Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for February 18, 2014

Francophone board to take case to top court

A contentious, culturally sensitive legal battle over French-language education in the Yukon is headed to Canada’s highest court to consider hearing.

By Christopher Reynolds on February 18, 2014 at 3:36 pm

photo

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Ludovic Gouaillier

A contentious, culturally sensitive legal battle over French-language education in the Yukon is headed to Canada’s highest court to consider hearing.

The territory’s francophone school board announced Monday it will submit a recent decision by the Yukon Court of Appeal for review by the Supreme Court of Canada.

The high court can accept or reject hearing the case.

The move sends a multiyear, multimillion-dollar dispute between the territorial government and the Commission scolaire francophone du Yukon (CSFY) to the highest rung of the nation’s legal ladder.

“The CSFY is basically arguing for a full right to manage French education,” board president Ludovic Gouaillier told the Star today. “That’s its mandate, and that’s why it was created.”

The appeal court did not so much disagree as defer the decision.

Its unanimous ruling, handed down Feb. 11, in effect cancelled a previous judgment by the Yukon Supreme Court, which ruled in 2011 that the government violated minority language education rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

The lower court ruling stated that the government had “failed to accord the CSFY adequate management and control of French language education.”

The school board successfully argued that the government had breached its “fiduciary duty” by directing money earmarked for French-language education toward immersion programs — “second language instruction” — at English-speaking schools in Whitehorse rather than “first language” education at the exclusively French École Émilie-Tremblay.

The trial judge found in favour of the CSFY and ordered a number of remedies, including $2 million in financial damages to make up for the diverted funds.

More surprisingly, Justice Vital Oullette ordered a new French high school built — within two years — alongside École Émilie-Tremblay.

Oullette demanded the school have the capacity for 150 students from Grades 7 to 12, even though French students in the territory number far fewer than that, a government lawyer argued.

The government, however, has now successfully appealed the decision, arguing that the judge was biased — a rare claim — among other problems.

The appeal court ordered a retrial of the civil case.

Oullette, a former francophone school board trustee and local French association executive in Alberta, gave the appearance of bias when he grimaced and laughed at the government lawyer at various times in the proceedings, the appeal decision reads.

“Quite apart from issues of facial expressions or laughter, however, we are of the view that the judge treated counsel for the government with a lack of respect on many occasions during the trial,” the three-judge panel stated.

“The judge’s comportment during the trial gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias.

“While his former connections to francophone education in Alberta do not raise concerns about bias, his continuing role as a governor of a foundation do,” the judges concluded, referring to Oullette’s position at the Fondation franco-albertaine.

Gouaillier said he was disappointed with the appeal court’s focus on potential bias: “It’s unfortunate; it has the effect of sidestepping those other important issues that don’t get ruled upon and send us back to starting blocks.”

He had hoped the panel might address what he called the “essential and fundamental” points of the case.

These revolve around financial authority over things like professional development for teachers, programs for children under five years old and special needs students, staffing and custodial budgets and, crucially, the new high school.

The Court of Appeal did address whether the Charter grants the French school board — the Yukon’s only school board — the right to admit children of “non-rights holder parents.”

Section 23 of the Charter stipulates that children born to a francophone parent or whose siblings were educated in French have the right to French language education in jurisdictions where English is the dominant tongue.

The appeal panel concluded children who don’t fall under such conditions in the Yukon, like anglophones or new Canadians whose first language is neither English nor French, cannot attend Émilie-Tremblay

Gouiaillier said this is unfair to both the francophone community and the broader immigrant community.

“The significant factor of the growth of our population in Canada is through immigration.

“If the francophone community is not allowed to share in that growth ... that goes against the spirit of Section 23, which is to not only preserve, in the case of the Yukon, the French community and allow it to sustain itself, but to grow and repair historical damages that have been done to it,” Gouiaillier said.

He added that the appeal court “chose a very narrow reading of Section 23” because, taken literally, it would exclude “immigrants who don’t speak English or French but who choose to integrate into the French community.”

Gouaillier hopes the Supreme Court of Canada will not only grant permission to appeal the recent ruling, but go beyond the issues examined by the Court of Appeal to rule on the case as a whole, rather than sending it back to square one with a new trial — a lengthy and expensive process.

“Only this will allow CSFY to continue its quest to provide the members of the Yukon francophone community with educational services of a quality which conforms with the Article 23 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms,” Gouiaillier said in the release.

“Meanwhile, we are glad to be able to rely on a positive relationship and the real commitment for collaboration which exists today between CSFY and the Yukon government.

“Nevertheless, the Yukon Court of Appeal’s decision to refer the issues in dispute back to the first instance does not constitute a viable option for CSFY. We must consider the human and financial resources already invested in this process as well as those that would be spent through a new trial.”

CommentsAdd a comment

north_of_60

Feb 18, 2014 at 4:40 pm

Why continue wasting money you could use to educate children?

“Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.” - Albert Einstein

hmm

Feb 18, 2014 at 8:31 pm

I think they should add in native language, don’t give the french an entire school to themselves, it is becoming Quebec up here.

June Jackson

Feb 19, 2014 at 2:00 pm

As usual I speak only for myself but my opinion is.. it was not a good thing for Canada to have 2 official languages.  French or English, or Spanish, even German.. I don’t care…but one official language.  Having 2 languages has caused division in the entire country and been costly beyond counting, and has caused an entire sect in the country to think that they are “special” in some way that they are ‘entitled”.

Just an aside, but the last time I was in Quebec City, I could not get service in English.

Mick

Feb 19, 2014 at 3:55 pm

to be honest, it’s NOT good to have “french” in schools because it’s NOT FRENCH. Its just a dialect and no-one would understand the Quebec “french”. I agree that a native language, I understand there are multiple, would be way more appropriate.

Learn german, spanish or chinese, those are language which are useful, Quebec french is not…

Just Say'in

Feb 19, 2014 at 9:19 pm

The only reason we have all of these Quebecers here is because the Government keeps feeling compelled to have all of the phones answered and services offered in French. So to supply all of these positions, there has been a huge influx of people from Quebec. It is getting very hard for a Westerner to get those positions now because of the Bilingual requirements. Most coming here from the east are fine, it is just a few radicals that are making all the noise. I wish the good ones would shut the others up.

Just Say'in

Feb 19, 2014 at 9:25 pm

The reason that the High school is not required and the elementary is far from full is that the kids do not want to go to that school. They want to go to school with their friends, the kids they play with, the kids next door. All of the feeling that their parents have about language are lost on the kids. They just want to hang with their friends. As the kids get older they ultimately make the discussion which school they attend and that will be with their buddies.

north_of_60

Feb 20, 2014 at 12:22 pm

In the real world that kids of today will inherit, Mandarin will be far more useful than French, unless they plan to live in Quebec.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview