Budget hikes average residential tax bill to $2,265
Property owners around the city could be facing a 1.7 per cent increase in property taxes next year, while water and sewer bills may rise by 6.3 per cent.
Property owners around the city could be facing a 1.7 per cent increase in property taxes next year, while water and sewer bills may rise by 6.3 per cent.
Meanwhile, garbage and compost collection are expected to remain at the same cost, though that doesn’t factor in the proposed curbside recycling collection program the city is planning to begin next year.
The costs were outlined as part of the city’s proposed $69-million operational budget for 2015, unveiled at Monday evening’s city council meeting.
Members voted to pass first reading on the bylaw after Mayor Dan Curtis presented his five-page speech, promoting the spending plan as a “balanced budget that allows us to live within our means.
“We are doing this by finding efficiencies and keeping operational increases to a minimum. We are also doing more with less. The result of this work is a lean and fiscally responsible budget for the upcoming year,” the mayor said.
The tax increase is lower than the 2.3 per cent hike the city had originally projected for 2015.
At 1.7 per cent – the same increase taxpayers absorbed in 2014 – Curtis emphasized it’s the lowest increase in the past decade.
“The average homeowner will pay $29 more in taxes next year, which amounts to 55 cents a week,” Curtis said.
“The average business will pay an extra $561 in taxes or about $11 per week.”
The increase will bring the average residential tax bill up to $2,265 from $2,227.
“Taxes help pay for roads, fire protection, recreation facilities, parks and trails, transit, planning, engineering and other operations that keep the city running,” Curtis said.
“Taxes in Whitehorse remain lower than many other comparable municipalities. And our modest tax increase will keep it that way.”
While the tax hike is less than the city had originally projected for 2015, the increase to water and sewer bills is almost two per cent higher than the 4.7 per cent boost that had originally been projected.
If it’s passed, it means that those on the city’s water and sewer system will pay $73 each month compared to the current rate of $69.
“Rising electrical costs are driving this rate increase,” Curtis explained in his speech.
“Electricity costs have risen by more than $300,000 this year. We are making some changes that will help manage these cost pressures.
“We have a new energy tracker enabling departments to review electricity and water consumption on a monthly basis, and take action as needed to address issues and make improvements.”
Also impacting costs on the system has been the need to “run the old and new Selkirk pump stations on a temporary basis as we transition to the new infrastructure.”
And there have been services added to new developments, such as Whistle Bend, the mayor pointed out.
Curtis noted residential curbside collection of waste and compost will remain the same at $10.30 each month.
What’s not known is how much residents will have to pay for the recycling program proposed in the coming year.
“The cost of this service and other details will be announced in the upcoming months, following our consultation with citizens and analysis for the program design,” the mayor said.
“The city will tender this new service, and we are currently working on this with our private sector partners in the recycling and waste industry.
“We are also committed to developing a recycling program that will be sustainable over the long term.”
While it won’t cost any more to have garbage picked up at the curb, tipping fees at the landfill are proposed to rise from $84 per tonne to $94 per tonne.
Bagged compost at the city’s compost facility at the landfill will be available at a cost of $5 per bag.
Curtis emphasized that waste services are provided on a cost recovery basis.
“All waste costs money, whether it is recycled, composted or buried in the landfill,” he said.
“We know that landfilling our waste has a high environmental and financial cost for our community. That is why we are focusing on waste reduction, and the city is working towards our ambitious goal to reduce waste by 50 per cent by 2015.”
With a goal of recovering 50 per cent of the cost of operating recreation facilities as it works to balance “fairness, affordability and community benefits,” the city is proposing to raise most rental rates at its facilities by 1.5 per cent next year, though the aquatic centre rental rate for youth groups would jump by 10 per cent to “better recover costs.”
Recreation service fees would go up by 1.5 per cent as well, including fees for the Canada Games Centre (CGC).
A summer discount is being suggested for the CGC to encourage fieldhouse rentals in the off-season.
