Anti-fracking rally, march lure 100-plus
The territorial government and Yukon Energy must not be allowed to embrace the use of natural gas as an alternative to diesel fuel, Yukoners heard at an anti-fracking rally held Saturday afternoon.
By Chuck Tobin on October 21, 2013
The territorial government and Yukon Energy must not be allowed to embrace the use of natural gas as an alternative to diesel fuel, Yukoners heard at an anti-fracking rally held Saturday afternoon.
Anne Middler of the Yukon Conservation Society said accepting the use of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in the Yukon is to invite the industrial practice of hydraulic fracturing for natural gas resources in the Yukon.
LNG equals fracking, and allowing Yukon Energy to move forward with plans to switch two of its older diesel generators to new natural gas generators with the backing of the Yukon government opens the territory's door to fracking, she said.
"If we allow a market for this extreme hydrocarbon to be developed here, we will have a much harder time to keep fracking out,” Middler told more than 100 people gathered for a march from Elijah Smith Building to the Kwanlin Dun Cultural Centre.
"We need to say no to LNG.
"Our priority now is to keep the Yukon frack-free, so say no to LNG,” Middler said.
"Spread the word.”
The anti-fracking rally organized by Yukoners Concerned with Oil and Gas Exploration/Development coincided with the violent and very publicized anti-fracking protest late last week in New Brunswick.
Yukoners Concerned maintain geological records indicate the only economical natural gas reserves in the Yukon are found in shale structures, and the only viable method of extracting natural gas from shale deposits is with hydraulic fracturing.
Yukon Energy is moving forward with a $34-million plan to replace two of its diesel generators at the Whitehorse Rapids Dam with two natural gas generators next year.
The publicly owned utility has a five-year contract with Shell Canada to supply LNG from the company's facility near Calgary.
Yukon Energy maintains it has been assured the natural gas will be produced by conventional means, and not by hydraulic fracturing.
Yukon Electrical Co. Ltd., on the other hand, told municipal leaders at a conference last spring it cannot say what portion of the LNG it plans to import for an experimental project will be a product of hydraulic fracturing.
The private utility is moving forward with plans to convert one of its six diesel generators in Watson Lake to a hybrid of natural gas and diesel. If it proves to be beneficial, it would convert the remaining five.
When Yukon Electrical representatives were asked about the source of the LNG they would be importing, they said it would be impossible to say. Their supplier obtains its product from both fracking and conventional gas wells, the company pointed out.
Yukon Energy and Yukon Electrical maintain LNG is less expensive and burns more cleanly, which they say is better for the environment.
Middler and others, however, told the 100-plus Yukoners gathered Saturday that natural gas is not cleaner when considering the whole life cycle, from the well-head to the burner, particularly if it's produced using hydraulic fracturing.
Evidence shows natural gas is harder on the atmosphere over the long-run because it is essentially methane gas, and methane gas emissions are much more harmful than emissions from burning diesel fuel, Middler said.
She said importing LNG into the Yukon will send a message that fracking is OK here.
And if Yukoners embrace LNG now, they would have a much harder time later fending off the oil and gas industry's desire to use hydraulic fracturing in the Yukon, she said.
NDP Environment critic Kate White told the gathering fracking requires a massive industrial exercise requiring thousands of transport trucks of sand, chemicals and fresh water for every single well.
The impact on the surface landscape alone by the construction of the road network to support fracking projects would be mind-boggling, the MLA suggested.
White said the additional heavy transport traffic would have serious implications for highway maintenance, and would ultimately stretch the Yukon's volunteer ambulance corps even thinner than it is already.
Yukoners must not buy into industry's platform that it can safely extract natural gas, that natural gas is critical in meeting North America's energy needs and is a stepping stone to economic revival, she said.
White noted Yukoners stood together two years ago in the debate over oil and gas exploration in the Whitehorse trough. They did much more than force the Yukon government to implement a five-year moratorium on trough, she said.
The NDP Environment critic said Yukoners turned the conversation from the question of when fracking would occur here to if fracking will ever occur here.
"The oil and gas industry is knocking on our door, and we have a choice to make,” White told the gathering. "Do we really have to let them in because they are knocking?
"No way,” some in the crowd responded. "No way.”
See related story.
