Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Forest Pearson

Active transportation measures fall short, council told

The city needs to do more to encourage active transportation in Whitehorse, city council heard at its meeting Monday.

By Chuck Tobin on December 14, 2021

The city needs to do more to encourage active transportation in Whitehorse, city council heard at its meeting Monday.

Forest Pearson of the Whitehorse Urban Cycling Coalition said in his submission to council there has been an explosion of people choosing to travel by bicycle year-round.

Cycling is becoming more accessible, and many people are seeing the benefits of active transportation, he said.

Pearson said people want to take action on climate change through active transportation.

“We know that many more people want to choose cycling but do not feel safe, and feel that there are no convenient or reasonable ways for them to commute by bike year-round,” he said.

“Currently the bike network is disconnected, incomplete and difficult to use. North American research shows us that there is about 60 per cent of the population that is interested in choosing cycling for some of their trips but are concerned and don’t feel safe – this is a huge, untapped potential.”

Pearson said residents are growing impatient and frustrated with the slow progress on building the active transportation network.

There hasn’t been a significant project since the widening of the Robert Campbell Bridge, he said.

Pearson was among a handful of residents who made submissions to council on the city’s proposed capital budget plan for 2022 to 2025.

The bylaw required to approve the proposed budget of $30 million over four years received first reading on Nov. 29. Second and third readings are scheduled for Jan. 17.

Pearson told council the cycling coalition is pleased to see the proposal for an active transportation link from the bottom of Two Mike Hill to the Waterfront Trail in the budget, but is dismayed it won’t be completed until next year.

He noted it’s been two years since school children presented a petition to council calling for a safe transportation link to the Waterfront Trail from Two Mile Hill so they could bike safely to their École Whitehorse Elementary School.

There needs more done to find ways to ensure cyclists can travel safely through the roundabouts, Pearson said.

Doing a little bit at a time to improve the active transportation network does not work, he added.

What the city needs, he said, is a bolder, broader and more transformative plan.

“Because we know most of Whitehorse’s greenhouse gas emissions come from local transportation (us driving around town), focusing on building a progressive, inclusive, connected, convenient, high-quality active transportation network is a key action of the climate emergency you declared two years ago now,” he told council.

“And it is about building our community for the traffic we want. Every trip by active transportation or transit is one less car.”

He said they need to see a project pipeline of how and when a continuous, connected cycling network will be built, but they’re not seeing it the proposed capital budget.

Copper Ridge resident Beatrix Goltz told council in her submission she does not feel safe cycling to the downtown area.

Goltz said she comes down Hamilton Boulevard, then travels along Robert Service Way – but there are no protected bike paths.

She said she was involved in one incident already, and has the RCMP report to show it.

If she doesn’t feel safe, Goltz asked, how can she teach her children?

“I am encouraging mayor and council to nurture the huge potential the capital of the Yukon has for becoming a real bike-friendly city that works towards becoming carbon-neutral,” she said.

Copper Ridge resident Richard Legner said in his submission the budget does not reflect the needs of an active transportation network.

Combining the city’s capital budget and its operation and maintenance budget, the total will top out at $160 million, he said.

He pointed out active transportation projects are being allotted $1.6 million, or just one per cent of the total, Legner pointed out.

Whitehorse, said Legner, has a rush hour congestion problem.

“A robust, safe, and inclusive active transportation infrastructure is key to reducing the city’s traffic congestion and its carbon footprint,” Legner told council.

“Dedicating only one per cent of the capital budget to combat these challenges is a significant miscalculation and one that cannot be easily corrected should the budget pass as currently written.”

