Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Dave Loeks

City must better prepare for a wildfire, council is warned

The city needs to put a greater effort into FireSmarting the community, says Yukon forestry consultant Dave Loeks.

By Chuck Tobin on March 23, 2022

The city needs to put a greater effort into FireSmarting the community, says Yukon forestry consultant Dave Loeks.

Loeks told council at its meeting Monday the threat to Whitehorse from wildfires is real – and needs to be addressed sooner rather than later.

In his presentation, Loeks noted there is a 55 per cent probability of ignition near the city on an extreme fire weather day within 30 years.

He said thinning out the stands of trees surrounding Whitehorse is necessary, but is not the only safeguard.

There must be a unified approach by residents to FireSmart their properties and homes, he said.

“You need to treat the community.”

Loeks completed a fire risk analysis for the city two years ago.

The effort to carry out FireSmarting in the community is being done in a piecemeal fashion, he told council.

The work being done around the Mary Lake subdivision is good, as the south end of the city is the most vulnerable, Loeks said.

He said there is an 83 per cent probability a wildfire will approach from the south, and the loss of property would be extremely high.

The city, he said, can choose to do nothing and accept the risk that could result in up to $3 billon in losses, like it was with the 2016 wildfire that burned through Fort McMurray, Alta.

Alternatively, it can understand the risk and effectively reduce it by removing the fuel from the surrounding forest and exposed properties, he said.

Loeks said removing the fuel and replacing it with deciduous trees like aspen or widely-spaced pine trees would be the most effective.

Burning embers carried by the wind, he said, pose a significant threat, as they can travel up to three kilometres, though most will drop within 500 metres, he said.

Embers, Loeks noted, have jumped the Yukon River.

Loeks said FireSmarting needs to be done in the first 500 metres of forest to create a buffer and reduce the threat from embers.

Many of the homes destroyed in Fort McMurray were not on the forest edge but well away from it, he pointed out.

The consultant who deals with fire risk management said there should be a focus on FireSmarting around Whitehorse General Hospital.

Right now, he said, there is no credible way to evacuate the hospital.

Loeks said in addition to FireSmarting, the city needs to develop an evacuation plan.

He noted Fort McMurray had four lanes of highway going in two directions. Whitehorse might only have one direction available if the time comes, he said.

Loeks said he believes it’s an understatement to suggest Whitehorse residents are a little uninformed about the threat of wildfires and evacuation.

“We do not have an evacuation plan,” he insisted.

Loeks said the city needs to do more than rely on sending out an emergency alert by cellphones, as not everybody has a cell phone.

Mayor Laura Cabott, however, said the city does have an evacuation plan as part of its emergency measures preparation.

Council will have a lunch-hour meeting Thursday to discuss the city’s emergency measures.

The consultant recommended the city focus on four priorities in the next two or three years:

•Make the hospital and its grounds a safe zone that does not need to be evacuated;

•Focus on and accelerate the installation of wood boilers (to create a market for trees removed – Loeks said fuel management can pay for itself);

•Accelerate the universal FireSmarting of Whitehorse properties; and

•Accelerate and complete a city evacuation plan.

Comments (20)

Up 5 Down 3

Bill on Mar 27, 2022 at 11:58 am

@ Rolf
I got news for you Rolf - he is no friend of the YP.

Up 10 Down 0

BB on Mar 25, 2022 at 5:51 pm

The Fort McMurray retrospective study about why houses burned down while others didn't, was interesting. Some key things: sprinklers on your roof - not effective. The way the houses were burning down was that embers were being sucked into openings. Like an open window or an attic air opening. Or, embers were gathering at inside corners on decks, against the side of the house. Recreational vehicles - quads, dirt bikes etc, up near the house and full of gas. Bushes against the house or underneath overhangs. Stacks of firewood against the house, a tool shed near the house - these were the start points of the fires that burned houses down! And embers rather than flames were the source of the heat.

They suggest moving things away from your house, and if you have time before the fire comes, shut your windows and any openings. Sprinklers on the roof are not going to do much about those embers - yes they could land on the roof but I guess more likely they'll roll off.

Make your own plan! Where are you going to go? Pets, kids, vehicles gassed up, a suitcase ready to go with medication, id, and money. Important documents / pictures etc. - know ahead of time what you intend to take and where you will put it in the vehicle.

Up 5 Down 16

Rolf on Mar 25, 2022 at 5:28 pm

I'm more intimidated at hiring this Yukon Party shill than any perceived fire threat that's not already being looked after.

Up 12 Down 1

AdmiralA$$ on Mar 25, 2022 at 1:44 pm

Some of us remember why Haeckel hill area is bald and how close we came then. Hope for the best and plan for the worst.

Up 21 Down 7

Nathan Living on Mar 24, 2022 at 3:08 pm

A city evacuation is a major undertaking with many safety concerns.
It's best coordinated by the GY, RCMP, Wildland Fire and the Whitehorse Fire Department with the assistance of City staff.

