Photo by Whitehorse Star
PIctured Above: MARILYN WOLOVIK and JENNIFER CAMPAGNOLA
Photo by Whitehorse Star
PIctured Above: MARILYN WOLOVIK and JENNIFER CAMPAGNOLA
City council has been asked to let the city serve as the administrator for a federal program to combat homelessness.
City council has been asked to let the city serve as the administrator for a federal program to combat homelessness.
Marilyn Wolovik of the Whitehorse Planning Group on Homelessness pitched the request at Monday night's council meeting, along with Jennifer Campagnola of Service Canada.
Having a local "community entity” look after the books and administer the annual contribution of $304,227 is much more effective than running every funding request through Ottawa, council heard.
Wolovik assured council the community advisory board which recommends how the money should be spent will remain in place as the principal body to guide the program.
The board, she said, includes representation from the city at large and all four levels of government, including the city.
Campagnola said community entities can use up to $46,000 of the annual funding to cover the cost of a half-time administrative position.
Of the 61 designated communities providing the federal homelessness program, 36 are currently administered by municipalities. Twenty-five are administered through the same shared delivery model as Whitehorse, she said.
Campagnola said having a "community entity” to provide administrative services is so much more efficient than having to go through Ottawa, where each request has to be reviewed by the federal minister's office.
The advisory board, said Wolovik, believes city hall is the right place to administer the Homeless Partnering Strategy.
"We have made presentations to other groups but because the city already has the infrastructure and knows about accountability, we felt this was a way the city could help contribute to solve a problem that affects the city,” she said.
"We all thought, frankly, the city is the right place to host the fund.”
City manager Dennis Shewfelt said there's really not a staff position in the city right now that is geared toward taking on that type of administrative role.
There's the possibility of the city linking up with a local organization – one with a greater profile in the delivery of social services – to jointly form the community entity, he said.
Information provided to council indicates the federal homelessness program has been operating here under a shared delivery model since 2000.
But Ottawa has directed that the administration of the program be turned over to a community entity, for reasons of greater efficiency and local knowledge of the issues.
Since its inception, it has provided support to a variety of issues revolving around homelessness.
Funding purchased the first Outreach Van, and annual support has been provided to the Salvation Army shelter and the Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder Yukon to assist clients with housing issues.
Money is being provided this year to Blood Ties Four Directions to help the non-profit organization develop policies around its Tiny House project, with the first mini-home scheduled for construction this year.
Campagnola explained federal funding for the Homelessness Partnering Strategy works in a three-year cycle, with this fiscal year being the second in the current cycle.
She and the advisory board hope the city will indicate sometime this spring whether it's interested in serving as the administrator, she said.
Campagnola said there is a process of negotiations that needs to take place between the community entity and the federal government to formalize the arrangement.
Knowing the city's position this spring will provide the necessary time to get an agreement in place for the beginning of the next three-year cycle next April, she said.
"We put a lot of effort into negotiations to make sure it's a good relationship.”
Coun. Betty Irwin expressed some concern that this may be an effort by the federal government to offload some of its social responsibilities to the municipal level.
And to date, despite years of funding, she said, there is still no place for the homeless to live.
And at $304,000 a year, building something would be difficult, Irwin suggested.
Campagnola pointed out the advisory committee can recommend pooling the money for an entire three-year cycle, if indeed it felt the need for a larger capital program, she explained.
With $900,000 at the end of three years, Irwin suggested, there may be the ability to build a home.
"Those of us with a roof over our heads can hardly imagine the desperate feeling of people living on the margin,” Wolovik told council.
All one has to do is look at last summer's tent city outside the legislature, the number of people who sleep in chairs at the Sally Ann because there aren't enough beds, she said.
Wolovik said couch surfing is never-ending, and some people can find themselves making tough compromises in exchange for a place to sleep.
"This city can help make Whitehorse a place where there is a home for everyone.”
Campagnola explained in an interview today many of the community entity arrangements have been in place in Alberta for as many as five years.
Yellowknife and Iqaluit have both become community entities in the last couple of years, she said.
Campagnola said in smaller centres like Whitehorse, it's particularly helpful for the municipal government to take on the administrative role because it has the office space and staff.
In larger centres, non-profit organizations like the Salvation Army are big enough to take on the job.
In smaller municipalities, however, those types of social service organizations are usually down to skin and bones already, she said.