The city would also continue to offer its 12.5 per cent discount on monthly transit passes with its Super Pass offering to those who purchase a monthly pass to the CGC.
The price for an adult monthly bus pass under the Super Pass would be $54.20 compared to $62 for the pass alone. Meanwhile, CGC monthly passes would be $49.58 per adult beginning next September.
Curtis emphasized the city’s commitment to delivering “top quality” services to citizens.
“This includes snow-clearing, road maintenance, fire protection and first response, transit, park and trail maintenance, recreation programs and a number of other important services,” he said.
Under the budget, funding would provide a new half-time position dedicated to planning and management of the city’s radio systems and other telecommunications; enhanced training for firefighters and training for water and wastewater systems operations.
“We are also transferring $12.2 million into the city’s reserve funds in 2015. We are looking to the future, and we are making choices that are financially responsible for now and the years ahead,” Curtis said.
He noted the city’s thanks for the federal gas tax and Building Canada Fund “that provide predictability and certainty for our government.”
Speaking to reporters after last night’s council meeting, Curtis praised city staff for working to keep taxes and fees as low as possible.
“We have a very lean machine here,” he said.
The 1.7 per cent boost to taxes did not come without some “pain and suffering,” he said as he pointed to the 2.3 per cent hike that was originally projected.
Projections for 2016 and 2017 show a 2.3 per cent increase for each of those years.
While a 6.3 per cent hike to water and sewer may sound like a lot, he noted it’s only $4 per month for the service that operates on a “break even” basis, with users paying the entire cost of the service.
With first reading of the operational budget approved, residents will have a chance to address council on it during a public input session at council’s Jan. 12 meeting.
A report on that will come to council on Jan. 19, with second and third readings scheduled for a vote Jan. 26.
Comments (29)
Up 1 Down 1
Blame CoW for Rent Increases on Dec 15, 2014 at 5:49 pm
It is obvious that the City of Whitehorse is much to blame for the lack of affordable housing in the Yukon. Landlords are forced to raise rents accordingly when they continuously get hit with these increases in utility charges and property taxes. Do a calculation and see the percentage of COW increases along with other basic housing costs in the past few years and wonder no more why housing is getting so expensive.
Up 26 Down 3
Just Say'in on Dec 11, 2014 at 11:15 pm
Here is how they mould and form the lie. They will say Taxes will increase by 3% when in fact what they do is increase the Mil Rate by 3%. This in conjunction with the assessed value that of course is not set by them but by YTG in their property assessment process. Now due to these outrageous development costs and new building regulations, property values have gone through the roof and hence the calculations of the Mill rate as it combines with the assessed value. That my friends is how your taxes can double with a few 3% increases. Time for new Council and upper management at the city. Council is supposed to give direction to Administration not the other way around.
Up 13 Down 6
Josey Wales on Dec 11, 2014 at 10:10 am
Hey Bud...Yes I noticed those mega lights and the make work project.
When I walked by the crews I just did some basic math, wages, truck, fuel for said truck, new copper required to bling the town (need mines for that product)...in short?
Walked away pondering...Gee I wonder why we get civic taxation ever so chronically, rhetorical!
I also notice two up dump trucks...wth?
Santa truck make news yet? Tis the season!
Up 3 Down 28
Mr.Rogers on Dec 11, 2014 at 7:14 am
To oh my partner.
"egregious", cut the dramatics. 7 percent for transit is reasonable. Most municipalities spend a higher percentage of their budget on transit. Most municipalities require their citizens pay more taxes. Stop the whining, we have it good.
Up 27 Down 2
DMZ on Dec 10, 2014 at 10:41 pm
These figures they come up with -- .55 cents a week and so on -- never seem to translate. My taxes have easily doubled in the past few years, despite all those types of assurances. $1.50 a month, I think Buckway said at one time.
As for our taxes being among the lowest in Canada, maybe. But last time I looked, Whitehorse was among the highest in fees for services.
I love the lights, though. I don't use the Canada Games Center, but I do have to look at this city. And it gives me such a lift to see all that colour this time of year. I don't know how much they cost, but probably not $55 million. Those buildings are, and always will be, for city administration, and they've made sure we're out of the loop on the decision. I don't respect the way they're doing it.
But the lights, we get to enjoy those. So thanks. See? It doesn't really take that much to please.
Up 14 Down 1
Ottawa comparison? on Dec 10, 2014 at 4:52 pm
Not sure if Ottawa and Whitehorse can be compared - but ottawa.ca has a pretty interesting property tax estimating tool that calculates taxes, based on a few criteria. I entered the value of my house, and got an estimate of $4800 tax - but it's hard to figure out what that includes compared to Whitehorse (am betting, tho, that Ottawa has more and better services for the $$)
Up 31 Down 2
Hold on there Partner on Dec 10, 2014 at 2:58 pm
7% of property tax for the Transit system? This is egregious. It would be cheaper to give people that ride the buses a Taxi pass there are so few of them. However the buses could haul the recycle dumpsters on wheels to the center during their slow periods making better use of a poorly used system.
The proposed half a day communications planner should be all finished his job after the system is in place and working so this could be a 6 month temp position not a chance to do some empire building.
Stop sending 3 people to do a one person job. Pretend you were private enterprise. I'd like to see a tax rollback until the CoW can prove they are running a tight ship. Merry Xmas!
Up 44 Down 2
Bud McGee on Dec 10, 2014 at 12:13 pm
I love the Holiday Season just as much as everyone else I'm sure, but has anyone else noticed the effort the City has gone through to put lights up this year? I realize that LED lights make the power consumption less, but wow. The person-hours spent to put them up at union wages must eclipse the previous year. Just a personal observation....I may be out to lunch. The lights look awesome, but I wonder what the price tag was this year.
Up 44 Down 1
different look at the math on Dec 10, 2014 at 11:14 am
Instead of trying to sell this as a 55 cent/week increase, think of the totals:
$43.55/week (new property tax residential average, divided by 52 weeks)
$18.25/week ($73/month water and sewage, divided by 4 weeks).
$61.80 per week ... nearly $250/month that's 'not' going to food, clothing, purchase of goods. I appreciate the services that we have here in Whitehorse, but I would appreciate them more if the CoW folks would stop relying on tax/fees to pay for them.
Up 40 Down 2
Bud McGee on Dec 10, 2014 at 9:15 am
This is pretty bad. These councillors know they can get away with it. Only 25% of us vote in municipal elections. Most people vote for the names they recognize, which are typically the incumbents. It's not a Whitehorse-only thing. This is a pretty common thing in most municipalities. If you want change, you have to participate in the process.
Up 38 Down 1
wolfe on Dec 10, 2014 at 7:51 am
They, the City managers, already have the foresight to predict the upcoming 2016 and 2017 increases. These increases of 1.7, 2.3, 2.3 don't sound like much when presented on an annual basis, but lets put this into context over a 5 year period, compounded this is close to a 15% increase in 5 years..thats right. Now if you were asking for a pay raise and asked for 15% in 5 years you would be laughed out of the building you would be lucky to get 2.3% in 5 years.
Something to think about.
How about a little more user pay system, there are a lot of folks that live right on the outskirts of the city and still use all city facilities, let me give you a comparison. A country residential property with-in city limits is paying between 3 and 5 thousand per year. Yet a country residential property on the hotsprings road is paying about 1500/year in taxes. A simple solution to this is to get users to pay for what they use, if you use the sports venues you pay, if you use the bus transit you pay, don't make the general population pay for items they don't use.
And don't keep telling us that building the new mega-building on the hill so the king can watch over the pawns won't result in a tax increase. Simple math tells us that if the money were put back into existing facilities and programs we would not be facing this annual tax increase.
Up 50 Down 3
Sandy Helland on Dec 10, 2014 at 7:21 am
$54,000,000 ($54 million) for new buildings ...
That money would be better spent on services rather than a down-payment on another over-budget building fiasco.
No new buildings for council, admin or operations.
Up 42 Down 2
Charles on Dec 10, 2014 at 12:35 am
This is ridiculous; I agree with 'unbelievable'. All the spouting about affordable housing is redundant if people can't afford the upkeep and this also means rentals will increase. This is all geared to the middle/upper income earners who might not notice a few extra $$. Subsidizing a non user friendly transit system and the proposed recycling system (they will implement it whether citizens rebel or not) are decisions made by a non realistic 'small pond, big fish' mentality. How do we fix this nonsense, I am tired of it. Maybe we should elect homeless folk to COW, they might be more down to earth.
Up 55 Down 2
north_of_60 on Dec 10, 2014 at 12:23 am
If the CoW got rid of frivolous spending like an Environmental Sustainability Department, curbside recycling, and a planned 'megaplex', then there would be no need for tax increases.
Use our gas tax rebates to fix and improve our petro based transportation infrastructure, not as your personal 'sustainable slush fund'.
Up 35 Down 1
Maureen N on Dec 9, 2014 at 8:49 pm
Curtis said the average tax increase will go from $2227 to $2265 thus “The average homeowner will pay $29 more in taxes next year, which amounts to 55 cents a week.” Is the difference not $38?
Up 39 Down 3
Doug Rutherford on Dec 9, 2014 at 8:42 pm
While I'm content to see the tax increase limited to below the cost of living, there is no reason beyond overspending for fees to exceed it.
And forget the misleading comments regarding us having lower taxes. Many of the municipalities being compared have their water, sewer and garbage included in their taxes, so try the comparison with another $1000 added to the tax amount to get an honest comparison.
Up 44 Down 2
Raps on Dec 9, 2014 at 8:20 pm
I have no idea if these tax hikes and continuing increases in city services (be prepared, tipping fees at the landfill are going up AGAIN) have anything to do with the new municipal building that is being proposed. However think about this for a second. The new building is reported estimated at 56 million. The Canada Games Center cost 55 million. Half the city uses that facility, about 150 overpaid city employees will be in the new building. I guess the managers feel they deserve the best office space in the Yukon. How about this. Build a modest structure at 20 million and spend the other 35 million on something the general public can use.
Up 33 Down 2
Pjt1959 on Dec 9, 2014 at 7:36 pm
Well where to start, 12 million more to the reserve fund but 6% to sewer and water because of electric is up, but lit up every tree in the city and say are lights don't cost us more. So in what is said sewer and water is also electric if that is what I am reading. Now I want to comment on a statement about parks in city and the bridge crossing. When one is forced to have a special license then they should have access to all trails and as a walker I would like to see more motorized trails as they are easier to walk on and most are friendly to walkers, and paving ski trails are they going to pay for that. I know a lot of people won't agree with that but it is my opinion. It's nice to think COW council think are giving us a tax break but services rates go up fast and just wait till we see this recycling cost is going to be and COW is going to say no matter how much, it's a deal. I think 1.7 and 1 .7 for tax and services would be a least a little more fair with no more cost as far as this recycling fees. That is my rant.
Up 40 Down 2
J on Dec 9, 2014 at 7:16 pm
Did they forget to mention that the tax increases are to also fund their new building that we don't really need? Doesn't seem to make sense given that our economy showed a decrease. "Lean and fiscally responsible" was used, I don't agree at all.
Up 36 Down 1
Comparisons, please! on Dec 9, 2014 at 6:51 pm
"Taxes in Whitehorse remain lower than many other comparable municipalities" says Mayor Curtis. I too would like to know which municipalities are being benchmarked. And what other benchmarks can be made (for example - how many employees do other municipalities have, and what percentage of operating budget goes to labour?). I have an idea - give direction to department heads to come up with a budget that results in no property taxes, and see what they can come up with. I'm tired of the administration assuming that taxpayers will continue to bear increases every year.
Up 6 Down 53
Barker on Dec 9, 2014 at 6:21 pm
Wow, that's pretty affordable. I live in Ottawa and pay $5100 a year for a three bedroom, middle class home.
