Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pictured above: DAVE STOCKDALE and ROB FENDRICK. Below: TELL-TALE TRACKS - A vehicle's tire tracks are seen on a Whitehorse greenbelt this morning. The city is planning to crack down on greenbelt users who violate local bylaws. photo By Kieran Oudshoorn

City may curtail greenbelts abuse by purchasing new equipment

The city could end up fighting fire with fire, or in this case snowmachines and ATVs with a snowmachine and ATV.

By Stephanie Waddell on August 19, 2009

The city could end up fighting fire with fire, or in this case snowmachines and ATVs with a snowmachine and ATV.

At Tuesday evening's city council meeting, members were asked to approve the re-budgeting of $35,000 that was earmarked for a vehicle for the bylaw department for parking enforcement downtown.

Instead, it's suggested the money should go to buying an ATV, a snowmobile and a trailer for hauling both.

As council members heard in a report presented by Rob Fendrick, the city's director of administrative services, bylaw officials haven't been able to find a suitable vehicle for parking enforcement.

An internal reorganization of the department in the past year has seen the hiring of a full-time education constable.

"With the numerous complaints received from citizens of the city regarding the usage of the greenbelt areas, bylaw services has made it one of the main duties for the education constable to patrol and monitor the greenbelt areas," notes the report presented by Fendrick.

"The greenbelt areas are presently being patrolled by the bicycle constables in the summer months and during the rest of the year on a complaint basis only. In order to be successful with patrolling and monitoring the greenbelt areas all year round, it will be necessary to obtain equipment for that purpose."

Fendrick stressed the city's bylaw officers would be on the trails enforcing the bylaws already in place, adding that "we're not talking high-speed chases here."

Coun. Doug Graham praised the move to have a bylaw officer on the trails, but said more has to be done.

"It's a good first step," he said, arguing that some of the bikes, ATVs and the like driven in greenbelts around the city are ruining trails to the point that they can no longer be used for walking.

"I think the other part is going to be enforcement and working with YTG on some kind of penalty phase that when we catch these people tearing up the trails that we can actually do something," he said.

As Mayor Bev Buckway noted, the territory's work on changes to the Motor Vehicles Act may address that.

Coun. Florence Roberts cited the high cost of the idea. She questioned whether the city could receive financial help from the territory to off-set the costs, with Fendrick replying that he isn't aware of any such program.

Coun. Dave Stockdale, on the other hand, voiced his support for the purchase.

"It's frustrating when people call you and complain about the same things and you can't do anything about it," he said.

"Without some teeth out there, you know, it's very hard to stop ATVs and motorcycles."

Along with the proposed $35,000 the city plans to spend on buying the three pieces of equipment, it's also expected the ATV would cost about $5,000 in maintenance. As replacement items, the cost of maintaining the proposed snowmachine and trailer are already covered in this year's budget.

Council will vote on the re-budgeting next week.

Comments (6)

Up 0 Down 0

Arn Anderson on Aug 25, 2009 at 8:54 am

Whoop dee doo, who really cares? Another nice sunny day patrolling the trails on my nice quad or maybe checking them 'traplines' on my new snowmobile enforcement ride...

Up 0 Down 0

Tim Rampanen on Aug 23, 2009 at 11:49 pm

Actually Josey Wales, Bylaw does not enforce regulations for people drinking or running through stop signs. That is a territorial law and is enforced by the police, not bylaw as bylaw enforces municipal bylaws. Also, it's about time something is done about the trails. We just can't stand there and say our trails are a mess and do nothing about it...the enforcement needs to start somewhere...if people are going to go out and willingly destroy our trails for a thrill, than that's what they are going to do...but it's good to see the city start to take a proactive stance for once and maybe we'll even get a few less careless riders almost crashing into mothers pushing baby strollers on the trails.

Up 0 Down 0

susan rogan on Aug 21, 2009 at 2:50 am

I believe rock blockades extending 25 feet into the woods on each side of the trail, every 300 meters, would be safer (no chases), cheaper and more effective. They would be there ALL the time, 'policing' the trail with no wages or benefits and very little repair or maintenance.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Aug 19, 2009 at 12:50 pm

Of course they need new toys to play with...why not it's only OUR FREAKIN' MONEY!

You need not go all the way to green belts to look for rules to ACTUALLY ENFORCE....What about all the drunks a mere 100 or so meters from the nobles castle(our...city hall), each & every street in this town has many jackass drivers passing on the right...slowing mostly at slow down signs aka stop signs...how about panhandlers, both local &imported;?

or a thousand or so dogs,atvs running all over Porter Creek, not just on the trails but right on the streets.

and to think of all the money I waste on silly things like car insurance...registration...keeping my vehicle mechanicly sound, when all one NEEDS to do...is ride an ATV...wherever & however one pleases!

How many days till the civic election?

Not soon enough I say!

They say they do not have a suitable vehicle for parking enforcement?

Do they have a bong at by-law central...that gets used often?

What about those white vans with a blue stripe & lights that go flash?

Is this van only used for Timmys runs?

Why not go big and just buy a helicopter? then just as the birds see things...so too could a by law pilot...and just like the vans they have...stay inside...away from all the cranky peasants...enforcing almost nothing presently on the books...fill your time...and go home all nice & relaxed...clean & even a pound or two of gold jingling in your pockets.

as each year go by the ineptness of the keystone coppers and the nobles whom direct them...gets more and more clear to ol' Josey.

Up 0 Down 0

darkwolf on Aug 19, 2009 at 12:06 pm

i have been riding trails around whitehorse for 25 yrs and found many young riders thought it a bonus when bylaw

tried to catch them, as they were quite inferior as to riding skills, knowledge of trails, and atv's they couldnt handle.

Also, many of these boys have experience

in motocross type riding and i'm sure they will welcome a bit of a challenge.

In no way do i condone riding in restricted areas, quite the opposite. There are enough trails around here without using the greenbelts or the like . Perhaps also raising the fine for such activity may help....

Up 0 Down 0

Thomas Brewer on Aug 19, 2009 at 9:10 am

Anyone else find it ironic that the city is looking to spend more $$ on a variety of equipment to run on trails that aren't supposed to carry that kind of traffic?

And I thought the city was broke.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.