Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pauline Frost

Community YG workers will see rent increases

A rent hike will hit workers living in Yukon government housing across communities starting in October, adding up to $13 on top of their rent each month.

By Palak Mangat on May 31, 2019

A rent hike will hit workers living in Yukon government housing across communities starting in October, adding up to $13 on top of their rent each month.

That’s thanks to changes YG is making to its Employee Housing Policy, rules that date back 25 years.

The changes apply to housing “in rural Yukon communities for Yukon government employees where there is little or no rental market available,” Sarah Murray of the Yukon Housing Corp. (YHC) said Thursday afternoon.

An estimated 170 units will be impacted, she told the Star.

The number of individuals within those units can vary among singles, couples and a family – much like the options which may see two-bedroom or five-bedroom units.

Currently, Murray explained the average monthly rent a tenant pays ranges between $450 and $600, depending on the community and type of unit.

An approved increase of 2.2 per cent annually on top of that $600 would make the monthly rent $613. In short, that would mean workers would have to fork over $156 more each year for their housing.

The policy, available online, also notes that the YHC will set and charge market-based rents for the units.

“We know there’s a limited amount of government-owned housing in communities,” Murray said.

“We want to make that available for people who are coming in new to communities who may not have connections, who really need the support to find housing.”

Pauline Frost, the minister responsible for the YHC, noted in a release the rules “will help ensure that government-owned housing is not in competition with private rental housing.”

That private rental housing market is, by the YHC’s own admission, varied throughout communities like Watson Lake, Dawson City and Haines Junction.

“What’s happening right now, if you’re paying between $450 and $600 a month in rent, that is less than the private market,” Murray said, meaning going with the YHC would be cheaper.

“What our rent increase is designed to do is make sure that YG-owned housing is not in competition ... so underselling the private market,” she added.

Rent hikes aren’t the only changes coming forward; YG is also putting a cap on how long workers can stay in the unit, at three years.

Murray said there are about 900 YG workers living in communities with 170 housing units available.

“As you can see, there are many employees living outside of Yukon government housing,” she said. That also led to the government to making a priority list.

“This is kind of an acknowledgment that there are lots of YG workers living in communities, not all can have government housing.”

Right now, tenants tend to sign one-year leases.

Under the new rules, they will be given the boot from their unit once they hit three years, unless an application for an extension is granted.

“In the case of an employee living in government housing and that housing is required after three years, an application can be made to the Public Service Commission and it can be granted (further),” Murray added.

As for what exactly “required” meant, she confirmed there were no plans nor forecasts at this stage that those units would be needed for something other than staff housing.

“We do know that it could be really detrimental to have an employee leave after three years if they can’t find housing.”

Murray noted these changes “work in tandem” with other initiatives offered by the corporation.

Meanwhile, a YG release also noted that changes create a new way to assign housing units – this will now be on a first-come, first-served basis and take priority professions into account.

The first tier of priority professions include nurses, community counsellors, paramedics, community addictions workers, regional social workers, nurses and teachers.

The second priority group includes people like healthy families workers, natural resources officers, mining recorders, conservation officers, water and waste water supervisors and airport supervisors.

Joining this second list are carpenters, plumbers and heavy equipment operators.

“Only when there is no demand for employee housing from an employee in a Priority 1 position will an employee in a Priority 2 position be considered,” the policy adds.

A tenant will not be asked to leave their unit “for the sole purpose of providing housing to another employee in need of housing whose position is categorized in Annex 1 as having a higher priority housing rating,” it continues.

“We needed to update it to address operational challenges,” Murray said of the 25-year-old rules. Those include the allocation system by which houses are assigned, the rent increase and tenancy durations.

Ultimately, it was an inevitable reality that rents would have to rise as demand rose and the territory continues to grow, she added.

In June, tenants will be given their first notice for October’s rent increases.

Comments (12)

Up 8 Down 1

The problem is on Jun 6, 2019 at 12:31 pm

Is hard to convince people living in many of these communities that they are s**t holes and nobody wants to be there.

Up 8 Down 5

Rural on Jun 4, 2019 at 1:42 pm

In some places unlimited housing is needed and the new policy allows for that to continue as necessary there.
In others, the housing market offer is good - and with 20 years in 'remote' Yukon, I can assure you the quality of life is just fine. In fact much better from my perspective.

The mistake is to regard all 'rural' communities the same and apply blanket solutions not tailored to the unique circumstances and needs of each. Unintended consequences result and the outcome of unlimited tenancy length there is that there are no spaces for the new hires we all know need to be attracted. In some places, 3 years of guaranteed housing is enough and provides plenty of time to make alternative arrangements in the market and vacate your space for the next family moving to town in a critical position.

