Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Pictured Above: RANJ PILLAI and BEV BUCKWAY

Buckway's budgetary order ‘laughable,' Pillai says

Acting mayor Ranj Pillai took dead aim at Mayor Bev Buckway during Monday night's city council meeting.

By Chuck Tobin on April 3, 2012

Acting mayor Ranj Pillai took dead aim at Mayor Bev Buckway during Monday night's city council meeting.

Pillai said Buckway was acting on sour grapes when she directed city administration to come up with another $60,000 in this year's budget to cover any costs related to council's decision to join a national anti-racism coalition.

The mayor, Pillai said tersely, was fear-mongering, and using a "laughable” approach to justify the additional $60,000, without so much as breathing a word to her council colleagues before leaving on holidays late last month.

After the mayor and other members of city council challenged the wisdom of joining the Canadian Coalition of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination, city hall became the target of a public backlash.

Many accused council of not wanting to stand up for racial equality.

Signing on with the national coalition, they argued, was above all a public statement that Whitehorse has no room for discrimination.

Lobbyists promised there need not be any cost associated with joining the coalition, if that's the way the city wanted it.

On judgment day, facing a community eagerly awaiting the vote, council unanimously agreed to sign on.

An official ceremony was held as Pillai inked the document on March 21 – the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

Buckway was among the members of council who questioned what the membership would cost the city and how much additional work it would place on city staff.

Other municipalities which have joined on, she told her colleagues during the debate early last month, did indeed have to dedicate both time and money toward their participation on the national organization.

City official Robert Fendrick explained last night that during his review of this year's proposed annual budget, the mayor had requested a pot of money be created to cover any expense that may arise from the city's commitment to the coalition.

She suggested it was better to have the money identified in the budget now rather than go fishing around for it later if there was a need, Fendrick explained.

He said the figure of $60,000 was based on what the mayor had learned from other municipalities.

"We have not even talked about this,” Pillai said, going on to accuse the mayor of creating a budget item simply to fear-monger.

He said picking a number out of the air because you've talked to a couple of other mayors is hardly the pinnacle of financial accountability.

"This is one of the most laughable situations I've seen on council,” Pillai said.

Coun. Dave Austin said he took a lot of heat for questioning the membership on the national coalition and what it would cost the city.

Now, a week later, city council is looking at a new line item to finance precisely what he was questioning.

"I will not support this,” Austin said.

Councillors Kirk Cameron and Dave Stockdale also questioned the additional $60,000, with Stockdale suggesting it could be singled out next week when council votes on the proposed 2012 annual operating and maintenance budget.

Coun. Florence Roberts, on the other hand, suggested council was making a big hullabaloo over nothing.

The money would simply sit there as a rainy day account should something come up, she insisted, noting the city doesn't have to spend it.

The amount, Roberts suggested, is indeed a reflection of what other municipalities had spent.

Council is proposing a three per cent property tax hike this year to cover off projected spending of $88.8 million.

Council approved the capital budget of $25.5 million back in December, representing a 21 per cent increase over the capital budget in 2011.

The proposed operating and maintenance budget for this calendar year is $63.4 million, including the $60,000 to cover expenses associated with the membership on the Canadian coalition.

The readjusted O & M budget for 2011 was $63.8 million.

Comments (16)

Up 0 Down 0

mark on Apr 11, 2012 at 8:43 am

the whole entire city council, raj included, should be replaced asap. you have done NOTHING for this city, except add more ... roundabouts ... shudder.

Up 0 Down 0

Lake Trout on Apr 11, 2012 at 1:37 am

The City of Whitehorse needs to look deeper on this issue, because I believe there is something there and there is resistance to this idea.

I would suggest a good place to start would be the hiring practices for the COW. How many minorities work there, are hired etc.

Up 0 Down 0

flyingfur on Apr 10, 2012 at 3:25 am

I guess the other question I have on this is:

Is there any relationship between the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Canadian Coaliton of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination? I realize they are not one and the same, but there appears to be some communication between the two and as such I'm wondering why this activity is such a surprise to the Mayor when she sits as an executive member of the FCM and taxpayers have been paying for her to attend these meetings for the past several years. It seems odd that a few weeks before the day of recognition that this came to COW like some bolt from the blue.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Apr 7, 2012 at 4:58 pm

@flying fur...funny that, you asked me my exact question I put forth?

I too am interested in those details, as I just skimmed the proposed most recent by-laws changes 40 of them proposed recently.

Read the city stuff on said F/N's exemption/special circumstances they need?

Which of course bounced me back to "land claims"...but of course!

The point I was trying to convey is the latest PC Crusade from the city (some of them) trying to fight racism...and yet council is proposing (done deal with that crew) a segregated community with regards to whom by-laws and land use within Whitehorse applies to...really?

