Candidate hopes three amigos will do the trick
Three years after losing a council seat by just three votes, Roslyn Woodcock is back and ready for another run for council.
By Stephanie Waddell on September 10, 2015
Three years after losing a council seat by just three votes, Roslyn Woodcock is back and ready for another run for council.
On Wednesday afternoon, the 43-year-old announced her plans to again seek a city councillor seat in the Oct. 15 municipal election.
In 2012, Woodcock placed seventh out of 22 candidates for council with 1,531 votes in her favour, just three behind Mike Gladish, who took the final sixth seat as councillor.
She began her announcement Wednesday with a joke about the 2012 results and Gladish’s decision not to seek a second term.
“I don’t want to take anything for granted this time so I have made efforts to secure three new friends who have promised to vote for me this time. Plus, since Mike Gladish isn’t running, I’m a shoo-in.”
Waste diversion continues to be a top priority for Woodcock. It was in her 2012 campaign, and she is looking forward to the city’s plan for a blue box program to collect recyclables.
The venture would see property owners on the city’s waste collection system charged for the program through their utility bills. A request for proposals on the plan is expected to be released later this fall.
While Woodcock would like to see the program move ahead more quickly, she acknowledged “it’s not simple.”
Not being privy to the work that has gone on so far, it’s difficult to say whether it could happen more quickly.
Woodcock is incorporating her commitment to waste reduction stand and community involvement into her own election campaign.
“Rather than printing a ton of signs that will just end up in the landfill or blow around town for months, I am making signs available for download,” she said.
“When a supporter prints out one of my signs and posts a photo of themselves with it on the campaign’s Facebook page, I will personally donate an item to the Whitehorse Food Bank.”
Woodcock opted to take that route with her signs as a visible way to show how making small changes to the traditional way of doing things can have a positive impact on the community.
“I challenge other candidates to look for ways to make their campaign about truly improving our city, and about more than just winning a seat,” Woodcock said.
She offered praise for the work the city has done in moving waste diversion efforts forward in recent years.
Along with waste diversion, Woodcock said she has heard from a number of people concerned about densification of the downtown and the territorial government’s $200-million long-term plans to upgrade the Alaska Highway, including twinning the road through a number of sections in the city.
“Our city should be livable and provide ready access to the outdoors for all residents,” said Woodcock, who lives downtown with her partner and dog.
“Densification of the downtown core is essential to a vibrant city, but it needs to be done responsibly. This means mixed-use planning and taking care of our main street, our river, our green spaces and ensuring access to wilderness.”
While work on the Alaska Highway falls under the jurisdiction of the Yukon government, Woodcock pointed out what happens to the highway affects the entire community.
“I still think the city has both the opportunity and the need to sit down with the Yukon government,” she said of the city’s involvement with the highway project.
Woodcock owns two small business – Plan Write Consulting and Imagine Laserworks – and has volunteered for and worked with a number of community organizations since arriving in Whitehorse in 1999.
She currently sits on the board of the Potluck Food Cooperative and is active with the United Way.
While Woodcock is the latest candidate to confirm her intentions to run, former councillor Kirk Cameron is continuing to ponder whether to seek office again.
Last month, he said he was “99 per cent sure” he would have his name on the ballot.
Today, he said he wants to confer with his three sons before he makes a final decision.
He and his 14-year-old son are slated to make a trip to Ontario this week to visit his two adult sons, and there, the family will discuss Cameron’s plans.
He said there is a lot to consider when running for council. The position can take up a lot of time and is a major commitment, sometimes consuming up to 40 hours a week when there is a major issue to consider.
While Cameron has been twice elected to city council, he has yet to sit for a full term.
In 2011, he was first elected part way through council’s term in a by-election following Doug Graham’s departure from city hall to the territorial legislature.
He was then re-elected to the current council term in 2012, placing third among councillor candidates with 2,363 votes.
He resigned last March over city manager Christine Smith’s firings of Brian Crist and Rob Fendrick, two long-time directors with the city.
