Whitehorse Daily Star

Attempted murder convictions challenged

The Yukon Court of Appeal heard allegations of racial bias

By Emily Blake on May 16, 2017

The Yukon Court of Appeal heard allegations of racial bias Monday in the case of a man convicted of the attempted murders of an RCMP officer and a conservation officer.

Appellant lawyer Jason Tarnow argued that Christopher Cornell’s case should be overturned on three grounds.

Those include Crown prosecutor Keith Pakkari’s preemptory challenges and the composition of the jury allegedly showing racial bias.

Tarnow also argued that Yukon Supreme Court Justice Leigh Gower lost jurisdiction of Cornell’s trial and that inadmissible evidence about Cornell’s tattoo are grounds for an appeal.

Crown counsel Noel Sinclair, however, argues that the appeal should be dismissed on all three grounds. He asked that the court issue a statement vindicating Pakkari against allegations of racism.

Sinclair referred to the allegations as “entirely misguided and offensive.” He said their basis was “vague, superficial, and disturbingly speculative.”

In November 2014, Cornell was sentenced by the Yukon Supreme Court to 11 1/2 years in prison for the attempted murders of an RCMP officer and a conservation officer, along with other criminal charges.

Cornell was also designated as a dangerous offender and given a 10-year long-term supervision order that will commence upon his release.

He was charged following a robbery in Haines Junction and a high-speed chase that ended with the shooting of an RCMP officer in 2011.

On Monday, the court heard from David Tarnow, the defence counsel for Cornell.

He testified that early on in the jury selection process, Pakkari challenged four First Nations jurors.

At the time, Tarnow requested an adjournment to discuss his concerns in the judge’s chambers. Cornell was not present for the discussion.

Tarnow said he raised the issue of racial bias in chambers and recalls that Pakkari said he had no comment on the allegations.

“I inferred that he was relying on the fact that we as counsel don’t have to justify our challenges,” said Tarnow.

“I was surprised that he didn’t say anything.”

Pakkari, however, testified that he adamantly denied the accusations in chambers and was “absolutely not” using a racially motivated jury strategy.

In an affidavit filed with the court, he said his objective was to select jurors who were reasonable, had life experience, were typical of Yukon society and were content to be jurors.

His reasons for challenging the jurors, he said, was due to these objectives.

He noted that one of the jurors sought to be excused due to business obligations. Another worked out of town for the Carcross-Tagish First Nation, which may have posed geographical challenges.

He said another juror sought to be excused as she was a distant cousin of co-accused Jessica Johnson, who pleaded guilty to four of nine charges on the opening day of trial.

Pakkari said he dismissed this juror out of concern for potential bias. He could not recall why he challenged a fourth juror.

Jason Tarnow questioned why, after the chambers discussion, Pakkari challenged another First Nation juror but did not challenge a juror who sought to be excused due to family obligations.

Pakkari testified that her obligations did not begin until the trial would conclude, and he believed the juror was First Nations and wanted to take heed of David Tarnow’s concerns.

Sinclair noted that determining a person’s race or ethnicity is based on many factors, and cannot always be determined by appearance.

Citizens chosen for the Yukon jury selection process are based on health care records, so that the ethnic and racial population of the territory are represented for random selection, Sinclair added.

Jason Tarnow also argued that Justice Gower lost jurisdiction of the trial by having a discussion about jury selection off the record without the accused present.

“We are left with different accounts of what was said in that meeting,” he said.

But Sinclair argued that nothing substantive occurred during the in-chambers meeting and that the discussion was of a preliminary nature.

“Not everything that happens during trial is part of a trial,” he said.

Finally Tarnow said the case should be appealed based on a line of questioning near the end of cross-examination of Cornell about his tattoo, which reads “f--- the police”.

In his affidavit, Pakkari noted that Cornell brought up the tattoo and claimed that he was surprised he did so.

But Tarnow argued that this line of questioning was “deliberate and strategic,” and meant to impress upon the jury that a person with such a tattoo would likely commit the crimes that Cornell was accused of.

He said the Crown ought to have known of the inadmissibility of this evidence.

He also said the jury laughed out loud when they heard about the tattoo.

“It was so prejudicial and outrageous that the jury found it to be comical,” he said.

During trial, David Tarnow filed a mistrial application over evidence about the tattoo.

Justice Gower dismissed the application but made a mid-trial instruction to the jury to disregard this evidence, finding it inadmissible.

Jason Tarnow argued this did not address the damage caused by hearing the evidence.

Sinclair noted that in his mid-trial instruction, Justice Gower explained to the jury to dismiss the evidence, as some people get tattoos and then regret them.

“That hit the nail on the head,” said Sinclair.

He also said that mistrials are an extraordinary remedy in only the clearest of cases, which does not apply in this case.

Chief Justice Robert Bauman, Justice Ian Donald and Justice Bonnie Tulloch presided over Monday’s appeal. They have reserved decision in the case.

Comments (6)

Up 17 Down 5

Josey Wales on May 17, 2017 at 12:07 pm

Gee...what a predictable epic edit comrades. Same excuse being libel?
Folks, real bummer they had not the courage to post my "opinion" in a unedited context. You carry on enabling this nonsense star, as I know you will.

Up 53 Down 3

Brian on May 17, 2017 at 7:31 am

Cpl. McKellar was the officer, who has a wife and 2 children. Russel Obourne is the C.O. Who also has a wife and child. I find this completely disrespectful on the courts part to not give a 25 yr sentence for this crime.
Hey man, you wanna be cool and act like a thug, have a NWA tattoo and call a race card! Do you know what the N stands for in NWA? Well it isn't Indian! Much much worse.

We need to bring back a certain level of capital punishment. Crimes like these are unexceptable. No time sentence will justify the actions. Doesn't matter the race, as a First Nations person you have free access to help that I as a white guy don't have.

So let's take that BS race card and put it in the compost.

Up 52 Down 2

Mike on May 17, 2017 at 2:02 am

What a joke....you robbed a store and tried to kill a cop.... stop trying to weasel your way out of it because of a tattoo issue. I wonder how often defense lawyers ask their clients if they did the crime?

Up 27 Down 3

Josey Wales on May 16, 2017 at 9:15 pm

Yup....furthering your point, I think we should toss the whole file of political correctness and revisionist history in the trash.
Not recycling it, DISPOSING of it completely.
Not just in our legal system but in every facet of OUR (all of us) society.
Justine's papa calved it, he himself milks it....the cow has gone mad.
Many of our good fellow f/n citizens are never an issue...busy working whatever. However a notable sect of their brethren will never get it and those?
Well, I call them Gladue kangaroos bouncing from one crime scene to the next and daily hide behind the veil (pun absolutely intended) of political correctness....as clearly is the case here.
Many Trevor the human types here as I bleat often, mars and Venus represented....we need to stop the bulls**t ...or start fighting back.

Up 34 Down 3

yukon56 on May 16, 2017 at 5:14 pm

Lawyers making money is all this is. Bring back the noose and rid us of this POS

Up 150 Down 2

Dave on May 16, 2017 at 3:18 pm

We need to put a stop to this BS of appeals based on complete and utter nonsense. While trying to escape in a vehicle this person shot at a police vehicle causing wounds to an officer. It was just sheer chance that the bullet did not hit the officer directly when it penetrated the windshield. It does not matter if the person who did the shooting was white, brown, green, or bright purple he shot with intent to kill, was found guilty in a court of law and needs to serve the full sentence handed out to him. No hail mary appeals based on trying to twist the legal system should be permitted. This POS should be thankful he's in Canada where he only got 11.5 years.

Add your comments or reply via Twitter @whitehorsestar

In order to encourage thoughtful and responsible discussion, website comments will not be visible until a moderator approves them. Please add comments judiciously and refrain from maligning any individual or institution. Read about our user comment and privacy policies.

Your name and email address are required before your comment is posted. Otherwise, your comment will not be posted.