Photo by Whitehorse Star
Coun. Rob Fendrick and Coun. Samson Hartland
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Coun. Rob Fendrick and Coun. Samson Hartland
Questions on how municipalities in the territory can go about generating more revenue are closer to making their way to the Yukon government.
Questions on how municipalities in the territory can go about generating more revenue are closer to making their way to the Yukon government.
At Monday’s city council meeting, members voted in favour of putting forward a resolution to the Association of Yukon Communities (AYC) that would seek greater clarity from the territory on municipal revenue generation.
Municipalities are set to gather at the AYC’s annual meeting May 12-15 in Watson Lake.
There, the umbrella group for communities in the Yukon will adopt a number of resolutions for the organization to work on.
The city’s resolution asking for clarity is one of four it will bring forward.
The others are aimed at:
• encouraging the Yukon government to implement a territory-wide recycling program for electronics;
• working with the territory to ensure funding is provided to deal with any associated costs should municipalities be included under the Access to Information and Protection of Privacy (ATIPP) Act; and
• working with the territory to ensure that municipal priorities are reflected when infrastructure investments are being considered.
It was the issue of revenue generation that garnered the most discussion among council members Monday night.
City staff had initially proposed a resolution seeking clarity from the territory on whether Yukon municipalities have the authority to charge a hotel tax.
As Coun. Samson Hartland noted though, greater clarity is needed on the authority municipalities have in a variety of types of revenue generation.
“It’s incumbent upon us” to explore a variety of forms of revenue generation, rather than limiting it to one, he said.
Coun. Rob Fendrick echoed the sentiment. While municipalities may choose not to pursue additional streams of revenue, he pointed out, clarity is needed.
“Right now, unfortunately, it’s just not that clear,” Fendrick said.
With the issue being one that could affect all municipalities, he said, the AYC is the avenue to go in dealing with it.
The city can’t even begin to explore the possibilities until it knows what it is able to do, said Mayor Dan Curtis, who attended Monday’s session by conference call.
It’s an issue other municipal councils are also wondering about, Coun. Betty Irwin said.
As the AYC’s second vice-president, Irwin was at a board meeting last week. All municipalities in the territory seemed to want clarity on the matter, she said.
Council was unanimous in approving Hartland’s amendment before going on to adopt the resolutions.
The other one that drew some conversation among council members was the proposal on recycling electronics.
The resolution would see the AYC work to encourage the Yukon government – in co-operation with businesses and stakeholders – to establish recycling fees that would be paid at the time of purchase in the territory.
Those fees would be put into a fund that would go toward covering the cost of recycling.
As Curtis observed, electronics take up a lot of space in the landfill.
“We have to address this issue of how we can pay for it,” he said.
Irwin was also quick to note that the upfront fees would mean consumers would no longer have to pay tipping fees when they bring the waste to the landfill.
It would shift the cost of dealing with the waste to the actual users of the products when they buy the items, she said.
The resolutions will now make their way to the AYC gathering, where municipalities will vote on whether to pursue the issues.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (7)
Up 15 Down 0
And yet again... on Mar 21, 2016 at 2:58 pm
...tax, tax, tax. If it moves, or is about to, tax it. For what? To fund special interest groups, pet projects that give nothing back to the community, because you can, no added value, deter visitors from coming to the Yukon, treat everyone as if they are a cash cow, ah hell the list goes ad nauseum.
I have a rather unique idea - rather than perversely take, take, take how about give, give, give? Give - lower the number of staff, give by reducing council junkets and over inflated salaries, give by getting rid of stupid inane bureaucratic suggestions to keep digging deeper into our pockets, give by leaving us the hell alone, give back some of the taxes you keep robbing from us and finally GIVE ME A BREAK and just go away.
Up 8 Down 2
Josey Wales on Mar 19, 2016 at 7:42 am
SJW...I do not do this for support, up nor down. I do it to balance the "engineered" state we live in, remind folks where these "ideas" or legislation comes from.
in our narcissist saturated times of instant gratification, seems to I we are losing/lost our critical thinking skills. We do not live in a merit based society and have not since 1982...that makes me puke.
if you cannot understand my abstract and yes mostly cynical writing, not really sure what to do for that...other than exercise your critical thinking?
You personally SJW your support means nothing, you still continue to tell me how I should write "but they need to be clear and positive"...you will not modify my tactics. As stated in another thread SJW, "it doesn't mean that much too me to mean that much to you".
Why you leave your happy safe space to engage with me, make me wonder.
it was "nice" doing so but for me to carry on with you would be like pissing in a 70 knot wind..and wondering why my legs are wet.
Enjoy the crusade.
Up 4 Down 4
Josey Whales on Mar 18, 2016 at 11:42 am
I was sincerely hoping to agree with Josey Wales but it's hard to follow what he is saying.
Josey, please try again - I may actually support your comments, but they need to be clear and positive. Maybe you just need another latte.
A friendly ramora.
Up 28 Down 1
Instead of looking for new revenues on Mar 18, 2016 at 8:40 am
How about some efficient cost cutting measures. The City has raised the cost of living for City residents by 6.3% harming low income earners, the poor, homeless people and seniors.
Up 7 Down 5
Josey Wales on Mar 17, 2016 at 5:17 pm
Really...eh? Star, may I please?
How? Well as with any place as this absolutely INFECTED with crat's and their delusional dreams there is only a few suggestions that make any sense.
I got this idea from our civic overlords, toll booths going into every community and depending a what level of love/hemp your car is made with...will "dictate" your "entry fee".
What goes in often comes out...so do not forget your leaving fees.
Oh yeah...whilst there loitering fees, highest for whites but of course.
For those loitering in a "realistic" or "non inclusive manor" dole out serious SJW tax via fines.
Quadruple the current fees for everything, do not forget to tax each fee separate ensure double turns into quadruple taxation.
Every 10 K on the highway have like a roadhouse to "evaluate" peoples vehicles and fine/confiscate whatever in the name of "the state" to be redistributed via the redistribution agency and its SJW agents.
Do a oral exam on random folks, if they cannot recite at least 6 "acts" decipher the SJW dictionary? yup..more fines.
If any of that does not sit well with the over lords?
Maybe try letting china dig our rocks, Canada could chip in?
too late.
Or give it away at low cost high volume land sales to wealthy folks fleeing all the insanity that is Europe today.
too late.
Nah...try regulating and fining the absolute s**it outta us mere "subjects"
Seems?...Too late.
Up 33 Down 6
ProScience Greenie on Mar 17, 2016 at 3:36 pm
How about municipalities stop spending like drunken sailors and look at ways to reduce costs and most importantly, reduce the epic amount of waste that exists. That's mostly Whitehorse but Dawson is trying it's best to burn through the money too.
And a hotel tax? Maybe for people from Outside but if it is for Yukoners travelling about our territory then that is just rude. It is also twisting the knife in deeper with so many out of work, bank accounts drained and nothing prosperous on the horizon.
This is all about greed and entitlement. Shame on AYC and the powers that be behind them.
Up 19 Down 22
Arn Anderson on Mar 17, 2016 at 3:02 pm
Send Samson in a bulldozer to bulldoze some useless CoW property and fire himself. That should ease some of the burden.