Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Maude Barlow

‘Why would you endanger this beautiful environment?’

Known internationally as an advocate of water resources, Maude Barlow was in the Yukon on Monday to say no to fracking.

By Chuck Tobin on May 5, 2015

Known internationally as an advocate of water resources, Maude Barlow was in the Yukon on Monday to say no to fracking.

The chair of the Council of Canadians addressed an anti-fracking rally outside the legislature at noon yesterday.

The Yukon is still in the position to say no, and it should say no, Barlow insisted.

The world is already in trouble with its water sources, she added.

The United Nations study says by 2030, demand for water will outstrip the available supply by 40 per cent, she said.

Barlow told the crowd to visit places in the world that don’t have water anymore, then come back to the Yukon and fall on your knees.

“I am here in solidarity, my Council of Canadians is here solidarity and we will take your message across the country,” she said.

“No fracking in the Yukon. Make your statement and take your stand on it.”

Barlow said water used in fracking operations has as many as 600 chemicals, and nobody has any way of dealing with where that contaminated water is going to go.

In an interview afterwards, the former senior advisor on water at the United Nations said you don’t have to look far, and you don’t have to look hard, to find critical water shortages on the planet.

They’re everywhere, she said, taking time to cite areas around the globe that are desperate.

She said half the rivers in China have disappeared.

“They are just gone,” she said. “They’re not polluted, they’re just gone.”

California is in crisis, Barlow noted. She said Alberta’s Bow River is in trouble.

“Demand is going up and supply is going down.”

She said no place on Earth is safe from the effects of climate change and loss of water.

Water resources in the Yukon are still largely intact, she pointed out.

Barlow said to allow fracking in the Yukon is a step in the wrong direction.

Fracking involves using water contaminated with chemicals, some of them carcinogenic, and nobody should believe anybody who says otherwise, she said.

Barlow said fracking contaminates local wells and ground water, leads to animal deaths and causes human health problems.

All have been well-documented, she said.

“Why would you take the beauty of this place, this place is known for clean water and clean air, and put it at risk?” she said. “Why would you endanger this beautiful environment?”

Barlow said Yukoners should not let the hydraulic fracturing industry get started in the territory.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper has gutted the legislation meant to protect the country’s supply of fresh water but Canada still has the First Nations and their aboriginal rights as a safeguard, she said.

Barlow said the negative impacts of fracking have been felt mostly by the First Nations because the First Nations occupy the remote areas where fracking occurs.

“So suddenly it is going from First Nations being kind of victims for a while to First Nations being leaders in our struggle to protect our water and air.”

The Yukon, said Barlow, should apply the precautionary principle.

“Until you prove it is safe to us, you do not have access.”

As much as greenhouse gas creates climate change, so does the removal of water, she said.

Barlow said in her most recent book, Blue Future, she documents some of the successful attempts around the world to reclaim water resources that were once exhausted.

There have been some spectacular examples, she explained, noting cases in Slovakia, Australia, Portugal, Africa....

Barlow said the bottom line is if you want healthy water resources, don’t let them get destroyed in the first place.

See related coverage.

Comments (22)

Up 2 Down 0

north_of_60 on May 11, 2015 at 8:02 pm

Hydraulic fracturing is a process by which rock layers thousands of feet below the groundwater table are cracked using significant quantities of sand and water in order to release gas (or sometimes oil) trapped under them. Some people are concerned about possible groundwater contamination from the technique.

Contrary to what is misrepresented as a new technique, hydraulic fracturing has been used in Canada since the 1960s. Since then, more than 175,000 new wells have been hydro-fracked in British Columbia and Alberta "without a case of harm to drinking water," according to regulating agencies in both provinces. That number constitutes more than a third of all new wells in this country in the last half-century. In New Brunswick there have been 49 hydro-fracking operations since the mid-1980s, all without a single report of water contamination.

In the United States around 90 per cent of 493,000 active natural gas wells in the country, across 31 states, were hydro-fracked when they were drilled. These numbers do not constitute the unknown record of a new, untested technique that those concerned about its safety would have us believe. Rather, they indicate that concerns about the safety for water tables from hydro-fracking , while valid, are grossly exaggerated. New wells require tests and inspections to ensure the well is safe to use hydraulic fracturing. That's why there are no documented examples of newly drilled wells causing groundwater problems.

