Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pat Ross

City approves YG plan to create group home

Council was unanimous Monday evening in voting to approve

By Stephanie Waddell on March 13, 2018

Council was unanimous Monday evening in voting to approve the conditional use application that will allow for a Yukon government group home for up to 10 youth at 22 Wann Rd. in Porter Creek.

The vote came with no discussion.

All seven members raised their hands in agreement following the recommendation that it be approved for a maximum of 10 residents.

Conditional use approval is among the conditions for the territory to buy the property from the current owners.

Last night’s vote came after council heard both support and concerns over the proposal during a public input process on the proposed group home.

Those voicing concerns over it argued the Yukon government had not consulted with the community on the plans for a home aimed at older youth in government care who are transitioning toward independent living.

Issues over safety, the home’s proximity to liquor sales outlets, whether the water and sewer system can handle an influx of residents, and possible noise problems were also raised. A man was fatally shot nearby in the fall of 2017.

Those anxieties were not, however, enough to convince council that 22 Wann Rd. is not the right place for a group home.

As Mayor Dan Curtis pointed out to reporters after last night’s meeting, crime can happen anywhere in the city – and alcohol is available in any neighborhood.

Those who will be living in the house are there through no fault of their own, Curtis added.

“What we have right now is we have group homes in many communities, in neighbourhoods, and there’s not a rise in crime,” the mayor said.

The city follows the same process for every conditional use application, Curtis stressed.

The issues brought forward were considered and addressed before council’s vote, he added.

“I didn’t see anything at all,” Curtis said of there not being any major issue.

He also stressed the need to support youth in the city.

A report to council on the proposal also cited city policies which promote “densification in existing residential neighbourhoods to enable a compact growth strategy and the efficient use of municipal infrastructure.”

It was also pointed out that the zoning allows for supportive housing as a conditional use, and that the home would be a residence to the youth who live there.

“This residence will be the full-time home for these youths and is more appropriate and effective when placed in a residential neighbourhood rather than a commercial or industrial area,” Pat Ross, the city’s manager of land and building services, noted in the report.

“Youth require access to amenities typically found in residential neighbourhoods, such as parks, schools and transit services, etc.

“The size of this home and property is significant and well-equipped to accommodate the 10 residents being proposed.”

The large house, located at the Centennial Street end of Wann Road, was listed for a $1.1-million sales price.

Comments (5)

Up 0 Down 0

Politico on Mar 19, 2018 at 8:46 pm

@ Martin. these tired old NIMBY arguments have all been discussed and proven false.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Mar 18, 2018 at 10:29 am

Yes two comments, indeed!
More throttling these days at moderation than our Northwestel overlords.
Even Jeff Healy, Stevie Wonder and Helen Keller could see the engineering in your bias.
Update your terms to make clear PC Crusaders, eco zealots and the perpetually offended are the preferred method of indoctrination.
Facts are racist and truth is xenophobic in this land of equity seems?

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Mar 14, 2018 at 1:56 pm

Hey Martin....they “could” very well be, but we won’t ever know.
As it is in the states interest to keep things as that hush hush.
The political state actors and their colleagues at the civic level, only have the optics of concern for public safety.
Given the evidence omnipresent here in Whitehorse, very clear not a value held.
Just came from town, freepour season has a early start obviously.
Had a discussion with a member at M in regards to enforcing laws existing, apparently one needs to write a letter to an MLA to engage their sergeant at arms? Was not aware of that step, as I thought when laws are breached...the good folks at M are the ones to talk to?
If one need write a letter to a political blowhole to get our Mounties to enforce the law? Very clear police state if they only take orders from MLA’s
The member I spoke with gave me answers one would expect from a politician. He had yellow stripes but sounded like a total politician Vs. A member of a national police force.
Granted I do ask very uncomfortable questions, and do so in a manner certain to offend....for that I make no apologies.
If more members hold the attitudes on law enforcement he does, it really is no wonder to me why our community is a compost.
A compost with a very high level of unsolved homicides, drunks aplenty etc.
Remember folks if you see or know of a crime, write your MLA then they will give orders to their armed state actors...is apparently how it goes.
My query was on how the YG can stockpile millions worth of weed ahead of the law, as clearly they are above the CCC.
Public safety and politicians? Look around you and ask yourself how this can continue?
They care not for anyone, anything but themselves and cronies these political windbags, think in four year cycles.
All of which is within WS terms for constructive discussion, is it not?

Up 5 Down 2

CR on Mar 14, 2018 at 11:02 am

I wouldn't worry about the elementary school.. Takhini Elem. is directly beside the Whse. Correctional facility. These youth need support not discrimination and segregation from our community.

Up 2 Down 2

martin on Mar 13, 2018 at 5:25 pm

How about the Elementary School nearby? Are the kids going to be impacted by it?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.