Whitehorse Daily Star

TV star, mining firm pronounced guilty

A placer mining reality TV star and mining company have been found guilty of offences under the Yukon Waters Act.

By Emily Blake on May 17, 2017

A placer mining reality TV star and mining company have been found guilty of offences under the Yukon Waters Act.

Anton “Tony” Beets was found guilty in territorial court this morning of permitting the deposit of waste into a water management system and not reporting it. He appeared by phone in the Whitehorse court.

Mining company Tamarack Inc. was found guilty of the same two charges plus two charges for the breach of a water licence.

Beets is one of the stars of Discovery Channel reality TV series Gold Rush and a director of Tamarack.

The case stems from an incident in October 2014, aired on season five of the show. Gasoline is poured into a dredge pond and lit on fire at a mining site near the Indian River in the Dawson City area.

In a clip from the episode “Hundreds of Ounces” played several times in court, the narrator describes the event as a “Viking baptism” intended to give luck to the dredge.

While the ensuing fiery blaze may have made for good TV, the episode is what prompted a complaint to the Yukon’s chief mining inspector in March 2015.

During trial, Crown prosecutor Megan Seiling argued that Beets should be held personally liable for permitting the spill. As licencees, Tamarack had a duty of care to prevent contraventions of the water licence, Seiling added.

Four Crown witnesses testified about the incident: two mining inspectors; Mark Favron, the contract welder who poured the gasoline; and Brendan Mulligan, the senior water quality scientist for the Yukon government.

Favron testified that when he asked Beets about his idea to pour the gasoline into the pond and light it on fire, Beets responded that he “didn’t give a f----.”

Favron said he poured about one to 1.5 gallons of gasoline from a jerry can.

Mulligan testified as an expert witness about the chemical composition of hydrocarbons and how they act in water.

Defence attorney Andre Roothman argued that the gasoline used in this case did not meet the definition of waste under the Waters Act as “any substance that, if added to water, would degrade or alter, or form part of a process of degradation or alteration of, the quality of the water to an extent that is detrimental to its use by people or by any animal, fish or plant.”

Due to the small amount of gasoline used and the fact that it was mostly burned off, Roothman argued, it had little effect on water quality.

Justice Peter Chisholm, however, found that it did fit the definition of forming “part of a process of degradation or alteration” based on scientific evidence and Mulligan’s expert testimony.

Roothman also argued that Tamarack should not be held liable as they were not involved in the TV series and the incident was unrelated to their mining activities.

But Chisholm noted that Beets is a director of the company, and, according to Favron’s testimony, was the face of Tamarack at the mining site.

Chisholm found that Beets’s decision to permit the deposit of waste and not report it was equally the decision of Tamarack.

It would be “disingenuous” he added, to say that Favron was not employed by Tamarack at the time of the incident, despite the fact that he was paid through Beets’ personal bank account.

Roothman further argued during trial that charges against Tamarack over breach of the water licence should be dismissed due to vagueness as they don’t specify which section of the licence was breached.

Chisholm disagreed, and found that the licence was clear about requirements over the deposit of waste.

He noted that according to Favron’s testimony, the company had not established a training program for employees or contractors on handling waste or managing spills.

Finally, Roothman argued that in Tamarack’s case, the Kineapple principle should apply, or the rule against multiple convictions for the same thing. He noted that two of the charges address permitting the deposit of waste, and the other two address failure to report.

Chisholm, however, found that the principle does not apply as the water licence is a distinct difference in two of the charges.

Beets and Tamarack have yet to be sentenced for the convictions. Counsel are expected to appear in court again on May 26.

Beets and Tamarack could face a maximum penalty of a $15,000 fine, six months in jail, or both, for each of the first two charges.

And the latter two offences that Tamarack was convicted of carry a maximum penalty each of a $100,000 fine, one year in jail, or both.

Favron previously pleaded guilty to two charges under the Waters Act for his involvement in the incident and paid a fine of $1,725.

Comments (7)

Up 9 Down 8

ProScience Greenie on May 21, 2017 at 12:55 pm

The Yukon has tons of positive energy all on its own PedroFerrero and always has, no need of fake reality shows pimping us out for easy money and slimy PR values. Fair enough, the vet and a couple of gold miners are decent people but in the big picture fake reality TV shows are straight up slimy and ignorant in nature and count on viewer's ignorance to make money. Show those networks the door to Outside and tell them to get out and stay out. We're better than that.

Up 7 Down 9

PedroFerrero on May 20, 2017 at 4:47 pm

ProScienceGreenie - about as ignorant a comment as is imaginable. The Yukon Vet show has brought a massive amount of positive energy and PR value to the Territory without compromising the reputation of a single resident. Dr Oakley is the single-most scientifically-minded individual promoting Territorial interests in existence.

Up 15 Down 13

Eugene Smith on May 19, 2017 at 3:25 pm

That's a bunch of horse hooey. I'm sure there's a lot much worser stuff in that water, a little gas won't make a difference.

Up 28 Down 18

ProScience Greenie on May 18, 2017 at 12:20 pm

The solution is simple, shut down all reality TV shows in the Yukon because they are all about making us look stupid.

Up 32 Down 15

Give both jail time on May 18, 2017 at 11:01 am

Disrespect for our Yukon we don't need.

Up 32 Down 14

ralpH on May 18, 2017 at 9:28 am

Excellent - hope it comes out of his pocket not his partners.

Up 31 Down 13

jc on May 17, 2017 at 9:20 pm

Give them the max. This wasn't funny. And as an ex miner, I know what goes on after 5pm and on weekends in some of these mining operations.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.