Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

NDP MLA Kate White and Environment Minister Wade Istchenko

Territory modifying carbon emissions monitoring

The Yukon is switching up how it tracks its carbon footprint in the territory.

By Aimee O'Connor on November 19, 2015

The Yukon is switching up how it tracks its carbon footprint in the territory.

Historically, the territory has relied on Environment Canada’s annual National Inventory Reports (NIR) to supply the territory’s data for greenhouse gas emissions.

But officials at the Yukon’s Department of Environment had concerns about the NIR.

“There had been a hunch that Environment Canada was under-reporting,” said Kirsten Burrows, a senior analyst with Environment Yukon’s Climate Change Secretariat.

And so, the government commissioned a report by Research Northwest in 2013 to gain a better understanding of Yukon’s emissions in the transportation sector.

Its main finding was that Environment Canada’s NIRs had been “substantively” under-reporting the territory’s emissions – to the point of significant inaccuracy.

In 2009, actual emissions in the territory’s transportation sector were 70 per cent higher than what was stated by the NIR.

The next year, emissions were actually 92 per cent higher than what was in the federal government’s report – which had actually suggested that Yukon’s greenhouse gas emissions have been declining.

In those two years alone, emissions rose 11 per cent.

Where the NIRs went wrong was in its main source of data – the Report on Energy Supply and Demand in Canada (RESD).

These data cover all refining companies, wholesalers and distributors in Canada but do not include fuel shipped into the territory from a secondary distributor in Alberta or fuel imported from Alaska.

“There’s quite a bit of fuel that’s not included,” Burrows said.

What Northern Research concluded was that using fuel tax data from the Department of Finance provided more accurate results – by calculating the tax that the government collects from fuel sold in the territory.

“Finance tracks all fuel imported to the Yukon from any source,” the Northern Research report stated.

“How confident are we that the recalculated emissions offered here are accurate? Very confident.”

The report was updated last March. The major finding was that on-road gasoline use and diesel use were responsible for half of the territory’s total amount of emissions, each accounting for 25 per cent of the total.

This finding contradicted a point from the NIR – that heavy-duty diesel use dominates the Yukon’s transportation emissions.

Both of the transportation reports conclude that it may be worthwhile for the Yukon to branch away from Environment Canada data and start working on something independently.

“Environment Canada is also open to provinces and territories developing their own emission reporting that will better reflect the realities in each jurisdiction,” the March 2015 report stated.

The discrepancies between the NIR and Research Northwest came to the forefront in the legislative assembly this week.

“How can Yukoners take this government seriously on climate change when their emissions data can be up to 75 per cent off what is actually being reported?” NDP MLA Kate White asked the Yukon Party government this week.

The first time the question was raised, the Yukon NDP did not receive much of an answer from the other side of the house.

Environment Minister Wade Istchenko said the issue is both important and a focus for the government. He added he looks forward to discussing how climate change affects the North at COP21, the upcoming global climate change conference in Paris.

The next day, NDP Leader Liz Hanson raised the question again.

One issue she touched on was that the last available report from the Yukon government on its emissions from its own operations was from 2012.

“In 2012 (the latest data year available), the Yukon government emitted 40.7 kilotonnes of verified GHG emissions, down 2.3 per cent from its 2010 base year,” the 2015 State of the Environment report states.

Another issue Hanson raised was that the Yukon delegation heading to Paris will be “armed with inaccurate data.”

This time, Istchenko declared that the Department of Environment is preparing the next climate change action plan progress report.

“(It) will provide a detailed update on the Yukon sector-by-sector specific targets and actions,” he said.

Though the department is hard at work preparing this document, Burrows indicated it may not be ready for months.

The department, she said, is moving forward on creating made-in-Yukon emissions reports, moving away from Environment Canada, and is hoping to update them on an ongoing basis.

The Yukon delegates to Paris will include Premier Darrell Pasloski, the opposition party leaders, Grand Chief Ruth Massie of the Council of Yukon First Nations, a youth ambassador and other government staff. The issue is likely to be a hot topic in the coming weeks.

Part of the COP21 process includes countries putting forward targets for emission cuts – with the ultimate goal of having each country quash global warming from rising more than 2 C above pre-industrial times.

The United Nations-sponsored summit will run from Nov. 30 to Dec. 11.

Comments (8)

Up 5 Down 1

north_of_60 on Nov 24, 2015 at 6:00 pm

A fair, honest, and effective CarbonTax would set the rate for any product based on the percent of global GHGs emitted by the country where the product was made. For example, products from China would be taxed at 29%, made in USofA: 15%, India/Bangladesh: 6%. Those countries are responsible for half the human-caused GHG emissions on earth.

The CarbonTax would be collected from the importer when the product clears Canadian Customs, and the cost would be passed on to the consumer. Canada produces about 2% of the global GHGs, so products made in Canada would be taxed at that rate. Consumers would actually pay for their share of the global pollution caused by their demand. Products from countries that don't pollute the planet would have a market advantage over products from countries that cause the most harm to the earth.

Any tax imposed across-the-board is nothing more than another blatant increase in the GST, regardless of how they choose to label it for consumer consumption.

It remains to be seen if this new government will be responsible to the people who elected it, or the corporate interests who continue to pay the vast majority of the taxes the government collects. Time will tell.

Up 14 Down 0

Groucho d'North on Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 pm

The present calculations of CO2 are estimations at best as there are other influences to the amount of waste that is emitted when the fuel is burned. The total volume of dirty old petroleum fuel shipped into the Yukon is tallied together and the chemical equations of so many grams, pounds and tonnes of carbon dioxide per litre of the particular type of fuel is calculated. Nobody provides the variable related to efficient burning of the fuel in an internal combustion engine, and there are many different types in various levels of operating condition and performance. Most will agree that some vehicles/engines operate at different efficiencies and burn fuel at different levels of contamination, so some will be better than others and pollute less. You can plainly see the difference by watching the traffic ahead of you, but that does not seem to factor into these estimations of Yukon’s CO2 contributions to the atmosphere.
It’s all smoke and estimates. And as North of 60 so effectively stated, Yukon’s emissions are but a minor fraction of the rest of the nation. But you have to be on the big end-of-the-world bandwagon if you are wanting to implement carbon taxes and reap the wealth they will generate for governments. Now that Alberta has implemented their new carbon tax – estimated to generate $6 Billion, I anticipate the Yukon NDP will be gushing about how it is the savior of our future and I expect will factor quite large in their upcoming election campaign. It’s a cash grab folks - pure and simple and Alberta’s new government wanted to set the tone before meeting with the new PM and his view of things.

Up 1 Down 18

Sally Wright on Nov 21, 2015 at 4:37 pm

It is nice to see the good results emerging out of the federal governments initiative to un-muzzle scientists.
Now we can go to Paris with a meaningful accounting of our greenhouse emissions. Scientists have known for years that the the transportation sector is responsible for half of our energy use. The Oil industry has kept Northerners trapped burning dirty fossil fuels, ruining our health and dividing our communities.
Now the un-muzzled scientists and engineers are telling us that there are far more efficient and cost effective ways to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and the transportation sector is a great place to start.
I want an electric car and I want charging stations all over the Yukon that are powered by wind, sun and hydro. This could be trans formative for our community if we all get electric cars.
We need to build a Wind farm on Mount McIntyre to power it, did you experience that wind storm yesterday?
Another un-muzzled scientist told me today that wind speeds have increased in Whitehorse in the past 50 years.

Up 20 Down 3

Josey Wales on Nov 20, 2015 at 4:29 am

Ah the "UN"...putting the U in useless since 1950 or so.
If you run your stove too much you must be participating in the increase of "the footprint"?
Maybe Kate can do her part, and eat salad.

Up 12 Down 1

safe on Nov 19, 2015 at 6:46 pm

Ive been eating bison and beans. Will it be warmer this winter?

Up 24 Down 2

Max Mack on Nov 19, 2015 at 4:04 pm

Environment Canada's methodology avoids double-counting of CO2.
The approach being boosted by the "Climate Change Secretariat" results in CO2 being counted 2x - once at the source (e.g. fuel sales originating in Alaska) and then again at the point of consumption. If we include the CO2 in our estimates, should we ask the Alaskans or the Albertans to remove it from theirs?

And, the CCS model does not remove CO2 contributions occurring outside the territory. It falsely assumes that "fuel sales" are synonymous with Yukon-generated CO2. This is the same problem as trying to tie alcohol sales to per-capita-consumption.

The CCS model also falsely assumes that all fuel sales are consumed (some fuel is stored for future use).
Sales does not equal consumption. And sales does not equal Yukon CO2 generation.

Up 43 Down 3

north_of_60 on Nov 19, 2015 at 3:39 pm

In 2012 the Yukon's contribution of 40.7 kt to global GHGs was 0.00012% of the global total, and 0.0073% of Canada's GHG emissions. It's like a mosquito fart in the wind.

The NDP's assertion of 'inaccurate data' is preposterous posturing. The Yukon's contribution is so insignificant that it doesn't matter what number is reported. In fact, the insignificance of the Yukon contribution makes one wonder how these 'delegates' can justify their taxpayer funded holiday in Paris with a straight face.

Maintaining the lifestyle of the average person in a remote community north of 60°, uses more energy and emits more CO2 than the lifestyle of almost anyone else on earth. That's with the possible exception of those who are wealthy, and those who jet around the world and stay in 5-star hotels on the taxpayers dime to attend climate-themed social events.

Almost every northerner has an attitude of entitlement regarding the fact that their lifestyle is either heavily subsidized or paid for entirely by the taxpayers. This provides very little incentive to consume less or use energy more efficiently.

Therefore the only reason for delegates from the Yukon to go there is to explain to the rest of the world why their entitlement attitude and profligate energy wastage per person is justified and acceptable.

Let's hear their excuses before they go.

Up 22 Down 33

Lost in the Yukon on Nov 19, 2015 at 3:01 pm

The Pharmacist couldn't manage a food cart let alone a government. He and his Ministers have no idea what is going on either within the bureaucracy or in the public. The only thing they are concerned with is giving the appearance doing something in the hope they can fool the Yukon electorate into re-electing them.

ABYP

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.