Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

MINING STRONGLY DEFENDED – Yukoners cannot profess to be responsible global citizens if the duty to develop resources is passed off to other countries in Asia, South America and Africa, says Premier Darrell Pasloski, seen this morning addressing the Yukon Geoscience Forum.

‘Before it's yours, it's mined,' premier reminds delegates

The Yukon has a social responsibility to nurture its mining industry, Premier Darrell Pasloski said this morning.

By Chuck Tobin on November 18, 2013

The Yukon has a social responsibility to nurture its mining industry, Premier Darrell Pasloski said this morning.

Pasloski told those attending the 41st Yukon Geoscience Forum the demand for metals in the world is not going anywhere.

What comes from the ground is part of everyday life, from cell phones to skates for kids, from bicycles to the pots and pans for the kitchen, Pasloski said in the remarks at the Coast High Country Inn.

As the saying goes, Pasloski reminded the audience: "Before it's yours, it's mined.”

The premier said the Yukon has a regulatory regime which ensures mining is done responsibly.

To dismiss mining in the Yukon and expect the resources Yukoners depend on everyday to come from somewhere else – perhaps a country where environmental and employment standards may not be treated with the same regard as here – would be irresponsible, Pasloski told delegates.

"We cannot profess to being responsible global citizens if we are willing to abdicate our responsibility to develop resources in Yukon, and pass it off to other countries in Asia, South America, and Africa, for it is impossible that we will stop using the very resources some would have us refuse to produce,” he said.

"I am comforted knowing that the copper in the wires that send electricity through my house may have been produced in the Minto mine, where I know Yukoners are employed and well cared for, and where our regulations ensure the environment is respected.”

The Yukon, he said, is not immune to the global downturn that has hit the industry.

"We are aware of the challenges you are facing, and we are facing them with you,” Pasloski said.

He assured delegates the free entry system which allows access for prospectors and exploration companies searching for new ore bodies is very much alive in the territory.

Territorial government staff have been working with the Yukon Water Board to see how and where the regulatory regime can be streamlined to address industry concerns about the time it takes to get through the licensing process, he said.

Similarly, said Pasloski, the government is working with the federal government to examine the process under the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board to ensure accountability and consistency.

"The federal government has indicated that it will establish a working group to discuss these and other proposed amendments to the act including assessable activities, exceptions and Executive Committee Projects Regulations within the fiscal year,” he said.

"Ultimately, these changes are intended to ensure certainty, predictability and timeliness which, in turn, make Yukon an even better place in which to work and invest.

"For we know that although government cannot control world commodity prices, we can continue to make improvements in other important ways.”

Pasloski told delegates the mining industry has been the lifeblood of the Yukon right back to the days of the Klondike Gold Rush.

So far this year, Pasloski pointed out, the territory's placer mining industry alone has produced $56 million in gold.

Mining is key to a vibrant economy, and the Yukon government is committed to doing what it can to see that it receives the support it deserves, he said.

Pasloski pointed to a number of ongoing programs and new initiatives such as the $450,000 it has contributed to investigate what is involved with upgrading the Freegold Road east of Carmacks for year-round use.

"The mining industry remains a cornerstone of our economy, and a proud part of our territory's history,” he said. "The Yukon government intends to keep it that way.”

Quite noticeable this morning was the substantial drop in the audience numbers, compared to the last few years when investment in mineral exploration and mine development in the Yukon hit heights not seen in decades, if ever.

Rob McIntyre, president of the Yukon Chamber of Mines, acknowledged this morning what he referred to as the headwinds currently buffeting the Yukon and the world commodity prices.

But when the Yukon is judged by investors from Outside, it still does fairly well, he said in a brief opening address to the geoscience forum just before Pasloski took the podium.

McIntyre, however, asked the government to use extreme care in the current revision of the Quartz Mining Act, in obvious reference to fulfilling the requirements of last year's court case involving a legal challenge by the Ross River Dena Council. (See story, p. 4.)

The Quartz Mining Act is the all-important book of laws which enshrines the rights of the exploration and mining industry, the chamber president emphasized.

It is, he said, the industry's Magna Carta.

