Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Photo submitted

PROJECT PROGRESSING – Crews work on the replacement of the Tatchun Creek Bridge. Photo courtesy GOVERNMENT OF YUKON

Board will monitor Tatchun Creek water quality

The Yukon Water Board has approved a plan for additional monitoring of water quality at Tatchun Creek where waste rock from the Minto Mine is being used for bank stabilization.

By Chuck Tobin on June 17, 2014

The Yukon Water Board has approved a plan for additional monitoring of water quality at Tatchun Creek where waste rock from the Minto Mine is being used for bank stabilization.

The board halted the placement of waste rock earlier this month following recent concerns raised by the Little Salmon-

Carmacks First Nation regarding the potential for metals leaching out of the rock.

The board last Tuesday ordered the Department of Highways and Public Works to develop a plan to conduct further analysis of the waste rock and examine the potential for the rock to leach toxic metals.

It's also instructed the department to prepare a water monitoring program for Tatchun Creek, as well as develop a contingency plan to remove the material if a problem arises.

The order remains in effect until tomorrow, or until the board issues a new directive, according to the decision last week.

The Tatchun Creek Bridge is being replaced at an estimated cost of $4.5 million.

Waste rock from the Minto is being used as rip rap, and the board has already approved its use, though it decided to have another look at it given the concerns raised in mid-May by the First Nation.

Assistant deputy minister Allan Nixon of the highways branch said he's hoping test results from additional rock and water samples will be available for the board this week so that the placement of rip rap can continue.

The board's order has not affected all construction work at the bridge site but has caused delays, though there has been no indication from the contractor about whether the delays will cause an increase in the project cost, he said.

In an interview last Thursday afternoon, Nixon emphasized the use of waste rock from the Minto Mine was fully examined by experts retained by the department as part of the application for a water licence submitted in October 2012.

The water licence issued by the board in February 2013 approved the use of the waste rock from the mine site, he pointed out.

In its decision last week, the board notes it's taking the measures to re-examine the use of waste rock because of the First Nation's concerns.

Nixon said the new management plan requested by the board was delivered last Thursday.

It's the department's hope the board will be satisfied by the test results from the additional samples taken in the last couple of days and will lift the stop-work order with regard to the placement of rip rap, he said.

Nobody, said Nixon, provided submissions to the water board during the initial process to screen the application for a water licence, and the First Nation was invited to participate.

He said he does respect the First Nation's right to raise the matter now. It could, however, put the squeeze on because the government only has a four-week window to work in the creek before the chinook salmon arrive, Nixon explained.

Chief Eric Fairclough said in an interview last week rain runoff from the pile of waste rock stockpiled for use at the bridge is already showing discolouration.

This is not waste rock, but rather low-grade ore containing minerals, the chief contends.

Fairclough said he isn't sure how the use of the waste rock passed in the first place.

Even the tiniest fraction of copper released into the water – eight parts per billion – can cause harm to the salmon's ability to navigate and harm their defensive system, he said.

Tatchun Creek, the chief insisted, provides very important spawning grounds.

The government's new management plan required by the water board was approved last Friday.

If the placement of waste rock is allowed to continue, water sampling on Tatchun Creek will be conducted at six sites every two days while the rip rap is being placed.

There will be two sites upstream of the bridge project, one on each side of the creek bank.

Also planned are two more sites 10 metres downstream of the rip rap zone and two more sites 200 metres below the bridge project.

Monitoring will be reduced to weekly for a month after completion of the waste rock placement, then to monthly for a full year.

After a year, it's proposed the monitoring will be reduced to once in the summer and once in the winter, though the schedule could vary, depending on the views and needs of the water board, according to the government's management plan.

Comments (19)

Up 16 Down 9

Fred Green on Jun 27, 2014 at 3:25 am

Salmon find their way back to the streams they were born in by tracing the chemical signature back to the stream. If that signature is altered by using material that is reactive or not similar to what is in the creek they may not find their way back or spawn. It is not just whether the rock is harmful to the aquatic system it is also taking care not to change or alter the chemical signature of the creek. In any event dilution is not the solution.

