Whitehorse Daily Star

Comments should be thoughtful, not abusive

Ed. note: this is a statement to readers from the Star’s ownership and staff.

By Whitehorse Star on January 19, 2024

Ed. note: this is a statement to readers from the Star’s ownership and staff.

Re. Whitehorse Star comments section at whitehorsestar.com

In past months, we have had an ongoing issue with the comments section of the Whitehorse Star.

The comments section is not about censoring anyone. As a 124-year-old independent newspaper, we know the importance of allowing freedom of opinion.

Our readers should be allowed to express themselves, but the Star does not have to provide the venue for that.

Keeping the comments section open is a choice we’ve made, but it can be cancelled at any time. The Star is one of few media organizations that permit comments, and it’s rapidly becoming too large a task.

The abuse that comes in is astonishing.

People are complaining that comments are censored or not put up fast enough. We don’t look at the comments on weekends or after regular business hours.

Moderating comments is very time-consuming.

Comments have never been moderated on a volunteer basis, as has been suggested by some people. We will not be looking for someone or group to do this, as it is just not feasible.

However a lot of the comments that we receive are just plain nasty to one group or another. Some might find it humorous – but that doesn’t make it publishable. (It is amazing what some people will write when they don’t use their real name.)

The biggest problem with the comments is the length at which some of you will go to when you don’t like a comment, or when your comment is 
not published.

Everyone who writes a comment thinks theirs is 100-per-cent right, and any and all dissenting views are wrong.

The hate and vulgarity that we see are incredible. We are sworn at, called names and even threatened with violence.

We have been told comments will be nailed to the door if we don’t comply.

Ninety-nine per cent of this is done anonymously, of course – and with the use of fake email addresses.

While we are doing our best to keep the comments section open, there are some who consistently make that hard to do.

Just because a comment doesn’t get posted doesn’t mean we are a Communist or Fascist organization that is denying people their right to have their opinions.

Furthermore, we don’t care what side of the political spectrum you are on. We are non-political, and give access to all points, from far left to far right.

If people have that strong of an opinion and want that belief out there for all to read, please consider writing a letter to the editor. With letters, of course, you are required to submit your real name, which, with very rare exceptions, will be published.

However, that being said, here some of the rules for the comment section of our website.

You are supposed to send in comments with real names, not anonymously, as well as genuine addresses – not some of the nasty, made-up ones we see on a regular basis.

In the past, in certain circumstances, we have allowed anonymous comments so people could avoid having confrontations with employers or people in public in a small city as Whitehorse. The problem is that some commenters take advantage of this.

We don’t publish anything that can be considered libelous and or slanderous, racist or discriminatory. (What you consider to be libelous or slanderous may differ from the law’s definitions.)

You are not supposed to insult or degrade anybody because you don’t like their appearance, i.e. clothing or hair colour/style or what have you.

The Star cannot publish content taken from Facebook that may violate a court-imposed publication ban, or any other information that we cannot independently verify. Just because you saw it on the Internet does not necessarily make it true.

In the final analysis, we are not obligated to publish any comments from anyone.

Comments (9)

Up 0 Down 1

stephen Kay on Jan 22, 2024 at 8:33 am

I agree completely with your stance. How interesting it is people can be nasty and do so under assumed names and emails. People tend to be too afraid to show their true colours under their real name. Stay the course and know those that the majority of us reading your paper support your stance. You should not have to explain yourself to the far right or far left.

It's one thing to disagree its another to bully, threaten, intimidate, etc.

I would hope the Star turns over to the police any threats of violence so the police can follow the IP address and engage the person(s).

Up 3 Down 3

Josey on Jan 21, 2024 at 8:22 pm

Yeah, that's easy for you in your ivory tower to spout off about.

Up 3 Down 3

Vern Schlimbesser on Jan 21, 2024 at 2:22 pm

Yes Vern is a pseudonym.
You have done a pretty good job over the 50 years I have been here, and I appreciate it, and I thank you for it.
We all watch as you under go changes, look for new direction, and purpose.
I am not the only one to remind you that continue to exist because you are different. EXACTLY BECAUSE YOU ARE DIFFERENT.
Become another woke media source and, unfortunately, you will become irrelevant and endure what that entails.
But at least it will be fast never fear.

Up 3 Down 2

YT on Jan 21, 2024 at 7:22 am

Sometimes, the actions of our governments regardless of party are worth scathing comments.
That being said, The Star does have the write to publish whatever it wants.
That’s not censorship/communism/fascism/whateverism, that’s business.
Regardless, SUPPORT THE WHITEHORSE STAR!!!
Buy copy at our local stores, take out an ad,
We don’t want to lose The Star.

Up 2 Down 2

MikeP aka. North_of_60 on Jan 20, 2024 at 9:01 pm

Thank you for publishing rules for the comment section. They appear reasonable and I don't see a problem abiding by them.

Up 2 Down 2

Moose101 on Jan 20, 2024 at 6:20 am

We’ll put but I would think there are many out there that think this is there personal paper and The Star cannot sensor there comments.Don’t let the Bastards grind you down

Up 6 Down 0

John Smythe on Jan 19, 2024 at 6:41 pm

The Star is one of the only papers that continues to allow reader comments. I hope it doesn’t have to be discontinued.
The fact that people are commenting means that the audience is engaged and as an amateur journalist myself I can assure you that nothing strokes a journalist’s ego more than knowing he or she has struck a cord with their readers.
In my opinion that is what true journalism is all about.

Up 0 Down 5

bonanzajoe on Jan 19, 2024 at 4:13 pm

Use Disquis. Let them do the Moderating.

Up 42 Down 37

Virginia Labelle on Jan 19, 2024 at 2:44 pm

Completely agree with the Star's position on this. If you have to close the comments section because of the nature of the comments and the resources needed to moderate, please do so. We can always write!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.