When he stated he was considering running again, Cameron stressed he had made his point when he resigned and, if elected to the next term, would like to work to ensure there are “checks and balances” so that something like the firings would not happen without more involvement from council.
He expects after he returns to the territory next week, he will have a better idea of whether he will run in the Oct. 15 election.
See letter on mayoral race.
Comments (15)
Up 3 Down 2
Practical voter on Sep 15, 2015 at 5:47 pm
If I were Ms Woodcock I would not be drawing on any comparisons to Mr Gladish as he was capitulating on his 8 million dollar Soccer stadium even though he new the estimated maintenance costs were totally ridiculous for the unneeded facility. He was trying to appease some of his friends and neighbors on his way out the door. Bye.
Is there going to be a public departure barbecue for Betty and Dave thanking them for they're past paid service?
Nice to see some new blood with common sense running for council. I will be voting for that strain.
Up 26 Down 1
Staff cuts are possible on Sep 15, 2015 at 6:32 am
@Resident - a news story from last week mentioned several vacancies in City of Whitehorse, some unfilled for months. I can't think of any services that were impacted. Where do you think 'quality of life' impacts would be if staff cuts took place (or if vacancies went unfilled)? I'd love to see comparisons of other cities of this size, when it comes to number of City employees (by department), average wages, etc.
Up 24 Down 5
Resident on Sep 14, 2015 at 4:03 pm
Reducing the city budget isn't hard. With half or so of the operating budget going to staff, you need to cut staff to make a dent in the budget. Staff cuts are noticeable and they're going to be quality of life cuts. If people want to live in the middle of nowhere with minimal services, they need to see that.
Up 45 Down 3
One more commitment and she has my vote on Sep 14, 2015 at 7:46 am
I will be looking for candidates who are talking about - and committed to - bringing the spending under control at City of Whitehorse (cost reductions and finding efficiencies rather than assuming tax and fee increases can support spending). Anyone? Anyone?
Up 10 Down 26
Sally Wright on Sep 13, 2015 at 8:12 pm
Right on Fed Up! You are so right. It is about time manufacturers stopped over- packaging our goods, and started paying for the waste they create. If our society doesn't start adding a third bottom line, the environment, we will never get out of the mess we are in.
One day we will mine our dumps, light our lives with renewable energy and fuel our bodies with ethical fuel. Keep moving Roslyn, don't stop!
Up 42 Down 2
Cut cut cut on Sep 13, 2015 at 7:16 pm
I want to hear from a candidate that wants to have a long hard look at the way this little town does business. I am convinced we are living beyond our means and need to be honest with ourselves about what a municipal government is and does.
When I hear that our Mayor is going to Yellowknife to promote an Air North route, I am thinking he should be more concerned about our roads, sewers, water services, animal bylaw, fire protection etc. Let's get back to basics and have a hard look at the extras we do. If there are anymore increases, I am out of here!!
Up 17 Down 24
Fed up. on Sep 12, 2015 at 4:57 pm
I am so sick and tired of hearing people complain about the cost of waste management. The private sector will never fully succeed in providing an effective waste recycling service in Whitehorse without government support or intervention. And by effective I do not mean "profitable", I mean a system that works to better our environment. I am from a younger generation and sadly sometimes I feel like giving up. Here in this city (and around the world) we prolong the argument against government intervention while most of our waste continues to get diverted to a landfill (some of it coming from private sector recycling businesses). Waste management is not a profitable enterprise, let's stop arguing about that and move on to finding solutions that work. This won't happen overnight but if we continue to argue about the costs we might as well all give up now...
We have to start investing in our waste management infrastructure. We need better facilities, better technology and more space to stockpile non-profitable recyclables instead of diverting them to the landfill or the unknowns in India and China. We have to start taking responsibility. This costs money people, start learning to accept that and maybe we can create some positive change in this city. Roslyn has my vote.
