Candidates enunciate on labour, CPP, food issues
Four of the territory’s five federal election candidates attended a debate Tuesday evening hosted by the Yukon Federation of Labour focused on issues affecting workers.
By Gabrielle Plonka on September 25, 2019
Four of the territory’s five federal election candidates attended a debate Tuesday evening hosted by the Yukon Federation of Labour focused on issues affecting workers.
Candidates answered six questions regarding pharmacare, pension protection, food accessibility, Canada Post, education and work opportunities for Indigenous peoples and childcare.
Conservative hopeful Jonas Smith did not attend the forum, held at Yukon College. Smith also missed last Thursday evening’s event put on by the Yukon Anti-Poverty Coalition and attended by all the other candidates.
Last evening, asked to pledge commitment to guarantee universal pharmacare, the Green Party’s Lenore Morris said her party is in support.
She lamented the current cost of pharmaceutical drugs in the country.
“The prices we pay are very high and almost random,” Morris said. “There is almost no relation in the cost of producing the drug and the cost of purchasing it.”
Nationalizing drug purchasing would help support universal pharmacare, she added.
Liberal incumbent Larry Bagnell said he is also in support.
He cited a recent Liberal policy announcement to encourage joint purchasing initiatives with the provinces and territories to work toward universal pharmacare. He said this will include a drug agency to start negotiations.
NDP candidate Justin Lemphers – the federation’s former president – said he agreed with Morris that provinces and territories should combine their purchasing power.
Lemphers said the NDP would implement a national pharmacare program “immediately.”
He suggested a one per cent wealth tax on Canadians with more than $20 million in personal wealth could potentially foot the bill.
Lemphers added the universal care plan would include “mouths and minds” for a more holistic approach than is currently seen in Canadian healthcare.
Joseph Zelezny, the People’s Party of Canada (PPC) candidate, was the only candidate opposed to universal pharmacare.
“It would bankrupt the country,” he declared.
Zelezny said the PPC would transfer GST revenue to provinces to give those governments the autonomy to “innovate and be fully responsible for health care.”
The candidates were then asked to explain how they would protect private pensions and ensure a high quality of life for seniors.
Zelezny said the PPC would instruct the Bank of Canada to have a zero per cent inflation rate to “stop the erosion of purchasing power.” He also pledged to end the carbon tax and lower business taxes.
To protect private pensions, Zelezny said the PPC will backdate funds to address disability pension reductions that created a two-tier category for veterans.
Pumping additional federal funding into pension initiatives would lead to “endless deficits” for the country, he added.
Morris said the Green Party plans to gradually raise the Canadian Pension Plan (CPP) from 25 per cent to 50 per cent of the income replacement target.
“Canadian Pension Plan is an important source of income for many seniors, but it’s not enough,” she said.
As a solution to protecting private pensions in case of bankruptcy, she suggested changing legislation by amending the Bankruptcy Act.
Morris added her party proposes raising guaranteed income supplements by 20 per cent.
Lemphers similarly advocated for the stronger protection of private pensions.
“We need to have mechanisms in place that allow those workers who invested into that pension program to have security in k
knowing their future is protected,” he said.
Lemphers said the CPP needs to be improved to support a rising number of Canadians who will need it.
He added that “not everyone is able to self-fund their retirement,” adding he wants to ensure stable access to pensions for seniors.
Bagnell said the Liberals have already boosted the guaranteed income supplement for low-income seniors and ensured the pension age begins at 65.
Bagnell proposed that old age security for seniors over 75 to go up 10 per cent and increase the basic personal exemption for people in the $15,000 annual income bracket.
He also proposed that the survivor benefit for pensioners who have lost their spouse to rise by 25 per cent.
“Once you retire, you’ve earned that pension,” he said.
The candidates were then asked how they proposed to strengthen food security in the North.
Bagnell cited work the Liberal party has done to improve the Nutrition North program. He mentioned assisting small retailers with payment options, a northern isolated food fund for greenhouses and freezers, and a local food infrastructure fund.
