Committee unveils ATV use recommendations
More than 16 months after sitting down to consider the contentious issue of off-road vehicle use in the territory,
More than 16 months after sitting down to consider the contentious issue of off-road vehicle use in the territory, a committee of Yukon MLAs has come up with a report which attempts to summarize all the opinions gathered and boil them down to a set of useful recommendations.
The report suggests that instead of writing legislation that would restrict ATV use, the government should "consider separate environmental protection legislation that targets and penalizes environmental damage.”
This is likely a reaction to the repeated insistence by off-road vehicle advocates that it is a few bad apples who are ruining things for the majority of responsible riders.
Of the 14 recommendations made in the special committee report released Thursday, most are common sense suggestions for the bureaucrats who will eventually write the legislation – only two address specific changes to the law.
The committee said that anyone riding on a road or highway should have a driver's licence and liability insurance, which would limit on-road riding to people over 16 years old.
They also agreed that anyone riding on the road must wear a helmet, but they could not reach a consensus on helmet use when riding off-road.
In their report, the four members of the committee advise better education about and enforcement of existing rules, clarification of terms such as "highway” and "off-road” in future and existing legislation, and consideration of other related laws within Yukon and beyond.
The committee also recommended that whatever laws are written are flexible enough to restrict the growth or continued use of trails in environmentally sensitive areas, and that government review the existing penalties for environmental damage to make sure they are appropriate.
They also recommended that whatever legislation is written should not restrict motorized access to areas which are open now and don't require protection.
In summarizing the results of the extensive public consultation done by this committee, which received 2,489 completed surveys, the members had this to say:
"One thing is clear: Yukoners are passionate about the issue. Comments tend to be emotionally charged and closely tied to what Yukon means to each individual.
"For example, some view Yukon as the last frontier and want it to remain that way. For them it's about protecting their personal rights and freedoms and having the ability to choose.
Others see it as that pristine, untouched wilderness experience.
"For them it's more about respect and the principle that Yukon belongs to all of us and must be protected for future generations.”
Of those who responded to the public survey, mailed out to every household and also available on-line, 68 per cent used an ATV, a snowmobile, or both; and the majority of respondents, 71 per cent, are from Whitehorse.
It should be noted however, that people may have responded more than once, through multiple mail-in or on-line surveys.
A vast majority of respondents said they support a minimum age for snowmobile and ATV riders, with 1,161 people saying 16 was an appropriate age for a person to drive an ATV unsupervised. But a majority of people also thought underage riders should be able to drive an ATV with adult supervision.
Respondents were split down the middle on the issues of mandatory driver training, licensing, registration and liability insurance.
The public's opinion on helmets was somewhat clearer, with 80 per cent of urbanites and 64 per cent of rural Yukoners supporting them.
Of those who do not support mandatory helmet use for everyone, three-quarters said they support helmet use for underage riders.
Officials with the Trails Only Yukon Association, which has lobbied for regulations, and the territory's offroad vehicles association could not be reached for comment this morning.
See more coverage in Monday's edition.
Comments (6)
Up 0 Down 0
TJ on Apr 2, 2011 at 10:50 pm
Steve: " if the hippies want clean trails they have the millenium but i paid way to much for my ATV for someone to say were i can and cannot take it."
I agree Steve. I spent way too much for my Hummer to have anybody tell me it's polluting the environment. I also spent way too much on hunting gear to have some hippie tell me what (and who?) I can or cannot shoot and when I can shoot it. And don't get me started on poop n' scoop laws. That bassett hound cost me a darned fortune. The more we spend, in fact, the less we should have to listen to anybody! Big spenders unite!!! Am I right BP? You musta spent thousands for your giant oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico before it blew up!
Up 0 Down 0
TJ on Apr 2, 2011 at 9:53 pm
Francis, you do realize, don't you, that your "real Yukon" existed for thousands of years before ATVs even existed? Anything that affects the environment affects EVERYONE, including all your imagined "real" and "non-real" Yukoners.
Up 0 Down 0
Patrick on Apr 2, 2011 at 4:58 am
This should not be turned into a "hippy" vs. "redneck" debate, or "Yukoner" vs. "outsiders". Let there be ATV trails, and let there be non-ATV trails. Lets all be clear on which ones are which. This continual grey area leads to constant conflict.
There also needs to be enforcement of non-ATV trails. They are right, there are bad apples, but there are also many riders who simply do not know what is permitted and what is not.
I have had too many unfortunate encounters with ATV riders in my neighborhood trails with "no-motorized vehicles" signs. This issue has become contentious due to fact that citizens have been put in the position to enforce these so called "regulations".
Up 0 Down 0
Lisa on Mar 29, 2011 at 8:28 am
I agree fully with both Francis and Steve's comments!!! Thank you both for speaking up!
Up 0 Down 0
Steve on Mar 26, 2011 at 4:48 am
I think this should be a non issue concidering no one is alowed on a ATV without being 16(warninng lables all over the ATV) and helmet use is also mandatory, why should it be any different here. children who dont know the rules of the road should not be on our road ways with vehicle not ment for the road way as it is. Also these trails have been here for many years road such as the copper haul have been around since befor the ATV was a problem so for thoese of you who think whitehorse is the untoched land just ride the trail behind the land fill and maybe we can see the hole truth behind what this place is. Also children on ski doos is one of the biggest problems around here iv almost been hit twice by kids on sleds with no care or concept of what the rules of the road are so were are the parents in all of this no were in sight giving the same amount of care to there child as there child is to the person walking on the trail. I say we can all share these trails but there has to be a level of respect from both parties and i think we must educate these kids to know what is right and wrong when there on the road ways. But realy its a sad state when we let out of towners who only live here 3 months of the year close our trails because they think that this is a pristien untouched land this may be the last frontier but theres just as much garbage on these trails as there is rocks my ATV isnt poluting anymore then joe bloe throwing his matress out the back of his truck on my trails and yes i have seen it. if the hippies want clean trails they have the millenium but i paid way to much for my ATV for someone to say were i can and cannot take it.
Up 0 Down 0
francias pillman on Mar 25, 2011 at 10:10 am
Who cares about ATV's. Oh wait the special interest gang from down south who have hi-jacked the Yukon. Never in my life have I seen so much wasted energy on on subject that in all honesty affects no one. Letter after letter, these special interest groups are losing sleep over it. The Yukon needs to be taken back, for the real Yukoners, not the fake, roof rack, organic oats, hippies.