Up 6 Down 8
Rover on Sep 11, 2015 at 10:02 pm
@David Morris - What does "handle heralded" mean? The blog is hilarious. I'm not sure if you're kidding or not, but I don't think I'd use it for a reference for Roslyn Woodcock or the dozens of people who have similarly got on the wrong side of the writer.
Up 12 Down 37
Roslyn Woodcock on Sep 11, 2015 at 5:33 pm
Specifically in response to Dave's comments...I’d nearly forgotten about those blogs. This isn’t even the best one. In one I also have terrible manners... which my mother can tell you is NOT true.
I guess with all the cat videos, we sometimes forget that the internet has some dark corners too. Some time ago, a person upset with the decision made by a national council I was part of, started on an ambitious, if unbalanced campaign of slanderous blog posts about each of the members. I’ll not link to them, as I have no desire to feed the internet trolls, but if you can stomach long, rambling, and grammatical injustice, there are dozens of similar posts (most directly cut and pasted with the only change being the person they purport to discuss) they are out there to find… as you, Dave, were lucky enough to learn. Personally, I’d rather watch another cat video.
As to the comments about the blue bin recycling business. I not just a big fan! I'm a customer. I think it is very unlikely that should the city implement a recycling program that this business will not be involved. I see the move towards city wide recycling as likely increasing their business many fold, not ending it.
Up 6 Down 7
David Morris on Sep 10, 2015 at 10:12 pm
Interesting link, makes me wonder how she will handle heralded in tough situations.
http://roslyn-woodcock.blogspot.ca/?m=1
Up 140 Down 7
Amanda Leslie on Sep 10, 2015 at 9:55 pm
I have never posted here, but cannot refrain myself this time, (and this is nothing against this particular candidate); rather it is my weariness about government interference (a/o competition) with our territory's small, yet fiercely committed private sector - which I can attest is "in the trenches" on a day-to-day basis trying to operate within an enormous public sector culture here in the Yukon.
We have a blue box recycling program here - Whitehorse Blue Bin Recycling. Support that. Support them. Please don't start something new and compete (in this case municipally) with the private sector.
While the City has been talking about starting a program like this (how many years now?) - Whitehorse Blue Bin started out as a volunteer society and donated their profits to various local charities for three years (at least).
They are now a business. If they are not picking up in your area, support them, allow them to grow and I have no doubt they will be at your curb every second Wednesday as they are at mine.
Up 57 Down 2
Blue bins? on Sep 10, 2015 at 9:46 pm
What about the current blue bins business? Assume just put them out of business after all their hard work?
Up 124 Down 5
June Jackson on Sep 10, 2015 at 7:56 pm
Well said Yukon 56. Not much I can add to that.
How come no one is saying.. "If i am elected I will do the best I can to ensure the City lives within its means. I will vote no on tax hikes instituted to cover the cost of frivolous expenditures. If I have to ask others to take a pay cut, i will take a pay cut." well.. readers get the picture.
I really like the look and humor of this candidate, but I am afraid I can't vote for anyone when the first thing out of their face is "jack the taxes". (The venture would see property owners on the city’s waste collection system charged for the program through their utility bills.") I am a renter.. but when the taxes go up.. so do mine.
Up 137 Down 5
Max Mack on Sep 10, 2015 at 4:39 pm
ANOTHER "progressive" liberal interventionist. Expect more taxes, more fees, more fines in the future while more and more changes are crammed down our throats. But, it's for our own good, you know.
Sigh.
Up 130 Down 15
Yukon 56 on Sep 10, 2015 at 4:27 pm
Waste diversion continues to be a top priority for Woodcock. It was in her 2012 campaign, and she is looking forward to the city’s plan for a blue box program to collect recyclables.
The venture would see property owners on the city’s waste collection system charged for the program through their utility bills. A request for proposals on the plan is expected to be released later this fall.
Just cram another cost down the homeowners throat. I recycle like most and do NOT support this BS