Lemphers said he hopes to further localize food sources in the North through “food hubs” in each community. He said advanced reconciliation and a reduced carbon footprint would be the result of leaning on traditional knowledge keepers to grow food systems.
“Food security has to be a much broader solution with our limited infrastructure,” he said.
Morris agreed that the expansion of local food production could be the answer to food security and reducing carbon footprint.
Morris said she has seen a big expansion in local farming in recent history, and thinks the government should work to encourage its growth.
“For local food production to thrive, it needs infrastructure,” she said.
Zelezny said enabling equal opportunity to expand Yukoners’ purchasing power would do more to increase security than “overregulation” of the industry would.
“Every time you try and control an economy, that’s borderline communism,” he said.
Candidates were then asked how they would support Canada Post.
Lemphers said his party is for expanded government support of Canada Post. Reinvesting in postal banking would help the country grow and allow it to serve the “greater good” of the public, he said.
Morris said the Green Party has a plan for expanding Canada Post. It includes diversifying services, better servicing rural communities, reversing recent funding cuts and moving to electric vehicles.
Morris also advocated for a “last mile delivery” system that would only use low-emission vehicles, limiting Canada Post’s carbon footprint.
Zelezny said he believes Canada Post should be privatized to enable more competition and inspire creative solutions to expand the service. He added that cutting income taxes would help with this.
Bagnell said he is for Canada Post establishing a banking service that would benefit rural communities. He added that he has made this case to the minister in the past.
In the fifth part of the debate, candidates were asked to describe how they would improve education and employment opportunities for Indigenous groups.
Zelezny said such support falls under territorial jurisdiction, but that the PPC supports all treaties. He discussed working with First Nations governments to better support them.
Morris said the Green Party believes Indigenous people have a right to access high-quality and culturally appropriate education and services. She called increasing equality a “high priority” for the party.
“It’s going to be community by community,” she said, adding the party would look for First Nations’ guidance in the best way to expand support systems.
Bagnell said First Nations education has been sorely underfunded, noting that the Liberal party has committed billions of dollars to try to correct that inequity. He cited the Liberals’ Indigenous Languages Act and advocated for simultaneous translation for Indigenous languages in Parliament.
“When you have the strength of your culture and language … you have the type of confidence in yourself that will lead you to success in education and in life,” he said.
Lemphers said the NDP endorses better employment, education and health for Indigenous groups.
For employment, Lemphers said Indigenous groups are on the front lines of climate change. He would create “co-ordinated action plans” for wildfires and floods.
He also advocated for more local education in rural Indigenous communities and better, safer housing in those communities.
Zelezny said providing clean drinking water to First Nations communities is a high priority for the PPC. He said “bureaucratic processes” have contributed to the issues Indigenous peoples face.
Finally, the candidates were asked if their parties will provide affordable childcare.
Morris said providing universal childcare is “fundamental” for women’s equality. She advocated for a national childcare program.
The Green Party would collaborate with provinces, territories, Indigenous communities and the childcare sector to make it happen.
Lemphers agreed that investing in universal childcare is “necessary” and the NDP would be willing to invest in establishing one.
Bagnell said the Liberal party is proposing to add 250,000 spaces to before- and after-school care and cutting fees across the country by 10 per cent.
Zelezny said childcare concerns come down to the economy and “whether people are prosperous.” He vowed to cut taxes, shrink the government and “make life cheaper.”
By GABRIELLE PLONKA
Star Reporter
Comments (30)
Up 1 Down 0
Max Mack on Oct 1, 2019 at 5:54 pm
I disagree that CPP needs "improving". CPP was designed to be a minimal employment pension and it should remain that way. Government should look at other ways to encourage employers and workers to invest in their own retirement, rather than expecting everyone else to be responsible for poor planning and poor life choices. Otherwise, expect CPP premiums or taxes to increase substantially or expect CPP cuts for those who've worked hard their entire lives so those "unfortunate" others can have a bigger piece of that pie.
Universal pharmacare, whatever that means as I'm sure no one knows what that program would look like, will be very expensive no matter how it is managed and will undoubtedly be a very heavy tax burden on those of us who are already heavily taxed beyond relief.
As for that mythical "food security" . . . the Yukon relies heavily on trucked goods and that will never change (unless . . . "climate change" to the rescue). In Whitehorse alone, there are at least 8 major grocery stores -- almost all of that stock comes up the highway. Local food "security" in the Yukon is a fairy tale.
Up 1 Down 3
North_of_60 on Oct 1, 2019 at 4:24 pm
@WC Actual carbon in our atmosphere from soot and combustion particulates is negligible and it fairly quickly settles out. Carbon dioxide CO2 in the atmosphere is about 410ppm or 0.04% of the atmosphere. Human activities burning hydrocarbons and making cement contribute 4.6ppm CO2 annually, or about 0.00046 % of the atmosphere, and is also insignificant. The natural seasonal variation in CO2 emissions is far greater than the human contribution, especially in the Yukon. The only effect of increased CO2 is making the planet greener, and for that we can take a small amount of credit with the CO2 we emit.
For the same reason we don't call H2O 'hydrogen' it's a mistake to call CO2 'carbon'. Those sorts of details are important to real scientists.
Up 5 Down 0
Jackson on Oct 1, 2019 at 2:54 pm
@Wilf Carter
Why do you drop idle speculation like it's yesterday's breakfast? Either you know or you don't know. There's no point tossing rocks into the wind and stating wind affects gravity, because you don't know it for a fact, you just know it's true.
Atmospheric CO2 has reached roughly 415 parts per million (PPM). Yes, it is a tiny percentage of our atmosphere but stubbornly creates problems for us. In the right amount CO2 is great for life and the stability of this biome that is incredibly well-suited for human life to flourish. Things are pushing out of balance and unless we do something about it we can't come close to predicting all of the potential consequences. Maybe humans, animals and plants will generally be able to adapt to the changing climate and we'll all be fine. I do not know. I do know that if mitigation doesn't work we'll have to focus on adaptation as a species. I do believe mitigation is the easier path though requires effort and sacrifice. We wouldn't have to worry as much about making effort on adaptation as this is more the 'let god sort em out' scenario - the planet will be fine, not as confident about humans as a species.
Up 5 Down 11
Willard on Sep 30, 2019 at 7:52 pm
Yet again, we have the Conservatives putting their best face forward.
Up 14 Down 6
Schultzy on Sep 30, 2019 at 4:34 pm
@ Charlie's Aunt - Jonas was absolutely out in the communities, as he knocked on my door in Teslin on Thursday and we had a wonderful conversation! I feel there is value in candidates getting out and pounding the pavement to talk to people, even if it means missing a few debates - which are really only about satisfying a small group on their concerns. As long as they can read a platform or chat with candidates elsewhere, why give them grief over missing debates when they are hard at work?
Up 7 Down 10
Wilf Carter on Sep 30, 2019 at 3:47 pm
You know what's interesting. Several months before the last Yukon election a mining company gave Yukon liberals $50,000 for their election campaign. I worked with him. Real facts. So how much of that money moved over to Larry's campaign?
Up 7 Down 12
Wilf Carter on Sep 30, 2019 at 3:20 pm
JP at what levels in our atmosphere does carbon exist? Stating carbon in higher levels is not correct according to NASA and many other groups. Carbon is necessary to maintain life and is only less than half a percent in our atmosphere
Up 14 Down 8
Jackson on Sep 30, 2019 at 2:11 pm
@JC, @North_of_60
Just a clarification that yes if you can control other variables such as temperature and watering in a closed environment like a greenhouse, higher CO2 (to a point) will yield more production while reducing nutritional value. However, in the real world higher CO2 is one component that is disruptive to agriculture. Higher atmospheric CO2 concentrations along with increased temperature promotes vapour retention in the atmosphere. The result is two-fold 1) an increase in evaporation rates and 2) the atmosphere holding a greater quantity of moisture for longer periods of time until eventually being released. The net effect are larger areas of drought and areas of over-saturation (dumping). Neither of these conditions is particularly good for agricultural crops and is a problem that gets worse as temperature goes up and upper atmosphere reduces in density. The clouds that form and stay in the atmosphere longer are themselves also a significant contributor to greenhouse effect. And there is the problem - it's a feedback loop and if/when the tipping point gets passed we can kiss our ideal biome (the environmental conditions that sustain us) goodbye.
Anyone who argues higher atmospheric CO2 is a good thing best avoid the real world, cause what comes next is NOT good.
Up 25 Down 6
Obi! on Sep 30, 2019 at 11:02 am
"You vote Lib-er-al and what do you get?,
another day older and deeper in debt"
Up 5 Down 9
Fair comments on Sep 29, 2019 at 3:10 pm
Excuse me North of 59, I find woodcutters comments much more insightful and fair on all issues, we as the other fellow seems like someone that has an axe to grind on just about everything and tend to be very right leaning to the almost extreme.
Up 9 Down 3
HarvardYaleAndPrincetonMan on Sep 29, 2019 at 1:04 pm
"Yukoner53 on Sep 28, 2019 at 11:53 pm" - INTERESTING !
And who gave Smith's campaign the $300,000 ?
Up 23 Down 18
Yukoner53 on Sep 28, 2019 at 11:53 pm
As another commenter already mentioned, Jonas Smith doesn't think he needs to show up to debates since he and the conservatives have plastered his smug mug all over Whitehorse for the past year. I've heard the Conservatives have spent over $300,000 on advertising since they nominated Jonas. Well guess what guys, you can't BUY our votes!!
Up 20 Down 17
Bob Folster on Sep 28, 2019 at 12:09 pm
Where was "Pasloski Junior" ?
I've seen his picture 5,000 times in the last 6 months but have no idea about what he wants to do FOR MY YUKON
Up 10 Down 26
Smitty on Sep 27, 2019 at 7:03 pm
The Liberals seem to have the most comprehensive plan for dealing with each of these individual issues.
Up 20 Down 5
North_of_60 on Sep 27, 2019 at 1:41 pm
JC is correct and woodcutter is misinformed.
Plants absorb CO2 and H2O and through the process of photosynthesis use the energy from sunlight to form carbohydrates. These are complex molecules composed of carbon, hydrogen and oxygen; the 'building blocks' of life on earth. CO2 is literally the gas of life; below 200ppm concentration plants begin to die. Without CO2, life as we know it would not exist.
Up 8 Down 17
woodcutter on Sep 27, 2019 at 10:50 am
@JC
I am reading the response to local food security as by growing more of our food locally the carbon foot print is reduced due to not requiring to truck it up the Alaska Highway. Vegetation does not feed on CO2, they feed on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium as well as a big long list of trace minerals. However, they do breath in CO2 and exhale O2 during the day and at night they breath in O2 and release CO2. Contrary to public understanding, plants are not a major contributor of breathable oxygen in the world, but pretty much use up all the oxygen they create during the day, in the night cycle, it's the algae's of the world that make the 02. What did you learn in science class? Or were you snoozing?
Up 21 Down 17
where on Sep 27, 2019 at 9:51 am
Where is Bus Stop Smitty?
Is he content to just have his face plastered on the back end of a bus spewing diesel smoke as a signal of his platform?
Up 21 Down 16
Scared CPC on Sep 27, 2019 at 9:47 am
Maybe Jonas didn't get the memo. He is supposed to be showing up at the debates, not hiding in the bushes like Leef did.
Up 13 Down 9
Mr M on Sep 27, 2019 at 9:26 am
Yeah the Conservatives don't show up and it is a big deal. Where was the Prime Minister on the first debate. Not there and it isn't the only one he was absent from. They all make promises and mistakes. Some admit to their mistakes even it is brought up years later. No one is perfect. Especially Government and Public Leaders.
Up 16 Down 7
joseph zelezny on Sep 26, 2019 at 10:01 pm
If anything federal government staff are under-represented in the Yukon considering all of the responsibilities here and over-represented in other areas of the country. This is a federal election and that is my focus. We don't need countless staff coming up with foreign funding things and managing corporate welfare and handouts. We need to ensure that the responsibilities are kept up and that considering the many areas of Federal responsibility that resources here are adequate which based on my discussions with folks are not - they are stretched to the limits and doing the best because they care, meanwhile add the billions of spending of previous federal liberal and conservative governments that have not and will not benefit any Canadians. We need to lead by example and worry about Canadians and not the rest of the world.
Up 16 Down 9
North_of_60 on Sep 26, 2019 at 7:09 pm
@Politico, don't believe everything you think. Parroting climate cult dogma is not science. JC is correct and you are sadly misinformed. Maybe consider doing some actual science research instead of simply parroting what your FB friends believe, and have a nice day.
Up 14 Down 0
Sham Wow! on Sep 26, 2019 at 5:44 pm
What a peculiar thing to write, “enunciate on...” It is interesting to think that all of the candidates required speech therapy and that they did so while discussing the subjects of labour, CPP, and food.
Strange things indeed... Sir Robert, indeed...
Up 10 Down 18
Politico on Sep 26, 2019 at 4:19 pm
@JC What an astounding lack of scientific knowledge. Hold your breath and see how beneficial the build up of CO2 in your lungs would be. More CO2 in the atmosphere contributes to the increase in climate warming which is driving rising sea levels, massive storms and habitat loose. There is also research to show that many of our current plants don't grow well with excess CO2 in the atmosphere. You might read up on that.
Up 19 Down 12
Charlie's Aunt on Sep 26, 2019 at 4:04 pm
Only supposition on my part, but Jonas may have been in the communities talking to people. There are more people entitled to vote and meet candidates than just those in Whitehorse. if that were the case it may not have been good planning by his team.
Up 21 Down 6
jc on Sep 26, 2019 at 8:44 am
Great job Joseph! Looking beyond the "internet" "facebook" garbage most believe in today's society, I really liked your answers and suggestions on these issues. I have worked tireless for over 15 years to get clean water into a few FN communities here in the Yukon, under a PC government and then Liberal govt, each time funds denied as the projects do not fulfill some LOSS (Level of Service Standard) or some other administrative glitch in the Federal Funding and Territorial Funding regime.
I have heard the promises over and over again from each PC and Liberal candidate how they are going to make FN clean water a priority.. well many are still waiting here in the Yukon! You have my vote!
I don't agree with throwing more money at these issues without a solid plan and commitment. Simply committing to increasing the funding pot does not guarantee the work gets done... it's simply an election promise without an implementation plan.
Up 26 Down 21
Speaks volumes Mr. Smith on Sep 25, 2019 at 11:05 pm
Hmmm. .. not attending the Yukon Federation of Labour and the Anti Poverty coalitions debate....guess the conservatives figure they got this election in the bag and don't have to try to win our votes. Ding dong you're wrong! You may have your face and posters plastered around for years now, Mr. Smith, but advertising when you are a hollow candidate isn't going to get you elected.
Up 17 Down 21
HarvardYaleAndPrincetonMan on Sep 25, 2019 at 6:19 pm
Why didn't "Rusty Pasloski" (Darryl's red-headed stepchild) bother to show up ?
Up 26 Down 3
Darrell Drugstore's smartest neighbour on Sep 25, 2019 at 6:09 pm
"Zelezny vowed to shrink the government"
LMAO - not going to go over well with the gigantic herd of highly paid Civil Servants in Whitehorse
Up 15 Down 9
jc on Sep 25, 2019 at 5:47 pm
Morris: Food production/farming, is the answer to reducing carbon footprint? Carbon/Carbon dioxide/C02 is what vegetation feed on! Hello. What did you learn in school science course? Were you snoozing?
Up 25 Down 4
Politico on Sep 25, 2019 at 3:20 pm
If they can't ask you questions they can't accuse you of lying.