Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

FEDERAL INTERVENTION SOUGHT – It’s time for the office of the Auditor General of Canada to conduct a performance audit of the Family and Children’s Services branch, says Patti McLeod, the Yukon Party’s Health and Social Services critic.

Critic wants audit of family, children’s branch

The Yukon Party official Opposition has reached out to the Auditor General of Canada requesting a performance audit of the Yukon government’s Family and Children’s Services branch.

By Taylor Blewett on April 18, 2018

The Yukon Party official Opposition has reached out to the Auditor General of Canada requesting a performance audit of the Yukon government’s Family and Children’s Services branch.

“I understand that you completed a review of this branch in 2014; however given recent events I believe it is prudent to look at this again and to monitor progress,” Patti McLeod, the Yukon Party’s Health and Social Services critic, wrote in her April 16 letter to Michael Ferguson, the Auditor General of Canada.

“Further, given recent media reports, I believe that particular attention should be given to Child Placement Services and Child Protection Services within this branch,” McLeod wrote.

Questions about Yukon government group home care and child protection have dominated the legislature this sitting, prompted by a series of CBC stories reporting allegations of wrongdoing in both.

“The minister hasn’t been very forthcoming with any questions regarding what she’s doing about the situation with group homes in Yukon,” McLeod told the Star this morning. “We felt that it was time to go a little further and invite another level of scrutiny.”

Health and Social Services Minister Pauline Frost told reporters after question period Tuesday that “we do not ever do anything to harm the children that we have in our care, that is absolutely not our practice.

“Our practice as a government is to ensure that every child in our care is given the support they need to be successful in our society; that’s what we’re obligated to do, and we will ensure that we abide by that.”

“If there are concerns brought to our attention, we will follow up on it, and that’s exactly what we’re doing.”

A media briefing on Transitional Support Services for children and youth in government care was held last Friday.

During the session, Stephen Samis, the deputy minister of Health and Social Services, noted that there have been seven reviews of Family and Children’s Services since 2010, including an audit by Ferguson’s office four years ago.

“We just recently did an analysis of all those recommendations and about … 80-odd per cent of those recommendations have now been implemented, and we are actively working on the ones we haven’t implemented,” Samis said.

The Auditor General of Canada’s audit examined the period between April 2010 and December 2013. It was published in a report to the legislative assembly in February 2014.

The audit examined the department’s compliance with selected requirements of the Child and Family Services Act (CFSA) and related policies.

It found that while the department was meeting many CFSA and policy requirements, several of its “key responsibilities related to the protection and well-being of at-risk children, youth, and their families” were not being adequately fulfilled.

These include failing to ensure all children in care or custody have annual medical and dental exams, neglecting to develop transitional plans for many youth, and conducting few annual foster home reviews.

In her letter, McLeod encourages the Auditor General to consider expanding the scope of the requested audit beyond those matters covered in the 2014 report.

To those who might criticize the Opposition’s letter as hypocrisy from members of the previous government or political point-scoring, McLeod says “regardless of who the government is, there’s a responsibility to Yukoners to make sure that programs are doing what they were intended to do.

“So I have no reservations in calling on the Auditor General to do a review of those programs.”

According to its website, the Office of the Auditor General (OAG) of Canada receives many requests to conduct audits.

“The ultimate decision about what to audit rests with the Auditor General,” the website reads.

“Final decisions about what to audit are made in light of the OAG’s mandate, the significance of the issue, the existing audit schedule, and available resources.”

Comments (3)

Up 0 Down 0

Juniper Jackson on Apr 20, 2018 at 8:55 pm

Ministers, ADMs, Directors, Managers.. all change.. but the grunts..the people that actually do the work (if any) are still advising.. still sitting on their butts talking about 'clients' because they think no one can hear them over their partitions.. still putting a 'fix' in so their unqualified friends can get the job.. and every once in a while there is a shake up and the Ministers, ADMs, Directors and Managers all change and the grunts just carry on depending on the Union to make sure they can't be fired.. Yes.. all government is top heavy.. but the bottom feeders? That's all some of them are.. I don't want to paint everyone with that brush as there are some fine people.. but in the end they can't stand it and they move along too. How many employee's are trying to get out of the dept. they work in? How many qualified people do not get the job, while some unqualified putz gets the job because their friend gave them all the winning answers? While I despise the Liberal government these days, my opinion did not start with them.. there is a reason Pasloski and the other PCs did not get voted in again.

Up 3 Down 1

Politico on Apr 18, 2018 at 10:28 pm

Will this also include the time the YP set up the system and ran it for so many years?

Up 2 Down 0

Lost In the Yukon on Apr 18, 2018 at 5:33 pm

A complete audit of the whole department is required not just Family and Children's Services ... an all-party committee needs to be established to set the terms of reference for an audit. The focus, in my opinion, needs to be on management and personnell practices. Solve that and address the culture within the department (which is a direct result of said practices) and issues regarding adherence to program standards and delivery will be dealt with. They are a symptom of poor management.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.