Comments (22)

Up 3 Down 1

Jim on Dec 20, 2021 at 10:45 am

Ok Forest, how about some actual numbers to backup your “explosion”. Anyone that wants to can drive downtown today, tomorrow, next week. Count the number of commuters on bicycles compared to vehicles. Maybe they only deserve 1% of the budget by the numbers. Don’t base your needs on a couple days of recreational biking.
We have already messed up traffic on our 2 main corridors through downtown. We’ve turned 4th ave into a single lane with a suicide turn lane in order to accommodate 2 bike lanes. This in turn has turned 2nd ave into a s**t show. We built a bike lane down the 2 mile hill, but apparently too curvy and had that pesky light at the bottom that interrupted your travel. So we built another bike lane on the other side. We also have the millennium trail that runs from Walmart to Rotary park. But alas, it has those annoying pedestrians that get in your way. If you want another bike lane put it on 6th. But realize that infrastructure costs money so get your cheque book out. Or maybe you can use gas tax money (which those nasty motorists pay) to build it.

Up 5 Down 7

Nathan Living on Dec 19, 2021 at 5:22 pm

I was terrified when biking on 2nd or 4th and had too many close calls.
The City is always advocating for skidoo and ATVs users so let's see a focus on bikes.

Why not a plan to add one or two major bike arteries each year which will be cleared of snow on a regular basis. Most bikers also drive cars so let's use more of the gas tax money for the benefit of bikers.

Up 3 Down 2

Let it snow, let it snow, let it snow…. on Dec 18, 2021 at 11:37 pm

Dear Politico - Not sure where you live but you do realize that in Whitehorse there are not always sidewalks on both sides of the street? Are bicyclists supposed to be on sidewalks? Seriously!?!?
Ironically, most people shovel the snow onto the side of the road where the bicycles are supposed to ride - LOL! Then there is the fact that many of the roads are not cleared for months at a time.

Then there are the city plows that occasionally bury our driveways, sides of the road or the middle of the road with snow furrows… Narrowing the roadways and maneuverability on the freshly scraped streets…
In fact there should be a bike riders tax to make up the shortfall in the snow removal budget so the roads can be scraped every Monday and Friday so people can ride their bikes to school, to work, to soccer practice, to hockey practice, to visit friends and family, to go to church on Sunday - Fun for the whole family.

You can probably convince millennials and gen zedders to get on a bike by making them an iPhone charging accessory… Finally, a way to take our children’s minds away from TikTok, Twitter, and other asocial media. We can have our kids back!
Where do you live? I’m kind of getting this Fantasy Island vibe.

Up 30 Down 8

Dave on Dec 16, 2021 at 6:21 am

Get your pick and shovel out nimbys (not in my back yard). All these trails require trees to get cut down and thousands of litres of diesel for your bike paths. The Yukon has truly turned full time retard.

Up 12 Down 19

Lee Carruthers on Dec 15, 2021 at 7:49 pm

This is NOT for the majority of courteous and sensible motorists out there.
I see plenty of entitled, and some deeply angry motorists here today. Whining about how their driving pleasure is so inconvenienced and even endangered by crazy cyclists every day. After all, it is their right to pollute and overheat the atmosphere, at the expense of our children's and grandchildren's future. It certainly serves to highlight our foolish car-centric culture.

As someone who drives as well as cycles, I cannot think of a single incident (over many decades) where I have had to take drastic action to avoid hitting a cyclist. I HAVE had drivers purposely swerve into the shoulder to try to frighten me off the road. I've had a couple of them pull up and pace me while shaking their fists and shouting mindless obscenities at me, again, while I rode along completely out of the motor traffic lane, displaying flashing lights and wearing reflective clothing. Their way of "subtle" intimidation. You know who you are.

It is those drivers who are keeping many, many people off their bikes. People who would love to ride their bikes to work, or to the grocery store, but are afraid to because of the very real danger from drivers. People who would love to let their children ride their bikes to school, but don't because of all the nasty, aggressive drivers on our roads. So they drive them to school and contribute even more to our problem with cars.

That is why we need continuous, connected and protected cycling routes through our city. To make cycling safe from those drivers. It's certainly nothing new or innovative. Thousands of cities and towns throughout the world have already done it. They have well established cycling routes where people move safely and peacefully through the environment, enjoying the quiet and efficiency of bicycle transport.

Up 13 Down 1

Nathan Living on Dec 15, 2021 at 1:24 pm

On the positive side biking is healthy for you and fossil fuel burning not much of an issue.
Yes, electric bikes use hydro electric power which may come from diesel or LNG generators.

