Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Vince Fedoroff

EXPLAINING THE CIRCUMSTANCES – Clarke LaPrairie, a senior official in the Department of Finance, discusses the Auditor General report’s findings at a news conference held Tuesday. The document called attention to a $750,000 transfer to the Mountain View Golf Club made in 2011 by a Yukon Party government. Inset Ted Laking

Description of $750,000 for golf club called ‘error’

The Yukon government has responded to concerns over findings in a recent audit.

By Emily Blake on March 8, 2017

The Yukon government has responded to concerns over findings in a recent audit.

Representatives from several departments held a press conference Tuesday morning to answer questions on the Auditor General of Canada’s report on government transfers to societies that was released Monday.

One of the key concerns was a Yukon Party government’s controversial $750,000 deal with the Mountain View Golf Club in 2011.

The transfer of that money to the club could not be audited because it was classified under “other expenses” which has no policy requirements.

The fund was initially listed as a government transfer. It was later moved into the more ambiguous “other expenses” category.

The Departments of Finance and Community Services explained that due to a clerical error, the fund was “erroneously” marked as a transfer payment agreement when it should have been a contract.

“Through our monitoring process, we identified that mistake,” said Clarke LaPrairie of the Department of Finance.

The “other” classification is used for spending that doesn’t fit within established categories such as travel, maintenance or insurance.

LaPrairie said this category is used all the time, often when operational documents are contracts.

“This is the first time I’m aware of a significant item where we identified the original one was a transfer payment erroneously and we had, for the purpose of making sure the government’s books are accurate, reclassified it as a contract after the fact,” he said.

But concerns were raised over the public’s ability to hold the government accountable when it comes to these expenses.

“The unfortunate nature of this error is there’s a different process for reporting a contract and for reporting transfer payments and the order in which the error was corrected it did not show up on the contract registry or the public accounts on that year,” explained LaPrairie.

When pressed on the potential for corruption, he said, “We have duties and responsibilities as public servants, and that’s the whole nature of Westminster systems.”

In an interview with the Star Monday afternoon, Casey Thomas, the principal for the Auditor General, said ideally, government funding should be backed up by policy.

“Government expenses should all fall within the accountability framework; there should be rules that need to be followed in order to make payments,” she said.

“In this case, there aren’t any, so I think the government should consider whether or not that’s something that would be useful for them with this expense category.”

But when government representatives were asked if there are any plans to add policy requirements under the “other expenses” category, the answer was a clear no.

While the payment could not be audited, the report did find that it was “properly authorized from a financial perspective.”

“They’re just making a statement of fact; they’re not really implying that’s anything untoward,” said LaPrairie of the finding.

“All they’re saying here is there’s no specific policy for this type of transaction.”

Ted Laking, the chief of staff for the now-official Opposition Yukon Party, released a statement in response to the issue.

“At the time of this decision in 2011, none of our caucus was in government.

“I do take note of the Auditor General’s findings that in this instance everything was properly authorized from a financial perspective.”

(Current caucus member Brad Cathers was sitting as an independent at the time of the Yukon Party’s $750,000 payout to the golf club after having had a falling-out with then-premier Dennis Fentie over the question of whether to privatize Yukon Energy.)

Department representatives said the findings from the audit were not surprising as the government completed internal audits in 2007 and 2010.

As well, improvements have already been made, including training, new databases, and a monitoring policy program in the Department of Finance.

“This report is night-and-day different from those internal reports; they don’t really give us kudos,” said LaPrairie.

“I know everyone is fixated on the golf course, but this is actually a pretty good news story audit, and yes, we still have some work to do and we accept it.”

The Departments of Community Services, Economic Development, Energy, Mines and Resources, Finance, and the Executive Council’s Office have agreed with all of the report’s recommendations and plan to implement them by April 1.

An audit committee with deputy ministers from several government departments will be responsible for making sure these recommendations are put into action.

Laking stated: “We are encouraged that the government has indicated it will accept the recommendations from the Auditor General’s report, and we look forward to holding the government to account to ensure timely implementation.”

The Yukon Party government faced many questions in the legislature over its $750,000 transfer to the golf club at the time. The opposition accused the government of buying back a piece of land it already owned – with the golf club pocketing the money.

As well, a major competitor of the golf course questioned why so much taxpayers’ money had been quietly transferred to a single private-sector organization.

See related story.

Comments (19)

Up 1 Down 0

Gina Alexander on Mar 21, 2017 at 6:03 pm

Total rip off. An attempt to squeeze as much cash out of people as possible with a good idea. No love has gone into the holes. Game lasts about 10 mins. Absolute trash. Maybe ok if you're the idiot with too much disposable income this place is aimed at.