As the government moves forward to amend the mining act to keep pace with the evolution of First Nations in the Yukon, McIntyre said, it must ensure there is no collateral damage to the mining industry.

Comments (18)

Up 11 Down 7

Johnny Baglee on Nov 21, 2013 at 8:44 am

Krysta Meekins, is that why you left the territory to work somewhere else? because our economy is doing so well under the mining party?

Up 15 Down 20

Brice Carruthers on Nov 21, 2013 at 6:02 am

Look at all you eco-nerds and tree-hugging hippies having your little love festival on the Whitehorse Star comment boards. LOL.

Great speech Darrell...and awesome Movember moustache, I might add! Put the Cat blade down and get those minerals I say!

Up 18 Down 5

Balance? on Nov 21, 2013 at 4:16 am

This YP government just does not get that it is 2013.

I consider myself as a middle of the road Yukoner that understands that we need resource extraction to live in the society that I live in. At the same time, the environment has to be the first priority. We need clean air and clean water to live. That means mines that meet the best environmental standards and someone can still profit. If a mine can't meet environmental standards and generate a profit it should not happen, end of story.

Government should have a broader responsibility to the greater Yukon population and should not be bending over to the mining industry that seems to be only interested on generating a large profit with no regard for the environment.

Up 13 Down 7

Stu Winter on Nov 20, 2013 at 11:22 am

Before its yours or mine or is mined there needs to be consultation and accomodation with Yukon First Nations and Yukon voters need to be onside.

Before its yours its mined- what does that mean. Do you call political contributions "mine" or mining.

Up 17 Down 13

Rorex21 on Nov 20, 2013 at 9:40 am

@bobby bitman

The tourism industry give me a break. That simply put, a luxury industry that only flourishes during the good times.

I agree don't sell out to China but we need to develope something other than that joke the tourism industry. I worked in it for 18 years and its been steadily going down hill. Even Holland America (Westmark/Carnival) is pulling out. Thats when you know an industry is dead, when a company kills off it loss leaders because they are losing too much.

Up 20 Down 9

north of 60 on Nov 19, 2013 at 11:07 am

" But how is it that Pazloski is so dead set on ignoring the vast majority of Yukoners on this issue? "

Because a majority government can ignore whatever they want to.

Unfortunately that so-called 'vast majority of Yukoners' couldn't get their act together to defeat the Yukon Party. Will they still be squabbling among themselves at next election too?

Up 28 Down 19

bobby bitman on Nov 19, 2013 at 9:26 am

There is only one 'pro Pazloski' comment here on this issue. I respect that this one person spoke her point of view. But how is it that Pazloski is so dead set on ignoring the vast majority of Yukoners on this issue?

Up 38 Down 18

north of 60 on Nov 19, 2013 at 7:42 am

In an ever more populated world, the Yukon's pristine wilderness becomes far more valuable than any mine. There are plenty of other places to mine.

Set aside some parts of the Yukon where no development of any kind is permitted.

Up 27 Down 16

bobby bitman on Nov 19, 2013 at 7:27 am

It is NOT our duty or responsibility to use public money facillitating mining development in the Yukon while Chinese corporate and/or government money is needed to invest in the mine, and half the mining industry workers in the Yukon are not even from here. If we do not have the people to work in the mines, or the capital to invest in huge mining projects right now, then save something for the future. Stop selling out this territory to the Chinese government and others! These are Canadian and Yukon resources and Canadians should benefit from them. 17 cents royalties per $1350 ounce of gold sums up the 'benefit' Canada is getting from mining right now. Plus messes left behind to clean up, a boom-bust economy which is costly and socially destructive to Yukoners, destroyed ecology, destroyed areas precluding the development of tourism, and even higher electrical rates so new systems can be put in place to serve foreign owned and other mines.

Done with it. Support mining which is owned and operated by Canadians, and start lighting some other candles up here, such as focusing the same enthusiasm, interest, and support to our tourism industry.

Up 37 Down 15

Bud Buckley on Nov 19, 2013 at 5:34 am

Before our resources are given away to China and the world, they are ours.

If we want to protect them, that is what should take place.

