Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for July 15, 2009

Previously abused dog to be put down

The owner of a dog that will be put down after attacking three people says he wasn't informed of the animal's traumatic history when he adopted it from the local animal shelter.

By Elizabeth Hames on July 15, 2009 at 5:17 pm

photo

Photo submitted

ON THE MEND - Trevor is shown at the time he was recovering from a chain that had grown into his neck. Photo courtesy CITY OF WHITEHORSE BYLAW SERVICES

The owner of a dog that will be put down after attacking three people says he wasn’t informed of the animal’s traumatic history when he adopted it from the local animal shelter.

Matthew Allaby, 27, went looking for a dog at the Mae Bachur Animal Shelter six weeks ago. A number of dogs appealed to him, but a two-year-old German shepherd Rottweiler-cross stood out among the rest.

“He seemed like a very happy-go-lucky dog,” Allaby told the Star this morning. “Real bouncy, playful, so I adopted him.”

At the time of the adoption, the shelter told Allaby that the dog, Trevor, was initially brought into the shelter because he had snapped at a child.

However, Allaby took Trevor home because he understood that “it wasn’t an aggressive attack. It was more of a playful thing,” he said.

When Allaby returned to the shelter Tuesday looking for a medical history of the dog to provide bylaw services, he was informed that, while in the care of a previous owner, a chain had grown into Trevor’s neck and had had to be removed. The abuse the animal suffered received extensive coverage in the Star at the time.

‘It’s kind of just a given that you would have the history of the animal and that you would give that history of the animal to the person who was adopting it,” said Allaby.

“Had I been given that information when I adopted him, I wouldn’t have adopted him.”

During a recent camping trip, Trevor was agreeable with other dogs and people. It wasn’t until Allaby brought Trevor back into the city and put a collar on him that he noticed a change in the dog’s behaviour.

Within the last week, Trevor has attacked three people, including Allaby’s landlord, who bled from the bite.

“So I made the decision to have him put down,” said Allaby. “I can’t have a dog going around and attacking people, and I can’t let other people have a dog that’s going to go around and attack people.”

Yesterday, Allaby turned his dog over to bylaw services.

Trevor was set to be put down this morning, but he can be held up to 14 days if bylaw services is not provided with the medical history of the dog.

If an animal does have rabies, it should show up in within that period of time.

At the time of adoption, Allaby said, he was told Trevor was up-to-date on all his shots, including rabies shots. But when he requested that information from the shelter Tuesday, he was told staff had no record of Trevor’s medical history.

Allaby doesn’t know if he will request compensation from the shelter for what he views as providing inadequate information.

“All I know is I’m out $200 and a dog. That’s how much it cost me to adopt him,” said Allaby.

“I’m going to be talking to them and laying out a guilt trip on them for adopting out a dog as violent as him.

“They should have known right from the beginning that a dog with that history was going to be violent, and they shouldn’t be adopting out violent dogs.”

No one from the shelter could be reached to comment on Allaby’s concerns before press time early this afternoon.

CommentsAdd a comment

anonymous

Jul 15, 2009 at 8:28 pm

Poor you…you insensitive jerk.  What about the poor dog?  I could care less about your 200 dollars.  You are an idiot and are lucky I don’t work at the animal shelter because when you came in to lay on your guilt trip I would tell you how insensitive you are.  If you are sniffing around for a lawsuit I hope they see are lame you are and give you the nothing you deserve.

Joseph Campbell

Jul 15, 2009 at 9:09 pm

WOW! Death row with a 14 day reprieve. I think Trevor should get the same treatment as humans - 25 years to appeal. After all, its not just a dog’s life.

Dog Lover

Jul 16, 2009 at 1:19 pm

It’s too bad Trevor is one of the victims in this situation..  Dogs can be rehabilitated with the proper care and training.. 

There’s a show on Nat. Geographic called “Dog Town”... it’s about a wonderful dog-sanctuary/compound down in Utah… they rescue dogs of all ages, breeds, shapes, sizes and conditions and put the time, effort & care into rehabilitating them from whatever they may suffer from… former abuse, illness etc…  They do this so that these animals can be re-adopted and enjoy a long and happy life..

As for poor Trevor.. it’s unfortunate that he bite someone… but this was most definitely a defense mechanism..  What would *you* do if you previously had a collar on and it was so tight it litterally grew in to your body?? I’d probably be a bit defensive too if someone tried to put another one on me…  It’s sad he is ultimately going to be punished for something he had no control over.

great

Jul 16, 2009 at 5:56 pm

“It wasn’t until Allaby brought Trevor back into the city and put a collar on him that he noticed a change in the dog’s behaviour”

A harness instead of a collar should be used-

The shelter should not have let someone who doesn’t have enough dog knowledge adopt Trevor- That dog needs a person who knows how to deal with his issues.

L. Miller-Goodall

Jul 16, 2009 at 6:16 pm

I am so incredibly saddened by this story.  As a volunteer at the shelter I walked this dog many, many times. Was he enthusiastic, active and loud?  Yes but never aggressive, never a hint of anything close to a bite.  I often went there specifically to walk him; I enjoyed his company.

Dogs who have had bad experiences with people often react to people who look, smell or act like their former abuser.  It’s all a matter of training and desensitizing them to that trigger or simply managing their exposure to certain situations.

The situation with his collar being grown into his neck was well publicized in the papers with color pictures - it was no secret.