Up 13 Down 6

been downtown on Jun 27, 2014 at 2:01 am

Just Sayin' I prefer rock to concrete, but agree with doing testing to make sure this copper waste rock is safe for the salmon. I hope it is! A good deal for the tax payer.

With the revelation that someone at highways changed the source of the rock after the YESSA review, and nobody thought to mention this to YESSA, I think those condemning the FN for 'not bringing this up at the appropriate time', need to stand down and acknowledge that the FN did not have that information. In fact that information may have even been carefully hidden from review.

There should not only be testing to see if the rock is safe for salmon, but also an investigation into how it came to be that the rock source was changed quietly after the YESSA review. Could be entirely innocent, but it seems to warrant some day light.

Up 7 Down 9

agree with north of 60 on Jun 25, 2014 at 9:43 am

I agree copper waste rock is a poor choice for fish bearing water.

However, given the discharge of the Tatchun creek and the limited amount of waste rock that would be used, there would likely be no impact.

It would be a different situation had it been a very small stream.

Up 14 Down 9

north of 60 on Jun 24, 2014 at 10:53 am

@JS

Copper mine waste rock was a poor choice for salmon stream rip-rap. If using that rock had been in the original plan it would have been rejected. Someone in HPW made an unauthorized change in the plan and they should be charged and exposed.

Up 10 Down 5

Just Say'in on Jun 24, 2014 at 8:22 am

@beerdowntown The only options for erosion control are rock or concrete, take your pick. When you have a chance, research what concrete is made from and tell me that rock is not a way better option.

Up 15 Down 17

north of 60 on Jun 23, 2014 at 8:55 am

This is just another case of HPW's 'old boys' circumventing environmental regulations that they don't personally like. Somebody should lose their job over this, however nobody has the cohones to challenge the YTG masters.

Up 9 Down 8

been downtown on Jun 23, 2014 at 5:45 am

Just sayin' says, "You think concrete would be better? Think again. Or just think for that matter."

Who mentioned concrete? Maybe you should read before you beak off like a fool.

Up 18 Down 11

Fred Green on Jun 23, 2014 at 3:35 am

Time line HPW Tatchun bridge replacement



August 30, 2012 YESAA requests information as to source of RIP RAP

September 12, 2012 Highways responds to information request stating, HPW will source materials from existing pits and road side cuts in the right of way.

September 12, 2012 YESAA correspondence with proponent re project scope, HPW confirmed source. HPW has access to the necessary rip rap and gravel from approved sources. Minto Mine is not an approved source and was not mentioned.

November 13, 2012 YESAA Project enters preparing recommendations until November 26 2012

November 15, 2010 HPW submits exhibit 1.2 to water board suggesting Minto waste rock will be used. This change could have been submitted to YESAB but was not.

December 20, 2012 HPW issues decision document ending YESAA process. HPW knew the RIP RAP was not assessed and issued it anyway.

January 11 2014 HPW signs a Water Board YESAB project confirmation form certifying a decision document has been issued for the project and the water use application is accurate and complete and reflective of the project proposed and assessed under YESAA. This was incorrect as there was no mention of RIP RAP being sourced from Minto Mine during the assessment even though there was an opportunity to correct the project proposal by submitting the significant change.

The question this raises is did HPW not screen the source of RIP RAP deliberately?

Up 28 Down 10

Just Say'in on Jun 21, 2014 at 12:24 pm

@beer downtown, The fish are not all circling around at the mouth of the creek not knowing where to go. They are not getting back to the Yukon, likely because they are getting slurped up by the big processing boats in the North Pacific (Japan). Also you comment about copper. That whole country is made of mineralized rock formations (hence the mines) that are full of copper. So find another reason to be indignant. Rip Rap has been used forever and has never been a problem. You think concrete would be better? Think again. Or just think for that matter.