Up 31 Down 20

Frank White on Nov 19, 2013 at 5:23 am

Darrel is just pandering to the industry which supports his party through campaign contributions. Legal bribery according to RKJr.

I see no comfort is his take on developing mines so we do not have to depend on metal from around the world.

If we mine the Peel for example, we then have to depend on wilderness areas around the world and the issue is that they are very rare.

Its too bad the YP does not have more balance and its unfortunate they do not want to represent Yukoners and deal honourably with FN's. The Peel is ours, its not a bunch of mines to counter our use of minerals from around the world.

If the YCS and local green groups contributed heavily to the YP would Darrell be saying that the Yukon is a big Park and we should not need to use parks around the world?

Up 31 Down 15

johnjack on Nov 19, 2013 at 4:11 am

And you have a responsibility to not be rolling over for the feds!!!!!

Up 33 Down 43

Krysta Meekins on Nov 19, 2013 at 4:07 am

Sounds like an excellent speech.

And to those who say "We have a social obligation to feed the hungry, make sure the homeless don't freeze to death, we have a social obligation to provide medical care.."

A healthy economy, with good jobs, and revenue from mining and other sectors is EXACTLY how we achieve the above. With the jobs created directly and indirectly by the mining sector, citizens earn money to feed and house themselves. And their taxes support those who cannot.

Up 23 Down 20

Minder on Nov 19, 2013 at 12:18 am

Harper reminded him to say that last week.....and then the Feds Yukon puppeteer made sure he did....he wouldn't make much of a bride with that boisterous wide open approach....but he sounds like someones #$%^h.

Up 30 Down 31

Pro Yukon on Nov 18, 2013 at 11:54 pm

To complain about mining in the Yukon is futile. Mining has been the main stay business in the Territory since the Gold Rush through hard times and good times. Demand for our resources are at an all time high with computers running in almost every gadget we buy now a days. Miners have rights and obligations to follow the rules and protect their interests. There seems to be a group of uneducated people going around sounding off on their own personal opinion rather then the actual facts. I encourage these people to get educated and get involved. As long as you own a smart phone, computer, car, etc., you are contribution to mining in the Yukon.

Up 42 Down 13

Former Yukon party guy on Nov 18, 2013 at 11:01 am

Man, this has been the best story in a long time in terms of what the heck is he saying.

"We cannot profess to being responsible global citizens if we are willing to abdicate our responsibility to develop resources in Yukon, and pass it off to other countries in Asia, South America, and Africa, for it is impossible that we will stop using the very resources some would have us refuse to produce,” he said.

Huh? Might it be more responsible to apply this to, well, a whole bunch of other objectives such as climate change or poverty??

I just heard on CBC that Darrel is professing that the YP is there for the mining industry in its battles with FNs and the environmentalists. Well, we knew it all along, I just wish he had come out and said that they were really the Mining Party,not the Yukon Party.

Y'know, most Yukoners I know get it. We need mining, and we have mining, and we will always have it, but we need the other stuff too, and that's what the YP just does not get.

Up 45 Down 41

June Jackson on Nov 18, 2013 at 9:11 am

Say whaaat? "A social obligation to nurture mining?" No we don't. We have a social obligation to feed the hungry, make sure the homeless don't freeze to death, we have a social obligation to provide medical care.. well..anyone reading gets this picture, but a social obligation to nurture mining? I can't believe our Premier really said that.

We might have a financial obligation to improve the economy in an ecologically sound manner, but nurture doesn't mean, "take the money and run", it dosn't mean "lets make a deal-here's the Peel"...

And, Mr. Paslowski..at the end of your chit chat, keeping in mind the audience IS miners/mining industry..I still don't want mines in the Peel and I still don't want fraking anywhere in the territory and I still don't want any smelters.

Up 51 Down 39

flyingfur on Nov 18, 2013 at 7:12 am

Darrell: Perhaps we should think about protecting our natural resources first before we go stampeding off in a great hurry to mine these areas to get there first before the Asians or South Americans or Africans. It is all well and good to have a mind for economic growth but what you are proposing sounds reckless and careless. Tread carefully Mr. Pasloski because one mistake cannot be undone with our wilderness and you seem to be unaware of that.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.