Photo by Whitehorse Star
Shown Above: RICK KARP
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Shown Above: RICK KARP
Three things must be done to help alleviate the housing crisis in the city, says the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce.
Three things must be done to help alleviate the housing crisis in the city, says the Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce.
A report released by the chamber in late April details a trio of recommendations aimed at the city, territory and local First Nations, including:
• that officials with each as well as land developers meet to come up with a policy so land deemed suitable for new homes in the city's Official Community Plan (OCP) can be released through a tender process to the private sector to be developed;
• that the city come up with incentives to help increase the amount of housing and redevelopment in the downtown; and
• that the different governments work together to speed up potential development sites in the OCP.
The recommendations come in light of the housing shortage throughout town that has seen average home prices rise to more than $400,000.
As the chamber described in the short report detailing its proposals: "The Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce is concerned that the City of Whitehorse's Growth Strategy is not sufficiently addressing some of the issues affecting the availability of housing in the city.
"As well, resulting from feedback from our membership and the community at large, it has become apparent to the chamber that any resolution to this issue should involve the Yukon government and Yukon First Nations.
"Finally, if all orders of government in Yukon – the municipalities, Yukon First Nations, Yukon government and the federal government – partner with the private sector, the housing crisis can be resolved.”
Before it makes a formal presentation to any of the governments on the suggestions though, the chamber is looking at two issues in more detail.
Chamber president Rick Karp said last month a committee reviewing the report asked first that developers, realtors and others in the industry be brought together, without government involvement, to look at what incentives would encourage development.
That happened May 10, with 23 people attending, Karp said.
"It was an excellent meeting,” he commented, though he declined to discuss what incentives were suggested.
Before the chamber presents its three proposals to the government bodies, it will be looking at the expected population growth in the city for the next few years.
As Karp described it, numbers are being thrown out by many about the expected population growth.
While the chamber could look to documents like the OCP, which deals with a few possibilities, Karp said he wants something more concrete.
Instead, he noted, the chamber will be looking at the Yukon government's numbers expected to come out within a few weeks.
"We need a reasonable estimate so we can be ready and be planning,” Karp said.
As the chamber waits for population information and puts together its report on the May 10 meeting of industry officials, Karp said, it's also gathering input from its members on the three recommendations.
So far, there's mixed reaction to the ideas with some agreeing and others not.
"There isn't a constant,” Karp said of the responses.
The only thing that is consistent among his members is that the housing crisis must be dealt with, he added.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (5)
Up 0 Down 0
North of 60 on Jun 3, 2011 at 10:20 am
The chronic abuse of our social welfare system needs to be addressed. However nobody want's to do it. The points outlined by Jackson, Pillman and Brewer are just the tip of the iceberg. Welfare abuse costs taxpayers way too much. Unfortunately the government bureaucrats who get rich riding on the backs of welfare abusers have no incentive to work themselves out of a job.
Up 0 Down 0
Matthew Sills on Jun 3, 2011 at 1:38 am
It appears from this article that the chamber has assumed that the only solution is getting more housing units for sale, and fails to address the issue of available rental housing. Not every new arrival, returning student, or new hire is able or willing to purchase into our housing market, and the shortage of viable rental accommodation leaves them with very few options. It is apparent to me that any discussion regarding housing should address the issue of decent affordable rental housing . One would think that the Chamber members would realize that access to decent affordable rental housing for workers gives the business community access to a more stable labour pool.
The current market has determined where builders and developers are choosing to invest. Building property for resale is where the best return is and all power to them. It does beg the question; what is precluding developers from making the investment in rental accommodations? My guess is that it is not as profitable as developing for resale, so in order to get rental accommodation built, the rules need to change to make it profitable. Would it make sense in a new development that property be set aside for the development of rental accommodations (specifically apartment buildings). I am not sure what the answer is, but we will never know if the question is not put on the table.
In summary, the housing market must be viewed in its entirety, and new development should address a wider spectrum of housing options rather than simply developing lots for single family dwellings.
Up 0 Down 0
June Jackson on Jun 3, 2011 at 1:33 am
You are right on target Mr. Brewster.
I know 5 people that pulled their parents/parent out of Ontario and Manitoba because of high senior costs, and they went right into housing because "I have no place to go." They turn over all their assets to their kids so it looks like they don't have anything.. I know a couple who keep a senior apt. here for Jun Jul and Aug and winter in arizona.
There are a lot of 'career' welfare people who go from province to territory to get the best hand out.. this government has encouraged that with the highest rates in canada. I can live with a 'hand up'.. but i despise the current hand outs.
Up 0 Down 0
Francias Pillman on Jun 2, 2011 at 1:22 pm
It seems every time you open the newspaper, on the issue of housing, certain demographics are the only ones who are mentioned. People on welfare, seniors, women, etc etc. How about there be a plan for the people who keep our society afloat with the taxes they pay? People on welfare do not deserve to be living in brand new residences. The people who refuse to contribute to society should get what they deserve. A rude awakening. Let them know it takes hard work and effort to get housing they deserve. Sitting around and feeling sorry for yourself and demanding government roll out the red carpet for your laziness is pathetic. But what's that I hear? Oh yea, it's the special interest groups who go to the ends of the earth to protect people who can't even stand on their 2 feet. Where is the housing strategy for the middle class? We pay for everything, where is our special interest groups? There is none, and never will be. I would be embarrassed to have a job where my sole purpose is to babysit adults and throw money at them so their feelings don't get hurt. You are as much of a virus on our society as these welfare warriors are.
Up 0 Down 0
Thomas Brewer on Jun 2, 2011 at 8:31 am
Lets get some statistics from YTG about the number of people collecting Social Assistance over the last 10 years...
Now lets contrast that with the housing shortage...
I propose that low/no income Canadians are moving to Yukon to take advantage of our generous SA rates and free healthcare.
Perhaps it's time to reassess both of these 'services'.