Asking for the city to integrate biking trails alongside our roads is a very slow process for some reason which escapes me.

Up 23 Down 10

My Road on Dec 15, 2021 at 12:50 pm

Those freakin cyclists are at it again! They want to take over the whole damn roadways and get in the way with our driving. They are a nuisance and a safety hazard, ruining our nice city. They don't pay taxes and cost us more every year.  Get them on their own path somewhere we can't see them.

Up 33 Down 12

"Green" Transportation LOL on Dec 15, 2021 at 8:53 am

OK I get that you feel like you are doing your part because hey, you aren't burning fuel to get around. But to think that you are not impacting the planet with your bicycle is laughable. What do you think was used to make said bike? Before it was yours it was mined. Those fancy paths or the roads you peddle down? Those are made from asphalt which is made from.....oil.
If we actually increased the flow of traffic and upgraded the roads for the vehicles, we would cut down on commute time which would reduce gas emissions as everyone wouldn't be creeping along at 30 km /hour or less for 30 minutes just to get to work (and this is the commute from Whistlebend, all other entries are clogged as we have 80 cars per minute driving on 40 car per minute roads). Bike paths are a lovely idea for a safety aspect as cyclists and cars sharing the road is dangerous, especially in winter when the vehicles decide to drive in the bike lane because everyone forgets where the actual lanes are if they can't see the lines and it's the blind leading the blind out there.

Up 13 Down 41

Yukoner Too on Dec 15, 2021 at 7:32 am

So many rednecks. They want the "greenies" off the road and out of their sight. They demand their right to go everywhere in big gas guzzling vehicles and sure as hell are going to idle the truck all day so they can waddle back into their warm seat. No consideration for their fellow neighbour or the state of the environment. Sad...

Up 36 Down 13

Matthew on Dec 15, 2021 at 4:42 am

Get bikes off the damn road! They think they own it. Guess what, you DON'T pay taxes to have the privilege for the road. Get them a license plate with insurance.. they need, mirrors, front and rear lights, and some turning signals, until then, get off the road and onto the path. Why can't year round cyclists take a yearly course on road safety? I've seen so many just turn, no signals, not even lights.. tell me how that's safe? Sad thing is, it's ALWAYS the motorists fault..

Up 30 Down 8

Dallas Schaber on Dec 14, 2021 at 7:06 pm

Gee I guess if everyone rode bikes there would be no money coming in to maintain the streets in the city and then who is gonna plow them, maybe the bikes should be required to have plates and insurance on them to drive on city streets to help maintain them .

Up 13 Down 12

Richard on Dec 14, 2021 at 5:11 pm

I used to be a winter cycling skeptic but have learned that winter weather is not actually a barrier to cycling. Having a proper protected cycling network and impeccable maintenance of it is key. It is amazing what they do in Finland. This video will blow your mind:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhx-26GfCBU

Up 26 Down 4

Charlie's Aunt on Dec 14, 2021 at 4:40 pm

@ David, strange as it may seem, the Alaska Highway was once known for being winding. You appear to want bike trails and shortcuts at same time & it doesn't work that way in this City. Some of the fat tire winter bike riders need to be more intelligent; last winter I was on 6th approaching Lambert when bikers 3 abreast turned from Lambert, took corner wide with one of them ending up right in front of my car. That clown should be thankful I was able to brake and hit the curb to avoid him. With behavior like that you can expect accidents.

Up 14 Down 17

marylaker on Dec 14, 2021 at 4:25 pm

He is totally correct. Not a single stretch of highway should be built or upgraded / maintained without putting a section of non motorized trail alongside it, at least 10 feet away, and preferably 40 feet away. We spend millions and millions on roads for cars. You get what you pay for. Spend money on infrastructure for bicycles, joggers, cross country skiers etc. I support this.

Up 8 Down 12

Jeff Bikaboom on Dec 14, 2021 at 3:31 pm

I have a hard time believing vehicle emissions are higher than emissions from oil stoves for heating. I would welcome some stats on volumes of fuel for each.

Not to pick on YG, but out of curiosity how much fuel do they use a day in their boilers to warm their 6000 employees? Whitehorse looks like an industrial area with the steam billowing out of their building in the winter.

Are Alaskans traveling through the Yukon, and the transport of goods to Alaska, counted as Yukon emissions? Are the RV's traveling through counted as our emissions?
It is emissions in the Yukon or from Yukoners?
We all know the solution. Hot Air Balloons!!!! Powered by clean burning hydrogen.

The real solution is a bagged lunch. The freeway up to Copper Ridge is packed for the two hour lunch break government employees take. Just stay at work and eat, or go for a walk, or write passive aggressive comments on the Whitehorse Star. Where is everyone driving all day long in Whitehorse, why aren't they working?

Dare I say a carbon credit system attached to the digital infrastructure of the vax pass will be offered up as a solution. It's a not a matter of if, but when. As climate change replaces Covid, I think it will be sooner rather than later.

Up 59 Down 4

martin on Dec 14, 2021 at 3:04 pm

Nice catchy words "focusing on building a progressive, inclusive, connected, convenient, high-quality active transportation network is a key action".
Too bad that Whse Transit is worse-designed now than it was 30 years ago. If management cannot fix the bus system, how can it get community support? It saddens me to see buses running empty, with 5-10% of seats at best.
Maybe is time to use smaller units if they REALLY want to reduce gas emissions.

Up 61 Down 18

Bingo on Dec 14, 2021 at 2:56 pm

Ok bud..nuff said...let's put a few things in perspective...the explosion in biking was all due to covid and people needing a mental health break. Also people working from home and still are afforded this luxury. At some point people will be back to the normal and will be driving their vehicles..kids to pick up, groceries, volleyball etc. I'm a biker and I bike in the back trails where, in my mind they belong. If you and your association, etc., want infrastructure around biking then that needs to come at a cost. To think that by taking a bike to work in The Yukon is helping the environment is laughable at best.

Up 60 Down 18

Juniper Jackson on Dec 14, 2021 at 2:47 pm

Bikers, at it again. I have complete agreement for sensible people who choose to bike it. But, RIP to those who have no sense, biking it down Mountain View with a wind that has polished the road to shiny, sheet ice, making it a hazard for vehicles. It's the Yukon. People have no business biking in deep winter here. It's cold, it's dark, snow is cleared to the sides of the road. A car sliding on the ice is bad news for a biker. I would probably hit the ditch instinctively. But, if i have that second to think about it, I'm not going to hit the ditch. I'm not the one to die or be injured. They want safe biking? I want safe bikers.
This woman doesn't feel safe to bike to town? Then don't.

Up 59 Down 21

Bill on Dec 14, 2021 at 2:41 pm

Yes, yes and pigs fly. Let's spend several million for a few of you who bike. I have yet to see anyone riding a bike at -35. Of course now that I have stated that, some nimrod will go ahead and do it, why? - just because.

Please don't give us that marginalized crap about saving the planet as leverage to get what "you" want.

Up 38 Down 13

Politico on Dec 14, 2021 at 2:16 pm

A good start would be to get the city to enforce people having to shovel their sidewalks! Everyone, including drivers when they get out of their car, would benefit!

Up 64 Down 10

Groucho d'North on Dec 14, 2021 at 1:37 pm

While I do not disagree with Mr. Pearson that cycling would provide some positive results, I do have an issue with the present crop of cyclists who do not follow the rules of the road and increase the risk for themselves and others through their dangerous antics while riding. Until Bylaw or the Mounties begin to enforce these violations by cyclists, it's just a matter of time before some poor motor vehicle driver is put through the legal wringer because of a preventable problem with bikers.

Up 23 Down 40

David on Dec 14, 2021 at 1:31 pm

Great work Forest, you have my full support!

Even the multi-use paths the city has built don't work very well, you can tell they were just an afterthought and not planned out very good. Many of the paths are so winding that it takes significantly longer to use the paths then it does to use the main roadway, so obviously people choose the main roadways because they're way faster but the downside is they are also more dangerous with motorists. When they build these paths they need to make them more direct so that people will actually use them.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.