Ottawa, said Campagnola, has set next April 1 as the deadline to have all the Homelessness Partnering Strategy agreements administered by a community entity.
She said she's not sure what will happen if one can't be found in Whitehorse.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (6)
Up 0 Down 0
north_of_60 on Apr 11, 2012 at 2:11 pm
Why don't those people who seem to think that free housing is a 'human right' invite the homeless to come live with them?
Perhaps they think someone else should pay to support their beliefs?
Why should those of us who have worked hard to afford a roof over our heads have to support the socialist beliefs of a few with our hard earned tax dollars?
We live in a democracy; those people who want free housing for the homeless can run for office on that platform and form a government if they get enough votes.
Up 0 Down 0
June Jackson on Apr 6, 2012 at 1:26 am
I agree with both above comments...a roof over your head is not a priority for everyone, nor is everyone without a home a junkie or a drunk, last year there was a man living in the park because he bought a brand new truck..
My concern lies primarily with families who are losing the struggle to stay above water and still live in the Yukon, 1,500-2,000 a month rent is a lot of money. It doesn't even allow a family to save money towards a home down payment. Build all you want, but if the government does not cap those rents we'll never get out of the homeless canoe.
Up 0 Down 0
bobby bitman on Apr 5, 2012 at 9:50 am
A real homeless shelter like the ones in Toronto and Vancouver would end the expectation that private landlords should be providing housing to 'the homeless', including the extremely hard to house. The Salvation Army does a decent job with a limited budget, but it is ultimately a religion based organization which is not great for a few reasons. All the same, the Sally Anne is our best bet right now and they are the people actually housing people right now. Maybe the money should be put toward getting them a larger location with more bunks and an administration that could record who is staying there, and then collect their benefit cheques to pay for the stay, just as they do down south, rather than just providing 'free' emergency housing. It then becomes somewhat self-sustaining. There is no need to put indigent people up in hotel rooms with a cook stove and a private washroom for $900 per month, especially when they are being kicked out after a week or so for non-compliance (according to news articles). Instead, the tax payer would pay the money to the homeless shelter for a bunk bed, and proper supervision, and the stories might end. Meals also could be provided in exchange for the homeless person's monthly meal allowance. We need to accept that these people are indigent, and they do need to be fed and housed much like other 'vulnerable' people (children, old folks, and others for one reason or another unable to provide for themselves). They are not normal renters, and they are not necessarily going to change, ever, no matter how much counselling is available. So let's cut the pretending about housing, and just get them into a shelter. It is a realistic and economical solution and might allow us to move on to other issues. What would not be good would be for this money to go to more studies and more counsellors. Put it into beds and roofs!
Up 0 Down 0
Max Mack on Apr 5, 2012 at 4:32 am
If CoW agrees to take on this responsibility, the cost of administering the program will very quickly exceed federal funding.
CoW may be hard-pressed to say no, but given the unprecedented rise in taxes, service fees, user fees and fines, they need to say no.
Up 0 Down 0
Yukoner Always on Apr 5, 2012 at 1:50 am
This is a priority for the Yukon. Most municipalities in BC are taking on this important issue. Just don't get caught up in the politics and use the money to build a home for these unfortunate human beings. What about setting up a program/sponsorship and getting businesses (give them a tax break or something/advertisement) on board to help at a reasonable cost, can also request and advertise volunteering for this important project. It's like a fundraising project, but have the funds already, just need a break on things, this is good advertisement/marketing for all businesses. Something should be in place soon, spring is here so the time to build or reno a piece of property is now. It doesn't have to be fancy, just a roof over one's head in the cold winter days in the Yukon is a bonus and miracle. This is where the generous hearts of humanity comes into factor and I know Yukoners have that!!! I don't want to see tent city again when I visit home this summer.
Born and raised in the Yukon, so I still consider myself a Yukoner and call the Yukon home. I'm temporarily away for now.
Up 0 Down 0
GUNCACHE on Apr 5, 2012 at 1:11 am
Not all homeless people want help. There are those who destroy any shelter you put them into. This type of person should be turned away. They are a drain on taxpayers dollars and no landlord wants them. Some of them like to play the role of "poor old me" and garner public attention like a certain "tent city" individual who camped at the Yukon admin. building last year. Bottom line is help those who need help and are responsible and the rest are on their own.