Comments (10)
Up 5 Down 8
Arn Anderson on Oct 25, 2013 at 3:02 am
The real sad thing is, most of these commentators on both sides have not or will not work in the fracking industry. I do not agree with the practice, however it makes energy cheap. But cheap energy is another facade in itself.
Groundwater is the main concern, if done correctly, but we know corporations love cost-benefit analysis and if they can get away with it, they can. One aspect mainly missed in fracking is the use of surface water. In the winter time, a group of workers laden with pipes hike out to the nearest stream. The suck millions of liters of water to force down the hole to create pressure. I've seen streams drop several inches and in one case a foot underneath the ice. This practice is mainly in the Grande Prairie area, hence another factor why the Peace River is dropping as its tributaries are being sucked dry.
Now onto another topic, I live in good ole Alberta at the moment. The oil and gas industry have skewed the income rates abnormally. This led to a increase in real estate prices and other products. People in the manufacturing and services industry have not had their wages increased dramatically and continues to fall behind. Working on the rigs requires no education, hence no investment in higher learning, but the payout is huge. It's hard work, but their wages keeps on increasing year after year skewing the real income of Alberta. Do you want this in the Yukon? Not everyone can work for the oil and gas industry.
I do not trust "corporate science" as it is heavily biased as with "green science". But on the contrary because of our patent laws and free markets, companies do not have to disclose what chemical soup they are shooting the well. Some of these chemicals are patented and cannot be tested on by independent researchers. How are we to know the environmental impact of these chemicals if no trials were done?
north of 60, the comment on all greens should not use petroleum products is weak. Their concern is with the cost benefit analysis of the impact on the ecosystem which is the life support system for homo sapien sapiens (plus many species) and not the sums of money in and out of a corporate bank account. Have you evolved or did your intelligent designer give you the means to use Nitrogen as internal fuel or consume nutritional toxins yet? I think not.
This short term planning and thinking to benefit the now has to go. The environment doesn't inhibit progress but it actually makes us think and problem solve, a concept that is dying in North America inspired by corporate rhetoric.
Real solutions come from a well informed public, that's how a democracy works and has yet to be tried in our modern age.
Up 23 Down 6
MIDNIGHTSUN007 on Oct 23, 2013 at 11:12 am
@north_of_60. You Sir, nailed it on the head. You apparently have knowledge in regard to the process of Fracking, unlike these other people running around thinking the " The sky is falling, the sky is falling". Susie Rogan, you be the first to stroll down town with all the street lights off. What were you thinking when you made that statement??? We need energy & jobs. Not scare tactics from a bunch of uninformed RADICALS!
Up 11 Down 2
yukon56 on Oct 23, 2013 at 9:53 am
Jackie Ward, yes electric powered everything would be nice. Explain how we get the electricity? No one will dam a river so don't say hydroelectric, wind is not cost effective either. Again, easy to so no but no solution.
Up 12 Down 17
B&R on Oct 22, 2013 at 12:16 pm
north_of_60
Your dismissive screed directed at those who would dare question fracking is laughable.
I could spend more space than is available here shredding your decidedly un-scientific point of view, but I will not.
Instead, I will focus on your fourth paragraph where you claim "It's unfortunate that the well-meaning but sadly misinformed and misdirected anti-fracking crowd doesn't understand the significance of important details".
It's these important details that you seem to overlook, and the anti-fracking people aren't. Important details such as:
*the millions of liters of contaminated water resulting from the fracking process that must be dealt with
*the fracking fluids that are left in the strata and may not emerge into aquifers for many, many years
The hydrological cycle is a process that is not based on human time scales, it's based on geological time scales, and while the EPA might not find immediate contamination, there are no studies or documentation available that will deny that future contamination is not a hazard, and that's a detail worth considering very, very carefully. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
Up 15 Down 35
hmmm on Oct 22, 2013 at 6:05 am
What I find funny is that those pro-fracking people don't understand the Definition of a Corporation. They are psychopaths. Look up that meaning!! What you will find is that they will do whatever it takes to make a buck and to hell with anyone that stands in their way. Psychopaths run these companies because they know if they do something wrong they can't be held accountable.
I take it the area in northern Alberta where they can burn their water was what, just bad fracking practices? Do any of you pro-fracking people want to be drawing water from a well that is close to where fracking is going on? If you answer no then don't attack those who don't want fracking to take place.
The environment is a bit more important to future generations not those baby boomers who have already saddled the younger generations with debt and environmental problems. We don't need you making anymore decision for us other generations thank you very much!!
Up 45 Down 14
north_of_60 on Oct 21, 2013 at 1:21 pm
Believing that hydraulic fracturing new gas wells almost always gives you ground water contamination, is like believing sexual intercourse almost always gives you STDs.
Hydraulic fracturing is a normal completion process in almost all new gas wells. Studies by the EPA have shown that it does not contaminate ground water because the wells must be logged, inspected and tested before hydraulic fracturing is done.
Fracking skanky old wells with deteriorated casing will likely cause ground water contamination. No well should ever be fracked unless it's been tested to ensure the casing is intact and capable of withstanding the pressure. It's these old wells that cause the fracking horror stories.
It's unfortunate that the well-meaning but sadly misinformed and misdirected anti-fracking crowd doesn't understand the significance of important details. It's understandable since few of them have any sort of science and engineering education or experience. They're easily misled by emotional rhetoric from political extremists.
The greenies should focus their energies on ensuring that the Yukon has the most stringent gas drilling regulations in Canada with the resources necessary to enforce them. Otherwise they should stop using any petroleum products in their lives; because that would be hypocrisy.
Up 15 Down 24
June Jackson on Oct 21, 2013 at 10:51 am
www.dangersoffracking.com
I am posting this easy to understand explanation of fracking. Please take a look.
Most of us give up quite a lot to live in the Yukon. There is no specialist right down the block when disease or disaster strikes, there is no Queen E theater, the prices skyrocket for everything from home oil to a T-shirt, housing is impossible, its colder than crap and we argue over everything. Everyone in the Yukon has an opinion and a different one at that. So, why do so many of us stay?
We stay because its ours, the Yukon is largely pristine and clean, clear air and water, because the snow capped mountains are as breathtaking on a bright day as the northern lights are at night. No matter where you go in the Yukon you are apt to meet someone you know by name for a chat. Lots of reasons, but not one has a dollar sign in front of it..
Why on this earth do we want to introduce poison into our ground water? 600 chemicals to make fracking fluid..lead, uranium, mercury, radium, methane, formaldehyde, glycol..proven carcinogens all..and there are 600 of them. Fracking fluid can not be contained, it enters our ground water and spreads. Why are we inviting people here who aren't going to contribute a damned thing? They aren't here because of that snow capped mountain, they don't love the Yukon, they are here for the money, and when that is exhausted they leave the poison with us, take the money and move on to someone elses pond. What's going to happen to us when we are ingesting contaminated drinking water? There are literally thousands of documented cases of water contamination next to areas of gas drilling along with sensory, respiratory and neurological damage to people drinking that water. As fracking fluid travels through the ground water, eventually we will all be drinking it.
Everyone needs to join the marches, keep protesting because if you don't, the Government will sell us to the highest bidder and we will all be moving out...or drinking that water.
Up 16 Down 21
susie rogan on Oct 21, 2013 at 9:38 am
The first thing I would suggest is that the city of whitehorse stop lighting up the nights with street lights glaring at full bore between the hours of 11 p.m. and 6 a.m. I have been on a dog sled 30 miles from town, past Lake Laberge at 3 a.m. and I can see the sky lit up. Turn out the lights! At least a majority of them, when they really are not needed. This goes for highways as well. There are a lot of ways we can reduce electrical consumption.
Next, I noticed recently that there are spiral windmills available now that are supposed to be state of the art, quieter, easier on birds, and less of an eyesore. Maybe time to try out new tech. alternative energy sources?
Just making a couple suggestions.
Up 14 Down 29
Jackie Ward on Oct 21, 2013 at 9:33 am
Yukon56; A plan that doesn't destroy our water. Like fracking does. But who cares right? We as a society have been designed to use oil. Not the other way around. The first cars were electric. But that was over a 100 years ago and it's still an emerging technology, lmao. Give me a break.
Up 58 Down 22
yukon56 on Oct 21, 2013 at 9:01 am
So you don't want gas or diesel. What do you suggest? It is easy to say no to everything but hard to put forward a comprehensive plan