The problems with hydraulic fracturing occur when old wells with damaged casing are hydro-fracked without testing first. This unregulated 'cowboy' fracking by small independent operators has become more frequent in the old oil fields of the USofA. That's where the 'fracking horror stories' come from. When sorting truth from fiction, details are very important. Most anti-frackers don't have the intelligence to sort truth from fiction.

Do you base your decisions to fly on the number of successful flights every day with no incidents, or by the number of old planes that crash or do something else 'newsworthy'?

A rational person looks at all the facts and makes an informed decision. An irrational person makes their decisions based on emotion, and what their friends tell them to believe.

Up 18 Down 2

70% of the items in our life have some fossil based materials on May 11, 2015 at 3:48 pm

70% of the items in our life have some fossil based materials in it.
All you anti everythings do not have a clue what they are trying to do.
People that talk like this just don't get the facts so they are waste of time.

Up 2 Down 0

Just the facts on May 11, 2015 at 3:22 pm

Hmm, Groucho should do some fact checking (or expanding) himself. While it's true NAFTA came into effect while Chretien was PM, having won the 1993 election, NAFTA was negotiated and signed (in 1992) by Brian Mulroney and the Conservative government, as was the predecessor FTA. Chretien, for his part, did not follow through on election promises to cancel NAFTA, and also negotiated two supplemental agreements. Governments change, but not much else does.

Up 3 Down 10

Thomas Slager on May 11, 2015 at 11:24 am

What I think is funny is, we absolutely can't burn garbage anymore because it pollutes the air. Fracking, on the other hand, is being considered. There are limited savings in burning garbage but resource royalties are huge cash cows for government. Am I the only one to connect these dots?

Up 20 Down 2

north_of_60 on May 10, 2015 at 1:02 pm

@Groucho d'North "We can have an oil and gas industry WITHOUT fracking, "

That is correct. Most of the petroleum deposits in the Yukon are in sandstones that don't require hydraulic fracturing like shale. The deposits in the Whitehorse Trough are a good example.

The anti-frackers can't grasp this, they don't actually understand geology. For them "fracking" is a buzz-word for any petroleum development. Most of them appear to be anti-development of any kind, not just anti-fracking. The NDP have made a serious political blunder by appearing to ally themselves with this radical fringe minority.

If the anti-frackers were speaking from knowledge, not blind emotion, then they would support development of the Whitehorse Trough deposits without hydraulic fracturing.

The government will likely move ahead with petroleum exploration in deposits that don't require hydraulic fracturing, and leave the antis looking foolish and perplexed.

Up 28 Down 8

Stu Summer on May 10, 2015 at 11:06 am

If you use metal and natural gas and oil and gasoline you should support all forms of extraction because they provide jobs and contribute to the economy.

I do not believe this but it's a silly argument others often post. If you drive a prius or yaris or matrix with a bike rack and a Peel and anti-fracking sticker you are a target of people who feel you are hypocritical.

Up 18 Down 4

Groucho d'North on May 10, 2015 at 10:58 am

Someone who attended Ms. Barlow’s presentation brought me a copy of her handout related to the water crisis she maintains Canada is heading for. On the cover there were words to the effect of: The Steven Harper government is putting Canada’s water future in jeopardy, and apparently in her speech she goes on about how NAFTA is the culprit by which this problem will be legitimized. Hey Maude, NAFTA was brought in in 1994 when Jean the Cretan was the PM and the Liberal flag was flying over Sussex Drive. Doesn’t anybody fact-check their propaganda anymore?

Up 15 Down 4

Groucho d'North on May 10, 2015 at 10:36 am

We can have an oil and gas industry WITHOUT fracking, why is it so hard to get past this pesky bit of policy application?
Politicians: you have heard the desires of the electorate re fracking, go make deals that do not include it. This will be on your final exam.

Up 6 Down 0

Here here! on May 8, 2015 at 7:03 pm

Hey Joel you mean readily got information like this?

"Canada Southern shares slip as Petro-Canada drops out of bidding
Canadian Oil Sands Trust will dump its share of the Yukon's only producing gas field if it takes over Calgary-based Canada Southern, says SirenFisekci, a Canadian Oil Sands spokesperson.

