Whitehorse Daily Star

Image title

Photo by Whitehorse Star

Shannon Clohosey

Businesses to be asked about commercial waste

The city could soon be asking the business community for its thoughts on how to keep commercial waste out of the landfill – and whether that might include separating waste in commercial businesses.

By Stephanie Waddell on February 2, 2016

The city could soon be asking the business community for its thoughts on how to keep commercial waste out of the landfill – and whether that might include separating waste in commercial businesses.

On Monday evening, sustainability manager Shannon Clohosey brought forward the recommendation that staff engage with the business community on the next steps for waste diversion.

It’s a move Coun. Betty Irwin later described as a “no-brainer.” The city should not embark on new regulations that would impact businesses without consultation, she noted.

“We definitely need to have that input,” Irwin said.

The initiative is part of the city’s continuing efforts to keep waste out of the landfill.

Those initiatives include putting out a request for proposals on a residential recycling curbside collection program. That venture would be mandatory for those currently on the city’s garbage and compost collection system.

As Clohosey outlined in her report to council, close to 90 per cent of the waste in the city comes from industrial, commercial and institutional (ICI) sectors, as well as the construction and demolition sectors.

“Recognizing this, the 2013 Solid Waste Action Plan focused waste diversion programs and plans on these two sectors,” Clohosey noted in her report.

“The commercial sectors in Whitehorse responded, and much of the increase in waste diversion since 2013 is thanks to the efforts of Whitehorse businesses.”

Among those efforts, some commercial compost collection is underway, and cardboard has been banned from the general landfill.

Clohosey, however, pointed out that more work is needed to keep the significant volume of hazardous materials, organics and recyclables from entering the dump.

“Next steps are required to ensure Whitehorse’s waste diversion rate continues to increase,” Clohosey said.

“Whitehorse businesses have unique challenges and innovative ideas in waste management. Engaging with businesses on next steps will help the city develop the most effective plans and programs for the business sector to continue its waste diversion efforts.”

Separating waste has been shown to be one of more effective ways to keep waste out of the landfill. However, it requires businesses to set up and install areas for waste to be separated, as well as enforcement by the city.

Requiring businesses to separate waste could also benefit those in the waste industry – such as haulers and processors – with the market demand for extra services, thereby providing revenue for the recycling of certain materials, Clohosey stated.

“Engaging with the business community on effective waste management at their place of business will help ensure challenges are addressed and next steps are better tailored to business needs,” she said.

Public engagement on the residential waste front will also continue, Clohosey added.

“Following consultation, amendments to reflect waste management efforts will be drafted to the waste management bylaw for further consideration,” Clohosey stated in her report.

Coun. Jocelyn Curteanu asked her for further details on the proposed consultation with businesses.

Clohosey said there would be plans to meet with individual business owners along with online initiatives over a couple of months.

“We want to make it as accessible and easy as possible,” she said of receiving input from the business community.

Questioned by Coun. Dan Boyd, Clohosey stressed that keeping certain wastes out of the landfill could be a fairly major undertaking for commercial haulers, though they’re experienced in separating cardboard.

The city is planning to move ahead with its plans to charge haulers $250 per tonne for unsorted loads containing cardboard. However, that has been put off until January 2017, Clohosey pointed out.

Until then, haulers will continue to pay the regular tipping fees (currently $94 per tonne), but will also be warned that cardboard is prohibited from the dump.

Council will vote on whether to go ahead with the consultation next week.

Coun. Samson Hartland and Mayor Dan Curtis were absent from Monday’s meeting, with Coun. Roslyn Woodcock serving as acting mayor.

Comments (14)

Up 0 Down 0

Max Mack on Feb 9, 2016 at 2:30 am

Asking business about recycling and keeping waste out of the landfill?

City: what do you think we should do to keep waste out of the landfill?

Businesses: we support recycling initiatives, but we have reached the limit of what we can readily accommodate in terms of resources and costs.

What the City hears: "we support recycling".

I suspect the point of these "consultations" will be to further justify plans that have already been made.

Up 3 Down 29

Alan Miner on Feb 7, 2016 at 1:57 pm

If the Sustainability Department had more staff they would not have to contract out so much.
Let's expand this department and get this town going in the right direction.

Up 27 Down 4

Lost in the Yukon on Feb 5, 2016 at 8:32 pm

Get rid of the Sustainability Department and this Manager ... she is making my continuation as a senior in this City on a fixed income unsustainable. You can thank John Struck-out for this position ... a guy who lives in Marsh Lake and doesn't have to pay for this. It galls me no end that people like our Sustainability Manager who is a fly-in to this community, makes $100,000 a year and screws with my limited income.

Up 24 Down 0

north_of_60 on Feb 5, 2016 at 6:35 pm

According to CBC NorthBeat from an interview with the Sustainability Manager, "The next step is setting up curbside recycling. The contract for that service is expected to be released in a couple of weeks."

So, mandatory fee increase for curbside recycling pick-up is a done deal and what we've been seeing in the papers about Mayor & Council receiving feedback before making a decision is just BS platitudes.

Up 33 Down 2

Max Mack on Feb 5, 2016 at 3:37 pm

@Yukoner 39

Your comment that taxes would have to increase to pay for a new landfill is ill-informed. Taxes alone have already paid the capital costs of the existing landfill and its replacement. Add utility charges and tipping fees. The cost of replacing the dump should be handily covered by reserves. However, the City has been playing crafty by padding expenses, diverting revenue to other projects, capping reserves, and moving funds between capital and reserve accounts.

$50M for a legacy City Hall project, but I will guarantee the City will cry poverty when it comes time to replace the dump REGARDLESS of recycling efforts and REGARDLESS of capital/reserve account levels and REGARDLESS of revenue levels. Yes - the City will most definitely try to increase taxes for a new dump. But not because a new dump warrants an increase in revenue.

As for the net benefit of recycling, it costs us more (many, many times more) to recycle in a northern context than conventional landfill. Benefits of recycling are hugely overstated and costs hugely understated. Meanwhile, costs of landfill are exaggerated (especially land costs) and benefits minimized.

CoW is salivating over "diversion credits" and other federal/territorial funds that are tied to recycling and user-pay initiatives (e.g. metered water). But those grants and funds are not free, as they invariably come with strings attached requiring user-pay initiatives, increased taxation or worse. I can't wait for privatization. Oh wait -- that would be Raven Recycling. Sigh. What's next? Water services? Another topic for another day . . .

Recycling in the North provides us with a "morally" satisfactory feeling of "saving the environment", but the environment is actually worse off.
If you were worried about the life of the landfill, then are you ok with shipping tons of waste from the communities to our landfill? Are you also ok with Raven dumping tons of recycled materials into our landfill? Do you not question the logic of shipping recycling thousands of miles south?

Up 55 Down 35

Yukoner 39 on Feb 5, 2016 at 10:26 am

"You will now have to have armed guards on your commercial dumpsters to keep people out. We are going to be put in the Poor House by these self serving, self righteous bureaucrats."

So we are going to be put in the poor house even though this is normal for the rest of the country? Maybe tone down the hyperbole a notch.

Unless we are the dumbest municipality in the country.... I'm sure we will be just fine. Also, if you are just against recycling then I'm sure you won't mind a big tax hike to pay for closing the dump once it quickly fills up and opening a new one.

Up 31 Down 3

Just Say'in on Feb 3, 2016 at 9:19 pm

You will now have to have armed guards on your commercial dumpsters to keep people out. We are going to be put in the Poor House by these self serving, self righteous bureaucrats. How about we send them packing? How about that?

Up 30 Down 2

Just Say'in on Feb 3, 2016 at 9:16 pm

Businesses will just have to pass this on to the consumer exactly the same way they have been forced to do with hazardous wastes such as batteries and engine oil. We will all pay big time.

Up 27 Down 0

Just Say'in on Feb 3, 2016 at 9:14 pm

How can they even say 100% diversion, that is just crazy talk.

Up 39 Down 1

Just Say'in on Feb 3, 2016 at 9:13 pm

My wife diligently washed jars and bottles, removed lids and picked and scrubbed to remove labels only to find out that all these years the crushed glass was sent to the dump as cover. She was soooo mad when she found out she was wasting her time all these years. This is all a bunch of GREEN WASH.

Up 38 Down 1

north_of_60 on Feb 3, 2016 at 5:41 pm

When dealing with those responsible for 90% or more of the waste to the dump, it's all about 'engaging the business community'. The city should not embark on new regulations that would impact businesses without consultation, “We definitely need to have that input,” Irwin said.

However when it comes to interacting with residents who are responsible for maybe 10% of the waste in the dump, it's a case of 'you will be taxed to recycle whether you like it or not - we know what's best for you'.

“Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do with the approval of their own conscience.”
--C. S. Lewis

Up 9 Down 47

Alan Miner on Feb 3, 2016 at 12:49 pm

Shannon Clohosey brought forward the recommendation that staff engage with the business community on the next steps for waste diversion.

There is nothing wrong with this and it's never to late to effectively engage the business community to make Whitehorse a more progressive city.
We have five new parks and many other exciting things happening in our community. There is even a new city park along Wolf Creek. Sustainability is not a bad word folks!

Thank you Shannon.

Up 43 Down 6

ProScience Greenie on Feb 2, 2016 at 4:37 pm

So after all this time and all these studies and meetings and having a highly paid sustainability expert on staff they just now propose consulting business about waste? Talk about a gravy train for a select few and high taxes for the rest.

Up 44 Down 9

Yukoner on Feb 2, 2016 at 3:41 pm

Get rid of this department already. One study or consultation after another.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.