Up 11 Down 16

been downtown on Jun 20, 2014 at 10:54 am

And note that the salmon who breed in Tatchun Creek are Chinook. Total ban in Alaska and the Yukon this year, including FN subsistence, because they are doing so poorly. Not showing up and nobody knows why. Maybe projects like this, just little problems one on top of the other, a little copper messing up their navigation won't matter, are the reason the fish are going down. It does some pretty ridiculous to be using low grade ore rocks from a copper mine to line a flippin' salmon stream with!!

Up 20 Down 9

been downtown on Jun 20, 2014 at 10:48 am

Point is, minute amounts of copper can screw up the piloting devices in the salmon. Whatever it is that directs them back to their spawning grounds. Maybe this information did not come to the attention of the decision makers until now. Whatever. Do some tests on those rocks: crush them, subject them to a fire hose, see what happens in terms of copper leaching out. No point in getting in fights about this, it's about the salmon. And if the rocks are safe, all the better. A cheap source close to the project.

Up 18 Down 11

Communication is key on Jun 20, 2014 at 4:59 am

Well I guess some people are always going to be confused. Before making comments it might be an idea to do some research and understand the inner workings between different levels of government. After that come back and make a informed comment.

Up 7 Down 31

concerned swimmer on Jun 19, 2014 at 3:29 pm

When is the government going to stop using big angular rocks for Rip raping rivers, it ugly and a safety hazard for river users.

Up 29 Down 8

Just Say'in on Jun 19, 2014 at 12:15 pm

OK, so if our (SO CALLED) Government has to consult with their (SO CALLED) Government then why is my Government being voted in by them. Most of the communities in the Yukon are primarily Native communities. They vote for and elect MLA's that sit in my so called Government. Now my so called Government has to negotiate with their so called Government and I am not allowed to vote for their representative. Does anyone else see the irony here?

Up 15 Down 16

June Jackson on Jun 19, 2014 at 9:46 am

Even if agreement had taken place, the chief has raised a valid concern.. now that the waste rock is in.. is the water safe? So, they will monitor the water.

I'd rather do that now than find out later that contaminants have filtered into ground water, or water venues that we drink, fish, boat, and play in.

Yes, people should play by the rules.. but what rule says you have to stay the course when the rules have changed?

Up 33 Down 10

Confused on Jun 19, 2014 at 8:34 am

Communication is Key - you say "if" the FN asked about the rock? Did they? If they did I am sure they would have been given a response.........I'm guessing they didn't - at least initially when the process was running it's course...... they started thinking about it more after the water license was issued.......I don't think you can suggest the Department steamrolled the FN when they applied for a water license well over a year ago.

These licenses and regulatory processes are put in place for all to follow.......not just proponents. FN's must also play by the rules and follow the timelines.

Up 20 Down 28

Communication is Key on Jun 19, 2014 at 3:02 am

Yes I agree there are people that are confused! Just because FNs have representation on a Board does not mean the individual FN was consulted. All Board appointments are arms length from all the parties to the Board.

What communication happened between the department and the FN is the question that should be asked. If the FN asked questions about the rock ( a salmon producing stream should be treated like gold, not many left) and did not get satisfactory responses, then in my mind they were left with no choice but to do what they did.

If the YTG department thinks they can just steamroll a FN this is the result. My question is where is the real waste of the tax dollar?

Up 38 Down 16

Yukoner 2 on Jun 18, 2014 at 1:01 am

Just another big waste of money to do a study for what rock came from the earth.

Up 52 Down 17

Confused on Jun 17, 2014 at 11:35 am

It seems nearly every week we hear another story about a First Nation that has not been properly consulted on one issue or another. Here we have a regulatory process, that includes the First Nation (member on the Board), which approved the work well over a year ago. Now the work has been tendered and awarded to a contractor with all of the permits, work plans, schedules etc in place and the FN takes action to stop the work.... what the hell! There is no doubt in my mind the contractor will claim for delays, and the Govt. has little ammunition to deny them..... these are our tax dollars!

Consultation doesn't mean agree then change your mind whenever it suits!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.