Photo by Whitehorse Star
Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu
Photo by Whitehorse Star
Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu
City council unanimously adopted its $30-million 2015 capital spending plan for 2014 at its meeting Monday night.
City council unanimously adopted its $30-million 2015 capital spending plan for 2014 at its meeting Monday night.
It made no changes to the document which came forward in November.
The spending blueprint focuses largely on consolidating the city’s operations into two new buildings.
The building consolidation project will see the city move many of its operations to a new structure to be built off Range Road and Two Mile Hill next to the Public Safety Building.
Many of the day-to-day services accessed by residents will move to a smaller building that will be built on Second Avenue, sharing the site with city hall.
The entire project is estimated at more than $55 million over three years, with the city expecting to spend $21 million in 2015, $33.8 million in 2016 and $1.5 million in 2017.
Prior to passing the budget Monday, council members defended the spending and the project.
Coun. John Streicker pointed out that without the building consolidation project, the capital budget is modest.
He then went on to note that if the building consolidation project didn’t go ahead, the city would still be facing a $20-million cost to repair its Municipal Services Building on Fourth Avenue. And that, he said, doesn’t even address the need for asbestos removal.
The city has worked hard to plan for the building without its construction having any impact on taxes.
That’s meant modest capital budgets for the past couple of years to allow reserve funds to build up.
Streicker argued it’s now the city’s job to keep the public informed of what’s happening with the project as it moves along.
“We still have a lot of work in front of us,” he said.
Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu, meanwhile, addressed criticisms she’s heard about the project.
“We weren’t trying to be sneaky,” she said, taking issue with comments that the project hadn’t come up in the capital budget process initially.
The project, she said, deserved its own process, which the city has undertaken, including an information session about the project.
“It’s a big deal, and we recognize that,” Curteanu said.
The plans are no “Curtis’ castle” (referring to Mayor Dan Curtis), she added, but rather the city has a goal to be as efficient as possible for the needed buildings.
As she pointed out, all council members are also taxpayers, who want the city to run as efficiently as it can.
“We didn’t embark on this lightly,” she said.
Curtis emphasized as well he will be remaining in his office at city hall, and it will not be growing any bigger.
“This is not a luxurious item,” he said of the building consolidation project, pointing out the operational savings – estimated at more than $500,000 per year – which will come to the city through the more energy-efficient buildings.
Curtis also noted the economic impact the construction of the new buildings will have on the community.
Coun. Kirk Cameron cited the benefits that will come in making land available in the downtown as the city moves from eight buildings into two.
He noted that while it may have made sense at one time to have city vehicles serviced in the downtown area, that’s just no longer the case, and it’s time to move that out of the city’s core.
It will also be beneficial to residents to have one spot, a block from Main Street, they can go to for all city matters.
Among other initiatives approved in the capital budget are:
• more than $250,000 on continued implementation of the Solid Waste Action Plan;
• $200,000 for compost collection bins for the commercial sector;
• $150,000 to continue planning for infrastructure assets;
• $400,000 for a fire response truck and $100,000 for other fire equipment;
• $750,000 for Livingston Trail Lagoon operational improvements and odour mitigation;
• $225,000 for expansion of the Hidden Valley Storm Pond;
• $400,000 for parks and trails projects and upgrades;
• $370,000 for improvements to the Canada Games Centre, Takhini Arena and Mount McIntyre improvements;
• $260,000 for intersection work at McIntyre Drive and Hamilton Boulevard;
• $75,000 for a new Quartz Road crosswalk and $105,000 for more permanent crosswalk markings;
• $350,000 for rural road surfacing;
• $440,000 for Main Street infill and infrastructure improvements;
• $555,000 for equipment that will be used to deliver services to Whistle Bend; and
• $60,000 to implement a Regional Parks Management Plan and $35,000 to implement a Range Road North Plan.
In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.
Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.
Comments (18)
Up 1 Down 0
Numbers, please? on Dec 17, 2014 at 5:27 am
I keep seeing references to the numbers used to support the business case for new buildings vs maintaining current ones, but can't seem to find any backup documents. Anyone have a link? That said, I find it very hard to believe that retrofitting existing buildings would cost $55 million. As for the comment about Whitehorse looking 'poor and shabby', I agree - but new City buildings are not going to 'fix' nasty-looking 4th Avenue.
Up 7 Down 5
Vote on the projects first COW on Dec 16, 2014 at 9:11 am
THE COW should get serious about economic development and sell the old buildings and rent space in COW instead of building monuments to themselves. People of COW have spoken. It is the responsibility for Mayor and Council to listen to the voters. If I was major or council member I would hold the project for a year and have a vote on it before going ahead. Only comment sense.
Up 9 Down 10
kevin on Dec 15, 2014 at 5:54 pm
Just want to add my opinion...I think its great that mayor Curtis wants to carry Whitehorse into the future instead of clinging to the past...up till now Whitehorse has always looked poor and shabby compared to other northern cities...thanks Mayor Dan. Curtis, from somebody born and raised in Whitehorse.
Up 18 Down 3
north_of_60 on Dec 15, 2014 at 1:29 pm
The issue isn't about demolishing the old building. It's about squandering our tax dollars on an extravagant edifice, instead of building a cost effective industrial garage for Public Works equipment next to the bus garage in Marwell, and leasing some of the unused office space in town.
The issue is spending our tax dollars unwisely for aggrandizement.
