Photo by Whitehorse Star
Valerie Anderson
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Valerie Anderson
City staff have recommended city council move the proposed $30-million 2015 capital budget as is, without making any changes when council votes on second and third readings next week.
City staff have recommended city council move the proposed $30-million 2015 capital budget as is, without making any changes when council votes on second and third readings next week.
Valerie Anderson, the city’s financial manager, brought forward the recommendation at Monday’s city council meeting after presenting a public input report on the budget.
The Whitehorse Chamber of Commerce was the only organization to make a presentation at the public input session held last week.
However, Anderson said, the city also received four written submissions and five comments about the plan from the city’s new interactive budget tool.
A major focus of the public input was on the building consolidation project. That would see the city move a number of operations out of numerous buildings downtown into a new building off Range Road and Two Mile Hill near the Public Safety Building.
While many operational components of the city, like the maintenance of city buses, would move there, another smaller building will share space with city hall. That structure will deal with such day-to-day services as development permits and the like.
The entire project is budgeted at $55 million, with the city anticipating spending of $21 million in 2015 and provisional plans showing spending on the project of $33.8 million in 2016 and $1.5 million in 2017.
In its presentation to council, the chamber emphasized the importance of local contractors, suppliers and workers to benefit from the project.
It also stressed the importance of the city moving forward with plans to revitalize the downtown area as a number of city workers get set to move out of the city’s core as businessesdepending on downtown workers coming by on their lunch or shopping after work adjust to fewer city workers in the area.
In her report to council last night, Anderson emphasized: “The City of Whitehorse strives to obtain the maximum economic benefit in the acquisitions of all goods and services that it acquires from all qualified suppliers.
“The City of Whitehorse’s ‘Purchasing and Sales Policy’ provides the guidelines for all procurement activities. As such, local suppliers are afforded every opportunity to compete for the city’s business.”
Coun. Kirk Cameron was also quick to note his support for creating opportunities for local business and artisans with the project, with new city buildings subject to the city’s policy aimed at ensuring there is local art in public buildings.
Cameron noted in this case he is open about his bias, favouring local opportunities.
He also pointed out that residents want to see the work of Yukon artists in local facilities, and stressed that ways to strengthen support for local artists should be considered.
Anderson then noted that art is a council policy which already has a strong local preference component. It’s unlikely any art will be sought for the new buildings until 2017, giving council two years to consider art for the new buildings.
Coun. Betty Irwin suggested the city’s sustainability policies should also incorporate the benefits of going to local contractors and suppliers.
Looking to downtown development, Anderson noted the city has made that a priority with the reconstruction of several streets, housing initiatives and the Downtown South-Clay Cliffs Park implementation.
“In addition to these projects, the city looks forward to further opportunities with the chamber to ensure a vibrant downtown core,” she said.
Irwin noted she hopes to get more detail from the chamber on what they’d like to see done to accelerate redevelopment in the downtown.
While the chamber focused most of its comments on the building consolidation project, Anderson noted a number of other written comments came in.
They were focused on recycling, following council’s decision to sole-source a $100,000 contract (with the 2014 capital budget adjusted to fund the contract) for Morrison Hershfield Ltd. to come up with a plan for a curbside recycling collection program begin next year. Residents would be required to pay a monthly fee for it, currently estimated at $15.
The Yukon Blue Bin Society currently offers a collection program, with voluntary participants paying $20 per month for the twice-monthly collection service.
“Many comments were received on recycling and will be addressed with the operating budget,” Anderson said.
She then pointed to the 2013 Solid Waste Action Plan, which calls for a 50 per cent diversion rate at the landfill by 2015.
“Recognizing that the existing system for funding recycling in the territory is not sustainable, administration researched other options for funding and supporting recycling,” she said.
“The most viable option is a residential recycling collection service that would fund both the collection and processing of recyclable materials.”
A survey and information is currently underway – and available at www.whitehorse.ca/recycling – to look at how to deliver the program.
Another written submission requested that Dogwood Street in Porter Creek be reconstructed, a proposal Anderson noted has come forward in the past, but is not seen as a priority.
“This project has been considered in prior years, and for 2017, it was proposed that the project proceed as a local improvement project with a portion of the funding coming from area residents,” she said.
“However, due to other similar capital budget requests, this project was not prioritized at this time. Engineering staff will continue to monitor the condition of this road and will likely bring forward a budget submission again this year.”
Trails were also an issue for a number of residents who requested trail enhancements and lighting along the Millennium Trail near Spook Creek Station.
Cross Country Yukon also requested the paving of a three- to five-kilometre trail over existing trails at the Whitehorse Cross-Country Ski Club to allow for safe off-season training and more recreational opportunities for residents.
Anderson pointed out the 2015 to 2018 provisional plan calls for $225,000 to be spent on continuing to implement the city’s trail plan in addition to $200,000 for resurfacing existing paved trails.
The requests made as part of the budget consultation will go to the city’s trail committee for future consideration, but Anderson also noted the city is encouraging Cross Country Yukon to pursue other funding options.
A few other ideas that came in through the city’s online budget tool included putting in more berry gardens at city parks, and street and infrastructure improvements for Old Town.
Support was noted for a new skateboard park and a proposed seniors’ home in Riverdale.
In addition to the public input opportunities, the city also met with the Kwanlin Dun First Nation, which raised no concerns about the spending plan, but asked that it be consulted as the city plans for intersection improvements at McIntyre Drive and Hamilton Boulevard, near Race Trac Gas.
Council will vote on the budget next week.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (8)
Up 8 Down 2
PJT1959 on Dec 6, 2014 at 7:12 am
I really wonder how many COW council read this cause they really are in the clouds if they do think people are happy. It seems that we are now going to pave ski trails, must be going to put more taxes on motorized recreation to pay for that. If all this moving to one building should result in requiring less staff to answer phones etc., can council tell us if there are going to be fewer staff? The blue bin - that is a real tax grab as another service that we will have to pay for above our taxes so the next thing we'll have a snow removal charge. OH, OH I forgot, most do not get that but once a year so we will be paying each month for that too. So I guess that means taxes being paid the COW can pay higher wages to the people making a lot of the planning on where to raise taxes to spend more money then raise service fees to pay for them. That is my rant.
Up 7 Down 0
Political life next election on Dec 5, 2014 at 2:01 pm
How many from COW council will be running in the next Yukon election? Maybe 3 at least maybe 4. Who are they and who will they run for?
Up 6 Down 6
yukon56 on Dec 4, 2014 at 5:13 pm
Many people do not realize that buildings have a shelf life, It is a hard pill to swallow as a taxpayer and my only hope is that there is vision enough to know what the potential real estate value could be which may offset "our" investment.
Up 19 Down 2
What do the people of COW want on Dec 4, 2014 at 12:33 pm
Lets outline what the COW can spend their capital dollars on:
> retain the existing capital plan!
> cut the capital budget in half and lower taxes!
> Cut the capital budget in half, cut taxes and reduce service costs!
> cut the capital budget in half which is about $27 million and complete a joint venture with the YTG $11 million and develop an affordable housing village.
> Only spend capital dollars on what is needed and I think that was about $14 million leaving $36 million available for other ideas to where best to invest the COW public funds.
COW put a list of capital project each years in September and ask the people to vote on what projects they think would be a priority for the COW. This can be done very inexpensive with a mail drop.
Up 16 Down 2
Charles on Dec 4, 2014 at 12:24 am
@ June, good one. I hope your are early asking for forgiveness because I suspect a long line up & I will be one. I only voted for 2 of this present council because I had high hopes for them, but those votes were obviously wasted. The recycling idea did me in before the budget. I hope everyone has completed the survey about recycling, either on line or at CWG.
Up 20 Down 3
J on Dec 2, 2014 at 7:53 pm
The plans to spend this absurd amount on a new building is outright silly. When taxes have continued to go up, how can you expect tax payers to support initiatives like this. From a procurement standpoint for both the city and government, it is not designed local. It's designed to who can provide benefit to the government officials. If procurement policies were fair, then there should be guidelines that they keep the money local and not send it to big companies outside the Territory or in some case Canada.
Up 42 Down 4
Max Mack on Dec 2, 2014 at 4:09 pm
Perhaps the City and its "shining star" council members should be asking why people are not participating in the budget process.
Maybe it is because the City has demonstrated repeatedly that it is only interested in comments that satisfy its pre-determined agenda. Stacked planning and consultation sessions, "partnerships" designed to blunt public criticism, "experts" aligned to shut down public dissent, and predatory funding practices to ensure compliant societies.
Property owners are increasingly feeling disenfranchised, ignored and unrepresented.
Up 46 Down 5
June Jackson on Dec 2, 2014 at 3:44 pm
Forgive me Lord; I made a lot of mistakes at the polls in the last election.