I cannot envision a COW war room with enough staff and communication resources to deal with this undertaking.
It makes me uneasy to hear the Mayor say there is a plan in place when a major fire could overtake the City in a short time period and there would likely be pandemonium. And of course residents are not currently aware of what the plan is; this to me means that city communication is severely lacking.

It's not a situation of the sky is falling to have an evacuation plan that is available to residents.

Up 19 Down 8

CJ2 on Mar 24, 2022 at 1:01 pm

Dave Loeks does this every year, and he never acknowledges that any work has been done, which it has. According to him, we seem to be in exactly the same state of unpreparedness as we were told we were 30 years ago.

The City of Whitehorse worked on an evacuation plan last year, I believe. There is probably some concern that it has to be frequently updated and timing for sharing it could be sensitive. Tell people too far ahead of time and it will get addled, especially if it has to be amended. Tell them too often and they'll tune it out. That kind of thing, perhaps, could be part of what they have to consider. I'm just guessing, though.

Loeks also never fails to insert in there a reference to wood boilers, which he may or may not have a vested interest in. Whether he has or not, the perception is a turn-off.

There was a report after the Fort MacMurray fire that detailed how some residences survived and some didn't. It is well worth reading, but Dave Loeks isn't interested in getting people to think they have any control over the situation. It's fine if that's not his focus, but there are diminishing returns to his annual message.

Up 9 Down 22

Not Worried on Mar 24, 2022 at 10:50 am

a 55% chance of an ignition within the next 30 years?
Can't say I'm too worried...

Up 36 Down 1

Ione Christensen on Mar 24, 2022 at 10:37 am

A City evacuation plan is only effective when all those who are to be evacuated know what the plan is and how it works. It is also critical they have the information well ahead of the time it is needed. We needed to have the plan six years ago!

Up 27 Down 3

Groucho d'North on Mar 24, 2022 at 9:24 am

The COW and YG need to do a much better job of informing we citizens about existing emergency plans in place and how we are expected to react.
What good is a plan if nobody knows about it? We citizens must also create emergency plans for our families, because if you rely on government's to look after your interests, you may be disappointed.

Up 16 Down 7

Mitch Holder on Mar 24, 2022 at 9:23 am

Oh but there is a plan. YTG will prioritize itself, its' families, its' homes and favourite local businesses (their ski hill, bike trails and game center) over endangered citizens in the same way men rushed women and children for a seat on the lifeboats of the Titanic. That is always the plan up here, that is what we pay for, right?

How are those apartment buildings coming along?

Up 29 Down 12

Max Mack on Mar 23, 2022 at 9:46 pm

Loeks and his buddies back at the trough again.

Up 25 Down 7

Roy on Mar 23, 2022 at 7:51 pm

The same people complaining about this just being a money grab - or making poor arguments like “let’s drain the lakes too” - will be the exact same people complaining that the government “didn’t do enough!” when a wildfire burns their house down.

They’ll be the same people asking for taxpayer funded handouts to rebuild and will have no shame.
“Live free or die” until you really need something - then belly up to the trough and make the taxpayers foot the bill for your poor decisions.

Up 23 Down 0

Nathan Living on Mar 23, 2022 at 7:38 pm

Yes, there is a major wildfire risk. A buffer area will help as may firesmarting near homes.

What really concerns me is the false comfort people have when there is a 50 or 100 meter firesmart buffer. If you want to protect your home you actually should cool all combustible surfaces before the fire arrives.; this takes a significant personal investment to set a system up.

The City is not really prepared in my opinion, a fire with a strong wind will be very hard to stop.

Up 32 Down 3

TMYK on Mar 23, 2022 at 7:14 pm

Did Council really need to pay someone to tell them this?

Up 28 Down 18

Dallas on Mar 23, 2022 at 6:01 pm

The biggest threat to Whitehorse and the Yukon is the liberals and the NDP.

Up 19 Down 6

Cath on Mar 23, 2022 at 5:19 pm

The city doesn't own the forests/trees just because there are plenty of them inside city limits. The city actually has very little undeveloped, treed land. Most of the trees are on YG land; some are on FN land. I don't understand why Mr. Loeks doesn't go after YG, the government responsible for forest management. I agree that the fire risk is high, but the city doesn't have the right or responsibility to go around cutting down trees on other people's land.

Up 22 Down 48

Dave on Mar 23, 2022 at 4:37 pm

Lakes are a threat to humans
Simple drain them all to protect your homes.

Trees pose a threat to the city of Whitehorse.
Simple, cut all the trees down.

Up 41 Down 8

Wilf Carter on Mar 23, 2022 at 3:31 pm

Very smart move which people who understands forestry has called for this for many years.

Up 59 Down 3

Austin on Mar 23, 2022 at 3:06 pm

The City has been told this over and over again. The Haeckel Hill fire from 1991 rings a bell.

Up 46 Down 29

Bill on Mar 23, 2022 at 3:04 pm

Loeks - Mr Chicken the Sky is Falling. I am here to save you if you give me more money. Every time you look he is at the consultant trough, telling you what you already know. Of course, all consultants tell you that anyway.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.