Up 40 Down 1
Max Mack on Dec 9, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Curtis still barking on about Whitehorse having the lowest tax rates amongst comparable municipalities? News flash! There is next to zero (possibly zero) municipalities that are comparable to Whitehorse. We live in a jurisdiction that is awash with Federal inflows of resources, which benefits the City of Whitehorse directly and indirectly in so many ways that it is difficult to even enumerate them. Comparing property tax rates (especially net of HOG refunds) is simply dishonest.
While holding property taxes to inflation, which I'm supposed to feel grateful for, I see CoW has managed to find myriad other ways to line their pockets (increased sewer/water, increased dump fees, increased environmental fees, forced curbside recycling, what else??).
Up 5 Down 44
Mr.Rogers on Dec 9, 2014 at 5:55 pm
Smurf maybe you should carpool on your way in given there's no service - start your own grassroots movement. You sound really worried about transit service in this community. By chance are you living in the palatial country residential area? It's the only area I can think of in this town that does not have bus service. Mmmmm, I walk to work, I probably smell your fumes as you whizz by me; maybe you should be paying for the crap you put up in the air and I have to breath in - why not start incurring that via the 7% of your taxes that go towards transit service.
Up 34 Down 1
Gene Brown on Dec 9, 2014 at 5:09 pm
We can sure as heck vote them all out next time around, let them worry about making a wage with no city job!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Up 139 Down 1
Unbelievable on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:38 pm
6% increase in water and other services. Did anyone in the COW get a 6% increase in their wages this year? We need to get a cap on what the mayor and council can raise taxes or services. Whats next? There goes any change for affordable housing if you can't afford the house, you are not going to afford the taxes and services. What a mess.
Up 59 Down 3
Mike Smyth on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:34 pm
This tax increase is utterly terrible.
Infrastructure needs to be phased in over a much longer time period. City management has to give us a period, a number of years, with a zero (0.00%) tax increase.
The city gets lots of federal funding and just fritters it away. I can afford a tax increase but I know many people who cannot and its painful to hear them say they have to give things up. What things? Well they cannot afford to drive around town as much and cannot afford to use the Canada Games Centre thus they are not as fit as they could be.
And the city is not developing the new parks in a manner that benefits people who enjoy quiet walks in the forests near town. The city is even thinking of putting a motorized trail on our beloved Rotary Centennial Bridge. Who is going to pay for the silly traffic lights? Well the very people who disagree with this stupid idea will be forced to.
Mayor and council have got to start dealing with reality.
Up 53 Down 5
Smurf on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:32 pm
I have an interesting question for all of us - especially the "not transit users" like me because they live in a city area with no transit access (and if I would post a list, it would be pretty long):
On pages 17/19 of the budget package on the city's website it shows that on average 149 $ (958 $ for a business) from the property tax goes towards transit (impressive 7%)!
The last fare increase was 2008 (and of course the operating costs were way lower almost 7 years ago).
Can somebody please explain to the citizens without transit access why they have to subsidize a system what they can't even use???
I actually expected a fare increase this year already after implementing the luxurious evening service for weekdays - but not Saturdays!
It doesn't make any sense at all!
Up 64 Down 1
Wayne on Dec 9, 2014 at 4:23 pm
I am not grateful for a 1.7% tax increase, as Curtis implies I should be. Sewer and water are up, and I'm sure getting into the dump is going to cost more. I've lost count of the continuous years of increases. Taxes and fees must be reduced.
Up 65 Down 2
June Jackson on Dec 9, 2014 at 3:51 pm
Why is it when any government is putting the screws to the taxpayers, they always say “Taxes in Whitehorse remain lower than many other comparable municipalities. And our modest tax increase will keep it that way.” What community would this be? Some mountain village in Patagonia? ...our taxes are high and no posturing is going to make them look acceptable. We are 650,000 in the hole and you are talking about 'balanced budget". You are jacking taxes AGAIN, how is that 'living within our means?"