Up 5 Down 11
Jwhite on Dec 14, 2014 at 5:33 pm
I didn't say anything about the asbestos. My comment was in response to the person who wondered if the old buildings would become someone elses problem. The plan, I believe, is to demolish and that's what should happen and yes that will be the city's cost. We cannot always be opposed to every expenditure folks. Sometimes we just have to accept that some old buildings need to come down and be replaced. In this case, the city has substantiated this expenditure with facts. Please, read the facts on the city website. Keep an open mind.
Up 8 Down 1
Just Say'in on Dec 13, 2014 at 7:09 pm
@ jwhite. Yes it will be demolished, at the taxpayers expense and you are wrong about that negating the asbestos removal requirements. That will have to be done prior to demolition at our expense as well. Not that I agree with that but that is the law we have to deal with at this time.
Up 23 Down 6
jwhite on Dec 12, 2014 at 10:22 am
Jaymanic, the old asbestos building will be demolished. Reading the information available at the city website might help us all have a reasonable discussion about this matter, based on facts.
Up 14 Down 16
jwhite on Dec 12, 2014 at 10:20 am
I realize that there is an instinctive reluctance in all of us to accept that sometimes it is necessary for government to spend money. In this case, however, I hope that people will go to the City website and read the facts about the buildings that are currently used. The old Cassiar building costs us taxpayers so much money to maintain, and it is indeed beyond it's useful life. Would you prefer that we wait until it becomes uninhabitable? Have you ever seen the inside of that garage? Have you tried to climb those stairs with a cane? Are you happy to pay to heat the outdoors through that building because there simply are no more "updates" that can save any energy? I don't want the City to spend money on a luxury office building any more than the next person. But I don't want to toss any more dollars down the tube on buildings that should have been replaced a long time ago. So lets just suck this one up as necessary, okay? And as to leasing, except to line the pockets of a few (look at that ugly building the Yukon liberal government paid for through a long term lease prior to construction) on quartz. Leasing will just cost the city more, and line someone else's pockets.
Up 24 Down 6
Pjt1959 on Dec 11, 2014 at 9:11 pm
Well there is one thing, we got to guess what is next for COW - lets look at it. We have Ernie's hill to start, then came the Buckway round about's now the Curtis castle. The next mayor and council are really going to go big to leave their mark on the city. I am trying to figure out what is wrong with a big square building which would not need to have plans worth a million so some firm can claim a pretty building they designed. Yes buildings I guess have a life time but when I, as a tax payer, live in a 40 year old home do I get a tax break as according to some? My house needs to be replaced not fixed up so with a tax and fees break maybe I can build a new one. That is my rant.
Up 14 Down 5
north_of_60 on Dec 11, 2014 at 5:32 pm
Every one of these Sustainability Posers knows fully well in their heart, that if they had been up-front and honest with taxpayers about their plans to squander our Gas Tax Rebates on self- aggrandizing schemes like Curtis' Castle and greenwashed social engineering scams, then they never would have been elected.
Enjoy your time at the trough, it will be your last. We will remember when we go to the polls.
Up 26 Down 8
Jaymanic on Dec 11, 2014 at 1:02 am
So just make a new building and leave the old asbestos building for someone else to deal with? Nice! And just because the councils are tax payers too that trumps all other citizens. Time to make a change Yukon. Show these people this is our home.
Up 33 Down 5
Mike Smyth on Dec 10, 2014 at 8:09 pm
No ‘Curtis’ castle’?
I think the message mayor and council did not understand is as follows. Stop building castles in the sky; you have to build a solid foundation for responsible civic spending money on all these dream projects.
We want fiscal responsibility! Use that federal money to ensure our taxes do not increase.
Up 34 Down 6
Just Say'in on Dec 10, 2014 at 6:03 pm
Pay attention Mayor and Council. Look at the comments and the number of likes. There is tons of office space all over downtown for very inexpensive prices. City employees do not need to be in the Garage Mahal. Expand the Bus Garage for the equipment Garage call it a day. There is tons of other stupid spending here if you ask me. We have had tax increases for years now, I guess they didn't need that because they had this slush fund all along for their nice new cushy building. NICE.
Up 25 Down 6
north_of_60 on Dec 10, 2014 at 4:55 pm
The plans are no “Curtis’ castle” OH Really?
The simple fact that they're admitting this, shows that they know what it is too.
Up 47 Down 11
... get rid of these clowns on Dec 10, 2014 at 4:25 pm
This Council was elected on the belief they would be more responsible than the last ... wrong.
Up 40 Down 7
Hold er there Partner on Dec 10, 2014 at 4:22 pm
The revenue reserve fund should be a rainy day fund to deal with emergencies.
This fund should not be encouraging tax gouging scenarios so that bureaucrats can satisfy a wish list by spending other peoples money frivolously.
Merry Xmas!
Up 47 Down 5
north_of_60 on Dec 10, 2014 at 3:31 pm
If the CoW truly cared about sustainability, then they would have built a modest industrial shop facility over in Marwell next to the bus garage, for the cost to repair the old shop building. Then close the old Public Works building and move those folks into unused office space all over downtown Whitehorse. Sustainability is just a buzzword for the CoW, they haven't a real clue what it means.
There was no public discussion or consultation on this megaplex "Curtis Legacy" boondoggle. It was another 'done deal' shoved down the taxpayers' throat by people who think they know better than us.
There will be an election before this gets built.
"Politicians and diapers should be changed frequently, for all the same reasons" Mark Twain
Up 36 Down 3
Tater on Dec 10, 2014 at 3:12 pm
I don't see anything about repairs to the deck of the Riverdale bridge. And if we are to vacate these older buildings, will they be disposed of and for what value?