Photo by Photo submitted
FATE HANGS IN THE AIR – The stairs to the Ross River Suspension Bridge have been removed to dissuade would-be crossers of the Pelly River. Photo courtesy GOVERNMENT OF YUKON
Photo by Photo submitted
FATE HANGS IN THE AIR – The stairs to the Ross River Suspension Bridge have been removed to dissuade would-be crossers of the Pelly River. Photo courtesy GOVERNMENT OF YUKON
The Department of Community Services will release a request for proposals to investigate the possibility of restoring the Ross River Suspension Bridge in the spring.
The Department of Community Services will release a request for proposals to investigate the possibility of restoring the Ross River Suspension Bridge in the spring.
Minister Brad Cathers made the pledge at about noon today during an interview with the Star.
In the meantime, the government still intends to proceed with the removal of the dangerous portions of the 70-year-old historic structure.
Under the latest plan, the bridge would be taken down and placed on shore for experts to examine it.
About 35 people gathered Tuesday on the ice near the bridge, Kitty Sperling, an instructor at the local Yukon College community campus told the Star yesterday afternoon. They had learned a demolition crane was en route to the southeast Yukon village.
Some demolition workers tried to access the ice to measure its depth in preparation for removing the bridge decking and other parts deemed dangerous.
"But the Dena Council was very strong in the sense that they need to meet with government to discuss the imminent destruction of the bridge,” Sperling said.
Like many others, Sperling said the government didn't conduct sufficient consultation before moving forward with the destruction of the community and historical resource.
Warmed by a bonfire, people were still camped out at the bridge late Tuesday afternoon. Sperling didn't expect them to be going anywhere.
The community is also inviting others to make the trip there this weekend to join the camp-out and
participate in cultural activities.
The government appears to hope its latest announcement regarding the request for proposals will ease some of the community's concerns.
The minister also committed to meeting with Ross River Chief Brian Ladue, who couldn't be reached for comment, to discuss the bridge if he receives an invitation from him.
"Again, the whole impetus for government acting in this instance is that we have to take seriously the memo that we received from David Nairne and Associates on Sept. 30, 2013 that recommended the bridge be demolished as soon as possible for safety reasons,” said Cathers.
The minister wouldn't explain how the government would proceed if protestors refuse to vacate the area.
"Our priority is public safety; of course, we'd also like to avoid confrontation in proceeding forward,” said Cathers.
But the government plans to proceed with work on the bridge before spring breakup, hoping to avoid affecting ferry operations as it did in early October 2013, when concerns were first raised about the structure's integrity.
The bridge has been officially closed to the public since August 2012, but there were anecdotal reports from community members that people continued to use the bridge to cross the Pelly River.
Last June, the government announced it would invest $1.1 million to repair the bridge.
During detailed engineering assessments last September, Gerry Lum, an engineer from David Nairne and Associates (DNA), discovered the critical condition of the bridge and recommended its demolition.
At that point, the government took further steps to restrict access to the structure and eventually made the decision to remove the bridge.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (9)
Up 6 Down 6
Joel on Mar 18, 2014 at 2:42 am
The bridge was designed for a pipeline, not people and is now broken and worn out. Anyone even looking at it would know its time has come. Just because it has been there for a long time doesn't mean there is a need for it.
Dawson City has a river with a ferry or ice bridge. Ross River will now have a ferry or an ice bridge
Up 5 Down 15
Frank on Mar 13, 2014 at 1:22 pm
Thanks Atom
You are the voice of reason. It's hard to find balance sometimes but protecting the Peel is like protecting motherhood.
I have not been told there are mountains everywhere and rivers run through it. Hope it's protected before its ruined.
I do not have a strong position on the bridge.
Up 21 Down 0
BnR on Mar 13, 2014 at 9:28 am
This is what you get when you have a minister who has never had any other "job" beside being an MLA; ill thought out decisions.
Up 16 Down 21
Atom on Mar 13, 2014 at 7:20 am
It's amazing how many folks in the Yukon are doubting the Yukon Government re the decision to get rid of the bridge....Save the Bridge....how many feel the same about the First Nations and fellow Yukoners who want to save the Peel?
The bridge makes no one money and folks feel the YG should spend tons of taxpayers dollars on it....to save it.
Meanwhile the Peel supports all kinds of ecotourism and folks feel this should be displaced with miners....and miners take non-renewable resources.
It really does take all kinds.
Up 25 Down 4
Wundering on Mar 13, 2014 at 12:22 am
Under the latest plan, the bridge would be taken down and placed on shore for experts to examine it.
In other words Good Bye Bridge.
Up 22 Down 4
Skeptical on Mar 13, 2014 at 12:04 am
If the community of Ross River believes Cathers proposal. I have some beach front property in Arizona for sale, interested?
Up 21 Down 9
Friends Of The Ross River Foot Bridge on Mar 12, 2014 at 10:40 pm
I've been asked quite a lot as to whether the bridge demolition will be postponed, whether the recent words of Minister Brad Cathers are based on fact, whether the bridge, once it is taken down, lying vulnerable on the frozen Pelly River, can be "salvaged," "stabilized," and "reconstructed" as a functional footbridge?
My answer to this is listen loudly to Bruce Hornsby's, (That's Just) The Way It Is, specifically the lyrics, "Ha. Don't you believe them."
I don't profess to be a bridge engineer; however, my gut instinct and common sense tells me that once that bridge is taken down, it will never rise again. Ever. Besides, this bridge CAN be repaired IN SITU or in place, and how does it get any better than that?
It is a bridge in need of repair. It can be repaired. (See DNA's report - despite their memos stating demolition, why would this company put their Engineer's Seal on a report that includes Options to repair, if they weren't able to put the full weight of their conviction - and the company's reputation! - behind such an assertion?
It requires money for repair. There is $1.1 million still allocated for repair within this fiscal.
There are options for repair. Option 1 costs $1.5 million for repairs that can salvage, stabilize, and reconstruct this bridge as a functional footbridge.
This bridge is unique in many, many ways - the longest in Canada and the US; the last remaining artefact of the Canol Pipeline Project; a necessary bridge between a land immemorial and a life in this world. Priceless, really.
I am trusting that this government make choices based on all the information, listen to the people, uphold their oath of office, recognize the significance of this bridge and are respectful.
That's Just The Way It Is.
Up 17 Down 7
Sandy Helland on Mar 12, 2014 at 11:35 am
I wish we could get a second opinion on government opinions. Government issues orders to tear down or condem too often, yet there's no recourse for the public to challenge new government buildings being built; because there's no other opinion allowed.
Up 27 Down 9
Brian W. Hemsley on Mar 12, 2014 at 7:22 am
I believe that once the bridge is down, Mr. Cathers will find someone to report that the structure is unusable. As I have said many times already the most pressing problem is the header on the north side tower. The short term repairs can and could have been done when the crane and the engineers were out looking at the bridge.
There is no reason to bring the bridge down, nor is the ferry in any danger from the bridge. Once again Mr. Cathers is hiding behind a report the was done for ygt, Wonder if a historical site paid for a study...might have a different conclusion.