Instead of just blowing the racist rape whistle as the standard default....does anyone else out here NOT see the total lunacy of it...both the irony and the level of racial segregation(which I thought died in 1950's Alabama) we are willing to tolerate?

Will the PC Crusader lunacy end? Ever?

Up 0 Down 0

Dan Davidson on Apr 6, 2012 at 1:23 pm

Re: announcements about municipal elections

Jaymac, they happen regular as clockwork in October every three years. It used to be two. The byelection was due to one of your councilors becoming an MLA in the territorial election last fall. Didja miss that one too? Election days are announced in all the newspapers and over all the radio stations and probably on the various text ad channels.

Up 0 Down 0

flyingfur on Apr 6, 2012 at 12:09 pm

Jaymanc;

You can't be serious. Municipal elections in Whitehorse are not well advertised? A few thousand signs, knocks on the door, radio, newspaper, everything else is not enough of a clue? I hope you're not a detective.

Up 0 Down 0

Jaymanc on Apr 6, 2012 at 12:52 am

"Funny that", this whole announcing of any election done for the city, I've never heard of. I've been in town and seen some signs before and saying that these candidates are running for positions, but never have I been notified about the election day or even where to go to vote for that. Federal and Territorial isn't the problem, you can't miss those. You want to know why only 19% went to vote is because the rest probably didn't know. So that would be "lack" of communication to the "people". Now thats "funny".

Up 0 Down 0

jenn on Apr 5, 2012 at 9:55 am

can't we just get rid of all current city council members, including pillai. useless, they have done nothing for the city

Up 0 Down 0

flyingfur on Apr 5, 2012 at 4:51 am

CG - well said.

Josey: what special considerations and bylaw are you talking about? Help de-mystify the whole "gibberish" thing and pass along your wisdom for all our sakes.

Up 0 Down 0

CG on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:38 pm

Yes, Jaymanc, anyone can run--this is what is known as a "democracy". The people vote for candidates to represent their interests in what are known as "elections". The great thing about this "democracy" thing and its "elections" is that YOU can run for city council if you don't like how others are running it! If others like you and your ideas, they might even vote you in! Funny that!

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Apr 4, 2012 at 10:57 am

Hey Steve, great point! I noticed that very same thing 2 weeks ago re:barriers on our latest condo hell.

Went direct to the city Engineer to discuss said angle of safety both public and workers in said hole.

that was a few days 'n some ago...yes they are concerned about safety alright?

Noticed on the side street there were concrete barriers but not on fourth?

Maybe they were freshly installed and are awaiting placement of others on fourth?

Glad to see others seeing obvious dangers that elude those whom are in charge of "our" public safety.

Up 0 Down 0

Dan Davidson on Apr 4, 2012 at 7:04 am

Don't know much about the issue involved, but the councillor's comments sound more like an early declaration of intent to run for office than anything else.

Up 0 Down 0

Angela on Apr 4, 2012 at 5:02 am

Yes, anyone can run for Mayor or for a City Councillor position. They are elected by the public. Based on the turnout of voters for the last by-election in Dec 2011, are you really surprised? 19.29% of registered voters turned out. If you don't like the way things are being done, get off your duff and do something about it! Run for City Council yourself! Or, at the very least, VOTE!

Up 0 Down 0

Steve E on Apr 4, 2012 at 3:41 am

The city and safety officials including WCB should be concerned as well in respect to the huge construction hole which runs along second avenue related to Mah's Point. There should be proper barriers in place and one lane shut down and a flag person employed to hinder anyone in a vehicle from landing in the hole. This is sacrificing safety for development. The wire fencing now in place is an insult to the public's safety.

Up 0 Down 0

Jaymanc on Apr 3, 2012 at 11:28 pm

Why or how is a hair dresser in charge of a city? Does this mean anyone can run for mayor or city council. Is it to much to ask to get people who know what they are doing to fill these positions?? What is this world coming too? Next thing we'll have a sixth grader as mayor and a 10th grader as PM. I say this needs changing or we'll fail hard.

Up 0 Down 0

Josey Wales on Apr 3, 2012 at 8:31 am

Hey since the city has signed onto the latest PC Crusaders cause/lobby can Councillor Pillai explain WITHOUT PC gibberish, how the city can propose a by-law exclusive to the F/N's and their "special considerations" the F/N's will/soon get?

Are we actually supporting segregated racial communities or elitist exemptions for "special circumstances"?

Is the PC Crusade so normal now that we see not that VERY slippery slope of racial divide.

Believe in REAL equality Mr. Pillia?

I do too, that is why I think this latest PC cause...is not only hogwash, but racist in its very nature.

All are equal, just some are more equal?

Absolute crap...and we all know it!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.