Whitehorse Daily Star

‘We’re losing our homes,’ Faro resident says

Residents of a mobile home park in Faro

By Stephanie Waddell on February 9, 2017

Residents of a mobile home park in Faro could be faced with moving their homes as the town, which owns the land the trailers are on, considers rezoning the space to for an expansion of the RV park next to it.

As Ian Dunlop, the chief administrative officer in Faro, explained in an interview Wednesday afternoon, the change is being considered among a number of changes to Faro’s Official Community Plan and zoning bylaw.

Debate on the matter, however, is far from over, and a number of options are being looked at, he said.

There are two mobile home parks in town that both once housed many more trailers than they do today.

The mobile home park that would be used as RV park space currently has seven trailers – five of which are occupied full-time – in what was once a space for about 30 mobile homes.

The community has seen an increase in RV traffic through the summer, particularly for major events like Faro’s annual sheep and crane festival.

There is an area for overflow parking in the community. However, Dunlop noted additional RV space would allow those visitors closer access to the visitor centre and the like as well as a wider turning space for the larger RVs that are more common today than when the RV park was built.

With the site zoned for commercial use – a result of a previous vision for the downtown – the mobile homes are considered a non-conforming use.

Dunlop noted the other mobile home park in town, less than a kilometre away, has space that would allow for the consolidation of the two, with larger individual lots than the site they are in now.

Dunlop stressed though that there are many details that need to be considered. The bylaw has only passed first reading, with a public hearing set for next Tuesday.

“We realize this will take some time,” he said. “These are people’s homes.”

The town is working to reach out to each mobile home owner who would be impacted to get a sense of their individual issues.

The trailers, he said, are older and there may be some that would not survive a move.

There’s also a question of whether they would have to be brought up to current building code requirements – and whether that is possible.

In some cases, depending on the situation, the town may consider working with home owners to provide one of the abandoned housing units in the town.

As a starting point, Dunlop said, the community is looking at providing the owners with $5,000 to offset costs, but it recognizes that won’t likely cover all the expenses owners may incur.

All these factors – and more that may come up at next week’s public hearing – need to be considered, he stressed.

It was just last August that Darrell Rieger bought his trailer.

Now, he is being faced with the possibility of moving, a move he insists would cost much more than $5,000.

“Some of the trailers here won’t survive a move,” he said.

If they are required to meet current codes due to the move, Rieger added, new electrical breaker boxes can cost $5,000 alone.

Then there’s the cost to move the units along with any additions to the buildings that would be hard to move, other renovations that might be required, landscaping at the new site which does not currently have any in the vacant trailer sites, the cost of hooking up to utilities and so on.

At the end of the day, Rieger said, such a move could cost in the tens of thousands of dollars and that’s money many who live there just don’t have.

“We’re losing our homes,” he said, adding that it will come at a cost to taxpayers.

Rieger has heard, though hasn’t been approached on it by any officials, about the possibility of vacant housing units also being considered for those in the trailer park.

He noted they too would require renovations likely costing more than $5,000 to bring them up to current standards.

He argued a better and less costly way to deal with the space for the community would be to consider selling the trailer sites to residents, noting the community doesn’t need more RV parking.

There might be two or three weekends each year where RV parking is at a premium in town and the overflow sites are used, he said, pointing out that the Johnson Lake territorial campground is nearby.

“There’s no shortage of camping,” Rieger said.

The hotel in Faro is also there to accommodate any tourists who are visiting the community, he pointed out.

Rieger is expecting he will be joined by many others at next week’s meeting concerned about the mobile home park or any one or more of the numerous zoning bylaw and OCP changes being considered.

Rieger noted his plans to review the 60-plus pages of documents detailing potential changes before next week’s meeting.

Comments (10)

Up 6 Down 3

YukonMax on Feb 15, 2017 at 12:58 pm

Tourism; two weekends a year. During the sheep and crane festival, the town shuttles people to the sheep viewing cabin and back. If there are not enough campsite in the town of faro campground, why not promote the (YG) Johnson Lake campground just 5 minutes outside of town and offer a shuttle service from there as well? At the golf tournament, some locals were using some campsites and so did some contractors and town employees. You know what TOWN OF FARO??? Let me give you a hint...Your best promoters for tourism are your residents. If your residents are happy, healthy and proud to be Faroites, then half the battle is won.

Up 2 Down 6

roguerat on Feb 14, 2017 at 6:45 pm

First Nations don't get anything for free! They have paid, big time!
If you want clarity on the Faro homes fiasco, talk to the real estate moguls that sold that ghost town.

Up 7 Down 4

Joe on Feb 14, 2017 at 4:29 pm

@fed up...obviously you don't remember the millions and millions of dollars that poured out of Faro when the mine was operating. It would take a hundred years of tax payers funding the remaining services to even put a dent in the wealth this town provided to the territory.

Up 20 Down 3

Fed up Yukoner on Feb 13, 2017 at 5:34 pm

As someone living in the Yukon when Faro closed I question why taxpayers fund anything in Faro. It's a company town built for a mine, but the NDP of the day thought their buddies should have it for the token buck. Why is there a school and RCMP and government services there? The "town" owns all the buildings, the "town" aka Faro Real Estate should be paying for everything in this town! The government should have taken over and sold the assets, end of story!

Up 11 Down 2

Just Sayin' on Feb 13, 2017 at 4:11 pm

When the Faro mine was closed, some of the trailers which were owned by the mine went to Ross River. These trailers in Ross are now the derelict trailers Ross riverites are complaining about. Should people in Faro not get the same treatment and have new dwellings? Right, these people had to buy and or rent them, they did not get them for free. Seriously, if anyone has been to Faro there are numerous areas where a new RV park could be built. You could have two RV parks and let tourists enjoy different parts of Faro.

Up 9 Down 7

Herb on Feb 12, 2017 at 10:31 pm

If we can move some malcontents up to Faro into Senior housing, I say why not.

Up 17 Down 0

yukonmax on Feb 10, 2017 at 6:54 am

@J.C. The town now owns all empty dwellings. However, they can't get them ready for occupation because they are in bad shape and would require some upgrades i.e fuel tanks, furnace, roofing etc., etc., and that would cost more than the $5000.00 the town is willing to give each mobile home owner to relocate on another street. The mobile home court has been severely neglected by the owner (the town of Faro) and abused by the pad renters who have spread out their belongings onto adjacent pads. Also the town can't make a case to expand the current campground considering the level of tourism in the area.

Up 14 Down 9

June Jackson on Feb 9, 2017 at 6:36 pm

There are a lot of reasons people live in a trailer.. one..it's their home.. I live in a trailer..I have privacy, a little garden in the summer, I have a slight physical impairment, I can park real close to my door, I can have a pet, it's one floor, easy for me to keep clean.. There is a difference in having some place to live..and having a home. A roof is good.. but a home is cozy, warm, and yours.

The council should make every effort to let these folks just stay where they are.. if they are forced to move it shouldn't cost them a cent. Nothing..
Jeez..we all think we are safe..but we aren't.

Up 19 Down 7

jc on Feb 9, 2017 at 5:46 pm

I think the government fed and territorial should turn Faro into a senior citizen town. It's beautiful scenic and quiet. Put services there, like restaurants and a good service station etc. Keep the prices down to affordable. I know I would consider moving.

Up 32 Down 7

Jonathan Colby on Feb 9, 2017 at 3:15 pm

Why doesn't the town just trade them for a house and remove the trailers? Are people that attached to their houses? Is that unreasonable?

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.