This poor creature is yet another victim of cruelty of humans.  This guy seems to care more about his $200 than the living creature.  Poor Trevor

Arn Anderson

Jul 16, 2009 at 7:22 pm

Regardless of your personal feelings towards dogs the shelter still has to obey the law and provide adequate information on the dog. Im pretty sure many of you would be quite angry or frustrated with the shelter.

Something like this needs to be fixed quickly so more people have the confidence in adopting dogs from shelters.

Animal Lover

Jul 16, 2009 at 7:46 pm

He was fine until you put a collar on him.  That should have been your First Clue - the dog had been traumatized and would not handle a collar ever again. Why weren’t you sensitive to his limitations?  You could have seen the area around his neck where the surgical healing had taken place. Great on your camping trip, but once a collar was put on, he became ‘aggressive’.  Collars had bad memories of pain and abuse for him. With some sensitivity, which you didn’t show, it could have been avoided.

I had a dog who, before being rescued and brought to the shelter, also had a collar on so tight it had imbedded itself in his skin and needed surgical removal.  Needless to say, he would not tolerate anything around his neck ever again - a bandana, a collar, etc. And I respected him enough to abide by his limitations. He lived to 18 yrs. with love and understanding.

Poor Trevor.  A helluva life.  Abuse before…insensitivity later.

name withheld

Jul 16, 2009 at 10:45 pm

Maybe we need the whole story here - this man is not even the one who applied for and was accepted to adopt this dog.  Nothing would have been told to him because he wasn’t the one adopting.  I suggest the Star get all the facts before they publish one person’s attempt to get his name in the paper.

dog lover too

Jul 16, 2009 at 11:46 pm

I feel sorry for the dog too, but the issue here is non-disclosure. While I think it’s a bit ridiculous to “go lay a guilt trip”, I do think the shelter was negligent in releasing this dog without advising that he was essentially a special needs animal with a history of being abused.

Why not let the owner (who, let’s face it appears to be pretty responsible when you consider the risk posed by “Trevor”) pick a new dog?

Pet lover

Jul 18, 2009 at 3:57 am

If the dog’s history had such press coverage and the shelter was fully aware, why wasn’t the dog put down at that time?

It’s nice to think pit bulls and rottweilers (even those crossed with more forgiving breeds) will bounce back after horrendous abuse. But their default setting is attack. Even if they’ve been raised in stable, loving homes you can never be sure that a screaming child or a jogger won’t suddenly turn into prey and be clamped into those powerful and unrelenting jaws.

This situation is a sharp example of why those breeds should be outlawed.

Don McKenzie

Jul 18, 2009 at 6:50 pm

While I feel bad about the life that the dog had before, I can agree with the new owner not wanting to have a vicious dog.  And to “Annoymous”, you sure are brave when you are allowed to hide your identity, while giving your self-righteous rant.  Why don’t YOU adopt the dog?

Disgusted

Jul 21, 2009 at 4:58 pm

Wow Matthew Allaby, you’re a real piece of work. I can see clearly from the photo that the dog has had trauma to his neck that has healed, and it doesen’t take a rocket scientist to figure out it’s from being tied up. To bad the dog has to die because you’re not very observant. And no, I’m not saying I would do better with the dog, but cetainly someone could have done better than this Allaby guy. Your not really defending what he did, are you Don? I think if Allaby had educated himself a little better, maybe he would picked a different dog, and Trevor would have got a chance at having an owner who can deal with him instead of being put down. Allaby blew Trevor’s shot because he didn’t know enough.

Another Allaby

Jul 22, 2009 at 11:13 pm

Wow, you guys are so harsh, matt had no idea what had happened to this dog until he was told by a third party!  this non disclosure thing from that “Inhumane” society is pitifull and they should get fined severly for their lack of good judgement, yes i know ceasar always says it’s never the dog it’s the owner, and power breeds should not be banned, but when it comes to rehabilitation of an animal with thaty much damage, i bet there is not one of you that can afford, monetarly or the amount of time it takes to do so.  matt did the best he could, and made the right decision to have him put down, before bylaw ordered him to be put down, which the way i see it was inevitable.

Courtney Heffernan

Jul 23, 2009 at 5:22 pm

Of course this man wasn’t provided with the medical history of this dog - he wasn’t even the one who had adopted him initially. Though I hadn’t previously commented anonymously, I will respond to Don McKenzie (with my full name) - Matthew Allaby makes me sick, and I would gladly adopt this dog.

susan rogan

Jul 25, 2009 at 12:11 am

Hey, I can see that there are a lot of upset dog lovers here but Matt did adopt a dog, and did care for him, took him camping and by all evidence did a darn good job of being a pet owner of an adopted, adult dog, who’s history he did not know.

Take it easy on him.  He’s lost a friend here one way or the other, and his belief is that the dog is dangerous, and that dangerous dogs should be put down.  There are worse things to believe.  He is not cruel or insensitive, in fact he seems to be very upset, and not just about his $200.

Matt is not you, and you are not him.  I think a lot of people would put a dog down who they thought they knew, but who on more than one occasion viciously attacked a person without provocation.

Me?  I hope Trevor finds a home and I tend to believe that collar free, he can be rehabilitated.  I myself have a dog that was to be put down for biting three people.  He has been with me for 3 years and has not had an incident in those three years.  So don’t think I do not have compassion, but my compassion also extends to Matthew Allaby.  To say ‘you make me sick’ and things like that is really not called for here.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview