Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

SNOW IN ABUNDANCE – In the Log Cabin area (above) on the South Klondike Highway – home of the Buckwheat Classic – the snow depth on Feb. 26 was 142 cm compared to 92 last year. Inset Benoit Turcotte

Above-average snowpack carries flood implications

The snowpack across the Yukon is above average, and way above in some places like the Klondike.

By Chuck Tobin on March 13, 2020

The snowpack across the Yukon is above average, and way above in some places like the Klondike.

Results of the annual March snow survey were released this week.

Environment Yukon hydrologist Benoit Turcotte explained Thursday that an above snowpack will of course bring a higher risk of flooding in the spring and summer.

There are, however, other factors which feed into the equation that may or may not materialize, he emphasized.

Turcotte said spring temperatures play a huge role in how fast the melt occurs, whether it’s prolonged or accelerated, and whether the spring runoff comes quickly or over a long time.

There’s also the amount of rainfall in the spring that feeds into the equation, he said.

Turcotte said with a higher snowpack, there is of course a higher flood risk. They go hand-in-hand, he explained.

The hydrologist said even if the snowpack was 30 per cent below normal, temperatures and rainfall could still lead to flood conditions.

Right now, he said, the outlook is for cooler temperatures prevailing for the next few weeks.

“We are definitely not expecting an early melt like last year,” Turcotte said.

The snow surveys are conducted just days before results are published for March 1, April 1 and May 1.

It measures snow depth and tracks monthly precipitation and winter temperatures from October onward.

It also converts snow depth into what is called the snow water equivalent.

Across the Upper Yukon River Basin, which includes Whitehorse, the snow water equivalent or SWE is 21 per cent above normal.

At the Whitehorse airport on Feb. 26, the snow depth measured 55 centimetres, compared to 28 cm last year in late February.

The SWE at the airport this year was 105 millimetres, or 15 per cent higher than the 55-year historical average of 91 mm.

On the other hand, at Log Cabin on the South Klondike Highway – home of the Buckwheat Classic – the snow depth on Feb. 26 was 142 cm compared to 92 last year.

The SWE was 405 mm, or 23 per cent higher than the historical average.

Across the Lower Yukon River Basin that includes Dawson, the snow water equivalent was 53 per above average, the highest it’s been in 40 years, according to the snow survey.

On King Solomon’s Dome, for instance, the snow depth measured 104 centimetres on Feb. 27, compared to 62 at this time last year.

The snow water equivalent in all the major river basins feeding into the Yukon River watershed is above average: Stewart River, 41 per cent above; Pelly River, 135 per cent above; Central Yukon (Carmacks) 124 per cent above; White River 110 per cent above.

The Environment Yukon hydrologist pointed out the different basins don’t all contribute to runoff at the same time or in the same fashion.

Peak flows past Dawson in mid-June are mainly associated with runoff from the Pelly and Stewart Rivers and smaller watersheds like the Klondike River, he noted.

He said runoff from the Upper Yukon River Basin, the Takhini River and the White River doesn’t hit Dawson until later in the summer.

“A cold spring and delayed summer would not cause much flooding and would flatten all the peaks,” Turcotte said.

“A very warm mid-May or June could be problematic if it generates massive snowmelt in a majority of watersheds.”

He said temperatures also play a role in whether ice jamming will become an issue.

The snow water equivalent in the Liard River Basin is 50 per cent above normal but to the west, the SWE in the Alsek River Basin is 12 per cent below average.

The SWE in the Peel River Basin is 43 per cent above average.

The snow water equivalent for the Porcupine River Basin could not be estimated because of limited data available by March 1.

Comments (12)

Up 6 Down 6

north of here on Mar 19, 2020 at 2:52 pm

@north_of_60
whether you agree or disagree with climate change, calling someone Climate Barbie is derogatory, sexist and unnecessary. Call them uneducated for sure if you don't agree, but saying things like that just make those of us who are open to debate and a change of view think your views are skewed.

Up 5 Down 3

Greasy Tex on Mar 17, 2020 at 4:13 pm

Now 72 thar whar a snowpack. VW beetles had to go right under water with a pipe up for breathing just to git through puddles. Thar whar a snow pac.

Up 16 Down 3

Groucho d'North on Mar 17, 2020 at 12:48 pm

At least we won't have to wait until mid July to be able to launch a boat.

Up 12 Down 7

woodcutter on Mar 16, 2020 at 4:46 pm

lol.. I was wondering how long before someone said it was JT's fault. FYI, climate is a 30 year average and weather is what happened today, yesterday, last week, last month and tomorrow, next week and next month, ect, ect.

Up 21 Down 20

North_of_60 on Mar 16, 2020 at 4:31 pm

Matthew is well intentioned, but misinformed. Environment Canada weather data has not been erased. The Liberal government omitted 100 years' worth of weather data from a federal website intended to illustrate climate change. Staff also used "modeling" instead of actual temperature readings to plot dramatic graphs, but said the result was not intended to be misleading.
Climate Barbie's department didn't like that 100 years of Environment Canada data failed to support their ClimateChange™ scare tactics, so they didn't use it in their climate alarmist propaganda. By now we should be used to Liberals 'cherry picking' data to support their narrative, don't be fooled, we're smarter than that.

Up 10 Down 9

BnR on Mar 16, 2020 at 3:14 pm

Mathew, homework doesn't mean what you think it means....

Up 16 Down 10

brian on Mar 16, 2020 at 2:33 pm

matthew... linking an article to a far right news source criticizing a liberal government isn't going to convince many people.

Up 5 Down 19

Matthew on Mar 15, 2020 at 8:45 pm

Sigh... Let me help you do your homework...
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/09/20/environment-canada-destroys-inconvenient-climate-data/

Up 22 Down 13

U. C. Knaught on Mar 15, 2020 at 3:22 pm

Damn Liberals and their climate change!
The Yukon used to have a semi-arid climate. Now, thanks to the Liberals changing the climate we have more precipitation which will lead to more flooding, thawing arctic land masses which will further warm the region creating more precipitation in the form of rain and snow. Rivers and lakes will swell, mud slides will occur and pests, parasites and pathogens will flourish.

Thanks Liberals!
And then... They are taking our jobs away which just adds to the mess... For example, now the government is competing with its citizens for local resources. Bye, bye Central Stores...

Up 20 Down 14

BnR on Mar 15, 2020 at 10:54 am

From Mathews comment: "LOL read the breitbart article"
I think that's all we need to know about Matt. LOL indeed.

Up 19 Down 14

Dave on Mar 14, 2020 at 12:00 pm

Hey Matthew. You've presented me with an interesting conundrum. On one hand you suggest I read a breitbart article while on the other hand it is common knowledge that to do so requires that one's head be fully imbedded in sand.

Up 38 Down 32

Matthew on Mar 14, 2020 at 8:17 am

Even though last years water levels were low, I knew they would twist the snowfall into a climate change narrative.. if we even had 1000 years of UNCHANGED data that still doesn't scratch the surface on a 4.5 B year old planet.. but they're using the past 40 years as Environment Canada has erased the first 100 years.. LOL read the breitbart article!

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.