Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for May 20, 2010

Premier’s anti-Liberal gibe backfires on him

The premier’s habit of attacking opponents’ credibility is often effective,

By Jason Unrau on May 20, 2010 at 2:44 pm

photo

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Premier Dennis Fentie and Liberal Leader Arthur Mitchell

The premier’s habit of attacking opponents’ credibility is often effective, but what Dennis Fentie launched at the official Opposition during Tuesday’s budget debate exploded in his face Wednesday, opening the door to his own criminal past.

Nearing the end of legislative proceedinigs on Tuesday, Fentie and Liberal Leader Arthur Mitchell were engaged in yet another credibility match-up when the Civil Forfeiture Act – passage of which has since been delayed – became the focus of the pair’s banter.

Fentie questioned the company Liberals were keeping when that party’s members appeared at a May 6 protest against the proposed act.

“What came our way – from a very reputable source – was one of the demonstrators holding a sign while the Liberal caucus was out trumpeting their ever-changing views ... had recently been released from the Whitehorse Correctional Centre,” Fentie said. “It only gives one pause to reflect on all of this and what it really was.”

That day, MLAs from both the Liberals and NDP attended and spoke at the rally organized by Yukoners for Civil Freedom, a newly formed group which wants the proposed Civil Forfeiture Act scrapped.

The group also managed to gather more than 2,000 like-minded citizens to sign a petition which was presented to the legislature later that day.

What has riled Yukoners for Civil Freedom and their supporters is if the forfeiture act is passed, the Justice department and RCMP could seize property and cash based on suspicion of criminal activity, not a conviction, as is required under criminal law.

During the rally, several protesters held aloft huge placards emblazoned with slogans like “OUR Territory, OUR Government, OUR SAY!”, “Better police work, less laws!” and the suggestive “Why 10 years? Why not 35? Fentie”.

That was a reference to the premier’s conviction for heroin dealing in the 1970s, for which he served time in prison in Alberta.

That puts the premier in similar company with one of the rally’s organizers, Micah Hoeschele, also convicted of drug trafficking after a routine stop by police turned up several packages of marijuana, 122 grams of hash and electronic scales.

Hoeschele pled guilty in June 2008, and served a six-month conditional sentence.

Asked after the rally about his criminal record, Hoeschele told the Star he takes full responsibility for his actions, has changed his behaviour and is trying to be a model citizen.

“This law the government is trying to pass has a 10-year retroactive clause ... that means the state can still come after my property even after I’ve done my time,” Hoeschele said.

“It’s amazing how our premier, who has a drug conviction, can go ahead with something today that 35 years ago would’ve trampled all over his rights.”

As Hoeschele’s sentence did not include jail time, it is unlikely he was the target of Fentie’s remarks, nor did the premier say why the placard-carrying protester had been in the custody of the Whitehorse Correctional Centre.

However, the premier’s veiled guilt-by-association comments were not lost on Mitchell, who retorted with a spate of embellished double entendres, leaving Fentie red-faced and not his usual confident self.

“To use phrasing that should be familiar to the premier, this young man has ‘taken responsibility for his actions, paid for his mistakes, paid his debt to society and moved on,’” Mitchell said.

“More than just paying his debt and moving on, this young man is now actively participating in our democracy and attending this legislature.

“Such rehabilitation is heartwarming .... We just hope all such young men eventually enter this House on similar terms. Does the premier really believe that a drug conviction should keep someone out of this House?”

Legislators voted April 28 to support an NDP motion delaying the forfeiture act until public consultations occur.

Both the Liberals and NDP have stated if revisions aimed at protecting civil liberties do not materialize and the public rejects amendments or the bill altogether, neither will support it.

At last weekend’s Yukon NDP convention, party members supported an emergency motion directing their MLAs not to support the bill in its current form.

Fentie declined to comment for this story.

CommentsAdd a comment

Jack Malone

May 20, 2010 at 3:27 pm

Man, Fentie is a territorial embarassment.

Nile

May 20, 2010 at 8:24 pm

Never forget that drug dealers and criminals have more rights and protection than anyone else in the Yukon. Of course drug dealers were at the rally opposing civil forfeiture. What would happen to all their houses and harleys if it went through?  That being said I’m glad it’s not going through. I shudder to think how it would be abused if the Liberals got in power.

Don McKenzie

May 24, 2010 at 12:26 am

Thank Christ nobody outside of The Yukon, takes the politics of The Yukon seriously, or it would be a national embarassment.  Hey “Nile”  what’s with the stereotyping about drug dealers and harleys?  You come across as saying that only criminals ride Harley-Davidsons.  That being said, I shudder to think of you ever being in a position of power.

Tobias Hoeschele

May 27, 2010 at 2:02 pm

That petition of 2000 signatures was gathered in about a week. With the low population of the Yukon 2000 signatures in one week is an incredible amount of support.

If Fentie is really suggesting that 1 or 2 criminal convictions is representative of the population of Yukoners who oppose this bill that is an incredible insult to the Yukon’s population.

Nile

May 28, 2010 at 8:59 pm

I wasn’t saying that all Harley owners are drug dealers, just that many drug dealers own Harleys. They also own many other expensive toys that those of us on a moderate income could never afford.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview