Community liaison to be appointed in probe
The Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) is now taking the lead on a use-of-force investigation involving a Whitehorse RCMP officer,
By Rhiannon Russell on April 10, 2015
The Alberta Serious Incident Response Team (ASIRT) is now taking the lead on a use-of-force investigation involving a Whitehorse RCMP officer, and will appoint a community liaison as an impartial observer.
After initial consultation between the RCMP, the Yukon’s Department of Justice and ASIRT, it was decided that police would conduct the investigation and ASIRT would review it.
But that’s changed.
“It should be clear that there was no suggestion that the investigation commenced by the RCMP was anything other than thorough and professional,” ASIRT stated this morning in a news release.
“It was simply determined that the particular incident required a higher level of engagement to ensure independence and objectivity.”
ASIRT’s executive director, Susan Hughson, said today that both RCMP and the Yukon government requested greater involvement from ASIRT.
The independent Alberta team examines cases of serious civilian injuries or deaths involving police.
“This case was the subject of a lot of back-and-forth debate of what level of engagement ASIRT should have,” Hughson said.
“From our perspective, we see it as a very straightforward investigation.
“I would have been satisfied with a review, but the RCMP wanted more involvement from ASIRT, the Yukon government wanted more involvement from ASIRT.
“After some discussion, it seemed that because of concerns that were raised about past incidents with the RCMP, it might be better to simply take over the investigation, and, from that perspective, increase public confidence.”
A community liaison will also be appointed “to facilitate the link between the community, the affected person and as an impartial observer to the investigation,” the release said.
This happens in select cases, sometimes at a community’s request, ASIRT spokeswoman Lynn Crawford said.
“We engage with the community ... to ask for someone who they think would be a good person to work with us on the investigation,” she said.
A list of names will be gathered and provided to the Justice department, which makes the appointment.
The liaison reviews the investigation to see that it’s thorough and transparent.
“It’s just a way for the community to gain better confidence by having someone they know and trust in their community,” Crawford said.
Hughson said because Yukon First Nations communities are particularly concerned about this incident, ASIRT will try to appoint someone they’re satisfied with.
She expects this will happen next week.
That’s also when ASIRT’s investigators will arrive in Whitehorse.
Hughson stressed that no current or former RCMP officers will make up this investigative team.
At issue is a minute-and-a-half-long video posted on Facebook that shows a Whitehorse RCMP officer using force to arrest a man on Easter Sunday.
Insp. Archie Thompson said that police assistance was requested at a Jeckell Street home because of a reported fight.
But other details are unknown, including what happened before the video began.
Shot in a kitchen, it appears to show the officer punch the man, who is lying on the floor, in the face.
He then rolls the man onto his stomach and tells him several times to put his hands behind his back, but the man is unresponsive.
The officer then pulls the man’s arms behind his back and handcuffs him.
The man pictured in the video – which has since been viewed more than 800,000 times – is Joshua Skookum, 26.
Skookum appeared in territorial court Thursday on charges including resisting arrest and assaulting a police officer.
He was released on bail and ordered not to consume alcohol or possess firearms.
The officer in the video – who Thompson would not identify – has been placed on administrative duty while ASIRT’s investigation is ongoing.
“That’s why I really can’t say a whole lot, because I don’t want to in any way interfere with what they’re doing,” Thompson said today.
In a statement earlier this week, he said police have a responsibility to be accountable to the public for their actions, including the use of force.
“In order to make an informed judgment, more information is needed,” he said.
“Social media do not always allow viewers the benefit of context or offer the totality of events, including the moments leading up to the point where the video started.”
Skookum’s next court appearance is scheduled for April 22.
Comments (5)
Up 0 Down 0
Chris R on Nov 25, 2015 at 2:06 am
RCMP take the brunt of abuse from people everyday and I agree the video does not show the officer in a favourable light but the RCMP office was called in to arrest a resistant drunk man in a house surrounded by his friends threatening him with violence (ie - kicking the 'faggot' cop in the head). They ended up wrestling on the floor somehow and I am inclined to believe the the man being arrested is not totally absolved responsibility for the altercation. Cops get hit and beat up all the time in Canada. I wish I could see the beginning of the tape. The man was trying to use both arms to struggle against the cop and the cop actually had to pin his right arm to the guys chest using his knee to protect himself and try to take control of the situation. The video does not show the guy hitting the cop but the guy was certainly struggling to prevent the cop from doing what he needed to do in a house surrounded by the guys angry friends. If the guy had said ok officer I'll come with you to the station even though he didn't agree with the cause of his arrest in the first place, he wouldn't have even needed to be handcuffed. The cop could have just walked with him to the car on his way to the drunk tank where he could spend the night sobering up. RCMP officers have a really hard, high stress, high risk, high profile job.
Up 7 Down 10
Virgil on Apr 13, 2015 at 12:32 pm
ASIRT are X - RCMP members. This is a move to make the community less polarized after these types of issues.
No they won't do anything substantive for one main reason:
There is no enforcement agency in Whitehorse that can hold the RCMP accountable. ASIRT has been successful in holding RCMP accountable in larger jurisdictions (Edmonton for example ... two RCMP were found molesting children...another for assault). Here it won't happen.
The RCMP need to save face in the area. So Menard will go with "I could have made smarter decisions, I should have done the following."
He won't attempt to defend his actions ASIRT, being X RCMP, "the vigors and stresses of the job mean that RCMP are placed in high stress situations. The individual was not complying with requests to roll over. The RCMP had been called in to do an investigation. The officer was there lawfully. The use of force was required and it is important that RCMP not be afraid to use their COMBATO training for their defense especially in high risk situations. This officer was in a closed environment with 3 other people who were threatening him..."
Etc.
I can write the entire report for them. "We found that his actions were warranted in this case and were in accordance with the conditions set out in the RCMP act.""
Up 32 Down 3
Really? on Apr 13, 2015 at 9:58 am
We need a review for an officer dealing the best he could with a dangerous situation?
Still waiting for the bleeding hearts to come out and say the kid on the ground was, "a good boy" and "would never harm anyone".
Give your heads a shake. RCMP have to put up with this and worse type of bulls**t on a daily basis and to be honest the kid on the ground got off lucky. Imagine it was you trying to restrain an uncooperative subject whilst threats of violence were resounding around you. How would you act? You would want the situation under control and over asap, correct?
Up 23 Down 4
Cindy Beasley on Apr 10, 2015 at 8:12 pm
So what do you think, will we ever be able to judge if a crime is a crime, or if an injustice has been done? Something else always has to rise to the forefront , making it not at all about the issue! It's always about past issues, past injustice, past history's ! How will we ever grow, unite, trust each other, we have to put the past 2nd, deal with the issue now, not always bring up past issues we don't like, we have to give each other a chance. Why is that not acceptable? Why don't we want to move forward, instead of backwards? We cannot change the past but we can help change the future, people change, attitudes change if you allow them. What is positive about this blame you, blame me attitude ?
Up 7 Down 41
Barb on Apr 10, 2015 at 6:17 pm
Police investigating the police, expect a biased and favourable outcome in favour of the RCMP. This is THEIR WRITTEN LAW behind close doors. Fact.