Yukon North Of Ordinary

News archive for January 27, 2009

Budget clears way for firehall, Takhini work

Like the general public, city council members had little to say Monday night as they adopted a $32-million capital budget for 2009.

By Stephanie Waddell on January 27, 2009 at 5:32 pm

photo

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

ATTENDANCE DEFICIT - City council sat with four members present and Coun. Jan Stick on the phone last night. In council chambers were, left to right, Brian Crist, Coun. Florence Roberts, Mayor Bev Buckway, Coun. Jeanine Myhre, Coun. Dave Stockdale, Robert Fendrick, the city's director of administrative services, and city manager Dennis Shewfelt.

Like the general public, city council members had little to say Monday night as they adopted a $32-million capital budget for 2009.

Coun. Florence Roberts was the only member to bring up any questions prior to voting in favour of the capital expenses for the year. She asked city staff if any budget packages were picked up by residents.

While Rob Fendrick, the city’s director of administrative services, reported some were, he didn’t have a number on exactly how many had been taken.

The adoption of the capital budget comes after city advertisements seeking input into the document were published, along with the full budget being available on the website and in print form at city facilities.

“No written responses were received,” notes a report that went to council members.

Residents were also invited to speak at the Jan. 5 and Jan. 12 council meetings, but no one addressed the city’s planned capital costs.

The only presentation to council came from the Yukon Convention Bureau about its annual funding, which is covered in the operating budget.

Among the major projects in the 2009 capital budget are $9 million for the reconstruction of Takhini North, $8.7 million for a new fire hall at the top of Two Mile Hill and $4.3 million for sewage treatment equipment at the Yukon River outfall.

This year, the city broke up its budget release into two parts, with the $32-million capital budget being released first.

The operating budget proposes spending $55.7 million on running the city.

It also seeks a four-per-cent property tax increase and a 12.5-per-cent jump in water and sewer bills while raising many more fees. There have been property tax increases for several straight years, with more planned for at least the next two years.

Similar to the process in adopting the capital budget, a public hearing on the operating document is set for Feb. 9, with council set to vote on second and third readings later in the month.

Councillors Doug Graham and Dave Austin were absent from last night’s council meeting, while Coun. Jan. Stick attended by conference call.

CommentsAdd a comment

Anthony

Jan 28, 2009 at 5:23 pm

“No written responses were received“

Any guess as to why?  The public has learned that going to council to provide input is about as frustrating as pushing a rope up a hill…..while being berated by Austin and Stockdale.  In the end mayor and council dismiss any/all public input.

I look forward to a house cleaning in October, this crew has been a lame duck from day one.

Francias Pillman

Jan 28, 2009 at 8:32 pm

Wow, another useless project. How about you buy more snow plows and hire more people for snow removal. In a time when city services are getting cut, and taxes going up, is a new fire hall really what this town needs? No one showed up because no one cares about a bunch of hippies who don’t know how to run a city.

Me Too

Jan 29, 2009 at 5:58 pm

In response to Anthony—Yes! It is extremely frustrating to try to communicate with this council when they really don’t seem interested in any concerns people bring forward. They don’t even bother dismissing those concerns a lot of the time. They simply ignore them. I sure hope we’ll have some good candiates running in the next municipal election.

Add a comment

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your full name and email address are required before your comment will be posted.

Commenting is not available in this section entry.

Comment preview