Photo by Whitehorse Star
Joy Snyder, David Eikelboom and Philip Fitzgerald
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Joy Snyder, David Eikelboom and Philip Fitzgerald
Recycling, trails, property taxes and the city’s lack of reporting on consultation results were on the list of issues that came forward Monday night when city council hosted its public input session into its proposed $69-million operating budget.
Recycling, trails, property taxes and the city’s lack of reporting on consultation results were on the list of issues that came forward Monday night when city council hosted its public input session into its proposed $69-million operating budget.
The input session, part of the annual budget process, is held prior to second and third readings of the budget.
This year’s operating budget proposes a 1.7 per cent increase to property taxes and 6.3 per cent boost to water and sewer bills while garbage collection costs would remain the same.
There are, however, plans to implement a curbside collection program for recyclables, though the exact cost to users has not been determined and is not part of the 2015 budget documents.
Joy Snyder, the Raven Recycling Society’s executive director, was the first to address council during last night’s input session, speaking on behalf of both recycling firms in the city.
She noted P&M Recycling head Pat McInroy couldn’t make it to the council meeting as the Ray Street business is dealing with rising volumes of recyclables coming in.
While Raven is continuing with a number of recycling efforts like taking refundables and continuing recycling services to local businesses, it closed its depot for non-refundables last Oct. 15. It argued the diversion credits offered through the city and territory don’t cover the cost of shipping the material Outside.
That’s meant P&M is processing much of the non-refundable material that would have normally gone to Raven.
Last night, Snyder said she and McInroy met and wanted to bring forward three major issues with the operating budget.
It’s clear, she said, significant changes have to be made to the diversion credit system, which is designed to compensate recyclers for processing recyclable material that would otherwise end up in the landfill.
While the credit provides a maximum of $75 per tonne processed, she noted that with the cap of $150,000, the credit is expected to work out to just $55 per tonne this year as the two recyclers processed approximately $60,000 over the cap.
Both also came in over the maximum last year as well, she pointed out, suggesting the cap needs to be doubled.
The $75 per tonne also doesn’t cover the costs to the processors, Snyder said.
She added a payment schedule throughout the year is needed rather than the current one payment for the previous year which comes through in February of the following year.
Even if the city moves to the planned curbside collection program of recyclables, Snyder noted, there would likely be areas where the service isn’t provided (similar to garbage pickup), such as country residential neighbourhoods and/or multifamily units.
“We believe diversion credits will be required even with the blue box system,” she said, noting the credits are in place to cover recyclables that don’t fall under other systems.
“We know that Whitehorse residents want to recycle,” Snyder said. She then requested a meeting soon to discuss the diversion credits and potential city blue box program.
She also noted work on the issue with the Yukon government has been proceeding, and she hopes the city will work on the matter as well.
Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Mayor Dan Curtis acknowledged recycling in the territory is “a big challenge” affecting all municipalities.
He noted his hope the city could work with the territory in a collaborative way to deal with recycling, but added the city will also work on its own initiatives to manage it locally.
Meanwhile, Athletics Yukon president David Eikelboom called on the city to include more winter trail maintenance in the operating budget.
Currently, the city is set to keep a section of the Millennium Trail in the downtown clear from Rotary Peace Park to Shipyards Park through the colder months.
Eikelboom, however, argued that maintaining more of the trail which runs along the Yukon River would have positive impacts on the entire community.
Eikelboom noted his surprise in research the group did on trail use last year.
Going out to the community, he said he had anticipated numerous runners to speak up on their use of the Millennium Trail. He soon learned the trail is heavily used by commuters as well as families and individuals looking to get outside for a stroll. A number of businesses and service organizations also cited use of the trail by staff.
There are many physical and mental health benefits for individuals, he pointed out, also noting that a cleared trail through the winter could mean fewer people driving to work.
Many the group heard from commented that they’d continue using it through the winter if it was cleared.
Curtis was quick to tell reporters there’s a cost attached to maintaining trails that must be balanced with many other city issues.
Finally, Philip Fitzgerald, past chair of the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce, presented numerous concerns from the chamber.
He first took issue with the city’s earlier consultation process held prior to drafting the 2015 budget. He noted the city has not provided any aggregate data on what residents brought forward during that consultation process.
Later in the meeting, city manager Christine Smith told council administration would work on getting consultation results out with a “higher profile” to the public.
Fitzgerald also took issue with continued tax increases over the years.
If the latest one goes ahead as planned, he noted, this will be the 12th consecutive year that property taxes have risen while federal and territorial taxes haven’t seen any such hikes.
Fitzgerald stressed he wasn’t questioning the care the city took in coming to the 1.7 per cent increase. However, he suggested there needs to be a comprehensive review of what services the city provides and what could be provided by a third party to lower costs.
Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu was quick to note the tax hike is in line with increases in the consumer price index, a pointed echoed by Curtis after the meeting.
Curtis also cited the many services and projects the city already tenders.
Just last night, for instance, the city awarded a five-year contract each for gatehouse operations and transfer station operations at the landfill (see story, p.3).
Those are just two of many services the city goes to tender on, he said.
A report on the input session will come forward to council next week, with members scheduled to vote on second and third readings at their Jan. 26 meeting.
The city’s $30-million 2015 capital budget was adopted in December.
Councillors Mike Gladish and Kirk Cameron were absent from Monday’s meeting.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (11)
Up 0 Down 0
north_of_60 on Jan 19, 2015 at 8:36 pm
@GPWC "there is a lot of fuel being burned hauling the recycling south creating a lot CO2"
Almost all those trucks that bring all that stuff you like to buy, go back south empty, still burning a lot of fuel. The tractors and trailers alone are heavy. Recyclables like cardboard, paper and plastic are more bulk than weight, so the extra fuel to haul them south is less than you would guess.
One could expect that the CoW would hire staff competent enough to connect the dots and responsibly organize the one sustainable resource we have: our garbage.
Up 2 Down 1
Good Points Wilf Carter on Jan 19, 2015 at 10:11 am
Here we talk about recycling and we haul it south.
Here we have interest groups against LNG and fracking which is their right to challenge.
Here we have the COW pushing recycling which is good.
Here you have the NDP strongly supporting it all which is good.
But what is of interest to Yukoners is there is a lot of fuel being burned hauling the recycling south creating a lot CO2. Every person on the plant is waking up to climate change but the fact is how do we best do it, is my message here. On one hand we are recycling but on the other hand we are harming our environment by all that CO2 being released into the air by hauling out the recycling. Tough issue for all of us. First it has to be taken off of the political table and put into a science and strategic thinking table. Politicians and special interest groups just mud up the issue and it all becomes re-reactionary not smart planning or best solutions. That is what the COW is doing now - reaction to an issue and not thinking it through with the best possible advice. Has anyone asked PM or any of the other recycling people for advice? What do they do elsewhere in Canada and around the world?
Up 1 Down 0
just Say'in on Jan 17, 2015 at 9:08 pm
I am an avid recycler. Well, Ok, maybe it is more my wife. I think it is great but we can't loose touch with reality as well. It can not be done at any cost to the Tax Payers and the environment. Two things are happening or at least have been happening. We are either spending huge amounts of money to export our garbage to the lower mainland and burn thousands of gallons of diesel in the process or just take it to the dump. That is correct, most of the bottles that my wife worked so hard at washing, picking off the labels and removing the tops in an effort to clean up the planet were just crushed and sent to the dump. Why keep living the lie. They do not want our glass in Vancouver, believe it or not they already have lots, a never ending supply that only about 5% gets recycled. Why would they want to import any? Cardboard that is bundled at Raven, gets wet and black mould and is useless and goes to the dump. I could go on and on but it is just not viable were we are unless we burn burnables to make heat or power that is the only way.
Up 15 Down 0
north_of_60 on Jan 16, 2015 at 1:42 pm
It’s time for the CoW to stop wasting our tax dollars on frivolous, greenwashed ‘feel-good’ schemes, and take meaningful action to effectively manage garbage in Whitehorse.
Terminate the “Environmental Sustainability” department; find something useful for them to do, somewhere else in the CoW bureaucracy.
Terminate the CoW-Blue-Box scheme.
Use those savings to accomplish the following:
Make our public recycling bins on Industrial Road open again. You work out the details, just make it happen.
Provide financial incentives to trucking companies to haul recycled materials back south at substantially reduced rates.
Provide low interest loans or other financial assistance to the existing Blue Box pick-up services to improve their business.
Reduce ‘salvaging permit’ fees at the dump. Issue inexpensive daily permits at the gate house.
Accept all domestic residential garbage at the dump on weekends at no cost.
Continue removing garbage from our wilderness areas and encourage people to report garbage ‘spills’.
Stop hiring unqualified southern ‘experts’ for government staff positions. They don’t know how to do their job, so they spend our tax money on irrelevant studies by other southern ‘experts’. Graduates from Yukon College should be filling those positions.
Stop sending our tax dollars to southern ‘experts’ for inappropriate, useless studies. We don’t need doubtful advice from expensive ‘experts’ with advanced degrees from prestigious universities. We just want to responsibly manage our garbage, not send it to the moon.
Yukon College has been offering environmental management related courses for decades. Surely we have the necessary expertise here with staff, students and graduates of environmental programs at Yukon College. If we need studies, then make sure they’re relevant to our unique situation, and spend that research money here in the community.
Fix it Mayor and Council.
Up 16 Down 0
Consumer price index a poor benchmark on Jan 16, 2015 at 10:20 am
Not sure why this was used to defend increases in property taxes - if that's the index used, then what's up with all of the other higher increases? Or maybe it was simply to educate us poor ignorant voters. But I too would like to know the breakdown of costs by labour vs 'other'. I can't see who wrote this article, but maybe some investigation would be pretty illuminating. If 80% (as another poster estimated) is accurate well ... holy smoke.
Up 14 Down 0
Just Say'in on Jan 15, 2015 at 4:47 pm
I can't hold my nose tight enough when reading this CRAP from the city. For years and years we have been hearing about these one and two percent increases to our taxes but remember the city only controls the Mil Rate which is only a multiplier that is used in conjunction with your assessed value that is set by YTG. Over this same period of time property values have increased by 100% so do the math. As new lots are selling for hundreds of thousands of dollars due to development costs of these new subdivisions, yours too increases. They know full well how this works. Look at how much the budget has increased, way more the 1.7%. Smoke and Mirrors and we pay.
Up 20 Down 2
Yukon Gov't wages on Jan 15, 2015 at 10:19 am
YTG budget 80% wages. The COW is most likely the same as government who like to spend as much as they can on wages not services to the people!
Up 27 Down 0
Logic please? on Jan 14, 2015 at 6:19 pm
Where is the logic for the Consumer Price Index and the proposed property tax increase to be pegged together as a meaningful justification of said increase.
Pensioners retirement income is not pegged to the CPI.
These public officers should be looking for increases, or not based on projected costs not an imagined amount that is pegged to the CPI.
Up 15 Down 1
Wayne on Jan 14, 2015 at 5:42 pm
City councillors who think raising taxes each year is okay, and raising them by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the consumer price index as mandatory, need to remind themselves of where the money comes from. The number of citizens fleeing the over-taxed Whitehorse is becoming noticeable.
Up 34 Down 2
Yukoner on Jan 14, 2015 at 9:12 am
The last thing this city needs is another tax increase it cost too much here now .
The only saving grace theses days is the nice winter were having.
If David wants the trails cleared get a shovel it's just another cost for a special interest group. I'd still like to know what it cost to make the sidewalk wider on the bridge.
Up 26 Down 0
Increases everywhere on Jan 13, 2015 at 6:47 pm
Does anyone know what portion of this budget goes to wages and benefits for employees and staff? I'd like to see that, actually - and the way the budget is presented makes it difficult to figure out.