the current subsidization of mining corporations by residential customers.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.