The Kotaneelee gas field is in the southeast corner of the Yukon.
Canada Southern owns 30 per cent of Kotaneelee. Four other companies, including operator Devon Energy, own the rest.
Canadian Oil Sands Trust has made a bid to buy Canada Southern.
Fisekci says Canadian Oil Sands is not interested in the Yukon gas fields but is primarily after Canada Southern's natural gas holdings in the Arctic.
Fisekci says if the deal goes through, her company will sell off "conventional assets," including its share in Kotaneelee and properties in B.C.

Canada Southern's annual reports say the Yukon field made up 65 per cent of the company's natural gas sales in the first three months of 2006. Canada Southern is encouraging its shareholders to accept the offer by the Aug. 1 deadline."

Up 4 Down 1

Here here! on May 8, 2015 at 6:52 pm

Hey Joel you mean readily available information like this in which you conveniently left out the last sentence.
A recent report by the Yukon Geological Survey shows potential for natural gas in the Whitehorse Trough.
Brad Hayes, president of Petrel Robertson Consulting, a Calgary-based oil and gas consulting firm, prepared the report.

It found the potential for approximately 3 trillion cubic feet of gas and 107 million barrels of oil in the Whitehorse Trough. The oil and gas is spread over the trough’s 3.72 million hectares.

If taken together, the amount would be comparable to some findings in Alberta or British Columbia, Hayes said. By comparison, the Hibernia offshore oil deposit in Newfoundland has 1.2 billion barrels of oil, he said.

Exploration outfits with an appetite for risk may find the Whitehorse Trough worth exploring, said Hayes. His report identifies which areas are best to explore.

The Whitehorse Trough remains poorly studied. The most recent information came from a 2001 study by the National Energy Board. No new data was produced for the latest study.

Up 6 Down 5

Here here! on May 8, 2015 at 6:27 pm

Joel - If this plethora of billions of cubic ft of gas is really there then one why do we need to frack to get at it and number two why haven't we extracted it and done something like make our own LNG plant. I dunno things are not lining up here with what you state and what is. The good thing is time will tell and let's hope we don't screw up all the fresh water while we are speculating because you only get one shot. There is no such thing as de-fracking.

Up 17 Down 7

north_of_60 on May 8, 2015 at 4:43 pm

Maud's lifestyle uses more fossil fuels in a week than I use in a year. She is right up there with the other greenwashed hypocrites like Gore and Suzuki telling us mere mortals that we must cut back to 'save the planet' while they live a jet-set life promoting their books and agendas. "Do what we say, not as we do"

Up 14 Down 8

Josey Wales on May 8, 2015 at 1:35 pm

hey alex...hmmm? Seems your reading comprehension skills are rusty, June posted nothing to you.
assuming you peruse Josey's POV from time to time, I have no need to get out and stretch to go outside. I do it gobs currently, and view the world from the front lines. Up close and personal with our many criminal scum, calling fools out for the zealotry and passive aggressive crap...like now.

If the "non greenies" are so evil and destructive, how is it that "our" Yukon still is so pretty for jet setters as Maude to fly in to nag us after the gold rush, two world wars, many lil' ones, a trip back in the time machine via revisionist historians, a complete social re-engineering of Canada, the bogus climate change fear mongering, evil colonists etc?
Yet we still have trees, still have critters, and miss our freedoms greatly?
as UN types try to get their global hands on our people, our resources, and yes our sovereignty.
all under the guise of "environmentalism" and "the future".
If "the future" is such a concern, why do we WALLOW in the pas' so much?

...let'er rip zealots.

Up 32 Down 3

Why is M wearing a suit made from fossil fuels on May 8, 2015 at 11:59 am

Why is M wearing a suit made from fossil fuels if she against it.

Up 6 Down 12

Alex on May 8, 2015 at 9:45 am

June what are you babbling about now? Racism?! Well guess what I'm a whitey too, as you like to call it. This doesn't change anything about my statement. Something else I believe is you really need to give your legs a stretch and get outside more, instead of hiding behind your computer screen 24/8. It's not healthy for the body or mind. Enjoy yet another beautiful day!

Up 17 Down 13

Joel on May 7, 2015 at 2:58 pm

"These people who would try fracking don't even know if there is gas and oil here. They have done no seismographs or engineer reports to show reason in the first place." -- Here Here!

Lack of knowledge makes you look stupid when commenting. The current talk is to use hydraulic fracturing to pull the last bit of gas out of the Koataneelee gas field. There has already been ~230BCF taken out of there using traditional methods and hope to get another 30BCF. Liard basin has about 210TCF of gas. Eagle Plains basin has ~6000BCF of gas and ~450 million barrels of oil. Whitehorse Trough has ~2920BCF of gas and ~107 million barrels of oil.

This information is all easily found and has been researched extensively.

Up 17 Down 8

ProScience Greenie on May 7, 2015 at 2:11 pm

Wonder what our friend Alex thinks of KDFN's involvement in the LNG plant.

It's a shame that in this day and age some still judge people by the colour of their skin or the place of origin of their ancestors. It's also a shame that some do not get that most of us are a blended lot with ancestors coming from many different backgrounds.

"We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools." - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Up 13 Down 6

Josey Wales on May 7, 2015 at 10:08 am

Hey Alex...what kind of racist trash talk are you spewing?
I wish not your comment removed, as I believe in freedom of expression.
I also wish I could get away with crap like the "moderator" clearly enabled you with.
My POV is not very welcome at the drumbeat daily, hence the epic edits, no posts and vanishing threads.

Words from a "whitey", living in the same world you do calling you out for your racist tone, and clear ignorance of reality.
Alex your post suggests you are a fool, till later...JW

The instant gratification you spoke of?
Were you referring to political correctness and the lemming like mentality of its minions?
If you were...I'd agree!

Up 33 Down 8

Maudesahypocrite on May 6, 2015 at 4:24 pm

First I'd like to say I'm by no means a conservative or a supporter of the Yukon party. I'm also not a supporter of the no fracking movement in the Yukon. The reasoning for not supporting both is similar.

Both the government and the antifrackers are using fear tactics to support their position. The government uses economic threats and the antifrackers use environmental threats. Honestly I don't believe either side knows the true impact of fracking, even though they all claim to be experts.

Perhaps before jumping on either band wagon we should allow the decision makers to do their due diligence and present their findings on BOTH the economic and environmental impacts.

Lastly, why does Maude feel the need to push her book during her visit? Does she do that at all of her speeches that she flies around the country to attend? It honestly makes me wonder if she is more of an advocate or an author on a book tour.

Up 45 Down 64

Alex on May 6, 2015 at 11:05 am

I can't believe how people are willing to drive this world off a cliff for instant gratificiation. What a sick, sad white man's world we live in.

Up 42 Down 26

ProScience Greenie on May 5, 2015 at 5:50 pm

Hopefully the anti-everything crowd turned their furnaces off to make up for Maude's carbon footprint with coming up to the Yukon to campaign for the NDP. Funny how the precautionary principle is used so selectively.

I'm hoping super rich capitalist Elon Musk and others get us off hydrocarbons sooner than later so we see less of these far-left anti-everything types pushing their unrealistic agendas while at the same time living the charmed life.

Glad to see KDFN gets it. While I'm not sure about an outright fracking ban, switching from diesel to LNG is a partial and temporary step in the right direction. Nothing wrong with making a profit along the way to a greener Yukon. No need to swing dangerously far to the left like Maude and the Council of some Canadians and our Yukon anti-everything crowd.

Up 22 Down 40

Here here! on May 5, 2015 at 4:48 pm

Welcome to the Yukon Maude and thank you. These people who would try fracking don't even know if there is gas and oil here. They have done no seismographs or engineer reports to show reason in the first place.
In the second place Peter Lougheed agrees with you Maude, in that he stated Alberta's most valuable resource was it's water, not oil and gas. Look at them now.
This is an attempt by no nothings to show progression where none is viable and ignore the long term renewable benefits of Eco-tourism. They can see no further than hero for today villian for our grand children. These choices seem obvious to anyone who realizes that if Engineer reports and seismology reports indicated viable sources the big guys would be here in a heartbeat. This has not been the case and gives us time for the public to be aware of the real truth, not some indication of an intended, not required, gas industry for the Yukon. Maude you honor us with your presence and thanks for the help in trying to get the blind some sight.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.