Up 2 Down 0

Everet C. Ball on Mar 14, 2017 at 7:22 pm

@lost in space: The bureaucrats share culpability in that they could have come forward or leaked anonymously while they knew there was wrong doing.
"We were just doing our jobs" didn't stand in 1945 and it doesn't stand now.

Up 18 Down 2

Lost in the Yukon on Mar 13, 2017 at 4:19 pm

Don't blame the bureaucrats ... they were directed to do this by the Yukon Party. It is the Ministers of the day that need to be held to account.

Up 18 Down 3

ken on Mar 13, 2017 at 8:27 am

Definition of " Clerical Error " : YTG covering up dirty deeds.

Up 23 Down 5

Factually wrong! on Mar 11, 2017 at 10:00 am

"The Departments of Finance and Community Services explained that due to a clerical error, the fund was “erroneously” marked as a transfer payment agreement when it should have been a contract."
This is factually and legally wrong. Transfer payments are either grants or contributions. They occur with parties who are outside of government and essentially are a conditional or unconditional gift of money THIS IS NOT A CONTRACT.
It is a way for the senior bureaucrats to protect themselves because all transfer payments MUST be listed individually in an appropriation bill.

Up 14 Down 3

Howie on Mar 10, 2017 at 6:01 pm

Why was this a zombie story that came off the blue panel after one day and now it's back up. Attempt for a quick burial failed due to public concern????

Up 26 Down 2

Lost in the Yukon on Mar 10, 2017 at 5:31 pm

Dearest ProScience Greenie: the only thing that should happen is that Archie Lang should be made to pay the money back, since it was him who (as reported) engineered this.

Up 26 Down 6

Susan on Mar 9, 2017 at 4:12 pm

Laking looks to be showing up for work more than the government which seems to be taking vacation until April 20th. Maybe they elected him?

Up 15 Down 18

habuto on Mar 9, 2017 at 12:59 pm

Hell I'd elect Laking. Just wait to see the storm brewing by electing the Libs in. Golf Course will be a drop in the sh*%t bucket of giveaways.

Up 29 Down 3

whoops on Mar 9, 2017 at 12:42 pm

I wish an "oops" like that would end up in my bank account

Up 31 Down 7

June Jackson on Mar 9, 2017 at 9:32 am

An error? really? Bottom line.. Golf course got $750,000. sooooooooo.. I'm thinking they could come up with a better line of BS than this.

Up 33 Down 4

Ben Alvey on Mar 8, 2017 at 9:52 pm

"A clerical error". What a wormy way of shifting responsibility and ultimately blame on a poor clerk. I don't think that when it comes to 3/4 of a million dollars that clerks decide where that gets entered and filed on the booking system all on their own. Pitiful.

Up 32 Down 3

Joe on Mar 8, 2017 at 9:18 pm

Is anyone going to get charged? Nobody gets fired?

Up 23 Down 11

Don't forget who was in power at the time on Mar 8, 2017 at 9:15 pm

Well, that's why we have a different elected government now--many of us were tired of the Con party doing garbage like this, double dipping. As for the golf course, shame on you. I am in a non profit and I don't cheat and steal from people--I volunteer because it feels good. Shame on the golf course.

Up 20 Down 10

Nile on Mar 8, 2017 at 8:45 pm

Who elected Laking?

Up 19 Down 3

CJ on Mar 8, 2017 at 8:32 pm

"the order in which the error was corrected it did not show up on the contract registry"...

My smile of the day. Unless it's been drastically overhauled in the past few weeks, the last place I'd look for information is the contract registry. As far as I can figure, it's the very model of obfuscation disguised as transparency. A good place for the Liberals to begin transforming the way they do business.

Up 25 Down 8

Time for the police to investigate on Mar 8, 2017 at 3:56 pm

This is only tip of the iceberg. How about the contracts given to friends for money.

Up 26 Down 3

Stanley Miller on Mar 8, 2017 at 3:17 pm

When pressed on the potential for corruption, he said, “We have duties and responsibilities as public servants, and that’s the whole nature of Westminster systems.”

So, the transaction was hidden and placed in a financial category that can not be audited. What kind of nonsense is it to defend this secret giveaway of public funds?

Up 27 Down 5

ProScience Greenie on Mar 8, 2017 at 3:14 pm

Dear YTG/Fed Tax Collectors, Due to other expenses and a silly clerical error I won't be sending you any money this year. Next year isn't looking that good either. Thanks, PSG.

Bitter sarcasm aside, the graft / incompetence is overwhelming. Heads should roll but as usual they won't.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.