Up 17 Down 7

Seth Wright on Jun 3, 2019 at 5:54 pm

@ Racket - It’s not a scam or a racket it is an incentive to work in the remote communities where there are a lack of services, supports, and land/home ownership opportunities.
Individuals who move to the remote communities sacrifice the quality of living that those who live in larger city centres do. You are just ranting.

Up 17 Down 2

Investment on Jun 3, 2019 at 2:26 pm

When the government tries to hire into critical positions such as teaching and medicine in rural communities they often struggle because of housing shortages caused in no small part by

1. All the YHC units are full of workers that have been living in them for decades at these super-low rents. They have no incentive to ever leave and make space for the new hires and buy/build like the rest of us have to.
2. Little to no new rental housing for staff is built by landlords (government or private) because these low rents cannot finance the construction.
3. It's reality in these places that the government workers have the highest incomes and best access to mortgages to buy or build but they have no incentive to do so and invest the savings down south for retirement instead.

Lastly, it's inherently unfair that 2 workers doing the same job are rewarded by their employer differently because one happened to get a heavily subsidized unit and the other did not and is paying market rent. And re: the cost of living in these places, there is already a special remote allowance in placed added to salary.

Up 29 Down 5

Uh huh on Jun 3, 2019 at 12:00 pm

Yeah, shocking that when we try to recruit health professionals, social workers and teachers to more remote communities they would actually NEED A PLACE TO LIVE. Or that a lower rent (and often substandard accommodation) would be used as a recruiting tool.
In a lot of communities there simply aren't enough rentals available.

As for making $100k per year, not likely! But if you needed the skills and education to deal with the population and problems rife in the smaller communities... I bet you'd stay in Calgary

Up 8 Down 8

Dougie on Jun 2, 2019 at 10:24 pm

@juniper: You might say you were stunned.

Up 26 Down 11

Seth Wright on Jun 2, 2019 at 8:05 pm

Why would anyone want to move to a remote community to pay $1500 - $2000 to rent a place and then pay 20-40% more for gas, heating oil and groceries etc. Plus additional travel costs.

What an excellent way to discourage professional retention in the communities.
There are no houses to buy. Who wants to lease land? What an economic loss to the payee. What happens if the lessee makes a decision that is contrary to the political interests of the lessor - Move out? Eviction?

This is just stupid pandering politics at the expense of those sacrifice for service...
Bad Liberals... Bad...

Up 26 Down 6

Racket on Jun 2, 2019 at 2:20 pm

YHC low income social housing tenants pay 25% of gross income.
Such a household, making just $30,000 gross annually pays more in rent than a double government worker family in the exact same unit.

Two parents making minimum wage, full-time 40 hours weekly would pay over $1,000 for the exact same unit as that two government worker family paying $600.

There is no justification for giving cheaper rents to higher income workers. This has been a racket that is duly ending. Good.

Up 21 Down 8

Politico on Jun 2, 2019 at 1:59 pm

@JJ The majority of YTG workers do not earn $100K per year. Don't exaggerate, it ruins your credibility.

Up 9 Down 15

Yukonblonde on Jun 1, 2019 at 4:38 pm

Majority of Yukon housing staff pay for utilities and heat (teachers etc). Some that don’t are the nurses/doctors.

Up 30 Down 5

Charlie's Aunt on May 31, 2019 at 4:59 pm

They don't want to undersell the private market!!! Are they joking? Have they researched cost of private rental? Bet the YG rent includes utilities/heat as well, most of us pay close to that amount for our own homes when you add up all utilities, property tax etc..

Up 47 Down 18

Juniper Jackson on May 31, 2019 at 2:43 pm

Wow..and to think, to rent a trailer in Dawson, was $1950.00 on kajiji.. Whitehorse I've seen rents from 1400. yeah..I saw 1 of those.. most are from 1750.00 to 2000.00. I saw a couple at 2200.00 and better.. so..a government employee, earning at least 100,000 k a year is going to pay $613. you can't rent a bare room in someones house for that. And they don't live with landlord greed.. you can't even buy a trailer in Whitehorse these days, greedy owners just have a captive audience and they don't care who might not have enough to eat.. or who might pass on.. as long as they get their money.. In the end, the avarice of the trailer park owners, landlords, and apartment owners will force the government to put rent freezes in place so people can live.. Meanwhile.. we really have to get government jobs..it's the only way you can live here..and then go after government housing..jeez.. 613.. I'm in.. shock and awe.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.