Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedorof

SEEKING COUNCIL'S ENDORSEMENT – Kate Mechan of the Northern City Supportive Housing Coalition addresses city council Monday evening while colleague Laird Herbert listens.

City asked to support proposed shelter

A proposed housing project would provide ‘round-the-clock support to residents who may otherwise find themselves with no place to live.

By Stephanie Waddell on September 21, 2010

A proposed housing project would provide ‘round-the-clock support to residents who may otherwise find themselves with no place to live.

"It's a great, innovative project,” Laird Herbert of the Northern City Supportive Housing Coalition told city council at its meeting Monday night.

In a presentation to council, he and Kate Mechan, who also heads up the organization formed to make the housing project a reality, outlined the group's proposal to council in the hopes of gaining the city's support.

Mechan explained the group got its start out of discussions she and Herbert had over the "housing crisis” in the city.

Wanting to address the need for those who can't seem to find permanent housing, the pair worked to get others on board forming the coalition with members of a number of organizations around the city.

Since then, she said, the vision to address that need has taken the form of a proposed 20-unit "low-barrier” housing development.

The project would be built to green standards with a properly-zoned downtown property already being held to be sold to them as they wait for word on funding from a variety of sources. Those potential sources include the Yukon Housing Corp., the territorial and federal governments, First Nations and others, they said.

Rent, which would be based on social assistance rates, is proposed to cover the maintenance costs on the building.

The group is still looking at ways to come up with the approximately $240,000 to cover the salaries of a co-ordinator, two case managers and three residential support workers.

As Herbert explained, it's been shown in many cases that 24-hour support is key for some of the most marginalized people who would be calling the building home.

"These are people who have burned bridges,” Mechan said.

The project is aimed at providing housing and support to those who may have been evicted from several apartments or motels and need support for everyday living.

"Staff is key,” she said.

Commitments have also come from officials with the local outreach van to visit the building, once it's operating, three nights a week.

There are ongoing discussions with territorial departments like Health and Social Services and Justice about their potential involvement, Herbert and Mechan told council.

Support from the city could mean requests to waive required fees and taxes when the project goes ahead.

For now, the group is asking the city to simply vocalize its support to others that would be involved like the Yukon government, they said.

"Other models show municipalities have a strong role,” Mechan said, later citing examples of similar projects in Yellowknife, Vancouver, Toronto and New York.

Though council made no formal commitments to the project last night, the initiative appears to have at least one council member behind it.

"This has been an issue for years here,” Coun. Ranj Pillai said.

He went on to note the "fantastic work” that has gone into creating a concrete proposal out of their initial desire to do something about housing in the city.

Pillai also noted the assistance the city has offered to Habitat for Humanity projects in the form of fees and taxes being granted for their affordable housing projects aimed at those unable to get a traditional bank mortgage.

Comments (2)

Up 0 Down 0

bobby bitman on Sep 22, 2010 at 2:53 am

How much money does Yukon Housing, Whitehorse Housing, Grey Mountain Housing, Kaushee's, and all the other government funded housing agencies already get to house the 'hard to house' people in Whitehorse? Why aren't these agencies taking care of the truly hard to house, those who have 'burned bridges', instead of high grading social assistance recipients and luring the 'easy to house' into their heavily subsidized units?

Meanwhile, the private sector is being called the Evil Landlord by a coalition of poverty and women's groups who want to see the entire Landlord and Tenant Act revamped to 'protect the rights' of tenants. At the one public meeting of the Select Committee, there was maybe one 'normal renter' represented. Ie, one from the 85% of renters. The 15% who SHOULD be covered by social housing were represented by half a room full of activists and non-profits, all looking for more leeway on behalf of their clients - leeway to be demanded of the private sector landlord.

Meanwhile, here these people are asking for yet MORE money to supply housing for the 'marginalized' bridge burners. Use the money you have already got, and direct it at these people.

Furthermore, recognize and admit that the SA rates being paid to the private sector are an extremely good value to the tax payer, and are a fraction of what the government pays itself to house the same people.

Do we need MORE money directed at social housing? No. We need the agencies that are already in place to start taking responsibility for their mandate, and to start focusing on housing these individuals rather than high grading the easy to house SA recipients.

Up 0 Down 0

Tony Carson on Sep 22, 2010 at 1:18 am

This project is simply fundamental to a compassionate society.

If government's can't find money for this while they earmark $16 billion for war planes, all hope is lost. Societies are all about people, some of them need help from others. Just like in families.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.